Review of Philosophy and Psychology

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 681–698 | Cite as

Judgment of Intentionality and Moral Evaluation in Individuals with High Functioning Autism

Article

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the relationships between judgments of intentionality and moral evaluation in individuals with High Functioning Autism (HFA) or Asperger Syndrome (AS). HFA or AS are neurodevelopmental disorders characterised by severe deficits in communication and social functioning. Impairments in Theory of Mind (ToM), i.e., the ability to attribute mental states to oneself and to others, are thought to be the core features of autism. Of all mental states, the concept of ‘intentional action’ is particularly important. People normally distinguish between actions that are performed intentionally and those that are performed unintentionally and this distinction plays a crucial role in social understanding and moral judgment. Recently, Knobe (Analysis 63: 190–193, 2003a), (Philosophical Psychology 16: 309–324, 2003b) showed that people’s moral evaluations might serve as input to the process by which people intuitively arrive at the intentionality judgments. Here, by using two pairs of vignettes, the Knobe’s Harm/Help cases and Murder/Bull’s-eye cases, we showed that, as already observed in typical population, in individuals with HFA/AS judgment of intentional action is informed by the moral appreciation of the action outcome. However, the two groups differed on praise judgments and moral justifications, suggesting that these processes were poorly influenced by the agent’s psychological states. We concluded that, although under certain circumstances, individuals with HFA/AS and people with typical development have similar intuitive judgments of intentionality, over-assignment of praise judgments and the reduced use of folk-psychological concepts in moral judgment likely reflect difficulties using intentionality information for moral reasoning.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington: American Psychiatric Association. Google Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen, S., M. O'Riordan, V. Stone, R. Jones, and K. Plaisted. 1999. Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 29(5): 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blair, R.J. 2005. Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and Cognition 14: 698–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blair, R.J.R. 1996. Brief report: Morality in the autistic child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 26: 571–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair, R.J.R. 1999. Psychophysiological responsiveness to the distress of others in children with autism. Personality and Individual Differences 26: 477–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowler, D.M. 1992. “Theory of mind” in Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 33(5): 877–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bratman, M.E. 1987. Intention, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carpenter, M., B.F. Pennington, and S.J. Rogers. 2001. Understanding of others’ intentions in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 31: 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cushman, F., L. Young, and M.D. Hauser. 2006. The role of reasoning and intuition in moral judgments: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science 17: 1082–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Entremont, B., and A. Yazbek. 2007. Imitation of intentional and accidental actions by children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 37: 1665–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahlgren, S.O., and A. Trillingsgaard. 1996. Theory of mind in non-retarded children with autism and Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 37(6): 759–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans, J.St B.T. 2008. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59: 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gillberg, C., C. Gillberg, M. Råstam, and E. Wentz. 2001. The Asperger syndrome (and high-functioning autism) diagnostic interview (ASDI): A preliminary study of a new structured clinical interview. Autism 5(1): 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grant, C.M., J. Boucher, K.J. Riggs, and A. Grayson. 2005. Moral understanding in children with autism. Autism 9: 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansson, S.L., A. Svanström Röjvall, M. Rastam, C. Gillberg, C. Gillberg, and H. Anckarsater. 2005. Psychiatric telephone interview with parents for screening of childhood autism-tics, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and other comorbidities (A-TAC): Preliminary reliability and validity. The British Journal of Psychiatry 187: 262–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haidt, J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108: 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haidt, J. 2003. The moral emotions. In Handbook of affective sciences, ed. R.J. Davidson, K.R. Scherer, and H.H. Goldsmith, 852–870. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Happé, F. 1994. An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 24: 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Happé, F. 1995. The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development 66: 843–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang, C.T., C. Heyes, and T. Charman. 2002. Infants’ behavioral re-enactment of “failed attempts”: Exploring the roles of emulation learning, stimulus enhancement, and understanding of intentions. Developmental Psychology 38(5): 840–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ICD-10. 1992. Classification of mental and behavioural disorders diagnostic criteria for research. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  22. Karniol, R. 1978. Children’s use of intention cues in evaluating behavior. Psychological Bulletin 85: 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knobe, J. 2003a. Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis 63: 190–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knobe, J. 2003b. Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation. Philosophical Psychology 16: 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knobe, J. 2004. Intention, intentional action and moral considerations. Analysis 64: 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knobe, J. 2006. The concept of intentional action: A case study in the uses of folk psychology. Philosophical Studies 130(2): 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knobe, J. 2007. Reason explanation in folk psychology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31: 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knobe, J. 2010. Person as scientist, person as moralist. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33: 315–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knobe, J., and A. Burra. 2006. Intention and intentional action: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Culture and Cognition 1(2): 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knobe, J., and G. Mendlow. 2004. The good, the bad and the blameworthy: Understanding the role of evaluative reasoning in folk psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 24: 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lagnado, D.A., and S. Channon. 2008. Judgments of cause and blame: The effects of intentionality and foreseeability. Cognition 108: 754–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leslie, A., R. Mallon, and J.A. DiCorcia. 2006. Transgressors, victims, and cry babies: Is basic moral judgment spared in autism? Social Neuroscience 1: 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lord, C., M. Rutter, and A. Le Couteur. 1994. Autism diagnostic interview-revised: A revise version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 24: 659–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Machery, E. 2008. Understanding the folk concept of intentional action: Philosophical and experimental issues. Mind & Language 23: 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Malle, B., and J. Knobe. 1997. The folk concept of intentional action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33: 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nadelhoffer, T. 2004. Blame, badness, and intentional action: A reply to Knobe & Mendlow. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 24: 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips, W., S. Baron-Cohen, and M. Rutter. 1998. Understanding intention in normal development and in autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 16: 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Russell, J., and E.L. Hill. 2001. Action-monitoring and intention reporting in children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 42: 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Senju, A., V. Southgate, S. White, and U. Frith. 2009. Mindblind eyes: An absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Science 5942(325): 883–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sripada Chandra, and Konrath Sara. 2011. Telling more than we can know about intentional action. Mind & Language Google Scholar
  41. Tager-Flusberg, H., and R.M. Joseph. 2003. Identifying neurocognitive phenotypes in autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 358: 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Young, L., F. Cushman, M. Hauser, and R. Saxe. 2007. The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 8235–8240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zalla, T., A.-M. Sav, A. Stopin, S. Ahade, and M. Leboyer. 2009. Faux pas detection and intentional action in Asperger syndrome. A replication on a French sample. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 39: 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zelazo, P.D., C.C. Helwig, and A. Lau. 1996. Intention, act, and outcome in behavioral prediction and moral judgment. Child Development 67(5): 2478–2492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zelazo, P.D., S. Jacques, J. Burack, and D. Frye. 2002. The relation between theory of mind and rule use: Evidence from persons with autism-spectrum disorders. Infant and Child Development 11: 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Jean Nicod- CNRSEcole Normale SupérieureParisFrance
  2. 2.INSERM U 955, IMRB & University Paris Est Creteil, AP-HP, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier Hospitals, Department of Psychiatry, Fondation FondaMentalFrench National Science FoundationCreteilFrance

Personalised recommendations