AMS Review

, Volume 2, Issue 2–4, pp 72–87 | Cite as

Identity-motivated marketing relationships: research synthesis, controversies, and research agenda

Article

Abstract

Social identity and identity theories have recently emerged as an important theoretical lens in relationship marketing research. However, the study of identity-motivated marketing relationships, defined as internal and external stakeholders’ identification with a marketing entity that can be an individual, a group, a brand, or a company, is not without controversies. Following a synthesis of this stream of research, this paper reviews the nature and causes of two key issues surrounding the conceptualization and measurement identity-based constructs. Recommended solutions and avenues for further research are then discussed.

Keywords

Customer–company identification Customer–brand identification Social identity theory Identity theory Identity-motivated relationships 

References

  1. Aaker, J. L., & Akutsu, S. (2009). Why do people give? The role of identity in giving. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 267–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aaker, J. L., Fournier, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004). When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abrams, D., & de Moura, G. R. (2001). Organizational identification: Psychological anchorage and turnover. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ahearne, M., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Gruen, T. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of customer-company identification: expanding the role of relationship marketing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 574–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 7 (pp. 263–295). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Arnett, D. B., German, S. D., & Hunt, S. D. (2003). The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: the case of nonprofit marketing. Journal of Marketing, 67, 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 868–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashforth, B. E., & Johnson, S. A. (2001). Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 31–48). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.Google Scholar
  10. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34, 325–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & Mclaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bagozzi, R. P. (1995). Reflections on relationship marketing in consumer markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23, 272–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the concept of intentional social action in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 368–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: comment on Howell, Brievik, and Wilcox (2007). Psychological Methods, 12, 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006a). Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. International Journal of Research Marketing, 23, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006b). Open source software user communities: a study of participation in Linux user groups. Management Science, 52, 1099–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Barone, M. J., & Roy, T. (2010). The effect of deal exclusivity on consumer response to targeted price promotions: a social identification perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bartels, J., Pruyn, A., & de Jong, M. (2009). Employee identification before and after an internal merger: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bell, S. J., & Menguc, B. (2002). The employee-organization relationship, organizational citizenship behaviors, and superior quality. Journal of Retailing, 78, 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment, and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 555–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer–company identification: a framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bhattacharya, C. B., Rao, H., & Glynn, M. A. (1995). Understanding the bond of identification: an investigation of its correlates among art museum members. Journal of Marketing, 59, 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bohlmann, J. D., Rosa, J. A., Bolton, R. N., & Qualls, W. J. (2006). The effect of group interactions on satisfaction judgments: satisfaction escalation. Marketing Science, 25, 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bolton, L. E., & Reed, A., II. (2004). Sticky priors: the perseverance of identity effects on judgment. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: past achievements, current problems, and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brown, R., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Brown, T. J., Barry, T. E., Dacin, P. E., & Gunst, R. F. (2005). Spreading the word: Investigating antecedents of consumers’ positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: a theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 822–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Callero, P. (1985). Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Carlson, B. D., Donavan, D. T., & Cumiskey, K. J. (2009). Consumer-brand relationships in sport: brand personality and identification. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37, 370–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chaplin, L. N., & John, D. R. (2005). The development of self-brand connections in children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Corsten, D., Gruen, T., & Peyinghaus, M. (2011). The effects of supplier-to-buyer identification on operational performance: an empirical investigation of inter-organizational identification in automotive relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklehofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Donavan, D. T., Janda, S., & Suh, J. (2006). Environmental influences in corporate brand identification and outcomes. Journal of Brand Management, 14, 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression as an alternative to difference score in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577–1613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Edwards, M. R., & Peccei, R. (2007). Organizational identification: development and testing a conceptual grounded measure. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 25–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Einwiller, S. A., Fedorikhin, A., Johnson, A. R., & Kamins, M. A. (2006). Enough is enough! When identification no longer prevents negative corporate associations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Eisenberg, M., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Elliott, R., & Wattanasuwan, K. (1998). Brands as symbolic resources for the construction of identity. International Journal of Advertising, 17, 131–144.Google Scholar
  42. Epstein, S. (1980). The self-concept: A review and the proposal of an integrated theory of personality. In E. Staub (Ed.), Personality: Basic aspects and current research (pp. 82–132). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Escalas, J. E. (2004). Narrative processing: building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 378–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fisher, R. J., Maltz, E., & Jaworski, B. J. (1997). Enhancing communication between marketing and engineering: the moderating role of relative functional identification. Journal of Marketing, 61, 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Forehand, M. R., & Despandé, R. (2001). What we see makes us who we are: priming ethnic self-awareness and advertising response. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. George, E., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2005). One foot in each camp: the dual identification of contact workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 68–99.Google Scholar
  49. Gleibs, I. H., Mummendey, A., & Noack, P. (2008). Predictors of changes in postmerger identification during a merger process: a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1095–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Grégoire, Y., & Fisher, R. (2006). The effects of relationship quality on customer retaliation. Marketing Letters, 17, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Grégoire, Y., Tripp, T. M., & Legoux, R. (2009). When customer love turns into lasting hate: the effects of relationship strength and time on customer revenge and avoidance. Journal of Marketing, 73, 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gwinner, K., & Swanson, S. R. (2003). A model of fan identification: antecedents and sponsorship outcomes. Journal of Services Marketing, 17, 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (1997). Relations between organizational culture, identity, and image. European Journal of Marketing, 31, 356–365.Google Scholar
  55. Heide, J. B., & Wathne, K. H. (2006). Friends, businesspeople, and relationship roles: a conceptual framework and a research agenda. Journal of Marketing, 70, 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Henry, K. B., Arrow, H., & Carini, B. (1999). A tripartite model of group identification: theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30, 558–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hinkle, S., Taylor, L. A., Fox-Cardamone, D. L., & Crook, K. F. (1989). Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: a multicomponent approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: a critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Homburg, C., Jan Wieseke, J., & Hoyer, W. D. (2009). Social identity and the service-profit chain. Journal of Marketing, 73, 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Homburg, C., Jan Wieseke, J., Lukas, B. A., & Mikolon, S. (2011). When salespeople develop negative headquarters stereotypes: performance effects and managerial remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 664–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Houston, M. B., Walker, B. A., Hutt, M. D., & Reingen, P. H. (2001). Cross-unit competition for a market charter: the enduring influence of structure. Journal of Marketing, 65, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Howell, R. D., Breivik, E., & Wilcox, J. B. (2007). Reconsidering formative measurement. Psychological Methods, 12, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Huemer, L., Becerra, M., & Lunnan, R. (2004). Organizational identity and network identification: relating within and beyond imaginary boundaries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jackson, J. W., & Smith, E. R. (1999). Conceptualizing social identity: a new framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jarvis, C., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Johnson, S. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (2008). Externalization of employment in a service environment: the role of organizational and customer identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Johnson, M. D., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (2006). The evolution of loyalty intentions. Journal of Marketing, 70, 122–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kleine, R. E., III, & Kleine, S. S. (2000). Consumption and self-schema changes throughout the identity project life cycle. In S. J. Hoch & R. J. Meyer (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, vol. 27 (pp. 279–285). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  70. Kleine, S. S., Kleine, R. E., III, & Allen, C. T. (1995). How is a possession ‘me’ or ‘not me’? Characterizing types and antecedents of material possession attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kreiner, G. E., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kuenzel, S., & Halliday, S. V. (2008). Investigating antecedents and consequences of brand identification. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 17, 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., & Schillewaert, N. (2010a). Resistance to brand switching when a radically new brand is introduced: A social identity theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74, 128–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lam, S. K., Kraus, F., & Ahearne, M. (2010b). The diffusion of market orientation throughout the organization: a social learning theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74, 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lane, V. R., & Scott, S. G. (2007). The neural network model of organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Levinger, G. (1979). Toward the analysis of close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 510–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lichenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68, 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Luna, D., Ringberg, T., & Peracchio, L. A. (2008). One individual, two identities: frame switching among biculturals. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. MacKenzie, S. B. (2003). The dangers of poor construct conceptualization. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 323–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Jarvis, C. B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 710–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Nyffenegger, B. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: the relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing, 75, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Maxham, J. G., III, Netemeyer, R. G., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (2008). The retail value chain: linking employee perceptions to employee performance, customer evaluations, and store performance. Marketing Science, 27, 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66, 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. McCall, G. H., & Simmons, J. L. (1966). Identities and interactions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  86. Muniz, A. M., Jr., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 412–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Park, C. W., & MacInnis, D. J. (2006). What’s in and what’s out: questions on the boundaries of the attitude construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 16–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Park, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., Priester, J. R., Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 171–208). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Press, M., & Arnould, E. J. (2011). How does organizational identification form? A consumer behavior perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 650–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Reed, A., II. (2002). Social identity as a useful perspective for self-concept based consumer research. Psychology and Marketing, 19, 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: a meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Riketta, M., & Nienaber, S. (2007). Multiple identities and work motivation: the role of perceived compatibility between nested organizational units. British Journal of Management, 18, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sirgy, M. J., Johar, J. S., Samli, A. C., & Claiborne, C. B. (1991). Self-congruity versus functional congruity: predictors of consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sprott, D., Czellar, S., & Spangenberg, E. (2009). The importance of a general measure of brand engagement on market behavior: development and validation of a scale. Journal of Marketing Research, 56, 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: the relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 30, 558–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  103. Thoits, P. A. (1983). Multiple identities and psychological well-being: a reformulation and test of the social isolation hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 48, 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Thoits, P. A. (1992). Identity structures and psychological well-being: gender and marital status comparisons. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 236–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Thoits, P. A., & Virshup, L. K. (1997). Me’s and we’s: Forms and functions of social identities. In R. D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 106–133). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Park, C. W. (2005). The ties that bind: measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachment to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research, vol. 2 (pp. 22–122). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  108. Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Van Dick, R., Ulrich, J., & Tissington, P. A. (2006). Working under a black cloud: how to sustain organizational identification after a merger. British Journal of Management, 17, S69–S79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., Monden, L., & de Lima, F. (2002). Organizational identification after a merger: a social identity perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Verrochi, N., & Reed, A., II. (2009). Self-relevant brand alliances: When do consumers (not) fit. In A. L. McGill & S. Shavitt (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, vol. 36 (pp. 1057–1058). Duluth: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  112. Villarreal, R., & Peterson, R. A. (2009). The concept and marketing implications of Hispanics. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17, 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. White, K., & Argo, J. J. (2009). Social identity threat and consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2007). Are all out-groups created equal? Consumer identity and dissociative influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 525–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Wieseke, J., Ahearne, M., Lam, S. K., & van Dick, R. (2009). The role of leaders in internal marketing. Journal of Marketing, 73, 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: the role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27, 213–229.Google Scholar
  117. Zajonc, R. C., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Terry College of BusinessUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations