Sankhya A

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 112–125 | Cite as

Specific features of regions of acceptance of hypotheses in conditional Bayesian problems of statistical hypotheses testing

  • G. K. Kachiashvili
  • K. J. KachiashviliEmail author
  • A. Mueed


Specific features of the regions of acceptance of hypotheses in conditional Bayesian problems of statistical hypotheses testing are discussed. It is shown that the classical Bayesian statement of the problem of statistical hypotheses testing in the form of an unconditional optimizing problem is a special case of conditional Bayesian problems of hypotheses testing set in the form of conditional optimizing problems. It is also shown that, at acceptance of hypotheses in conditional problems of hypotheses testing, the situation is similar to the sequential analysis. It is possible an occurrence of the situation when the acceptance of a hypothesis with specified validity on the basis of the available information is impossible. In such a situation, the actions are similar to the sequential analysis, i.e. it is necessary to obtain additional information in the form of new observation results or to change the significance level of a test.

Keywords and phrases

Bayesian problem hypotheses testing significance level conditional problem unconditional problem 

AMS (2000) subject classification

Primary 62F03; Secondary 62F15 


  1. Berger, J.O. (1985). Statistical decision theory and bayesian analysis. Springer, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardo, J.M. and Smith, A.F.M. (1996). Bayesian theory. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacharyya, A. (1943). On a measure of divergence between two statistical populations defined by their probability distributions. Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 35, 99–110.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Casella, G. and Berger, R.L. (1987). Reconciling Bayesian and frequentist evidence in the one-sided testing problem (with comments). J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 82, 106–111.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Groot, M. (1970). Optimal statistical decisions. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E. and Stork, D.G. (2006). Pattern classification, (Second Edition). Wiley, Singapore.Google Scholar
  7. Kachiashvili, K.J. (1989). Bayesian algorithms of many hypothesis testing. Ganatleba, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
  8. Kachiashvili, K.J. (2003). Generalization of Bayesian rule of many simple hypotheses testing. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2, 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kachiashvili, K.J., Hashmi, M.A. and Mueed, A. (2012). Sensitivity analysis of classical and conditional Bayesian problems of many hypotheses testing. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods, 41, 591–605. DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2010.510255.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, P.M. (1989). Bayesian statistics: an introduction. Edward Arnold, London.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Lehmann, E.L. (1986). Testing Statistical hypotheses, (2nd ed.). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Lindley, D.V. (1991). Making decision. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Meng, C.Y.K. and Dempster, A.P. (1987). A Bayesian approach to the multiplicity problem for significance testing with binomial data. Biometrics, 43, 301–311.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moreno, E. and Cano, J.A. (1989). Testing a point null hypothesis: asymptotic robust Bayesian analysis with respect to the priors given on a subsigma field. Int. Statist. Rev., 57, 221–232.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sage, A.P. and Melse, J.L. (1972). Estimation theory with application to communication and control. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Stuart, A., Ord, J.K. and Arnold, S. (1999), Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics. Classical Inference and The Linear Model, vol. 2A, (Sixth Edition). Oxford University Press Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  17. Wald, A. (1947). Sequential analysis. Wiley, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Wald, A. (1950a). Statistical decision functions. Wiley, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Wald, A. (1950b). Basic ideas of a general theory of statistical decision rules, vol. I. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians.Google Scholar
  20. Westfall, P.H., Johnson, W.O. and Utts, J.M. (1997). A Bayesian perspective on the Bonferroni adjustment. Biometrika, 84, 419–427.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zacks, S. (1971). The theory of statistical inference. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Statistical Institute 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. K. Kachiashvili
    • 1
  • K. J. Kachiashvili
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • A. Mueed
    • 4
  1. 1.Georgian Technical UniversityTbilisiGeorgia
  2. 2.I. Vekua Institute of Applied Mathematics of Tbilisi State UniversityTbilisiGeorgia
  3. 3.Abdus Salam School of Mathematical Sciences of GC UniversityLahorePakistan
  4. 4.Air University Multan CampusMultanPakistan

Personalised recommendations