Skip to main content

A Note on Bootstrap for Gupta’s Subset Selection Procedure

Abstract

This study introduces a method of selecting a subset of k populations containing the best when the populations are ranked in terms of the population means. It is assumed that the populations have an unknown location family of distribution functions. The proposed method involves estimating the constant in Gupta’s subset selection procedure by bootstrap. It is shown that estimating this constant amounts to estimating the distribution function of a certain function of random variables. The proposed bootstrap method is shown to be consistent and second-order correct in the sense that the accuracy of bootstrap approximation is better than that of the approximation based on limiting distribution. Results of a simulation study are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Babu, G.J. and Singh, K. (1983). Inference on means using the bootstrap. Ann. Stat.11, 999–1003.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babu, G.J. and Singh, K. (1984). On one-term Edgeworth correction by Efron’s bootstrap. Sankya A46, 219–232.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, R.N. (1985). Some recent results on Cramer-Edgeworth expansions with applications. Multivariate Analysis Vol. VI (P.R. Krishnaiah, ed.)

  • Bhattacharya, R.N. (1987). Some aspects of Edgeworth expansions in statistics and probability. Wiley, New York, Bhattacharya, R. (ed.), p. 157–171.

  • Bhattacharya, R.N. (1990). Asymptotic expansions in statistics. Springer, Berlin, Denker, M. and Bhattacharya, R. N. (eds.), p. 11–66.

  • Bhattacharya, R.N. and Ghosh, J. (1978). On the validity of the formal edgeworth expansion. Ann. Stat.6, 434–451.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, R.N. and Rao, R.R. (1976). Normal Approximation and Asymptotic Expansions. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, P.J. and Freedman, D.A. (1981). Some asymptotic theory for the bootstrap. Ann. Stat.9, 1196–1217.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, Y.S. and Teicher, H. (1988). Probability Theory: Independence, Interchangeability, Martingales, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, X. and Wilson, J. (2008). On the probability of correct selection for large k populations, with application to microarray data. Biom. J.50, 5, 870–83.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourleijn, C.J. and Driessen, S.G.A.J. (1993). Subset selection procedures for randomized designs. Biom. J.35, 3, 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourleijn, J. (1995). Subset selection in plant breeding practice. Euphytica81, 2, 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourleijn, J. (1996). A case study of subset selection in sugar beet breeding. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference54, 3, 323–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudewicz, E. and Koo, J.O. (1982). The Complete Categorized Guide to Statistical Selection and Ranking Procedures. Columbus, American Sciences Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, R.M. (1989). Real Analysis and Probability. Wadsworth and Brooks.

  • Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat.7, 1, 1–26.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S.S. (1956). On a decision rule for a problem in ranking means. Mimeo. Series No. 150. Institute of Statistics University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S.S. (1965). On some multiple decision (selection and ranking) rules. Technometrics7, 2, 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S.S. and Huang, D. (1974). A note on selecting a subset of normal populations with unequal sample sizes. Sankhya B36, 389–396.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S.S. and Huang, D. (1976). Subset selection procedures for the means and variances of normal populations: unequal sample sizes case. Sankhya B38, 112–128.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S.S. and McDonald, G.C. (1970). On some classes of selection procedures based on ranks. Cambridge University Press, London, Puri, M. L. (ed.), p. 491–514.

  • Gupta, S.S. and Panchapakesan, S. (1979). Multiple Decision Procedures: Theory and Methodology of Selecting and Ranking Populations. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1992). The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion. Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Helmers, R. (1991). On the edgeworth expansion and the bootstrap approximation for a studentized U-Statistic. Ann. Stat.19, 1, 470–484.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrendörfer, G. and Tuchscherer, A. (1996). Selection and breeding. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference54, 3, 307–321.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrace, W.C. (2006). Selection procedures for economics. Appl. Econ. Q.52, 4, 1–18.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Horrace, W.C., Marchand, J.T. and Smeeding, T. (2008). Ranking inequality: Applications of multivariate subset selection. J. Econ. Inequal.6, 1, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, P.K. and Sanchez, S.M. (1994). Competitive market structures: a subset selection analysis. Manag. Sci.40, 11, 1484–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.H. and Nelson, B. (2005). Selecting the best system. Elsevier, Oxford, p. 501–534.

  • Listing, J. and Rasch, D. (1996). Robustness of subset selection procedures. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference54, 291–305.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, M.H. and Sobel, M. (1967). Nonparametric procedures for selecting a subset containing the population with the largest α-quantile. Ann. Math. Stat.38, 1788–1803.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, J. and Tu, D (1995). The Jackknife and Bootstrap. Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K. (1981). On asymptotic accuracy of Efron’s bootstrap. Ann. Stat.9, 1187–1195.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanepoel, J.W.H. (1983). Bootstrap selection procedures based on robust estimators. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods12, 18, 2059–2083.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanepoel, J.W.H. (1985). Bootstrap selection procedures based on robust estimators (with discussion). American Sciences Press, Columbus, Dudewicz, E. J. (ed.), p. 45–64.

  • van der Vaart, A.W. (2000). Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The main part of this study is done while author is a visiting professor of University of Tokyo. The author would like to thank Professor Hiroshi Kurata for his hospitality. The author also wish to thank Professor Satoshi Kuriki and two anonymous referees for valuable suggestions and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun-ichiro Fukuchi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukuchi, Ji. A Note on Bootstrap for Gupta’s Subset Selection Procedure. Sankhya A 82, 96–114 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-019-00163-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-019-00163-6

Keywords and phrases

  • Bootstrap
  • Selection problem
  • Subset selection approach
  • Second-order correctness
  • Edgeworth expansion

AMS (2000) subject classification

  • Primary 62G09
  • Secondary 62F07