Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A Citizen Science State of the World’s Wetlands Survey

Abstract

Citizen science is increasingly recognised as a valuable approach to improve the knowledge and understanding required for robust environmental management. We report on the results of a citizen science survey conducted on the status and trends of over 500 wetlands from across the globe. Whilst many wetlands were reported as being in fair or good ecological character state, many (particularly those already in a poor state) were reported as deteriorating. Although designated Ramsar Sites were reported as currently having a slightly better state than other wetlands, widespread deterioration of Ramsar Sites as well as other wetlands was reported. Significant regional differences were reported on the state of wetlands and their extent of improvement or deterioration. Large wetlands, particularly in Africa but also in Latin America and the Caribbean, were reported to be in a worse, and increasingly deteriorating, state than smaller wetlands in North America, Europe and Oceania. Numerous drivers are contributing to degradation and loss of wetlands. However, our data suggest that positive outcomes can be delivered where local community awareness, implementation of conservation measures, cultural values/traditions, tourism and forestry are proactively integrated in order to achieve the wise use of wetlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Abbott BW, Moatar F, Gauthier O, Fovet O, Antoine V, Ragueneau O (2018) Trends and seasonality of river nutrients in agricultural catchments: 18years of weekly citizen science in France. Science of the Total Environment 624:845–858

  2. An S, Li H, Guan B, Zhou C, Wang Z, Deng Z, Zhi Y, Liu Y, Xu C, Fang S, Jiang J (2007) China’s natural wetlands: past problems, current status, and future challenges. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment 36(4):335–343

  3. Azzone G, Brophy M, Noci G, Welford R, Young W (1997) A stakeholders’ view of environmental reporting. Long Range Plann 30(5):699–709

  4. Baharoon A (2015) Commentary: meeting the sustainable development goal challenge. SDG Knowledge Hub. http://sdg.iisd.org/commentary/guest-articles/meeting-the-sustainable-development-goal-challenge/. Accessed 20 Oct 2017

  5. Ballard HL, Robinson LD, Young AN, Pauly GB, Higgins LM, Johnson RF, Tweddle JC (2017) Contributions to conservation outcomes by natural history museum-led citizen science: examining evidence and next steps. Biological Conservation 208:87–97

  6. Barut M, Raar J, Azim MI (2016) Biodiversity and local government: a reporting and accountability perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal 31(2):197–227

  7. Bauer MW, Jensen P (2011) The mobilization of scientists for public engagement. Public Understanding of Science 20(1):3–11

  8. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Levitt EA (2005) Looking to the future of ecosystem services. Ecosystems 8(2):125–132

  9. Bird TJ, Bates AE, Lefcheck JS, Hill NA, Thomson RJ, Edgar GJ, Sturat-Smith RD, Wotherspoon S, Krkosek M, Stuart-Smith JF, Pecl GT, Barrett N, Frusher S (2014) Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets. Biological Conservation 173:144–154

  10. Bonney R, Phillips TB, Ballard HL, Enck JW (2016) Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science 25(1):2–16

  11. Bowman M (2002) The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: has it made a difference? In: O. Stokke S, Thommessen Ø B (eds) Yearbook of International Co-Operation on Environment and Development 2002/2003 Earthscan, London, 61–68

  12. Buijs AE, Elands BH (2013) Does expertise matter? An in-depth understanding of people’s structure of thoughts on nature and its management implications. Biological Conservation 168:184–191

  13. Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JP, Almond RE, Baillie JE, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque JF, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch M, McRae L, Minasyan A, Hernández Morcillo M, Oldfield TE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vié JC, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164–1168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512

  14. Buytaert W, Zulkafli Z, Grainger S, Acosta L, Tilashwork CA, Bastiaensen J, De Bièvre B, Bhusal J, Clark J, Dewulf A, Foggin M, Hannah DM, Hergarten C, Isaeva A, Karpouzoglou T, Pandeya B, Paudel D, Sharma K, Steenhuis T, Tilahun S, Van Hecken G, Zhumanova M (2014) Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development. Frontiers in Earth Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2014.00026

  15. Castillo JM, Rubio-Casal AE, Luque CJ, Nieva FJ, Figueroa ME (2002) Wetland loss by erosion in Odiel marshes (SW Spain). Journal of Coastal Research 36(sp1):134–138

  16. Catlin-Groves CL (2012) The citizen science landscape: from volunteers to citizen sensors and beyond. International Journal of Zoology 2012:1–14

  17. Chandler M, See L, Copas K, Bonde AM, López BC, Danielsen F, Legind JK, Masinde S, Miller-Rushing AJ, Newman G, Rosemartin A (2017) Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation 213:280–294

  18. Collar NJ (2003) Beyond value: biodiversity and the freedom of the mind. Global Ecology and Biogeography 4:265–269

  19. Cooper C, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R (2007) Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society 12(2)

  20. Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 26:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002

  21. Couix N, Hazard L (2013) When the future of biodiversity depends on researchers’ and stakeholders’ thought-styles. Futures 53:13–21

  22. Crall AW, Newman GJ, Jarnevich CS, Stohlgren TJ, Waller DM, Graham J (2010) Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists. Biological Invasions 12(10):3419–3428

  23. Darrah SE, Shennan-Farpón Y, Loh J, Davidson NC, Finlayson CM, Gardner RC, Walpole MJ (2019) Improvements to the wetland extent trends (WET) index as a tool for monitoring natural and human-made wetlands. Ecological Indicators 99:294–298

  24. Davidson NC (2014) How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Marine and Freshwater Research 65:934–941. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF14173

  25. Davidson NC, Finlayson CM (2018) Extent, regional distribution and changes in area of different classes of wetlands. Marine and Freshwater Research 69:1525–1533. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17377

  26. Davidson NC, van Dam AA, Finlayson CM, McInnes RJ (2019a) The worth of wetlands: revised global monetary values of coastal and inland wetland ecosystem services. Marine and Freshwater Research. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF18391

  27. Davidson NC, Dinesen L, Fennessy S, Finlayson CM, Grillas P, Grobicki A, McInnes R, Murray N, Stroud DA (2019b) A review of the adequacy of reporting to the Ramsar Convention on change in ecological character. Marine and Freshwater Research. MF18328. https://www.publish.csiro.au/MF/justaccepted/MF18328. Accessed 1 June 2019

  28. Davidson NC, Dinesen L, Fennessy S, Finlayson CM, Grillas P, Grobicki A, McInnes RJ, Stroud DA (in press) Trends in the ecological character status of wetlands reported to the Ramsar Convention. Marine and Freshwater Research

  29. Dennis EB, Morgan BJT, Brereton TM, Roy DB, Fox R (2017) Using citizen science butterfly counts to predict species population trends. Conservation Biology 31:1350–1361. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12956

  30. Dickinson JL, Zuckerberg B, Bonter DN (2010) Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 41:149–172

  31. Dixon MJR, Loh J, Davidson NC, Beltrame C, Freeman R, Walpole M (2016) Tracking global change in ecosystem area: the wetland extent trends index. Biological Conservation 193:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.10.023

  32. Eden S, Donaldson A, Walker G (2006) Green groups and grey areas: scientific boundary-work, nongovernmental organisations, and environmental knowledge. Environment and Planning A. 38(6):1061–1076

  33. Farnham DJ, Gibson RA, Hsueh DY, McGillis WR, Culligan PJ, Zain N, Buchanan R (2017) Citizen science-based water quality monitoring: constructing a large database to characterize the impacts of combined sewer overflow in New York City. Science of the Total Environment 580:168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.116

  34. Franzoni C, Sauermann H (2014) Crowd science: the organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy 43(1):1–20

  35. Frost TM, Austin GE, Calbrade NA, Mellan HJ, Hall C, Hearn RD, Stroud DA, Wotton SR, Balmer DE (2017) Waterbirds in the UK 2015/16: the wetland Bird survey. British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford, UK

  36. Gardner RC, Davidson NC (2011) In: le Page B (ed) The Ramsar Convention. Wetlands Springer, Dordrecht, pp 189–203

  37. Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data (2016) Making Use of Citizen-Generated Data. http://www.data4sdgs.org/guide-making-use-of-citizen-generated-data/. Accessed 20 Oct 2018

  38. Haklay M (2013) Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: overview and typology of participation. In: Sui D, Elwood S, Goodchild M (eds) Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 105–122

  39. Herath G (2004) Incorporating community objectives in improved wetland management: the use of the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Environmental Management 70(3):263–273

  40. Horton CC, Peterson TR, Banerjee P, Peterson MJ (2016) Credibility and advocacy in conservation science. Conservation Biology. 30(1):23–32

  41. Houlahan JE, Findlay CS (2004) Effect of invasive plant species on temperate wetland plant diversity. Conservation Biology 18(4):1132–1138

  42. Jansujwicz JS, Calhoun AJ, Lilieholm RJ (2013) The Maine vernal pool mapping and assessment program: engaging municipal officials and private landowners in community-based citizen science. Environmental Management 52(6):1369–1385

  43. Johnston A, Fink D, Hochachka WM, Kelling S (2018) Estimates of observer expertise improve species distributions from citizen science data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9(1):88–97

  44. Jollymore A, Haines MJ, Satterfield T, Johnson MS (2017) Citizen science for water quality monitoring: data implications of citizen perspectives. Journal of Environmental Management 200:456–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman

  45. Junk WJ, An S, Finlayson CM, Gopal B, Květ J, Mitchell SA, Mitsch WJ, Robarts RD (2013) Current state of knowledge regarding the world’s wetlands and their future under global climate change: a synthesis. Aquatic Sciences. 75(1):151–167

  46. Karanth KK, Kramer RA, Qian SS, Christensen NL Jr (2008) Examining conservation attitudes, perspectives, and challenges in India. Biological Conservation 141(9):2357–2367

  47. Keddy PA, Fraser LH, Solomeshch AI, Junk WJ, Campbell DR, Arroyo MT, Alho CJ (2009) Wet and wonderful: the world's largest wetlands are conservation priorities. BioScience 59(1):39–51

  48. Kinchy AJ, Kleinman DL (2003) Organizing credibility: discursive and organizational orthodoxy on the borders of ecology and politics. Social Studies of Science. 33(6):869–896

  49. Kullenberg C, Kasperowski D (2016) What is citizen science?–a scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS One 11(1):e0147152

  50. Lu Y, Nakicenovic N, Visbeck M, Stevance A-S (2015) Five priorities for the UN sustainable development goals. Nature 520:432–433

  51. McInnes RJ (2014) Recognising wetland ecosystem services within urban case studies. Marine and Freshwater Research 65(7):575–588

  52. McKinley DC, Miller-Rushing AJ, Ballard HL et al (2017) Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation 208:15–28

  53. Murdie A, Urpelainen J (2015) Why pick on us? Environmental INGOs and state shaming as a strategic substitute. Political Studies. 63(2):353–372

  54. Narayanan NC, Venot JP (2009) Drivers of change in fragile environments: challenges to governance in Indian wetlands. Natural Resources Forum 33(4):320–333

  55. Oscarson DB, Calhoun AJ (2007) Developing vernal pool conservation plans at the local level using citizen-scientists. Wetlands 27(1):80–95

  56. Papayannis T, Pritchard D (eds) (2011) Culture and wetlands in the Mediterranean: an evolving story. Med-INA, Athens, Greece

  57. Pittock J, Finlayson CM, Arthington AH, Roux D, Matthews JH, Biggs H, Harrison I, Blom E, Flitcroft R, Froend R, Hermoso V (2015) Managing freshwater, river, wetland and estuarine protected areas. In: Worboys GL, Lockwood M, Kothari A, Feary S, Pulsford I (eds) Protected area governance and management. ANU Press, Canberra, pp 569–608

  58. Poliakoff E, Webb T (2007) What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Science Communication 29:242–263

  59. Ramsar Convention (1971) Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat. Final Text adopted by the International Conference on the Wetlands and Waterfowl at Ramsar, Iran, 2 February 1971. Available at http://ramsar.rgis.ch/cda/en/ramsar-documents-texts-convention-on-20708/main/ramsar/1-31-38%5E20708_4000_0__. Accessed 10 Oct 2018

  60. Ramsar Convention (2015) Resolution XII.4. The responsibilities, roles and composition of the Standing Committee and regional categorization of countries under the Ramsar Convention. http://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/cop12_res04_sc_roles_e.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2018

  61. Ramsar Convention (2018) Global wetland outlook: state of the World’s wetlands and their services to people. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland

  62. Riesch H, Potter C (2014) Citizen science as seen by scientists: methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding of Science (1):107–120

  63. Roberts AMI, Tansey C, Smithers RJ, Phillimore AB (2015) Predicting a change in the order of spring phenology in temperate forests. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12896

  64. Russi D, ten Brink P, Farmer A, Badura T, Coates D, Förster J, Kumar R, Davidson N (2013) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for water and wetlands. IEEP, London and Brussels; Ramsar secretariat, gland, Switzerland

  65. Sandbrook C, Scales IR, Vira B, Adams WM (2011) Value plurality among conservation professionals. Conservation Biology 25(2):285–294

  66. Siddiqui J (2013) Mainstreaming biodiversity accounting: potential implications for a developing economy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 26(5):779–805

  67. Sparks TH, Atkinson S, Lewthwaite K, Dhap R, Moran NJ, Tryjanowski P (2017) Can bird abundance declines be detected by citizen science programmes? A case study using common cuckoo Cuculus canorus. Avian Biology Research 4:241–245

  68. Stark M, Davidson N, Kouvelis S (2004) A qualitative assessment of the status of Mediterrranean wetlands. Report to the 6th meeting of the Mediterranean Wetlands Committee (MedWet/Com6), Tipasa, Algeria, 14 December 2004. https://medwet.org/documents/medwetcom-meetings/. Accessed 1 Oct 2018

  69. Thelen BA, Thiet RK (2008) Cultivating connection: incorporating meaningful citizen science into Cape cod National Seashore’s estuarine research and monitoring programs. Park Science 25(1):74–80

  70. Vaganay A (2016) Outcome reporting bias in government-sponsored policy evaluations: a qualitative content analysis of 13 studies. PLoS One 11(9):e0163702

  71. Van Strien AJ, van Swaay CAM, Termaat T (2013) Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species produce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models. Journal of Applied Ecology 50(6):1450–1458. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12158

  72. Wetlands International (2010). ‘State of the World’s Waterbirds 2010.’ (Wetlands International: Ede, Netherlands.)

  73. World Bank (2016) Crowdsourcing water quality data: a conceptual framework. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/25755 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO

  74. Yamamoto YT (2012) Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate. Public Understanding of Science 21(1):101–125

  75. Zhang H, Lei SL (2012) A structural model of residents’ intention to participate in ecotourism: the case of a wetland community. Tourism Management 33(4):916–925

Download references

Acknowledgements

Drafting of this paper was supported by funding from the Institute for Land, Water & Society, Charles Sturt University, Australia. Colleagues at Charles Sturt University, and Maria Grazia Bellio and Michael Mitchell in particular, are thanked for their contributions. Freya Stacey of WWT Consulting contributed invaluable support along with additional assistance from the following WWT interns and volunteers: Patricio Guerrero, Abdallah Khazene, Hongyun Wu and Luke Fletcher. We particularly thank the members of the SWS Ramsar Section for their discussions during SWS conferences that led to establishing this survey. SWS and World Wetland Network members are thanked for their assistance in disseminating the survey. All respondents are warmly thanked for their contributions, without which the authors would be devoid of any results.

Author information

Correspondence to R. J. McInnes.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 285 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McInnes, R.J., Davidson, N.C., Rostron, C.P. et al. A Citizen Science State of the World’s Wetlands Survey. Wetlands (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01267-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Citizen science
  • Global assessment
  • Ecological character
  • Wetland status and trends