Review of Philosophy and Psychology

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 601–628 | Cite as

Where Do the Unique Hues Come from?

Article

Abstract

Where are we to look for the unique hues? Out in the world? In the eye? In more central processing? 1. There are difficulties looking for the structure of the unique hues in simple combinations of cone-response functions like (L − M) and (S − (L + M)): such functions may fit pretty well the early physiological processing, but they don’t correspond to the structure of unique hues. It may seem more promising to look to, e.g., Hurvich & Jameson’s ‘chromatic response functions’; but these report on psychophysical behaviour, not on underlying physiology. So ‘opponent processing’ isn’t any particular help on the unique hues—and even physiology in general seems not to have come up with any good correlate or explanation. 2. Wright (Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2: 1–17, 2011) looks in a different place: to (a) magnitude of total visual response that a stimulus light provokes, the maxima and minima of which, he thinks, give us the boundaries of the main hue categories (Wright connects these with Thornton’s ‘prime’ and ‘antiprime’ colours in an illuminant: Journal of the Optical Society of America 61 (1971): 1155–1163); and (b) the ratio of chromatic to achromatic response, the maxima and minima of which, he suggests, give us the focal points of the unique hues. The suggestions are extremely interesting; but the desired correspondences have some counterexamples; and where they hold, one could wonder how much they depend upon the particular choice of functions to measure (a) and (b); and one could hope for more of an explanatory linkage between the sets of items in question. 3. Could the unique hues come from, so to speak, the external world? White and black can easily be defined as particular kinds of reflectance. What of the standard four unique hues? Variation in kinds of sunlight and skylight coincides well with variation along a line from unique yellow to unique blue (cf. Shepard 1992, Mollon 2006). If we wanted something to calibrate our standards for unique yellow and blue as the lens of the eye changes with age, and despite interpersonal cone differences, this would be a good basis—and there are several ways this can be extended to surface colours. But is there any essential connection between these things: is there any rationale why the light of the sun and the sky should be counted as unique hued? An answer may be: because in our environment, these illuminants are as close to white (or the natural illuminant colour) as you can get—to see things tinged with sunlight or skylight should be to see them minimally tinged with any alien colour. Whereas other hues in an illuminant would be treated as tinging with a more alien colour the thing seen.

References

  1. Abramov, I., and J. Gordon. 1994. Color appearance: On seeing red—or yellow, or green, or blue. Annual Review of Psychology 45: 451–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramov, I., and J. Gordon. 2005. Seeing unique hues. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 22: 2143–2153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boynton, R. 1979. Human Color Vision. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  4. Broackes, J. 1997. Could we take lime, purple, orange and teal as unique hues? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 183–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broackes, J. 2003. Do opponent process theories help physicalism about color? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26(6): 786–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broackes, J. 2010. What do the Color-Blind see? In Color ontology and color science, eds. J. Cohen & M. Matthen, 291–405. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Byrne, A., and D.R. Hilbert. 2003. Color realism and color science. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 26: 3–21. With subsequent Commentaries and Replies.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. 2001. Visual color and color mixture. Chicago: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  9. Conway, B.R., S. Moeller, and D.Y. Tsao. 2007. Specialized color modules in macaque extrastriate cortex. Neuron 56: 560–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dacey, D.M., and O.S. Packer. 2003. Colour coding in the primate retina: Diverse cell types and cone-specific circuitry. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 13: 421–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Valois, L.R., I. Abramov, and G.H. Jacobs. 1966. Analysis of response patterns of LGN cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America 56: 966–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Valois, R.L., and K.K. De Valois. 1975. Neural coding of color. In Handbook of perception. Vol. V: Seeing, ed. E.C. Carterette and M.P. Friedman, 117–166. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  13. Derrington, A.M., J. Krauskopf, and P. Lennie. 1984. Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. The Journal of Physiology 357: 241–265.Google Scholar
  14. Golz, J., and D. MacLeod. 2002. Influence of scene statistics on colour constancy. Nature 415: 637–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardin, C.L. 1988. Color for philosophers: Unweaving the rainbow. Expanded edn., 1993. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  16. Hering, Ewald. 1878. Zur Lehre vom Lichtsinne: Sechs Mitteilungen an die Kaiserl. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. 2. unveränd. Abdr. Wien: Carl Gerold’s Sohn.Google Scholar
  17. Hunt, R.W.G. 1987. Measuring colour. Chichester, G.B./New York: Ellis Horwood. (2nd Edition, 1991. 3rd ed., 1998.)Google Scholar
  18. Hurvich, L.M., and D. Jameson. 1955. Some quantitative aspects of an opponent-colors theory: II. Brightness, saturation, and hue in normal and dichromatic vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America 45: 602–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hurvich, L.M., and D. Jameson. 1957. An opponent-process theory of color vision. Psychological Review 64: 384–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jameson, D., and L.M. Hurvich. 1955. Some quantitative aspects of an opponent-colors theory: I. Chromatic responses and spectral saturation. Journal of the Optical Society of America 45: 546–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jameson, K., and R. D’Andrade. 1997. It’s not really red, green, yellow, blue: An inquiry into perceptual color space. In Color categories in thought and language, eds. C.L. Hardin and L. Maffi, 295–319. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, K., and W. Wright. 2008. Reply to Philipona and O’Regan. Visual Neuroscience 25: 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jordan, G., and J.D. Mollon. 1995. Rayleigh matches and unique green. Vision Research 35: 613–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jordan, G., and J.D. Mollon. 1997. Unique hues in heterozygotes for protan and deutan deficiencies. In Colour vision deficiencies XIII, ed. C.R. Cavonius, 67–76. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Judd, D.B. 1949. Response functions for types of vision according to the Müller theory. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards (U.S.) 42: 1–16. Repr. in D. B. Judd, Contributions to Color Science, ed. D. L. MacAdam (Washington, DC: US Dept. of Commerce, 1979), 355–371.Google Scholar
  26. Judd, D.B. 1951. Basic correlates of the visual stimulus. In Handbook of experimental psychology, ed. S.S. Stevens, 811–867. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Judd, D.B. 1952. Color in business, science, and industry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Judd, D.B., D.L. MacAdam, and G. Wyszecki. 1964. Spectral distribution of typical daylight as a function of correlated color temperature. Journal of the Optical Society of America 54: 1031–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuehni, R.G. 2004. Variability in unique hue selection: A surprising phenomenon. Color Research & Application 29(2): 158–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuehni, R.G., R. Shamey, M. Matthews, and B. Keene. 2010. Perceptual prominence of Hering’s perceptual primaries. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 27: 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacLeod, Donald. 2010. Into the Neural Maze. In Color ontology and color science, ed. J. Cohen & M. Matthen, 151–178. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Mollon, J. 2006. Monge: The Verriest lecture, Lyon, July 2005. Visual Neuroscience 23: 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mollon, J. 2009. A neural basis for unique hues? Current Biology 19: R441–R442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mollon, J., and O. Estévez. 1988. Tyndall’s paradox of hue discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 5: 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mollon, J.D., and G. Jordan. 1997. On the nature of unique hues. In John Dalton’s colour vision legacy, ed. C. Dickinson, I. Murray, and D. Carden, 391–403. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  36. Palmer, S.E. 1999. Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  37. Philipona, D.L., and J.K. O’Regan. 2006. Color naming, unique hues, and hue cancellation predicted from singularities in reflection properties. Visual Neuroscience 23: 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Philipona, D.L., and J.K. O’Regan. 2008. Reply to Johnson and Wright. Visual Neuroscience 25: 225–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Regan, B.C., C. Julliot, B. Simmen, F. Viénot, P. Charles-Dominique, and J.D. Mollon. 2001. Fruits, foliage and the evolution of primate colour vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 356: 229–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Romney, A.K., and C.C. Chiao. 2009. Functional computational model for optimal color coding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 10376–10381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saunders, B.A.C., and J. van Brakel. 1997. Are there non-trivial constraints on colour categorization? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 167–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schefrin, B.E., and J.S. Werner. 1990. Loci of spectral unique hues throughout the life span. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 7: 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schrödinger, E. 1925. Über das Verhältnis der Vierfarben- zur Dreifarbentheorie. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Wien), Abteilung IIa (Mathematik, Astronomie, Physik …) 134: 471.Google Scholar
  44. Shepard, R.N. 1992. The perceptual organization of colors: An adaptation to regularities of the terrestrial world. In The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, ed. J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Stockman, A., and L.T. Sharpe. 1999. Cone spectral sensitivities and color matching. In Color vision: From genes to perception, ed. K.R. Gegenfurtner and L.T. Sharpe, 53–87. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Stoughton, C., and B.R. Conway. 2008. Neural basis for unique hues. Current Biology 18: R698–R699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thornton, W.A. 1971. Luminosity and color-rendering capability of white light. Journal of the Optical Society of America 61: 1155–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thornton, W.A. 1999. Spectral sensitivities of the normal human visual system, color-matching functions and their principles, and how and why the two sets should coincide. Color Research & Application 24: 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Volbrecht, V.J., J.L. Nerger, and C.E. Harlow. 1997. The bimodality of unique green revisited. Vision Research 37: 404–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Webster, M.A., E. Miyahara, G. Malkoc, and V.E. Raker. 2000a. Variations in normal color vision. I. Cone-opponent axes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 17(9): 1535–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Webster, M.A., E. Miyahara, G. Malkoc, and V.E. Raker. 2000b. Variations in normal color vision. II. Unique hues. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 17(9): 1545–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Webster, M.A., S.M. Webster, S. Bharadwaj, R. Verma, J. Jaikuma, G. Mada, and E. Vaithilingham. 2002. Variations in normal color vision. III. Unique hues in Indian and United States observers. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 19: 1951–1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Werner, J.S., and B.E. Schefrin. 1993. Loci of achromatic points throughout the life span. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 10: 1509–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wright, W. 2011. On the retinal origins of the Hering primaries. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wright, William D. 1944/1969. The measurement of colour, 4th ed. London: Adam Hilger.Google Scholar
  56. Wyszecki, G. and W.S. Stiles. 1967/1982. Color science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulas. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations