Skip to main content
Log in

Benign envy

  • Published:
AMS Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Envy has long been held to be a harmful emotion involving the desire to deprive others of the qualities or possessions that they possess and we covet. When the various religious injunctions against such malicious envy were conceived, the consumption landscape was vastly different. There was no branding, advertising, mass media, consumer credit, or Internet; neighbors knew neighbors; social hierarchies were relatively fixed; and discretionary income was largely unknown. This conceptual synthesis suggests that contemporary consumption is driven far more by benign envy involving a desire to “level up” through consumption emulation rather than “level down” by harming others. The concept of benign envy is developed along with an analysis of the forces leading to its displacement of malicious envy and its key role as a motivator of consumption. The paper concludes with a theoretical development of forms of envy and being envied and derives implications for theory and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, D., MacInnis, D., & Folkes, F. (2000). Social comparisons of possessions: when it feels good and when it feels bad. Advances in Consumer Research, 27, 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alicke, M. D., & Zell, E. (2008). Social comparison and envy. In R. H. Smith (Ed.), Envy: Theory and research (pp. 73–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed, Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1995). Jihad vs. McWorld: How globalism and tribalism are reshaping the world. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand Reference group influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1995a). ACR fellow’s address: awards, rewards, prizes, and punishments. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1995b). Collecting in a consumer society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1999). Leaping luxuries and transitional consumers. In R. Batra (Ed.), Marketing issues in transitional economies (pp. 39–54). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (2001). Specialty magazines and flights of fancy: feeding the desire to desire. European Advances in Consumer Research, 197–202.

  • Belk, R. W. (2008). Envy and marketing. In R. Smith (Ed.), Envy: Theory and research (pp. 211–226). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W., & Pollay, R. W. (1985). The good life in twentieth century advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 887–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W., Ger, G., & Askegaard, S. (2003). The fire of desire: a multisited inquiry into consumer passion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 326–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W., Devinney, T., & Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer ethics across cultures. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 8, 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W., Tian, K., & Paavola, H. (2010). Consuming cool: behind the unemotional mask. In R. Belk (Ed.), Research in consumer behavior, Vol 12 (pp. 183–208). Bingly: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C. J. (1994). The idea of luxury: A conceptual and historical investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettelheim, B. (1977). The uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairy tales. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. H. (1992). Beyond the Chinese face: Insights from psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorstin, D. (1973). The Americans: The democratic experience. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of taste. Richard Nice (translated by). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Buunk, A. P., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Social comparison: the end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadha, R., & Husband, P. (2006). The cult of the luxury brand: Inside Asia’s love affair with luxury. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, H. R., &Majumdar, S. (2006). Of diamonds and desires: understanding conspicuous consumption from a contemporary marketing perspective. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 11, http://www.amsreview.org/articles/chaudhuri08-2005.pdf.

  • Chua, A. (2004). World on fire: How exporting free market democracy breeds ethnic hatred and global instability. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, J. A., & Belk, R. (1990). Nouveaux riches as quintessential Americans: Case studies of consumption in an extended family. In R. Belk (Ed.), Advances in nonprofit marketing (Vol. 3, pp. 83–140). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, P. N. (2005). Let them eat cake: Marketing luxury to the masses—as well as the classes. Chicago: Dearborn Trade Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’arms, J., & Kerr, A. D. (2008). Envy in philosophical tradition. In R. H. Smith (Ed.), Envy: Theory and research (pp. 39–59). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Botton, A. (2004). Status anxiety. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tarde, G. (1962). The law of imitation. Gloucester: P. Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditmar, H. (2008). Consumer well-being: The search for the ‘good life’ and the ‘body perfect’. East Sussex: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doob, A. N., & Gross, A. E. (1968). Status of frustrator as in inhibitor of horn-honking responses. Journal of Social Psychology, 76, 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (1979). The world of goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drakuliç, S. (1991). How we survived communism and even laughed. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dundes, A. (1981). The evil eye: A casebook. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, M. (1981). Serum cortisol, testosterone and testosterone binding globulin responses to competitive fighting in human males. Aggressive Behavior, 7(3), 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englis, B. G., & Solomon, M. R. (1997). Where perception meets reality: The social construction of lifestyles. In L. R. Kahle & L. Chiagouris (Eds.), Values, lifestyles and psychographics (pp. 25–44). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. (2003). Envy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnane, A. (2008). Changing clothes in China: Fashion, history, nation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Cuddy, A. J. C. (2006). Stereotype content across cultures as a function of group status. In S. Guimond (Ed.), Social comparison and social psychology (pp. 249–263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. M. (1969). Peasant society and the image of limited good. American Anthropologist, 67, 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. M. (1972). The anatomy of envy: a study in symbolic behavior. Current Anthropology, 13, 165–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, W. S., & Philliber, W. (1978). Television viewing and the perception of affluence. The Sociological Quarterly, 19, 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraiman, S. (2002). Cool men and the second sex. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the right pond: Human behavior and the quest for status. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, T. (1997). The conquest of cool: Business culture, counterculture, and the rise of hip consumerism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. (1986). Newcomers to the world of goods: Consumption among the muriagond. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things (pp. 110–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ger, G. (1992). The positive and negative effects of marketing on socioeconomic development: the Turkish case. Journal of Consumer Policy, 15(3), 229–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ger, G., & Belk, R. (1996). Cross-cultural differences in materialism. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(February), 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ger, G., & Belk, R. (1999). Accounting for materialism in four cultures, Journal of Material Culture, 4(July), 183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: the violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 173–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorelli, N. (1980). The ‘mainstreaming’ of America: violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, R., & Papson, S. (1998). Nike culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. (1965). Enter Plato: Classical Greece and the origins of social theory. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, J., & Grimm, W. (1997). The complete illustrated fairy tales of the Brothers Grimm. Ware: Wordsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S., & Smith, T. L. (1903). Showing off and bashfulness as stages of self-consciousness. Pedagogical Seminary, 10, 159–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, M. (2006). Not just another powerless elite? When media fans become subcultural celebrities. In S. Holmes & S. Richmond (Eds.), Framing celebrity: New directions in celebrity culture (pp. 101–118). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, T. (1987). Populuxe. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, F. (1976). The social limits to growth. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. (1998). Does cultural capital structure American consumption? Journal of Consumer Research, 25(June), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D. O. (1983). Sumptuary law and social relations in Renaissance Italy. In J. Bossy (Ed.), Disputes and settlements: Law and human relations in the West (pp. 69–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, S. (2006). ’Sometimes you wanna hate celebrities’: Tabloid readers and celebrity coverage. In S. Holmes & S. Redmond (Eds.), Framing celebrity: New directions in celebrity culture (pp. 343–361). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. E., Powell, C. A. J., Johnson, N. F., & Gayannée, K. (2008). The functional neuroanatomy of envy. In R. H. Smith (Ed.), Envy: Theory and research (pp. 290–314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, L., & France, C. J. (1899). The psychology of ownership. Pedagogical Seminary, 6, 421–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBarbera, P. (1988). The nouveaux riches: Conspicuous consumption and the issue of self-fulfillment. In E. Hirschman & J. N. Sheth (Eds.), Research in consumer behavior (pp. 179–210). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, W. (1993). Land of desire: Merchants, power, and the rise of a new American culture. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, C. W. (2008). Envy, inferiority, and injustice: Three bases of anger about inequality. In R. H. Smith (Ed.), Envy: Theory and research (pp. 94–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, snob and Veblen effects in the theory of consumer demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaine, G. (1974). Social differentiation and social originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4(1), 17–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review, 37, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm, C. (2008). Culture and envy. In R. H. Smith (Ed.), Envy: Theory and research (pp. 227–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, S. (1978). The seven deadly sins: Society and evil. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, D. (1994). Serotonin and social rank among human males. In R. Masters & M. McGuire (Eds.), The neurotransmitter revolution: Serotonin, social behavior, and the law (pp. 146–158). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majors, R., & Billson, J. M. (1992). Cool pose: The dilemmas of black manhood in America. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, C. (Ed.). (1976). The evil eye. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. (1981). Conspicuous consumption: A study of exceptional consumer behavior. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. (1998). Conspicuous consumption: Theory and thought since 1700. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matt, S. J. (1998). Frocks, finery and feelings: Rural and urban women’s envy, 1890–1930. In P. Stearns & J. Lewis (Eds.), An emotional history of the United States (pp. 377–395). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matt, S. J. (2002). Children’s envy and the emergence of the modern consumer ethic, 1890–1930. Journal of Social History, 36(2), 283–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matt, S. J. (2003). Keeping up with the Joneses: envy in American consumer society, 1890–1930. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, L. (1980). Screening out the past: The birth of the motion picture industry. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A., & Lamb, T. A. (1980). Testosterone, status, and mood in human males. Hormones and Behavior, 14(3), 236–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (2005). Culture and consumption II: Markets, meaning, and brand management (pp. 53–90). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (2008). Transformations: Identity construction in contemporary culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S. (1998). Consumerism—as a way of life. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (2009). Spent, sex, evolution, and consumer behavior. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nueno, J. L., & Quelch, J. A. (1998). The mass marketing of luxury. Business Horizons, (November–December), 61–68.

  • O’Guinn, T. C., & Shrum, L. J. (1997). The role of television in the construction of consumer reality. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(March), 278–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, V. (1959). The status seekers. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palaver, W. (2005). Envy or emulation: A Christian understanding of economic passions. In W. Palaver & P. Steinmair-Pösel (Eds.), Passions in economy, politics, and the media (pp. 139–162). Vienna: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersson, B. (2004). Envy and paths to equality. Paper presented at Oxford Round Table, Lincoln College, University of Oxford, March 28–April 2, available at http://www.ifsv.ku.dk/afdelinger/almen_medicin/kvinde/publikationer/envy_and_paths_to_equality.pdf/, accessed April 26, 2010.

  • Philip, N. (1989). The cinderella story. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pountain, D., & Robins, D. (2000). Cool rules: Anatomy of an attitude. London: Reaktion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, C. A. J., Smith, R. H., & Shurtz, D. R. (2008). Schadenfreude caused by an envied person’s pain. In R. H. Smith (Ed.), Envy: Theory and research (pp. 148–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. (1991). Social comparison and the idealized images of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(June), 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. (1992). Media images, materialism, and what ought to be: The role of social comparison. In F. Rudmin & M. Richins (Eds.), Meaning, measure, and morality of materialism (pp. 202–206). Association for Consumer Research: Provo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, M. S. (2005). The symbolic servicescape: your kind is welcome here. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(4), 257–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandikci, Ö., & Ger, G. (2010). Veiling in style: how does a stigmatized practice become fashionable? Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 15–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassatelli, R. (2005). Consumer culture: History, theory and politics. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schau, H. J., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). We are what we post? self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(December), 385–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell, O. (1984). To get rich is glorious: China in the 80s. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmel, S. (2008). Envy in Jewish thought and literature. In R. H. Smith (Ed.), Envy: Theory and research (pp. 17–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeck, H. (1966). Envy: A theory of social behavior. New York: Bantam Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, M. (1984). Advertising, the uneasy persuasion: Its dubious impact on American society. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, L. J. (2001). Processing strategy moderates the cultivation effect. Human Communication Research, 27, 94–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, L. J., Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2005). Television’s cultivation of material values. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(December), 473–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1904). Fashion. International Quarterly, 10, 130–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. London: Millar, Kincaid, and Bell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1991). Envy and the sense of injustice. In P. Salovey (Ed.), The psychology of envy and jealousy (pp. 79–99). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., & Kim, S. H. (2007). Comprehending envy. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 46–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., Parrott, G., Ozer, D., & Moniz, A. (1994). Subjective injustice and inferiority as predictors of hostile and depressive feelings in envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(6), 705–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobh, R., & Belk, R. (2011). Gender privacy in Arab gulf states: implications for consumption and marketing. In: O. Sandicki & G. Rice (Eds.), Handbook of Islamic marketing. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 23–96.

  • Sobh, R., Belk, R., & Gressel, J. (2009). The scented winds of change: conflicting notions of modesty and vanity among young Qatari and Emirati women. Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 2009, 342–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, P. N. (1999). The battleground of desire: The struggle for self-control in modern America. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, L., & Maclaren, P. (2005). Exploring the shopping imaginary: the dream worlds of women’s magazines. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(4), 268–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J. (1986). Comparison processes in relative deprivation: A life-span analysis. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison (pp. 95–116). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundie, J. M., Ward, J. C., Beal, D. J., Chin, W. W., & Geiger-Oneto, S. (2009). Schadenfreude as a consumption-related emotion: feeling happiness about the downfall of another’s product. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(July), 356–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodoropoulou, V. (2007). The anti-fan and the fan: awe and envy in sport fandom. In J. Gray, C. Sandvoss, & C. L. Harrington (Eds.), Fandom: Identities in a mediated world (pp. 316–327). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2008). The material practices of glamour. Journal of Cultural Economy, 1(March), 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickle, P. A. (2004). Greed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (1998). Can we live together, equal, and different? European Journal of Social Theory, 1, 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twitchell, J. B. (2002). Living it up: Our love affair with luxury. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanov, A., & Ulanov, B. (2008). Cinderella and her sisters: The envied and the envying. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Üstüner, T., & Holt, D. B. (2010). Toward a theory of status consumption in less industrialized countries. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, N. (2009). The bright side of a deadly sin: The psychology of envy. Amsterdam: Kurt Lewin Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2009). Leveling up and leveling down: the experiences of benign and malicious envy. Emotion, 9(3), 419–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2011). The envy premium in product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 984–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (Eds.). (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake, E. J. (2008). Friend me if you facebook: generation y and performative surveillance. TDR: The Drama Review, 21–40

  • Wong, N., & Ahuvia, A. (1998). Personal taste and family face: luxury consumption in Confucian and western societies. Psychology and Marketing, 15(5), 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooten, D. B. (2006). From labelling possessions to possessing labels: ridicule and socialization among adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 188–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, B., & Murdock, G. (1996). Young pioneers: children and the making of Chinese consumerism. Cultural Studies, 10(2), 201–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizzo, D. J. (2003). Money burning and rank egalitarianism with random dictators. Economics Letters, 81, 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizzo, D. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Are people willing to pay to reduce others’ incomes? Annalesd’Economieet de Statistique, 63–64, 39–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell Belk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belk, R. Benign envy. AMS Rev 1, 117–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-011-0018-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-011-0018-x

Keywords

Navigation