Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Strong Population Structure and Differentiation within and among Burrowing Bog Crayfish Species of Southern Alabama Wetlands

  • Wetlands Conservation
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite their high diversity and degree of endemism in the southeastern US, little is known about population genetic structure of most crayfishes. This is because of their cryptic morphology and elusive behavior, particularly burrowing species. We compared population genetic structure of 2 burrowing crayfish species (Creaserinus burrisi and C. byersi) from bogs in Washington, Baldwin, and Mobile counties in southern Alabama, USA. Through hand excavation of burrows, we collected individuals from 7 drainage systems, with C. byersi in the southern extent and C. burrisi in the northern extent of the study area. Based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene sequences, tests of pairwise genetic structure approached the upper limit of 1.0, showed that haplotype sharing between and within drainages was nearly non-existent. Large differentiation between and low genetic diversity both between and within drainage systems occurred for both species. Genetic structuring corresponded to subtle hydrologic features such as fine-scale drainage patterns and human development (road crossings). Our data suggest that these species have recently diverged with extremely low vagility and rare dispersal events, resulting in isolated populations. Such population uniqueness from a genetic perspective pose considerable challenges to range-wide management of these and other similar species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainscough BJ, Breinholt JW, Robison HW, Crandall KA (2013) Molecular phylogenetics of the burrowing crayfish genus Fallicambarus (Decapoda: Cambaridae). Zoologica Scripta 42:306–316

  • Bateman LE (1987) A bdelloid rotifer living as an inquiline in leaves of the pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea. Hydrobiologia 147:129–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzing DH (1987) Vascular epiphytism: taxonomic participation and adaptive diversity. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 74:183–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernini G, Bellati A, Pellegrino I, Negri A, Ghia D, Fea G, Sacchi R, Nardi PA, Fasola M, Galeotti P (2016) Complexity of biogeographic pattern in the endangered crayfish Austropotamobius italicus in northern Italy: molecular insights of conservation concern. Conservation Genetics 17(1):141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickford D, Lohman D, Sodhi N, Ng P, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram K, Das I (2007) Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22:48–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Birky CW Jr (2001) The inheritance of genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts: laws, mechanisms and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 35:125–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Błedzki LA, Ellison AM (2003) Diversity of rotifers from northeastern USA bogs with new species records for North America and New England. Hydrobiologia 497:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohonak AJ (1999) Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Quarterly review of biology 74:21–45

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bovbjerg RV (1959) Density and dispersal in laboratory crayfish populations. Ecology 40:504–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogdon SM, Tabit CR, Kral LG (2003) Population structure of the Tallapoosa darter (Etheostoma tallapoosae). Southeastern Naturalist 2:487–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubb DH, Thom TJ, Lucas MC (2006) Movement, dispersal and refuge use of co-occurring introduced and native crayfish. Freshwater Biology 51:1359–1368

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhay JE (2009) “COI-like” sequences are becoming problematic in molecular systematic and DNA barcoding studies. Journal of Crustacean Biology 29:96–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhay JE, Crandall KA (2005) Subterranean phylogeography of freshwater crayfishes shows extensive gene flow and surprisingly large population sizes. Molecular Ecology 14:4259–4273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clay M, Stoeckel J, Helms B (2017) The role of abiotic and biotic cues in burrow habitat selection by juvenile crayfish. Behaviour 154:1177–1196

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement M, Posada DCKA, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9:1657–1659

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coffroth MA, Lasker HR, Diamond ME, Bruenn JA, Bermingham E (1992) DNA fingerprinting of a gorgonian coral: a method for detecting clonal structure in a vegetative species. Marine Biology 114:317–325

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly HM, Tabit CR, Kral LG (2006) Population structure of the Tallapoosa shiner (Cyprinella gibbsi) and the Tallapoosa darter (Etheostoma tallapoosae). Southeastern Naturalist 5:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Covich AP, Palmer MA, Crowl TA (1999) The role of benthic invertebrate species in freshwater ecosystems: zoobenthic species influence energy flows and nutrient cycling. BioScience 49:119–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (2006) Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature. Conservation Biology Series 14:383–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlem GA, Naczi RFC (2006) Flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) associated with north American pitcher plants (Sarraceniaceae), with descriptions of three new species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99:218–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn NJ, Mittelbach GG (2004) Effects of a native crayfish (Orconectes virilis) on the reproductive success and nesting behavior of sunfish (Lepomis spp.). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:2135–2143

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis JT, Spruce JP, Swann RA, Smoot JC, Hilbert KW (2011) An assessment of coastal land-use and land-cover change from 1974-2008 in the vicinity of Mobile Bay, Alabama. Journal of Coastal Conservation 15:139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick JF Jr (1987) Creaserinus (Creaserinus) burrisi and F. (C.) gordoni, two new burrowing crawfishes associated with pitcher plant bogs in Mississippi and Alabama. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 100:433–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkerts GW (1982) The Gulf coast pitcher plant bogs [Mississippi, Alabama]. American Scientist 70:260–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkerts GW (1991) A preliminary classification of pitcher plant habitats in the southeastern United States. The Journal of the Alabama Academy of Science 67:199–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkerts, D. (1999). Pitcher plant wetlands of the southeastern United States. Invertebrates in freshwater wetlands of North America: ecology and management, ed. D. Batzer, R radar, S Winninger pp. 247-275. New York: John Wiley and Sons

  • Folmer O, Hoeh WR, Black MB, Vrijenhoek RC (1994) Conserved primers for PCR amplification of mitochondrial DNA from different invertebrate phyla. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3:294–299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fratini S, Ragionieri L, Deli T, Harrer A, Marino I, Cannicci S, Zane L, Schubart C (2016) Unravelling population genetic structure with mitochondrial DNA in a notional panmictic coastal crab species: sample size makes the difference. BMC Evolutionary Biology 16(1):150

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fu YX (1997) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147:915–925

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Givnish TJ, Burkhardt EL, Happel RE, Weintraub JD (1984) Carnivory in the bromeliad Brocchinia reducta, with a cost/benefit model for the general restriction of carnivorous plants to sunny, moist, nutrient-poor habitats. American Naturalist 124:479–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall-Copestake WP, Tarling GA, Murphy EJ (2012) On the comparison of population-level estimates of haplotype and nucleotide diversity: a case study using the gene cox1 in animals. Heredity 109:50–56

  • Goodnight CJ (1940) Insects taken by the southern pitcher plant. Transactions of the Illinois Academy of Science 33:213

    Google Scholar 

  • Graydon, C. L. (2009). Burrowing crayfish associated with pitcher plant (Sarracenia sp.) bogs in Mobile and Baldwin counties, Alabama. Master’s thesis. Troy University, Troy, AL

  • Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano TA (1985) Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22:160–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hegner RW (1926) The protozoa of the pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea. Biological Bulletin 50:271–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms BS, Creed RP (2005) The effects of 2 coexisting crayfish on an Appalachian river community. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms B, Loughman ZJ, Brown BL, Stoeckel J (2013) Recent advances in crayfish biology, ecology, and conservation. Freshwater Science 32:1273–1275

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms BS, Vaught RC, Suciu SK, Santos SR (2015) Cryptic diversity within two endemic crayfish species of the southeastern US revealed by molecular genetics and geometric morphometrics. Hydrobiologia 755:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, H. H. (1981). The crayfishes of Georgia. Smithsonian contributions to zoology 318. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

  • Holderegger R, Di Giulio M (2010) The genetic effects of roads: a review of empirical evidence. Basic and Applied Ecology 11:522–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JM (2007) Constraints on recovery: using molecular methods to study connectivity of aquatic biota in rivers and streams. Freshwater Biology 52:616–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JM, Schmidt DJ, Finn DS (2009) Genes in streams: using DNA to understand the movement of freshwater fauna and their riverine habitat. BioScience 59:573–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JM, Huey JA, Schmidt DJ (2013) Is realised connectivity among populations of aquatic fauna predictable from potential connectivity?. Freshwater Biology 58:951–966

  • Ilhéu M, Acquistapace P, Benvenuto C, Gherardi F (2003) Shelter use of the red- swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in dry-season stream pools. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 157:535–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Isphording WC (1977) Petrology and stratigraphy of the Alabama Miocene. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transition 17:304–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C., and Figiel, C. (1995). Population estimates, microhabitat parameters, and life history characteristics of Creaserinus burrisi and Creaserinus gordoni, two crayfishes associated with pitcher plant bogs in southern Mississippi. Final report to the Mississippi natural heritage program, Jackson, MS.

  • Johnston CE, Figiel C (1997) Microhabitat parameters and life-history characteristics of Creaserinus gordoni Fitzpatrick, a crayfish associated with pitcher-plant bogs in southern Mississippi. Journal of Crustacean Biology 17:687–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones FM (1904) Pitcher-plant insects. Entomological News 15:14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneitel JM, Miller TE (2002) Resource and top-predator regulation in the pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) inquiline community. Ecology 83:680–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneitel JM, Miller TE (2003) Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. American Naturalist 162:165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson ER, Abbott CL, Usio N, Azuma N, Wood KA, Herborg LM, Olden JD (2012) The signal crayfish is not a single species: cryptic diversity and invasions in the Pacific northwest range of Pacifastacus leniusculus. Freshwater Biology 57:1823–1838

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Guo X, Cao X, Deng W, Luo W, Wang W (2012) Population genetic structure and post-establishment dispersal patterns of the red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in China. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040652

  • Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lockaby BG, Thornton FC, Jones RH, Clawson RG (1994) Ecological responses of an oligotrophic floodplain forest to harvesting. Journal of Environmental Quality 23:901–906

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama T, Fuerst PA (1985) Population bottlenecks and nonequilibrium models in population genetics. II. Number of alleles in a small population that was formed by a recent bottleneck. Genetics 111:675–689

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews LM, Adams L, Anderson E, Basile M, Gottardi E, Buckholt MA (2008) Genetic and morphological evidence for substantial hidden biodiversity in a freshwater crayfish species complex. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48:126–135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meffe GK, Vrijenhoek RC (1988) Conservation genetics in the management of desert fishes. Conservation Biology 2:157–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Momot WT (1995) Redefining the role of crayfish in aquatic ecosystems. Reviews in Fisheries Science 3:33–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore MJ, DiStefano RJ, Larson ER (2013) An assessment of life-history studies for USA and Canadian crayfishes: identifying biases and knowledge gaps to improve conservation and management. Freshwater Science 32:1276–1287

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (1994) Defining ‘evolutionarily significant units’ for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9:373–375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1989) Longleaf pine and wiregrass: keystone components of an endangered ecosystem. Natural Areas Journal 9:211–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F., LaRoe, E. T., and Scott, J. M. (1995). Endangered ecosystems of the United States: a preliminary assessment of loss and degradation (Vol. 28). Washington, DC, USA: US Department of the Interior, National Biological Service

  • Nylander, J. A. (2004). MrModeltest ver. 2. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden

  • Paetkau D (1999) Using genetics to identify intraspecific conservation units: a critique of current methods. Conservation Biology 13:1507–1509

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson EL, Martin AP (2014) Discerning invasion history in an ephemerally connected system: landscape genetics of Procambarus clarkii in ash meadows, Nevada. Biological Invasions 16:1719–1734

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JD, Gillis DJ, Hanner RH (2019) Incomplete estimates of genetic diversity within species: implications for DNA barcoding. Ecology and Evolution 9:2996–3010

  • Ponniah M, Hughes JM (2004) The evolution of Queensland spiny mountain crayfish of the genus Euastacus. I. Testing vicariance and dispersal with interspecific mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 58:1073–1085

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni CF (1992) Trophic linkage between stream centrarchids and their crayfish prey. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:1714–1721

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AMM (1983) The effect of the burrows of a crayfish on the respiration of the surrounding soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 15:239–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoden CM, Taylor CA, Peterman WE (2016) Highway to heaven? Roadsides as preferred habitat for two narrowly endemic crayfish. Freshwater Science 35:974–983

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos SR (2006) Patterns of genetic connectivity among anchialine habitats: a case study of the endemic Hawaiian shrimp Halocaridina rubra on the island of Hawaii. Molecular Ecology 15:2699–2718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnell, D. E. (2002). Carnivorous plants of the United States and Canada (no. Ed. 2). Portland, OR. Timber press

  • Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236(4803):787–792

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B., Schuster, G. A., Taylor, C. A., Wynn, E. A., and McGregor, S. W. (2011). A preliminary report on the distribution and conservation status of the Alabama crayfish fauna. Geological Survey of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL

  • Souty-Grosset C, Anastacio PM, Aquiloni L, Banha F, Choquer J, Chucholl C, Tricarico E (2016) The red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Europe: impacts on aquatic ecosystems and human well-being. Limnologica 58:78–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens JD, Santos SR, Folkerts DR (2011) Genetic differentiation, structure, and a transition zone among populations of the pitcher plant moth Exyra semicrocea: implications for conservation. PLoS One 6:e22658

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stone EL (1993) Soil burrowing and mixing by a crayfish. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57:1096–1099

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, C.C., C.R. Gilbert, S.A. Bartone, G.H. Burgess, and R.W. Yerger. (1986). Zoogeography of the freshwater fishes of the southeastern United States: Savannah River to Lake Pontchartrain. In Zoogeograph of north American freshwater fishes, C.H. Hocutt and E.O. Wiley eds. John Wiley and Sons

  • Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–595

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30:2725–2729

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CA, Hardman MH (2002) Phylogenetics of the crayfish subgenus Crockerinus, genus Orconectes (Decapoda: Cambaridae), based on cytochrome oxidase I. Journal of Crustacean Biology 22:874–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CA, Schuster GA, Cooper JE, DiStefano RJ, Eversole AG, Hamr P, Hobbs HH III, Robison HW, Skelton CE, Thoma RF (2007) A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada after 10+ years of increased awareness. Fisheries 32(8):372–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, S., Frost, C., and Doerr, P. D. (1993). Southern mixed hardwood forest: the former longleaf pine forest. Biodiversity of the southeastern United States: lowland terrestrial communities, 447-493

  • Webster MS, Marra PP, Haig SM, Bensch S, Holmes RT (2002) Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:76–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch SM, Eversole AG (2006) Comparison of two burrowing crayfish trapping methods. Southeastern Naturalist 5:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch SM, Waldron JL, Eversole AG, Simoes JC (2008) Seasonal variation and ecological effects of Camp Shelby burrowing crayfish (Creaserinus gordoni) burrows. American Midland Naturalist 159:378–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan NV, Galaska MP, Sipley BN, Weber JM, Johnson PD, Halanych KM, Helms BS (2019) Riverscape genetic variation, migration patterns, and morphological variation of the threatened round Rocksnail, Leptoxis ampla. Molecular Ecology 28:1593–1610

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitledge GW, Rabeni CF (1997) Energy sources and ecological role of crayfishes in an Ozark stream: insights from stable isotopes and gut analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:2555–2563

  • Yue GH, Li J, Bai Z, Wang CM, Feng F (2010) Genetic diversity and population structure of the invasive alien red swamp crayfish. Biological Invasions 12:2697–2706

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Eric Bauer, Sam Jeffers, Kathryn Heidt, Nick Barnwell, Stephen Sefick, Sue Colvin, and Jen Weber for field assistance and/or suggestions on earlier drafts of the manuscript. Representative crayfish specimen determinations were verified by Guenter Schuster (retired Eastern Kentucky University). The Nature Conservancy, Weeks Bay Reserve Foundation, and Alabama Forever Wild provided access to multiple sites. Last, Ken Halanych, Matt Galaska, and Damien Waits provided valuable laboratory advice.

Funding

Funding was provided by a Section 6 grant from the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mallary Clay.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clay, M., Brannock, P.M., Barbour, M. et al. Strong Population Structure and Differentiation within and among Burrowing Bog Crayfish Species of Southern Alabama Wetlands. Wetlands 40, 1595–1606 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01273-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01273-w

Keywords

Navigation