Advertisement

International Journal of Early Childhood

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 101–119 | Cite as

“You Can’t be Rich Only Doing Good Deeds”: Bilingual Kindergarteners’ Discussions About Poverty and Wealth

  • So Jung Kim
  • Soyeon Park
  • Song An
Original Article

Abstract

This interdisciplinary study explores the intersection of economic equality, bilingual discussion, and early literacy instruction by examining Korean kindergarteners’ discussions about poverty and wealth during read-alouds. As part of a larger qualitative study, the current study was conducted in a kindergarten classroom at the Korean Language School, in the midwest of the United States. The study focused on Korean–English bilingual children’s read-alouds of picture books that dealt with poverty and wealth issues. The data were collected across four months through multiple sources, including audio/video recordings, open-ended interviews, children’s artifacts, and observational field notes. The findings suggest that bilingual discussions about children’s books on poverty and human equality in early-childhood classrooms are a medium to help children develop critical perspectives about poverty, wealth, and economic equality from an early age.

Keywords

Kindergarten Korean bilingual children Poverty Wealth Read-alouds Critical literacy 

Résumé

Cette étude interdisciplinaire explore l’intersection entre égalité économique, discussion bilingue et enseignement précoce de la littératie en examinant les discussions d’enfants coréens de maternelle sur la pauvreté et la richesse au cours de lectures à voix haute. Faisant partie d’une étude qualitative plus vaste, la présente étude a été réalisée dans une maternelle de la Korean Language School (KLS, école de langue coréenne), dans le Midwest des États-Unis. L’étude s’est concentrée sur la lecture à voix haute d’albums traitant de questions de pauvreté et de richesse par des enfants bilingues, anglais - coréen. Les données ont été recueillies sur une période de quatre mois au moyen de multiples sources, dont des enregistrements audio et vidéo, des interviews ouvertes, des artefacts d’enfants et des notes d’observations de terrain. Les résultats suggèrent que les discussions bilingues en classe maternelle sur des livres pour enfants sur la pauvreté et l’égalité humaine sont un moyen d’aider les enfants à développer une perspective critique sur la pauvreté, la richesse et l’égalité économique dès le jeune âge.

Resumen

Este estudio interdisciplinario examina la intersección entre la igualdad económica, el debate bilingüe y la alfabetización temprana, a través del análisis del debate sobre pobreza y riqueza durante las sesiones de lectura en voz alta en jardines de infantes coreanos. Este estudio, que forma parte de uno cualitativo más amplio, fue llevado a cabo en un aula de jardín de infantes en la Escuela de Lengua Coreana (Korean Language School - KLS) en el medio oeste de los EE.UU. El estudio se centró en niños bilingües anglo-coreanos durante sesiones de lectura en voz alta de libros con ilustraciones que abordaban temas de pobreza y riqueza. Se recopilaron datos durante cuatro meses a partir de múltiples fuentes, que incluyeron grabaciones de audio/vídeo, entrevistas abiertas, objetos infantiles, y notas de observaciones de campo. Los hallazgos sugieren que los debates bilingües referentes a libros infantiles sobre la pobreza y la igualdad entre los seres humanos en aulas de educación de la primera infancia son un medio que ayuda a los niños a desarrollar una perspectiva crítica sobre la pobreza, la riqueza e igualdad económica desde una edad temprana.

References

  1. Beach, R. (1993). A teacher’s introduction to reader-response theories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  2. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  3. Canagarajah, S. (2011). Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics Review, 2, 1–28.Google Scholar
  4. Chafel, J. A., & Neitzel, C. (2004). Young children’s ideas about poverty: Gender, race, socioeconomic status, and setting differences. In S. Reifel (Ed.), Advances in early education and day care (Vol. 13, pp. 3–37). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chafel, J. A., & Neitzel, C. (2005). Young children’s ideas about the nature, causes, justification, and alleviation of poverty. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crowley, A., & Vulliamy, C. (2002). Listen up! Children and young people talk: About poverty. Cardiff: London: Save the Children. Retrieved from https://www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/docs/wales_lu_pov_1.pdf.
  7. Dever, M. T., Sorenson, B., & Broderick, J. (2005). Using picture books as a vehicle to teach young children about social justice. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 18(1), 18–21.Google Scholar
  8. Díaz-Rico, L. T., & Weed, K. Z. (2002). The crosscultural, language, and academic development: A complete K-12 reference guide (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  9. Dyson, A. H., & Genishi, C. (2005). On the case. NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. (1996). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. Freire, P. (1982). Pedagogy of the oppressed. NY: Contimuum.Google Scholar
  12. Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. London: Routledge and Kegan Dongwon.Google Scholar
  13. Garcia, O., Flores, N., & Chu, H. (2011). Extending bilingualism in U.S. secondary education: New variations. International Multilingual Research Journal, 5, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. García, O., & Leiva, C. (2014). Theorizing and enacting translanguaging for social justice. In A. Blackledge & A. Creese (Eds.), Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy (pp. 199–216). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hammond, L., Hesterman, S., & Knaus, M. (2015). What’s in your refrigerator? Children’s views on equality, work, money and access to food. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47(3), 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic respond. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jiang, Y., Granja, M. R., & Koball, H. (2017). Basic facts about low-income children: Children under 18 years, 2015. New York: National Center for Children in Poverty, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health.Google Scholar
  19. Johnston, J. (2008). Children’s perspectives on their young lives: Report on methods for sub-studies. Peru Pilot, Young Lives Technical Note No. 10, Oxford: Young Lives.Google Scholar
  20. Kelley, J. E., & Darragh, J. J. (2011). Depictions and gaps: Portrayal of US. Poverty in realistic fiction children’s picture books. Reading Horizons, 50(4), 263–282.Google Scholar
  21. Kim, S. J. (2016). Opening up spaces for early critical literacy: Korean kindergarteners exploring diversity through multicultural books. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 39(2), 176–187.Google Scholar
  22. Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lankshear, C. (1999). Literacy studies in education: Disciplines developments in a Postdisciplinary Age. In M. Peters (Ed.), After the disciplines the emergence of cultural studies (pp. 199–228). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, G. L. (2011). Teaching traditional values through folk literature in Korea. Childhood Education, 87(6), 402–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee, R., Hyun, E., & Lee, H. (2016). The humanistic educational implications of the motif of poverty in the picture books of Korean fairy tales. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(1), 170–189.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, J. S., & Shin, S. (2008). Korean heritage language education in the United States: The current state, opportunities, and possibilities. Heritage Language Journal, 6(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
  27. Leland, C., Harste, J., & Huber, K. (2005). Out of the box: Critical literacy in a first-grade classroom. Language Arts, 82(5), 257–268.Google Scholar
  28. Louie, B. Y. (2005). Unwrapping the pojagi: Traditional values and changing times in a survey of Korean-American juvenile literature. Children’s Literature in Education, 36(2), 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martínez-Roldán, C. (2000). Bilingual children’s responses to multicultural literature on discrimination. The Dragon Lode, 18(2), 17–23.Google Scholar
  30. Mascareño, M., Deunk, M. I., Snow, C. E., & Bosker, R. J. (2017). Read-alouds in kindergarten classrooms: A moment-by-moment approach to analyzing teacher-child interactions. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(1), 136–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oh, Y. E., & Kim, Y. J. (2007). Analysis of social virtue and setting in traditional fairy tales of South and North Korea. Korean Home Management Association, 25(1), 101–112.Google Scholar
  32. Pantaleo, S. (2007). Interthinking: Young children using language to think collectively during interactive read-alouds. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(6), 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Papola-Ellis, A. (2016). “It’s just too sad!”: Teacher candidates’ emotional resistance to picture books. Reading Horizons, 55(2), 1–26.Google Scholar
  34. Quintero, E. P. (2009). Critical literacy in early childhood education: Artful story and the integrated curriculum. New York: Peter Lang Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Ramsey, P. G. (1991). Young children’s awareness and understanding of social class differences. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 152(1), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenblatt, L. (1983). Literature as exploration (4th ed.). NY: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
  37. Rosenblatt, L. (1994). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R. Ruddle, M. Ruddle, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and process of reading (pp. 1057–1092). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  38. Ryan, S., & Grieshaber, S. (2004). Research in review: It’s more than just child development: Critical theories, research, and teaching young children. Young Children, 59(6), 44–52.Google Scholar
  39. Shin, S. J. (2005). Developing in two languages: Korean children in America. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  40. Stake, R. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., Yoon, M., & Mathes, P. G. (2010). Hispanic English learners’ responses to longitudinal English instructional intervention and the effect of gender: A multilevel analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 542–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vasquez, V. (2014). Negotiating critical literacies with young children. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Vuckovic, A. (2008). Making the multicultural learning environment flourish. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. Rieber & A. Carton (Eds.). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (N. Minick, Trans.). (pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wiseman, A. (2011). Interactive read alouds: Teachers and students constructing knowledge and literacy together. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38, 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. You, B. (2011). Heritage briefs: Korean Heritage Language Schools in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/heritage/pdfs/briefs/korean-language-schools-in-the-us.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teacher Education DepartmentThe University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Child and Adolescent DevelopmentSan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations