Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between beneficial invertebrates, field margin vegetation, and thrip damage in organic leek fields in eastern England

  • Published:
Organic Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Beneficial invertebrate numbers in two organic leek fields in eastern England were assessed in relation to four field margin vegetation treatments (clover/grass, regeneration, two flower mixtures) using pitfall and pan traps. Damage caused by onion thrips in one field was also estimated. Clover/grass and regeneration margins generally had more beneficial invertebrates than either flower mixture margins and invertebrate numbers in the fields were least opposite flower mixture margins. Distance from field margins had a greater effect on invertebrate numbers, with most ladybirds (Coccinellidae), hoverflies (Syrphidae), lacewings (Neuroptera) and parasitic wasps (Hymenoptera) recorded from the middle of fields. High ladybird, hoverfly and parasitic wasp (Icheumonidae) numbers were associated with lowest onion thrip damage, but there was no evidence that field margin treatments were related to damage. Sown flower mixture margins did not positively affect beneficial invertebrate numbers in the leek crop. It appears that an approach in keeping with elements already in the landscape would be just as effective as the use of alien vegetation mixtures in generating invertebrate natural enemy activity in vegetable fields of eastern England.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong G, McKinlay RG (1997) The effect of undersowing cabbages with clover on the activity of carabid beetles. Biol Agric Hortic 15:269–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry NA, Wratten SD, McErlich A, Frampton C (1996) Abundance and diversity of beneficial arthropods in conventional and “organic” carrot crops in New Zealand. N Z J Crop Hort Sci 24:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R Book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deligeorgidis PN (2002) Predatory effect of Orius niger (Wolff) (Hem., Anthocoridae) on Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) and Thrips tabaci Lindeman. J Appl Entomol 126:82–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deligeorgidis PN, Ipsilandis CG, Vaiopoulou M, Kaltsoudas G, Sidiropoulos G (2005) Predatory effect of Coccinella septempunctata on Thrips tabaci and Trialeurodes vaporariorum. J Appl Entomol 129:246–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyre MD, Foster GN, Luff ML, Rushton SP (2006) The definition of British water beetle species pools (Coleoptera) and their relationship to altitude, temperature, precipitation and land cover variables. Hydrobiologia 560:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoddle MS, Robinson L (2004) Evaluation of factors influencing augmentative releases of Chrysoperla carnea for control of Scirtothrips perseae in California avocado orchards. Biol Control 31:268–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Ann Rev Entomol 45:175–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landis DA, Menalled FD, Costamagna AC, Wilkinson TK (2005) Manipulating plant resources to enhance beneficial arthropods in agricultural landscapes. Weed Sci 53:902–908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leifert C, Rembialkowska E, Nielson JH, Cooper JM, Butler G, Lueck L (2007) Effects of organic and ‘low input’ production methods on food quality and safety. In: Niggli U, Leifert C, Alföldi T, Lück, L, Willer H (eds) Improving sustainability in organic and low input food production systems. Research Institute of Organic Farming, Frick, Switzerland. pp. 75–95

  • Luff ML (2007) The Carabidae (ground beetles) of Britain and Ireland, 2nd edn. Handb Identif Br Insects 4(2):1–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Lys JA, Zimmermann M, Nentwig W (1994) Increase in activity density and species number of carabid beetles in cereals as a result of strip management. Entomol Exp Appl 73:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod A, Wratten SD, Sotherton NW, Thomas MB (2004) ‘Beetle banks’ as refuges for beneficial arthropods in farmland: long-term changes in predator communities and habitat. Agric For Entomol 6:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall EJR, Moonen AC (2002) Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek B, Loxton D, Sparks T, Pywell R, Pickett H, Nowakowski M (2002) The effect of arable field margin composition on invertebrate biodiversity. Biol Conserv 106:259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan CM, Gormally MJ (2002) A comparison of ground beetle (Carabidae: Coleoptera) communities in an organic and conventional potato crop. Biol Agric Hortic 20:99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad RP, Snyder WE (2004) Predator interference limits fly egg biological control by a guild of ground-active beetles. Biol Control 31:428–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad RP, Snyder WE (2006) Polyphagy complicates conservation biological control that targets generalist predators. J Appl Ecol 43:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Riudavets J, Castane C (1998) Identification and evaluation of native predators of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in the Mediterranean. Environ Entomol 27:86–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade M, Sengonca C (1998) On the development, feeding activity and prey preference of Hippodamia convergens Guer.-Men. (Col., Coccinellidae) preying on Thrips tabaci Lind. (Thrys., Thripidae) and two species of Aphidae. Anz SchaÉdlkd Pflanzenschutz Umweltschutz 71:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (1998) CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to CANOCO for windows: software for canonical community ordination (version 4). Centre for Biometry, Wageningen

  • Theunissen J, Legutowska H (1991) Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thrasanoptera, Thripidae) in leek—within plant distribution. J Appl Entomol 112:309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theunissen J, Schelling G (1997) Damage threshold for Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in monocropped and intercropped leek. Europ J Entomol 94:253–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Theunissen J, Schelling G (1998) Infestation of leek by Thrips tabaci as related to spatial and temporal patterns of undersowing. Biocontrol 43:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Union Integrated Project QualityLowInputFood (EU FP6 Contract CT-2003-506358.). We thank two reviewers for ideas on improving the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael David Eyre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eyre, M.D., Labanowska-Bury, D., White, R. et al. Relationships between beneficial invertebrates, field margin vegetation, and thrip damage in organic leek fields in eastern England. Org. Agr. 1, 45–54 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-010-0004-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-010-0004-x

Keywords

Navigation