Review of Philosophy and Psychology

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 559–575 | Cite as

On Thought Insertion

  • Rachel GunnEmail author


By examining first-person descriptions of thought insertion I show that thought insertion is a complex and heterogeneous phenomenon. People experiencing this phenomenon have huge difficulty explaining what it is like due to the bizarre nature of the experience. Through careful analysis of first-person descriptions I identify some of the characteristics of thought insertion. I then briefly examine some of the philosophical literature regarding agency, ownership and thought insertion and conclude that the standard account of the basic characteristics of thought insertion is inadequate when we consider the phenomenon as it is experienced. First person descriptions suggest that thought insertion is characterised by a lack of personal ownership and not simply by a loss of agency or authorship. This is an important factor that should inform research and therapeutic intervention. We cannot hope to arrive at appropriate therapeutic intervention or identify underlying neuronal mechanisms for the experience if we cannot say what the experience actually is. I further suggest that more analysis of first-person description is required for an improved account of the phenomenology of thought insertion.


Mental Activity Intrusive Thought Thought Insertion Personal Ownership Passivity Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I am grateful to the two anonymous reviewers and to Professor Lisa Bortolotti for their valuable feedback.


  1. Albahari, M. 2006. Analytical Buddhism: the two-tiered illusion of self. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Task Force. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5, 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. Bortolotti, L., and M. Broome. 2009. A role for ownership and authorship in the analysis of thought insertion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(2): 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, J. 1999. Schizophrenia, the space of reasons, and thinking as a motor process. The Monist 82(4): 609–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feinberg, I. 1978. Efference copy and corollary discharge: implications for thinking and its disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin 4(4): 636–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Festinger, L. 1964. When prophecy fails: a social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction of the world. Researches in the social, cultural and behavioral sciences. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  7. Frith, C.D. 1992. The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Essays in cognitive psychology. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Frith, C.D., S.-J. Blakemore, and D.M. Wolpert. 2000. Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 355(1404): 1771–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallagher, S. 2000. Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(1): 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallagher, S. 2004. The structure and development of self-consciousness. In Agency, ownership, and alien control in schizophrenia. Advances in consciousness research, ed. D. Zahavi, T. Grunbaum, and J. Parnas, 89–103. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  11. Gerrans, P. 2001. Authorship and ownership of thoughts. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 8(2): 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibbs, P.J. 2000. Thought insertion and the inseparability thesis. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 7(3): 195–202.Google Scholar
  13. Jaspers, K. 1997. General psychopathology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Langland-Hassan, P. 2008. Fractured phenomenologies: thought insertion, inner speech, and the puzzle of extraneity. Mind & Language 23(4): 369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin, J.-R., and E. Pacherie. 2013. Out of nowhere: thought insertion, ownership and context-integration. Consciousness and Cognition 22(1): 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nordgaard, J., L.A. Sass, and J. Parnas. 2012. The psychiatric interview: validity, structure, and subjectivity. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 263(4): 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parnas, J., and L.A. Sass. 2001. Self, solipsism, and schizophrenic delusions. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 8(2): 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Romme, M.A., S. Escher, J. Dillon, et al., 2009. Living with voices: 50 stories of recovery, PCCS Books in association with Birmingham City University.Google Scholar
  19. Sass, L.A. 1994. The paradoxes of delusion: Wittgenstein, Schreber, and the schizophrenic mind. Ithaca: London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sass, L., and E. Pienkos. 2013. Delusion: the phenomenological approach. In The oxford handbook of philosophy and psychiatry, ed. K.W.M. Fulford, M. Davies, R.G. Gipps, et al., 632–656. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Sousa, P., and L. Swiney. 2013. Thought insertion: abnormal sense of thought agency or thought endorsement? Phenomenology And The Cognitive Sciences 12(4): 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stanghellini, G. 2013. Philosophical resources for the psychiatric interview. In The oxford handbook of philosophy and psychiatry, ed. K.W.M. Fulford, M. Davies, R.G. Gipps, et al., 321–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Stephens, G.L. 2000. Thought insertion and subjectivity. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 7(3): 203–205.Google Scholar
  24. Stephens, G.L., and G. Graham. 1994. Self-consciousness, mental agency, and the clinical psychopathology of thought insertion. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 1(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
  25. Stephens, G.L., and G. Graham. 2000. When self-conciousness breaks: alien voices and inserted thoughts. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Tavris, C., and E. Aronson. 2008. Mistakes were made (but not by me): Why we justify foolish beliefs, Bad decisions, and hurtful acts. Orlando: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  27. Waters, F.A.V., and J.C. Badcock. 2010. First-rank symptoms in schizophrenia: reexamining mechanisms of self-recognition. Schizophrenia Bulletin 36(3): 510–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weinberger, D.R., and P.J. Harrison (eds.). 2011. Schizophrenia, 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. World Health Organization. 1993. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  30. Zahavi, D. 2001. Schizophrenia and self-awareness. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 8(4): 339–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zahavi, D. 2011. Unity of consciousness and the problem of the self. In The oxford handbook of the self, ed. S. Gallagher, 314–336. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Web References

  1. Alienonite. 2010. Crazyboards Forum [online], posted 04/04/10, available via: [retrieved 16/07/11]
  2. Andypr. 2013. Schizophrenia Forum [online], posted Dec 2013, available via: [retrieved 28/09/14]
  3. Anna. 2014. Schizophrenia Forum [online], posted 25/08/14, available via: [retrieved 28/09/14]
  4. Anonymous. 2010. e Health Forum [online], posted 22/03/10, available via: [retrieved 15/07/11]
  5. Firebird. 2010. Crazyboards Forum [online], posted 04/04/2010, available via: [retrieved 16/07/11]
  6. LevelJ1. 2014. Schizophrenia Forum [online], posted 26/08/14, available via: [retrieved 28/09/14]
  7. Mussel. 2014. Schizophrenia Forum [online], posted Aug 2014, available via: [retrieved 29/04/15]
  8. Saadiqah. 2014. Schizophrenia Forum [online], posted Aug 2014, available via: [retrieved 29/04/15]
  9. Star-28. 2010. Mental Health Forum [online], posted 27/09/10, available via: [retrieved 16/07/11]

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations