Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Importance of Understanding Local Community Attitudes and Perceptions Regarding Nature Conservation

  • Wetlands in the Developing World
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protected Areas (PAs) are an important cornerstone of conservation efforts, which aim to stop habitat and species loss. However, conservation policies must also take into consideration the local community as an integral part of these areas. This study reveals the importance of understanding the local community’s perception of the impact of PAs on their livelihood and development. Here we analyzed the perceptions of 612 respondents living in 15 settlements surrounding two PAs in Serbia: Gornje Podunavlje and Koviljsko-Petrovaradin rit, which include important wetlands along the course of the Danube River. These areas are under protection because they contain undisturbed natural floodplains. Results from this study suggest that local residents have a very positive attitude about the benefits provided by PAs through the protection of resources. They have a very strong sense of belonging to the PA and are willing to contribute to its protection, but they feel excluded. A different approach of management that respects the rights and acknowledges the existence of local residents is required to prevent conflicts and foster mutual respect and benefit-sharing for everyone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abukari H, Mwalyosi RB (2018) Comparing conservation attitudes of park-adjacent communities: the case of Mole National Park in Ghana and Tarangire National Park in Tanzania. Tropical Conservation Science 11:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082918802757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abukari H, Mwalyosi RB (2020) Local communities’ perceptions about the impact of protected areas on livelihoods and community development. Global Ecology and Conservation 22:e00909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams W (2020) Green development: environment and sustainability in a developing world. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhya T, Banerjee S (2022) Impact of wetland development and degradation on the livelihoods of wetland-dependent communities: a case study from the lower gangetic floodplains. Wetlands 42:65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-022-01588-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancrenaz M, Dabek L, O’Neil S (2007) The costs of exclusion: recognizing a role for local communities in biodiversity conservation. PLoS Biology 5(11):e289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade GSM, Rhodes JR (2012) Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies? Ecology and Society 17(4):14. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05216-170414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayivor JS (2007) An exploration of policy implementation in protected watershed areas: case study of Digya National Park in the Volta Lake Margins in Ghana: master thesis presented to the College of Arts and Sciences, Ohio University, Athens

  • Ayivor JS, Gordon C, Ntiamoa-Baidu Y (2013) Protected area management and livelihood conflicts in Ghana: a case study of Digya National Park. Parks 19(1). https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2013.PARKS-19-1.JSA.en

  • Bacon DR, Sauer PL, Young M (1995) Composite reliability in structural equations modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement 55(3):394–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055003003

  • Bird Life International (2022) http://datazone.birdlife.org/. Accessed 22 Mar 2022

  • Buta N, Holland SM, Kaplanidou K (2014) Local communities and protected areas: the mediating role of place attachment for pro-environmental civic engagement. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 5–6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2014.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaigneau T, Brown K (2016) Challenging the win-win discourse on conservation and development: analyzing support for marine protected areas. Ecology and Society 21(1):36. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08204-210136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherono CG, Hellen I, Okelo OP (2018) Socio-economic benefits of Kingwal Wetland to the local people. Research & Reviews: Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 6(4). Available https://www.rroij.com/open-access/socieconomi-benefit-of-kingwal-wetlan-to-the-local-peop.pdf

  • Chin WW, Gopal A, Salisbury WD (1997) Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: the development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information Systems 8(4):342–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Coad L, Campbell A, Miles L, Humphries K (2008) The costs and benefits of protected areas for local livelihoods: a review of the current literature. Working Paper. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, U.K

  • Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

  • Dahlberg A, Rohde R, Sandell K (2010) National parks and environmental justice: comparing access rights and ideological legacies in three countries. Conservation and Society 8:209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dantzker ML, Hunter RD (2006) Research methods for criminology and criminal justice. Jones and Barlett Publishers, Burlington

  • Danubeparks (2020) DANUBEPARKS - network of protected areas. https://danubeparks.org/. Accessed 22 Mar 2022

  • Davenport MA, Bridges CA, Mangun JS, Carver AD, Williard KWJ, Jones EO (2010) Building local community commitment to wetlands restoration: a case study of the Cache River Wetlands in Southern Illinois, USA. Environ Manag 45:711–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9446-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers JE, Albert G, Milfont TL, Kelly B, Arnocky S (2019) Does personality mediate the relationship between sex and environmentalism? Personality and Individual Differences 147:204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.026

  • de Groot R, Stuip M, Finlayson M, Davidson N (2006) Valuing wetlands. Ramsar Technical Report No. 3 CBD Technical Series No. 27

  • De Pourcq K, Thomas E, Arts B, Vranckx A, Léon-Sicard T, Van Damme P (2015) Conflict in protected areas: who says co-management does not work? PLoS One 10(12):e0144943. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Q, Zhang B, Cai X, Morrison AM (2021) Do local residents support the development of a national park? A study from Nanling National Park based on Social Impact Assessment (SIA). Land 10:1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10101019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2006) Economic benefits of wetlands. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water

  • Filipović J, Janjušević B (2021) Traditional houses in the Gornje Podunavlje: a handbook for reconstruction - techniques and methods of construction and renovation: Cultural and historical society “Spring on Cheney farms" (Petrovaradin: Simbol), Novi Sad (in Serbian)

  • Fisher RJ, Maginnis S, Jackson WJ, Barrow E, Jeanrenaud S (2005) Poverty and conservation: landscapes, people and power. IUCN, Forest Conservation Programme, IUCN Commission on Environmental, Economic and Social Policy. Livelihoods and Landscapes Series

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1):39–50.

  • Gadd ME (2005) Conservation outside parks: attitudes of local people in Laikipia, Kenya. Environmental Conservation 32:50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanaweb (2006) Assailants of Kyabobo Park Guards would face justice-DC assures. Regional News of 2006-07-12. Hohoe, Ghana

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom R, Harris S (2008) Conservation on community lands: the importance of equitable revenue sharing. Environmental Conservation 35:242–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson, New York

  • Hamilton A, Cunningham A, Byarugaba D, Kayanja F (2000) Conservation in a region of political instability: Bwindi Impenetrable Forest, Uganda. Biological Conservation 14(6):1722–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.99452.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He S, Yang L, Min Q (2020) Community participation in nature conservation: the chinese experience and its implication to National Park Management. Sustain 12(11):4760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes G (2013) Exploring the relationship between local support and the success of protected areas. Conservation and Society 11(1):72–82. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.110940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • http://gornjepodunavlje.info/ (n.d.) Accessed 24.09.2022

  • IBM Corp. Released (2017) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. IBM Corp, Armonk

  • ICPDR (2008) International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River. https://www.icpdr.org/main/danube-basin/serbia. Accessed 22 Mar 2022

  • Infield M, Entwistle A, Anthem H, Mugisha A, Phillips K (2018) Reflections on cultural values approaches to conservation: Lessons from 20 years of implementation. Oryx 52(2):220–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317000928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instutute for Nature Conservation of Serbia (2008) Spatial plan for the area of special purpose the SNR “Koviljsko-Petrovaradinski Rit”. Protection and regulation of natural values (Zaštita i uređenje prirodnih vrednosti). Novi Sad

  • Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia (2022) https://www.zzps.rs/. Accessed 22 Mar 2022

  • IUCN (2022) https://www.iucn.org/. Accessed 22 Mar 2022

  • Jokinen M, Sarkki S, Heikkinen H (2016) The well-being effects of localized multi-level environmental governance: case of Kilpisjärvi. Nordia Geographical Publication 45:19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones N, Malesios C, Kantartzis A, Dimitrakopoulos PG (2020) The role of location and social impacts of protected areas on subjective wellbeing. Environmental Research Letters 15(11):114030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser HF (1970) A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika 35(4):401–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser HF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39(1):31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamil I, Abdullah O, Agustin H, Bakti I (2019) Role of stakeholder communication in sustainability of Indonesia’s conservation area. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): 3729. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3729?utm_source=digitalcommons.unl.edu%2Flibphilprac%2F3729&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

  • Khan MS, Bhagwat SA (2010) Protected areas: a resource or constraint for local people? Mountain Research and Development 30(1):14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovačević B et al (2000) Special nature reserve “Gornje Podunavlje”, proposal for protecting the area as natural asset of extraordinary importance. Institute for nature protection in Serbia, Department in Novi Sad, Novi Sad

    Google Scholar 

  • Kral P, Janoskova K, Lazaroiu G, Suler P (2020) Impact of selected socio-demographic characteristics on branded product preference in consumer markets. Management & Marketing Challenges of the Knowledge Society 15(4):570–586. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law on Nature Protection (2011) (“Official Gazette of RS”, No. 36/09, 88/10 and 91/10 - correction) and article 42, paragraph 1 of the Law on Government (“Official Gazette of RS”,No.55/05, 71/05 - correction, 101/07, 65/08 and 16/11)

  • Law on Nature Protection (2001) Official Gazette of RS, No. 66/91,83/92, 53/93, 67/93, 48/94 and 53/95

  • Maan JS, Chaudhry P (2019) People and protected areas: some issues from India. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 42(1):79–90. https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2019.42.0079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macharia JM, Thenya T, Ndiritu GG (2010) Management of highland wetlands in central Kenya : The importance of community education, awareness and eco-tourism in biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity 11(1–2):85–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2010.9712652

  • Macura I, Bojovic D, Petric I, Tadic M, Cosic N, Jaric I, Knezevic J, Spiric J, Jaric M (2010) Local communities and management of protected areas in Serbia. Ecological Society Endemit. Belgrade, Serbia

  • Masterson VA, Spierenburg M, Tengö M (2019) The tradeofs of win–win conservation rhetoric: exploring place meanings in community conservation on the Wild Coast, South Africa. Sustainability Science 14:639–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00696-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShane TO, Hirsch PD, Trung CT, Songorwa AN, Kinzig A, Monteferri B, Mutekanga D, Thang HV, Dammertf JL, Pulgar-Vidal M, Welch-Devine M, Brosius JP, Coppolillo P, O’Connor S (2011) Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation 144:966–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Enviroment and Spatial Planning of Republic of Serbia (2007) Protected natural resources in Serbia. Belgrade

  • Mir ZR, Noor A, Habib B (2015) Attitudes of local people toward wildlife conservation: a case study from the Kashmir Valley. Mountain Research and Development 35(4):392–400. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00030.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moges A, Beyene A, Triest L et al (2018) Imbalance of ecosystem services of wetlands and the perception of the local community towards their restoration and management in Jimma Highlands, Southwestern Ethiopia. Wetlands 38:1081–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-016-0743-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mojo D, Oduor AMO, Fu C, Bai J, Long H, Wang G, Zhang L (2020) Effects of protected areas on welfare of local households: the case of Maasai Mara National Reserve in Kenya. People and Nature 2(3):856–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortazavi R (1997) The right of public access in Sweden. Annals of Tourism Research 24:609–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosidi S(2004) Benefits beyond parks borders: the case of Madikwe Game Park, South Africa. In: Hamú D, Auchincloss E, Goldstein (eds.). Communicating Protected Areas, Commission on Education and Communication, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. IUCN

  • Nath TK, Dahalan MPB, Parish F et al (2017) Local peoples’ appreciation on and contribution to conservation of Peatland Swamp forests: experience from Peninsular Malaysia. Wetlands 37:1067–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-017-0941-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson J, Hossack L (2003) Indigenous peoples and protected areas in Africa: from principles to practice. Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark WD, Manyanza DN, Gamassa DGM, Sariko H (1994) The conflict between wildlife and local people living adjacent to protected areas in Tanzania: human density as a predictor. Biological Conservation 8(1):249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsham A, Bhagwat S (2016) Conservation and development. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory 3:248–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Obradović S(2021) Sustainable tourism development in the Bačko Podunavlje Biosphere Reserve. Doctoral dissertation, University of Novi Sad

  • Obradović S, Tešin A (2022) Hiking in the Covid-19 era: motivation and post-outbreak intentions. J Sport Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775085.2022.2048683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochieng TN, Elizabeth KN, Nigel LW (2021) Measuring the conservation attitudes of local communities towards the african elephant Loxodonta africana, a flagship species in the Mara ecosystem. PLoS One 16(6):e0253234. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okumah M, Ankomah-Hackman P, Yeboah AS (2021) Do socio-demographic groups report different attitudes towards water resource management? Evidence from a ghanaian case study. GeoJournal 86:2447–2456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10173-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panjković B et al (2010) Koviljsko-petrovaradinki rit special nature reserve proposal for protecting the area as natural asset of extraordinary importance. Institute for Nature Conservation of Vojvodina Province. (In Serbian)

  • Panjković B, Stojnić N (2011) Biodiversity and protected areas. In: Puzović S, Radovanović-Jovin H (eds) Environment in the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina. Provincial Secretariat for Urban Planning, Construction and Environmental Protection, Novi Sad

    Google Scholar 

  • Protected Planet (2022) https://www.protectedplanet.net/. Accessed 7 Mar 2022

  • Plant Life (2022) plantlifeipa.org. Accessed 22 Mar 2022

  • Polajnar K (2008) Public awareness of wetlands and their conservation. Acta Geographica Slovenica 48(1):121–146. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS48105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provincial Secretariat for Economy and Tourism (2022) http://www.spriv.vojvodina.gov.rs. Accessed 23 Mar 2022

  • Pullin AS (2015) Why is the evidence base for effectiveness of win–win interventions to benefit humans and biodiversity so poor? Environmental Evidence 4:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-015-0045-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puzović S, Panjković B, Tucakov M, Stojnić N, Sabadoš K, Stojanović T, Vig L, Marić B, Tešić O, Kiš A, Galamboš L, Pil N, Kicošev V, Stojšić V, Timotić D, Perić R, Bošnjak T, Delić J, Dobretić V, Stanišić J (2015) Management of natural heritage in Vojvodina. Provincial Secretariat for Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development and Institute for Nature Conservation of Vojvodina Province. (In Serbian)

  • Rampheri MB, Dube T (2021) Local community involvement in nature conservation under the auspices of community-based Natural Resource Management: a state of the art review. African Journal of Ecology 59(4):799–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar (2008) https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/1737. Accessed 23 Mar 2022

  • Ramsar (2012) https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/2028. Accessed 23 Mar 2022

  • Ramsar (2018) Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Scaling up wetland conservation, wise use and restoration to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals – Wetlands and SDGs. https://ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/wetlands_sdgs_e_0.pdf. Accessed 23 Mar 2022

  • Ruiz-Mallén I, Schunko C, Cobera E, Rös M, Reyes-García V (2015) Meanings, drivers, and motivations for community-based conservation in Latin America. Ecology and Society 20(3). http://www.jstor.org/stable/26270245. Accessed 23 March 2022

  • Sandell K (2005) Access, tourism and democracy: a conceptual framework and the non-establishment of a proposed National Park in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 5:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sillitoe P (2015) Indigenous peoples, national parks, and protected areas: a new paradigm linking conservation, culture, and rights. Mountain Research and Development 35(3):311–312. https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.mm162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha RK, Alavalapati JRR (2006) Linking conservation and development: an analysis of local people’s attitude towards Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Environment, Development and Sustainability 8:69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-0188-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling EJ, Betley E, Sigouin A, Gomez A, Toomey A, Cullman G, Malone C, Pekor A, Arengo F, Blair M, Filardi C, Landrigan K, Porzecanski AL (2017) Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 209:159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojanović V, Mijatov M, Obradović S (2021a) Strategy and action plan for sustainable tourism in the special nature reserve Gornje Podunavlje. Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel management, Faculty of Science, Novi Sad, PE “Vojvodinašume”, Petrovaradin.

  • Stojanović V, Milić D, Obradović S, Vanovac J, Radišić D (2021b) The role of ecotourism in community development: the case of the Zasavica Special Nature Reserve, Serbia. Acta Geographica Slovenica 61(2):171–186. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.9411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojanović V, Đorđević J, Lazić L, Stamenković I, Dragićević V (2014) The principles of sustainable development of tourism in the special nature reserve »Gornje Podunavlje« and their impact on the local communities. Acta Geographica Slovenica 54(2):391–400. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS54407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojković I, Tepavčević J, Blešić I, Ivkov M, Šimon V (2020) The influence of sociodemographic characteristics of residents on the perception of tourism development. Journal of Applied Economics 17(2):89–103. https://doi.org/10.5937/ejae17-26800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomićević J, Shannon MA, Milovanović M (2010) Socio-economic impacts on the attitudes towards conservation of natural resources: case study from Serbia. Forest Policy and Economics 12:157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2019) https://en.unesco.org/biosphere/eu-na/backo-podunavlje. Accessed 23 Mar 2022

  • van Weerd M, van Boven G, van der Ploeg J (2004) Using communication to involve local communities and local governments in protected area management: two related cases from northeast Luzon, Philippines. In: Hamú D, Auchincloss E, Goldstein (eds) Communicating protected Areas, Commission on Education and Communication. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • von Ruschkowski E (2009) Causes and potential solutions for conflicts between protected area management and local people in Germany. Conference: The George Wright Society Biennial Conference on Parks, Protected Areas, and Cultural Sites at: Portland, OregonVolume: Rethinking Protetcted Areas in a Changing World 2009, 240–244

  • Wali A, Alvira D, Tallman PS, Ravikumar A, Macedo MO (2017) A new approach to conservation: using community empowerment for sustainable well-being. Ecology and Society 22(4):6. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09598-220406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Pfister RE, Morais DB (2007) Residents’ attitudes toward tourism development: a case study of Washington, NC. In: Burns R, Robinson K, comps. Proceedings of the 2006 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium; 2006 April 9–11; Bolton Landing, NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-14. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, 411–419

  • Watts S, Faasen H (2009) Community-based conflict resolution strategies for sustainable management of the Tsitsikamma National Park, South Africa. South African Geographical Journal 91(1):25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2009.9725327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber S (2017) Connections across people, place, and time: Proceedings of the 2017 George Wright Society Conference on Parks, Protected Areas, and Cultural Sites. George Wright Society, Hancock

  • Wells MP, McShane TO (2004) Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. Ambio 33(8):513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins EJ, Sinclair W, Miller HM, Schuster RM (2019) Does proximity to wetlands matter? A landscape-level analysis of the influence of local wetlands on the public’s concern for ecosystem services and conservation involvement. Wetlands 39:1271–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1076-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Włodarska A, Gujski M, Pinkas J, Raciborski F (2021) The influence of socio-demographic characteristics on attitudes towards prophylactic vaccination in Poland. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health 34(1):121–132. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright PA, Matthews C (2015) Building a culture of conservation: Research findings and research priorities on connecting people to nature in parks. Parks 21(2). https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2014.PARKS-21-2PAW.en

  • Xu L, Xu W, Jiang C, Dai H, Sun Q, Cheng K, Lee CH, Zong C, Ma J (2022) Evaluating communities’ willingness to participate in ecosystem conservation in Southeast Tibetan Nature Reserves, China. Land 11:207. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafra-Calvo N, Geldmann J (2020) Protected areas to deliver biodiversity need management effectiveness and equity. Global Ecology and Conservation 22:e01026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žukauskas P, Vveinhardt J, Andriukaitienė R (2018) Sociodemographic indicators: Employee Attitude. In: Žukauskas P, Vveinhardt J, Andriukaitien R (eds) Management Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70635

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Edward Petri for editing the manuscript for English grammar and usage.

Funding

The research was supported by the project entitled: “Improving the environment in Vojvodina in order to adapt to climate change and reduce the risk of natural disasters” (no. 142-451-3161/2022-01) financed by the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina. The support was also provided by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Grant No. 451-03-68/2022-14/200125).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Sanja Obradović, Vladimir Stojanović and Dubravka Milić. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Sanja Obradović with contributions from Vladimir Stojanović and Dubravka Milić. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanja Obradović.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Obradović, S., Stojanović, V. & Milić, D. The Importance of Understanding Local Community Attitudes and Perceptions Regarding Nature Conservation. Wetlands 43, 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-022-01652-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-022-01652-5

Keywords

Navigation