Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Long-Term Assessment of Alternative Strategies for the Restoration of Floodplain Forest in the Presence of an Invasive Grass, Phalaris arundinacea

  • Wetlands Restoration
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1998, a 6.1-ha wetland restoration project along the Rock River, IL, USA was designed to test five afforestation methods on former agricultural land, including planting bareroot trees, balled-and-burlapped trees, seedlings, acorns, or allowing natural regeneration. Fifteen years later, we assessed vegetation at the site to determine the effectiveness of alternative strategies and compare treatments to an adjacent floodplain forest. We also compared the cost of treatments to determine whether long-term restoration outcomes justified initial costs. After 15 years, lower cost treatments (acorn plantings and passive restoration) were dominated by dense reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) with sparse trees, whereas higher cost treatments (bareroot and balled-and-burlapped tree plantings) had developed closed tree canopies, and tended to have greater plant species richness, tree basal area, and density of stems >7.5-cm diameter. For every additional $10,000 per ha spent on restoration, predicted richness increased by 1 species per 250-m2 plot, predicted P. arundinacea biomass decreased by 61 g m−2, and predicted tree basal area increased by 3 m2 ha−1. Although some studies have indicated that passive regeneration alone is effective for afforestation, restoration of floodplains in the presence of P. arundinacea will require a more intensive approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams CR, Galatowitsch SM (2006) Increasing the effectiveness of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) control in wet meadow restorations. Restoration Ecology 14:441–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams CR, Kauth PJ, Sorenson JW (2011) Assessing competition between reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and swamp white oak (Quercus bicolor). Ecological Restoration 29:332–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen JA (1997) Reforestation of bottomland hardwoods and the issue of woody species diversity. Restoration Ecology 5:125–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsfeld AJ, Bowman JL, Deller-Jacobs A (2010) The influence of landscape composition on the biotic community of constructed depressional wetlands. Restoration Ecology 18:370–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson MFJ, Galatowitsch S (2008) Long-term vegetation development of restored prairie pothole wetlands. Wetlands 28:883–895

    Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia LL, Keough JR, Pritchett DW (1995) Early secondary succession in a southeastern U.S. alluvial floodplain. Journal of Vegetation Science 6:769–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia LL, Pritchett DW, Minchin PR (2008) Evaluating dispersal limitation in passive bottomland forest restoration. Restoration Ecology 16:417–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman JM, Cochran C, Chapman J, Gilland K (2015) Plant community development following restoration treatments on a legacy reclaimed mine site. Ecological Engineering 83:521–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch JC, Newton AC, Alvarez Aquino C, Cantarello E, Echeverria C, Kitzberger T, Schiappacasse I, Tejedor Garavito N (2010) Cost-effectiveness of dryland forest restoration evaluated by spatial analysis of ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:21925–21930

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boers AM, Frieswyk CB, Verhoeven JTA, Zedler JB (2006) Contrasting approaches to the restoration of diverse vegetation in herbaceous wetlands. In: Bobbink R, Beltman B, Verhoeven JTA, Whigham DF (eds) Wetlands: functioning, biodiversity conservation, and restoration. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 225–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo JM, Figueroa E (2009) Restoring salt marshes using small cordgrass, Spartina maritima. Restoration Ecology 17:324–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Clewell A, McDonald T (2009) Relevance of natural recovery to ecological restoration. Ecological Restoration 27:122–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen DB (2018) Microbial community assembly and hydrologic variability as controls on potential denitrification rates in restored freshwater wetlands. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Coiffait-Gombault C, Buisson E, Dutoit T (2012) Using a two-phase sowing approach in restoration: sowing foundation species to restore, and subordinate species to evaluate restoration success. Applied Vegetation Science 15:277–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer VA, Hobbs RJ, Standish RJ (2008) What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23:104–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio CM, Chambers JC (2006) Using ecological theory to manage or restore ecosystems affected by invasive plant species. In: Falk DA, Palmer MA, Zedler JB (eds) Foundations of restoration ecology. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 260–279

    Google Scholar 

  • David MB, McIsaac GF, Schnitkey GD, Czapar GF, Mitchell CA (2014) Science assessment to support an Illinois nutrient loss reduction strategy. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, Urbana IL

  • De Steven D, Sharitz RR, Barton CD (2010) Ecological outcomes and evaluation of success in passively restored southeastern depressional wetlands. Wetlands 30:1129–1140

    Google Scholar 

  • De Steven D, Faulkner SP, Keeland BD, Baldwin MJ, McCoy JW, Hughes SC (2015) Understory vegetation as an indicator for floodplain forest restoration in the Mississippi River Alluvial Valley, U.S.a. Restoration Ecology 23:402–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey DC, Gardiner ES, Kabrick JM, Stanturf JA, Jacobs DF (2010) Innovations in afforestation of agricultural bottomlands to restore native forests in the eastern USA. Scandanavian Journal of Forest Research 25(Suppl 8):31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmer SL (2004) Soil survey of Henry County, Illinois. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, in cooperation with Illinois agricultural Experiment Station. US government printing office, Washington DC

  • Fike J, Niering WA (1999) Four decades of old field vegetation development and the role of Celastrus orbiculatus in the northeastern United States. Journal of Vegetation Science 10:483–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster RD, Wetzel PR (2005) Invading monotypic stands of Phalaris arundinacea: a test of fire, herbicide, and woody and herbaceous native plant groups. Restoration Ecology 13:318–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbutt A, Wolters M (2008) The natural regeneration of salt marsh on formerly reclaimed land. Applied Vegetation Science 11:335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Aparicio L, Zavala MA, Bonet FJ, Zamora R (2009) Are pine plantations valid tools for restoring Mediterranean forests? An assessment along abiotic and biotic gradients. Ecological Applications 19:2124–2141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green EK, Galatowitsch SM (2002) Effects of Phalaris arundinacea and nitrate-N addition on the establishment of wetland plant communities. Journal of Applied Ecology 39:134–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halle S (2007) Science, art, or application—the “karma” of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 15:358–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RJ (2004) The development of bottomland forest restoration in the lower Mississippi River Alluvial Valley. Ecological Restoration 22:170–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsen K, Hermy M, Honnay O (2013) Spatial isolation slows down directional plant functional group assembly in restored semi-natural grasslands. Journal of Applied Ecology 50:404–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs ES (1997) What is good ecological restoration? Conservation Biology 11:338–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Holl KD, Aide TM (2011) When and where to actively restore ecosystems? Forest Ecology and Management 261:1558–1563

    Google Scholar 

  • Holl KD, Howard EA, Brown TM, Chan RG, de Silva TS, Mann ET, Russell JA, Spangler WH (2014) Efficacy of exotic control strategies for restoring coastal prairie grasses. Invasive Plant Science and Management 7:590–598

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovick SM, Reinartz JA (2007) Restoring forest in wetlands dominated by reed canarygrass: the effects of pre-planting treatments on early survival of planted stock. Wetlands 27:24–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings MJ, Booth KD (1996) Studies on the feasibility of re-creating chalk grassland vegetation on ex-arable land. I. The potential roles of the seed bank and the seed rain. Journal of Applied Ecology 33:1171–1181

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannone BV III, Galatowitsch SM (2008) Altering light and soil N to limit Phalaris arundinacea reinvasion in sedge meadow restorations. Restoration Ecology 16:689–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop J, Spyreas G, Pociask GE, Benson TJ, Ward MP, Kent AD, Matthews JW (2015) Tradeoffs among ecosystem services in restored wetlands. Biological Conservation 191:341–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Jírová A, Klaudisová A, Prach K (2012) Spontaneous restoration of target vegetation in old-fields in a central European landscape: a repeated analysis after three decades. Applied Vegetation Science 15:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones HP, Jones PC, Barbier EB, Blackburn RC, Rey Benayas JM, Holl KD, McCrackin M, Meli P, Montoya D, Moreno Mateos D (2018) Restoration and repair of Earth's damaged ecosystems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 285:20172577

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamali B, Hashim R (2011) Mangrove restoration without planting. Ecological Engineering 37:387–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanowski A, Catterall CP, Wardell-Johnson GW, Proctor H, Reis T (2003) Development of forest structure on cleared rainforest land in eastern Australia under different styles of reforestation. Forest Ecology and Management 183:265–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Kercher SM, Zedler JB (2004) Multiple disturbances accelerate invasion of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in a mesocosm study. Oecologia 138:455–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KD, Ewing K, Giblin DE (2006) Controlling Phalaris arundinacea (reed canarygrass) with live willow stakes: a density-dependent response. Ecological Engineering 27:219–227

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King SL, Keeland BD (1999) Evaluation of reforestation in the lower Mississippi River Alluvial Valley. Restoration Ecology 7:348–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimkowska A, Van Diggelen R, Bakker JP, Grootjans AP (2007) Wet meadow restoration in Western Europe: a quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of several techniques. Biological Conservation 140:318–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimkowska A, Kotowski W, van Diggelen R, Grootjans AP, Dzierża P, Brzezińska K (2010) Vegetation re-development after fen meadow restoration by topsoil removal and hay transfer. Restoration Ecology 18:924–933

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski TT (2002) Physiological-ecological impacts of flooding on riparian forest ecosystems. Wetlands 22:550–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse BS, Groninger JW (2003) Vegetative characteristics of recently reforested bottomlands in the Lower Cache River Watershed, Illinois, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 11:273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzywicka AE, Pociask GE, Grimley DA, Matthews JW (2017) Hydrology and soil magnetic susceptibility as predictors of planted tree survival in a restored floodplain forest. Ecological Engineering 103:275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2006) Control strategies for the invasive reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in North American wetlands: the need for an integrated management plan. Natural Areas Journal 26:208–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyer I (2006) Dispersal, diversity and distribution patterns in pioneer vegetation: the role of river-floodplain connectivity. Journal of Vegetation Science 17:407–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindig-Cisneros R, Zedler JB (2002) Phalaris arundinacea seedling establishment: effects of canopy complexity in fen, mesocosm, and restoration experiments. Canadian Journal of Botany 80:617–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Linhares de Rezende C, Uezu A, Scarano FR, Araujo DSD (2015) Atlantic Forest spontaneous regeneration at landscape scale. Biodiversity and Conservation 24:2255–2272

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews JW (2015) Group-based modeling of ecological trajectories in restored wetlands. Ecological Applications 25:481–491

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews JW, Peralta AL, Soni A, Baldwin P, Kent AD, Endress AG (2009) Local and landscape correlates of non-native species invasion in restored wetlands. Ecography 32:1031–1039

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews JW, Pociask GE, Price EPF, Krzywicka AE (in press) Flood exposure affects long-term tree survival in compensatory mitigation wetlands. Wetlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01158-7

  • McClain CD, Holl KD, Wood DM (2011) Successional models as guides for restoration of riparian forest understory. Restoration Ecology 19:280–289

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod KW, Reed MR, Nelson EA (2001) Influence of a willow canopy on tree seedling establishment for wetland restoration. Wetlands 21:395–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton B (2000) Hydrochory, seed banks, and regeneration dynamics along the landscape boundaries of a forested wetland. Plant Ecology 146:169–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton BA (2003) Soil seed banks and the potential restoration of forested wetlands after farming. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:1025–1034

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton EL, Bever JD, Schultz PA (2010) The effect of restoration methods on the quality of the restoration and resistance to invasion by exotics. Restoration Ecology 18:181–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2007) Habitat restoration—do we know what we're doing? Restoration Ecology 15:382–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Wu X, Nairn RW, Weihe PE, Wang N, Deal R, Boucher CE (1998) Creating and restoring wetlands. BioScience 48:1019–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Moggridge HL, Gurnell AM, Mountford JO (2009) Propagule input, transport and deposition in riparian environments: the importance of connectivity for diversity. Journal of Vegetation Science 20:465–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Mateos D, Meli P, Vara-Rodríguez MI, Aronson J (2015) Ecosystem response to interventions: lessons from restored and created wetland ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology 52:1528–1537

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro NT, Fischer J, Wood J, Lindenmayer DB (2009) Revegetation in agricultural areas: the development of structural complexity and floristic diversity. Ecological Applications 19:1197–1210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell JL, Johnson LA, Beas BJ, Smith LM, McMurry ST, Haukos DA (2013) Predicting dispersal-limitation in plants: optimizing planting decisions for isolated wetland restoration in agricultural landscapes. Biological Conservation 159:343–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Öster M, Ask K, Cousins SAO, Eriksson O (2009) Dispersal and establishment limitation reduces the potential for successful restoration of semi-natural grassland communities on former arable fields. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:1266–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Peralta AL, Muscarella ME, Matthews JW (2017) Wetland management strategies lead to tradeoffs in ecological structure and function. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 5:74

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry LG, Galatowitsch SM, Rosen CJ (2004) Competitive control of invasive vegetation: a native wetland sedge suppresses Phalaris arundinacea in carbon-enriched soil. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:151–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plocher AE, Larimore R, Keene D (2001) Wetland mitigation monitoring for FAP 585 (IL 92). Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Plocher AE, Larimore R, Keene D (2003) Wetland mitigation monitoring for FAP 585 (IL 92). Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Prach K, Hobbs RJ (2008) Spontaneous succession versus technical reclamation in the restoration of disturbed sites. Restoration Ecology 16:363–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Prach K, Pyšek P (1994) Spontaneous establishment of woody plants in central European derelict sites and their potential for reclamation. Restoration Ecology 2:190–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Price EPF, Spyreas G, Matthews JW (2018) Biotic homogenization of regional wetland plant communities within short time-scales in the presence of an aggressive invader. J Ecol 106:1180–1190

  • Pywell RF, Meek WR, Webb NR, Putwain PD, Bullock JM (2011) Long-term heathland restoration on former grassland: the results of a 17-year experiment. Biological Conservation 144:1602–1609

    Google Scholar 

  • Řehounková K, Prach K (2008) Spontaneous vegetation succession in gravel-sand pits: a potential for restoration. Restoration Ecology 16:305–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid JL, Holl KD, Zahawi RA (2015) Seed dispersal limitations shift over time in tropical forest restoration. Ecological Applications 25:1072–1082

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz JA, Warne EL (1993) Development of vegetation in small created wetlands in southeastern Wisconsin. Wetlands 13:153–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke MK, Pigot AL, King JM (2008) Spontaneous succession of riparian fynbos: is unassisted recovery a viable restoration strategy? South African Journal of Botany 74:412–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey Benayas JM, Bullock JM, Newton AC (2008) Creating woodland islets to reconcile ecological restoration, conservation, and agricultural land use. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6:329–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas IM, Zedler JB (2015) An invasive exotic grass reduced sedge meadow species richness by half. Wetlands Ecology and Management 23:649–663

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rudgers JA, Holah J, Orr SP, Clay K (2007) Forest succession suppressed by an introduced plant-fungal symbiosis. Ecology 88:18–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner RH, van der Grinten M, Gover AE (2012) Planting native species to control site reinfestation by Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica). Ecological Restoration 30:192–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyreas G, Wilm BW, Plocher AE, Ketzner DM, Matthews JW, Ellis J, Heske EJ (2010) Biological consequences of invasion by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). Biological Invasions 12:1253–1267

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanturf JA, Conner WH, Gardiner ES, Schweitzer CJ, Ezell AW (2004) Recognizing and overcoming difficult site conditions for afforestation of bottomland hardwoods. Ecological Restoration 22:183–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanturf JA, Gardiner ES, Shepard JP, Schweitzer CJ, Portwood CJ, Dorris LC Jr (2009) Restoration of bottomland hardwood forests across a treatment intensity gradient. Forest Ecology and Management 257:1803–1814

    Google Scholar 

  • Streever B, Zedler J (2000) To plant or not to plant. BioScience 50:188–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft JB, Wilhelm GS, Ladd DM, Masters LA (1997) Floristic quality assessment for vegetation in Illinois, a method for assessing vegetation integrity. Erigenia 15:3–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen M, Brownell K, Groshek M, Kirsch E (2012) Control of reed canarygrass promotes wetland herb and tree seedling establishment in an upper Mississippi River floodplain forest. Wetlands 32:543–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth LA (2010) Restoration response of relict broadleaf marshes to increased water depths. Wetlands 30:263–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Tropek R, Hejda M, Kadlec T, Spitzer L (2013) Local and landscape factors affecting communities of plants and diurnal Lepidoptera in black coal spoil heaps: implications for restoration management. Ecological Engineering 57:252–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Twedt DJ (2004) Stand development on reforested bottomlands in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Plant Ecology 172:251–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Twedt DJ, Wilson RR, Henne-Kerr JL, Grosshuesch DA (2002) Avian response to bottomland reforestation: the first 10 years. Restoration Ecology 10:645–655

    Google Scholar 

  • USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers) (1987) Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Technical report Y-87-1. Environmental laboratory, US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, MS

  • Wallace KJ, Laughlin DC, Clarkson BD (2017) Exotic weeds and fluctuating microclimate can constrain native plant regeneration in urban forest restoration. Ecological Applications 27:1268–1279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren J, Christal A, Wilson F (2002) Effects of sowing and management on vegetation succession during grassland habitat restoration. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 93:393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner KJ, Zedler JB (2002) How sedge meadow soils, microtopography, and vegetation respond to sedimentation. Wetlands 22:451–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB, Agnew ADQ (1992) Positive feedback switches in plant communities. Advances in Ecological Research 23:263–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahawi RA, Reid JL, Holl KD (2014) Hidden costs of passive restoration. Restoration Ecology 22:284–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB (2009) Feedbacks that might sustain natural, invaded, and restored states in herbaceous wetlands. In: Hobbs RJ, Suding KN (eds) New models for ecosystem dynamics and restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 236–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB, Kercher S (2004) Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23:431–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB, Doherty JM, Miller NA (2012) Shifting restoration policy to address landscape change, novel ecosystems, and monitoring. Ecology and Society 17:36

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Illinois Department of Transportation provided funding for this project. George Geatz and Kyle Van den Bosch assisted with fieldwork. Dennis Skultety assisted with GPS/GIS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    Jeffrey W. Matthews

  2. Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA

    Susan McIntyre

  3. Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA

    Ariane L. Peralta

  4. District 2 Environmental Unit, Illinois Department of Transportation, Dixon, IL, 61021, USA

    Cassandra Rodgers

Authors
  1. Jeffrey W. Matthews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan McIntyre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ariane L. Peralta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cassandra Rodgers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey W. Matthews.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matthews, J.W., McIntyre, S., Peralta, A.L. et al. Long-Term Assessment of Alternative Strategies for the Restoration of Floodplain Forest in the Presence of an Invasive Grass, Phalaris arundinacea. Wetlands 40, 655–665 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01204-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01204-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation