Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying and Analyzing Reference Scenarios for the Development and Evaluation of Active Safety: Application to Preventive Pedestrian Safety

  • Published:
International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To develop and evaluate active safety systems, reference scenarios need to be identified and analyzed. In this research, a methodology for the deduction of reference scenarios and a simulation approach to evaluate the effectiveness of those systems is presented. Using the example of preventive pedestrian safety, accident data of the United States and Germany were analyzed to identify representative scenarios. Data of both countries show similar results and a combined set of scenarios was derived which could function as specifications for new systems, input parameters for simulation models and representative test scenarios for real world and simulator testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S. Department of Transportation: Traffic Safety Facts 2008. DOT HS 811170 (2009)

  2. Kühn, M., Fröming, R., Schindler, V.: Fußgängerschutz—Unfallgeschehen, Fahrzeuggestaltung, Testverfahren. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wisselmann, D., Gresser, K., Hopstock M., Huber W.: Präventiver statt passiver Fußgängerschutz. Gesamtzentrum für Verkehr Braunschweig e.v. (Hrsg.), AAET 2009—Automatisierungssysteme, Assistenzsysteme und eingebettete Systeme für Transportmittel, Braunschweig, pp. 60–76 (2009)

  4. Fastenmeier, W.: Autofahrer und Verkehrssituation: Neue Wege zur Bewertung von Sicherheit und Zuverlässigkeit moderner Straßenverkehrssysteme. Köln/Bonn (1995)

  5. Benda, H., Hoyos, C., Schaible-Rapp, A.: Klassifikation und Gefährlichkeit von Straßenverkehrssituationen. Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Aachen (1983)

  6. Tira, M., Bresciani, C., Costa, F.: A decision tool for improving road safety for pedestrians, 9th International Conference for Walking, Barcelona (2008)

  7. Schofer, J., Christoffel, K., Donovan, M., Lavigne, J., Tanz, R., Wills, K.: Child pedestrian injury taxonomy based on visibility and action. Accid Anal Prev 27(3), 317–333 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, S., Yang, J., Eklund, F.: Evaluation of remote pedestrian sensor system based on the analysis of car–pedestrian accident scenarios. Saf. Sci. 46(9), (2008)

  9. Neale, V., Dingus, T., Klauer, S., Sudweeks, J., Goodman, M.: An Overview of the 100-Car Study and Findings. ESV Conference 2005, Washington, D.C. (2005)

  10. Kates, R., Jung, O., Helmer, T., Ebner, A., Gruber, C., Kompass, K.: Virtual optimization of pedestrian protection systems in intelligent vehicles by stochastic simulation techniques. Erprobung und Simulation in der Fahrzeugentwicklung (2010)

  11. Helmer, T., Samaha, R., Scullion, P., Ebner, A., Kates, R.: Kinematical, physiological, and vehicle-related influences on pedestrian injury severity in frontal car crashes: multivariate analysis and cross-validation. Proceedings of the International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) (2010)

  12. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA): National Automotive Sampling System (NASS GES, NASS CDS). DOT HS 807 304 (2008)

  13. National Highway Traffic Administration (NHTSA): Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). DOT HS 809 726 (2005)

  14. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI): National Automotive Sampling System Pedestrian Crash Data Study (NASS PCDS) (2005)

  15. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration: Road Function Classifications. FHWA Safety, November (2000)

  16. Gabler, C., Digges, K., Fildes, B., Sparke, L.: Side impact injury risk for belted far side passenger vehicle occupants. SAE Technical Paper, 2005-01-0287 (2005)

  17. Willke, D., Summers, S., Wang, J., Lee, J., Partyka, S., Duffy, S.: Ejection mitigation using advanced glazing: Status Report II. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (1999)

  18. Blincoe, L., Seay, A., Zaloshnja, E., Miller, T., Romano, E., Luchter, S., Spicer, R.: The Economic Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes 2000. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2002)

  19. Martin, A.: Factors influencing pedestrian safety: a literature review. TRL Limited, published project report PPR214 (2006)

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to the German Academic Exchange Service that supported this transatlantic research by a scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Ebner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ebner, A., Helmer, T., Samaha, R.R. et al. Identifying and Analyzing Reference Scenarios for the Development and Evaluation of Active Safety: Application to Preventive Pedestrian Safety. Int. J. ITS Res. 9, 128–138 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-011-0035-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-011-0035-z

Keywords

Navigation