Advertisement

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 583–592 | Cite as

The Guru Effect

  • Dan SperberEmail author
Article

Abstract

Obscurity of expression is considered a flaw. Not so, however, in the speech or writing of intellectual gurus. All too often, what readers do is judge profound what they have failed to grasp. Here I try to explain this “guru effect” by looking at the psychology of trust and interpretation, at the role of authority and argumentation, and at the effects of these dispositions and processes when they operate at a population level where, I argue, a runaway phenomenon of overappreciation may take place.

Keywords

Confirmation Bias External Reason Internal Reason Relevant Interpretation Intellectual Style 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Dennett, Daniel (1989). Murmurs in the cathedral (review of R. Penrose, The Emperor’s New Mind). The times literary supplement, September 29–October 5, pp. 55–57.Google Scholar
  2. Mercier, H., and Sperber, D. 2009. Intuitive and reflective inferences. In Evans, J. St. B. T. and Frankish, K. (Ed.) In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Penrose, R. 1989. The emperor’s new mind: Concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Sperber, D. 1997. Intuitive and reflective beliefs. In Mind and Language 12(1): 67–83.Google Scholar
  6. Sperber, D. 2001. An evolutionary perspective on testimony and argumentation. Philosophical Topics 29: 401–413.Google Scholar
  7. Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Wason, P.C. 1960. On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 12: 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Jean NicodEHESS-ENS-CNRSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations