A Study on Car Following Models Simulating Various Adaptive Cruise Control Behaviors

  • Ryota Horiguchi
  • Takashi Oguchi


This study aims to develop car following models which simulate various adaptive cruise control (ACC) behaviors for a microscopic traffic simulator. There is a need for a microscopic traffic simulator to evaluate the impact of ACC penetration on highway traffic conditions. If the method of modeling of the simulator follows ACC technology as it is in the real world, the update frequency will be in millisecond order. This may result in an unexpected increase in the calculation time and often spoil the practical use of the simulator. To avoid this situation, it is necessary to develop a car following model which can simulate ACC with sufficient accuracy for impact assessment and which works in sub-second frequency, which is common for many microscopic traffic simulators. This paper outlines the Intelligent Driver Model and its derivations, which have many preferable features. Those model equations are modified to simulate three types of ACC behaviors which retain distance gap, time gap and time headway, and we verified their behaviors through computational platoon experiments with four cars.


Traffic simulation Car following model Adaptive cruise control Intelligent driver model 



The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) in Japan and the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) in Japan for their support for the study, and also appreciate the great efforts of the member of the ‘Energy ITS’ project.


  1. 1.
    Marsden, G., McDonald, M., Brackstone, M.: Towards an understanding of adaptive cruise control. Transp. Res. C 9, 33–51 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tsugawa, S., Kato, S., Aoki, K.: “An automated truck platoon for energy saving”, Proceedings of Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), CD-ROM (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kesting, A., Treiber, M., Schönhof, M., Helbing, D.: Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance. Transp. Res. C 16, 668–683 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Treiber, M., Hennecke, A., Helbing, D.: Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E. 62(2), 1805–1824 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schakel, W., Arem, B., Bart, N.: “Effects of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic flow stability”, Proceedings of 13th International IEEE Annual Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Madeira Island, September 19–22, CD-ROM (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brackstone, M., McDonald, M.: Car-following: a historical review. Transp. Res. F 2, 181–196 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Newell, G.F.: A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model. Transp. Res. B 36, 195–205 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.i-Transport Lab. Co., Ltd.TokyoJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Industrial ScienceUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations