Abstract
We recently conducted an experiment to show that a lot of the empirically measured disagreement cited to support the premise that there is mass perceptual disagreement about the colors, a premise often cited by philosophers, is due to conceptual factors. Kuehni and Hardin object to how we measured disagreement and to various aspects of our experimental design. In this reply, we defend our study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kuehni, R.G. & Hardin, C.L. 2014. Color matching and color naming: A response to Roberts and Schmidtke. doi: 10.1007/s13164-013-0174-z.
Livers, J.J. 1942. Some limitations to use of coefficient of variation. Journal of Farm Economics 24(4): 892–895. 892–893.
Roberts, P., and K. Schmidtke. 2012. In defense of incompatibility, objectivism, and veridicality about color. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3(4): 547–558.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roberts, P., Schmidtke, K. Color Matching and Color Naming: A Reply to Kuehni and Hardin. Rev.Phil.Psych. 6, 207–212 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-014-0225-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-014-0225-0