Advertisement

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 671–686 | Cite as

Moral Judgment and the Duties of Innocent Beneficiaries of Injustice

  • Matthew Lindauer
  • Christian Barry
Article
  • 352 Downloads

Abstract

The view that innocent beneficiaries of injustice bear special duties to victims of injustice has recently come under attack. Luck egalitarian theorists have argued that thought experiments focusing on the way innocent beneficiaries should distribute the benefits they’ve received provide evidence against this view. The apparent special duties of innocent beneficiaries, they hold, are wholly reducible to general duties to compensate people for bad brute luck. In this paper we provide empirical evidence in defense of the view that innocent beneficiaries have genuine special duties to victims of injustice. Through a series of four experiments, we show that judgments about the kinds of cases that luck egalitarian critics have provided do not undermine but rather support this view. We also explore a number of other questions that theorists working in this area have yet to discuss and provide suggestions for further research on the moral significance of benefiting from injustice.

Keywords

Geisser Correction Full Compensation Special Duty General Duty Luck Egalitarianism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Butt, Daniel. 2007. On benefiting from injustice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37(1): 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caney, Simon. 2005. Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change. Leiden Journal of International Law 18(4): 747–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caney, Simon. 2010. Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13(1): 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goodin, Robert E. 2013. Disgorging the fruits of historical wrongdoing. American Political Science Review 107(3): 478–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goodin, Robert E., and Christian Barry. 2014. Benefiting from the wrongdoing of others. Journal of Applied Philosophy 31(2): 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huseby, Robert. 2013. Should the beneficiaries pay? Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 14(2): 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Knight, Carl. 2013. Benefiting from injustice and brute luck. Social Theory and Practice 39(4): 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knobe, Joshua. forthcoming. Experimental philosophy is cognitive science. In A companion to experimental philosophy, ed. Justin Sytsma and Wesley Buckwalter. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. forthcoming. Affirmative action, historical injustice, and the concept of beneficiaries. In Journal of Political Philosophy.Google Scholar
  10. Miller, David. 2009. Global justice and climate change: how should responsibilities be distributed? Parts I and II. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 28: 119–156.Google Scholar
  11. Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Page, Edward A. 2008. Distributing the burdens of climate change. Environmental Politics 17(4): 556–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Rini, Regina. 2015. How not to test for philosophical expertise. Synthese 192(2): 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schwitzgebel, Eric, and Fiery Cushman. 2012. Expertise in moral reasoning? Order effects on moral judgment in professional philosophers and non-philosophers. Mind and Language 27(2): 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1973. Preferential hiring. Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 364–384.Google Scholar
  17. Tobia, Kevin, Wesley Buckwalter, and Stephen Stich. 2013. Moral intuitions: are philosophers experts? Philosophical Psychology 26(5): 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weinberg, Jonathan M. 2009. On doing better, experimental-style. Philosophical Studies 145(3): 455–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weinberg, Jonathan M., Chad Gonnerman, Cameron Buckner, and Joshua Alexander. 2010. Are philosophers expert intuiters? Philosophical Psychology 23(3): 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Williamson, Timothy. 2011. Philosophical expertise and the burden of proof. Metaphilosophy 42(3): 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Philosophy, Research School of Social SciencesAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations