pp 1–12 | Cite as

Fine Root Traits Are Correlated with Flooding Duration while Aboveground Traits Are Related to Grazing in an Ephemeral Wetland

  • Adam S. T. Purcell
  • William G. Lee
  • Andrew J. Tanentzap
  • Daniel C. LaughlinEmail author
General Wetland Science


Functional traits affect species ranges, but it is unclear how above and below-ground traits determine species responses to flooding and herbivory in wetland communities. We analyzed community-weighted means (CWM) of nine functional traits along a hydrological gradient inside and outside of grazing exclosures in an ephemeral wetland in New Zealand. Root traits exhibited the strongest relationships with the flooding gradient. Root aerenchyma increased linearly as flooding increased but plateaued in the ungrazed treatment. Root dry matter content and root tissue density decreased non-linearly as flooding increased. Grazing reduced the strength of the trait-flooding relationships for all traits except root tissue density, specific root length, and aboveground dry matter content. Specific leaf area decreased non-linearly and height increased linearly with flooding in the ungrazed treatment. Our results indicate that fine root traits can provide more information about the functional adaptation of plants to variation in flooding duration than aboveground traits, but traits such as height and specific leaf area responded to the exclusion of herbivores. Altered hydrological dynamics driven by changes in precipitation regimes will induce shifts in species ranges. Fine root traits, especially aerenchyma, can be used to predict how wetland species will respond to changes in soil hydrology.


Root aerenchyma Flooding gradient Grazing Root porosity Root traits 



This research was supported by funding from both the University of Waikato and Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research. We thank Kris Kramer-Walter, Toni Cornes, Brooke Shaffer, Beth Pearsall, Geoff Churchill, Tosca Mannall, and Ella Hayman for assistance in the laboratory and field. John Payne, Landcare Research, kindly provided the capacitance probe water level data.

Supplementary material

13157_2018_1084_MOESM1_ESM.docx (233 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 233 kb)


  1. Ackerly D (2004) Functional strategies of chaparral shrubs in relation to seasonal water deficit and disturbance. Ecological Monographs 74:25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araujo MB, Rahbek C (2006) How does climate change affect biodiversity? Science 313:1396–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong W, Brändle R, Jackson MB (1994) Mechanisms of flood tolerance in plants. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 43:307–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arreola J, Martinez-Sánchez JJ, Conesa E, Franco JA (2008) Effect of pre-conditioning water regimes during nursery production on seedling root system characteristics of Silene vulgaris. In: Leskovar DI (ed) Proceedings of the IVth International Symposium on Seed, Transplant and Stand Establishment of Horticultural Crops: Translating Seed and Seedling Physiology into Technology. International Society Horticultural Science, Leuven, pp 287–292Google Scholar
  5. Baastrup-Spohr L, Sand-Jensen K, Veggerby Nicolajsen S, Henrik Bruun H (2015) From soaking wet to bone dry: predicting plant community composition along a steep hydrological gradient. Journal of Vegetation Science 26:619–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belsky AJ, Carson WP, Jensen CL, Fox GA (1993) Overcompensation by plants: herbivore optimization or red herring? Evolutionary Ecology 7:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blom CWPM, Voesenek LACJ (1996) Flooding: the survival strategies of plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11:290–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blom CWPM, Voesenek LACJ, Banga M, Engelaar WMHG, Rijnders JHGM, van de Steeg HM, Visser EJW (1994) Physiological ecology of riverside species: adaptive responses of plants to submergence. Annals of Botany 74:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Briske DD (1996) Strategies of plant survival in grazed systems: a functional interpretation. In: Hodgson JG, Illius AW (eds) The ecology and management of grazing systems. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 37–67Google Scholar
  10. Caliaro M, Schmich F, Speck T, Speck O (2013) Effect of drought stress on bending stiffness in petioles of Caladium bicolor (Araceae). American Journal of Botany 100:2141–2148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng H, Wang YS, Fei J, Jiang ZY, Ye ZH (2015) Differences in root aeration, iron plaque formation and waterlogging tolerance in six mangroves along a continues tidal gradient. Ecotoxicology 24:1659–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cingolani AM, Posse G, Collantes MB (2005) Plant functional traits, herbivore selectivity and response to sheep grazing in Patagonian steppe grasslands. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cingolani AM, Cabido M, Gurvich DE, Renison D, Díaz S (2007) Filtering processes in the assembly of plant communities: are species presence and abundance driven by the same traits? Journal of Vegetation Science 18:911–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colmer TD (2003a) Aerenchyma and an inducible barrier to radial oxygen loss facilitate root aeration in upland, paddy and deep-water rice (Oryza sativa L.). Annals of Botany 91:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colmer TD (2003b) Long-distance transport of gases in plants: a perspective on internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from roots. Plant, Cell and Environment 26:17–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Comas LH, Mueller KE, Taylor LL, Midford PE, Callahan HS, Beerling DJ (2012) Evolutionary patterns and biogeochemical significance of angiosperm root traits. International Journal of Plant Sciences 173:584–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coughenour MB (1985) Graminoid responses to grazing by large herbivores: adaptations, exaptations, and interacting processes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 72:852–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Craine JM, Lee WG (2003) Covariation in leaf and root traits for native and non-native grasses along an altitudinal gradient in New Zealand. Oecologia 134:471–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deil U (2005) A review on habitats, plant traits and vegetation of ephemeral wetlands – a global perspective. Phytocoenologia 35:533–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Díaz S, Noy-Meir I, Cabido M (2001) Can grazing response of herbaceous plants be predicted from simple vegetative traits? Journal of Applied Ecology 38:497–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Díaz S, Lavorel S, McIntyre SUE, Falczuk V, Casanoves F, Milchunas DG, Skarpe C, Rusch G, Sternberg M, Noy-Meir I, Landsberg J, Zhang WEI, Clark H, Campbell BD (2007) Plant trait responses to grazing – a global synthesis. Global Change Biology 13:313–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Drew MC (1997) Oxygen deficiency and root metabolism: injury and acclimation under hypoxia and anoxia. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48:223–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eissenstat DM (1992) Costs and benefits of constructing roots of small diameter. Journal of Plant Nutrition 15:763–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eviner VT, Chapin FS (2003) Functional matrix: a conceptual framework for predicting multiple plant effects on ecosystem processes. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:455–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Front-Christensen H, Bolt-Jorgensen L, Floto F (2003) Species specificity of resistance to oxygen diffusion in thin cuticular membranes from amphibious plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 26:561–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fu H, Zhong J, Yuan G, Guo C, Ding H, Feng Q, Fu Q (2015) A functional-trait approach reveals community diversity and assembly processes responses to flood disturbance in a subtropical wetland. Ecological Restoration 30:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garssen AG, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Voesenek LACJ, Verhoeven JTA Soons MB (2015) Riparian plant community responses to increased flooding: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology 21:2881–2890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graff P, Aguiar MR, Chaneton EJ (2007) Shifts in positive and negative plant interactions along a grazing intensity gradient. Ecology 88:188–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grimoldi AA, Insausti P, Vasellati V, Striker GG (2005) Constitutive and plastic root traits and their role in differential tolerance to soil flooding among coexisting species of a lowland grassland. International Journal of Plant Sciences 166:805–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Groeneveld HW, Voesenek L (2003) Submergence induced petiole elongation in Rumex palustris is controlled by developmental stage and storage compounds. Plant and Soil 253:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Groom PK (2004) Rooting depth and plant water relations explain species distribution patterns within a sandplain landscape. Functional Plant Biology 31:423–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grubb PJ (1992) Presidential address: a positive distrust in simplicity - lessons from plant defences and from competition among plants and among animals. Journal of Ecology 80:585–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1986) Generalized additive models. Statistical Science 1:297–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. The Quarterly Review of Biology 67:283–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. HilleRisLambers J, Adler PB, Harpole WS, Levine JM, Mayfield MM (2012) Rethinking community assembly through the lens of coexistence theory. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 43:227–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Howison RA, Olff H, Steever R, Smit C (2015) Large herbivores change the direction of interactions within plant communities along a salt marsh stress gradient. Journal of Vegetation Science 26:1159–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackson MB, Armstrong W (1999) Formation of aerenchyma and the processes of plant ventilation in relation to soil flooding and submergence. Plant Biology 1:274–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jung V, Violle C, Mondy C, Hoffmann L, Muller S (2010) Intraspecific variability and trait-based community assembly. Journal of Ecology 98:1134–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaiser HF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Keddy PA (1992) Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kempel A, Razanajatovo M, Stein C, Unsicker SB, Auge H, Weisser WW, Fischer M, Prati D (2015) Herbivore preference drives plant community composition. Ecology 96:2923–2934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Laughlin DC (2014a) The intrinsic dimensionality of plant traits and its relevance to community assembly. Journal of Ecology 102:186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laughlin DC (2014b) Applying trait-based models to achieve functional targets for theory-driven ecological restoration. Ecology Letters 17:771–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the holy grail. Functional Ecology 16:545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luo WB, Xie YH (2009) Growth and morphological responses to water level and nutrient supply in three emergent macrophyte species. Hydrobiologia 624:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Merlin A, Bonis A, Damgaard CF, Mesléard F (2015) Competition is a strong driving factor in wetlands, peaking during drying out periods. PLoS One 10:e0130152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Milchunas DG, Sala OE, Lauenroth WK (1988) A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. The American Naturalist 132:87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mommer L, de Kroon H, Pierik R, Bögemann GM, Visser E (2005) A functional comparison of acclimation to shade and submergence of two terrestrial plant species. The New Phytologist 167:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mommer L, Pons TL, Wolters-Arts M, Venema JH, Visser EJ (2005b) Submergence-induced morphological, anatomical, and biochemical responses in a terrestrial species affect gas diffusion resistance and photosynthetic performance. Plant Physiology 139:497–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mommer L, Wolters-Arts M, Andersen C, Visser EJ, Pedersen O (2007) Submergence-induced leaf acclimation in terrestrial species varying in flooding tolerance. The New Phytologist 176:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moor H, Rydin H, Hylander K, Nilsson MB, Lindborg R, Norgberg J (2017) Towards a trait-based ecology of wetland vegetation. Journal of Ecology 105:1623–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. NIWA (2018) The National Climate Database. Retrieved from
  56. Oesterheld M, McNaughton SJ (1991) Interactive effect of flooding and grazing on the growth of Serengeti grasses. Oecologia 88:153–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Olmo M, Lopez-Iglesias B, Villar R (2014) Drought changes the structure and elemental composition of very fine roots in seedlings of ten woody tree species. Implications for a drier climate. Plant and Soil 384:113–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pedersen O, Rich SM, Colmer TD (2009) Surviving floods: leaf gas films improve O2 and CO2 exchange, root aeration, and growth of completely submerged rice. The Plant Journal 58:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Przywara G, Stepniewski W (1999) The influence of waterlogging at different temperatures on penetration depth and porosity of roots and on stomatal diffusive resistance of pea and maize seedlings. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 21:405–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rasband W (2013) ImageJ 1.50i. National Institutes of Health, USA. Retrieved from
  61. Reader RJ, Jalili A, Grime JP, Spencer RE, Matthews N (1993) A comparative study of plasticity in seedling rooting depth in drying soil. Journal of Ecology 81:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J, Craine JM, Oleksyn J, Westoby M, Walters MB (2003) The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164:S143–S164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rosenthal JP, Kotanen PM (1994) Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9:145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rubio G, Oesterheld M, Alvarez CR, Lavado RS (1997) Mechanisms for the increase in phosphorus uptake of waterlogged plants: soil phosphorus availability, root morphology and uptake kinetics. Oecologia 112:150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ryser P, Gill HK, Byrne CJ (2011) Constraints of root response to waterlogging in Alisma triviale. Plant and Soil 343:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Setter TL, Laureles EV (1996) The beneficial effect of reduced elongation growth on submergence tolerance of rice. Journal of Experimental Botany 47:1551–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shi FX, Song CC, Zhang XH, Mao R, Guo YD, Gao FY (2015) Plant zonation patterns reflected by the differences in plant growth, biomass partitioning and root traits along a water level gradient among four common vascular plants in freshwater marshes of the Sanjiang plain, Northeast China. Ecological Engineering 81:158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Silvertown J, Araya Y, Gowing D (2015) Hydrological niches in terrestrial plant communities: a review. Journal of Ecology 103:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Strahan RT, Laughlin DC, Bakker JD, Moore MM (2015) Long-term protection from heavy livestock grazing affects ponderosa pine understory composition and functional traits. Rangeland Ecology & Management 68:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Striker GG, Insausti P, Grimoldi AA, Ploschuk EL, Vasellati V (2005) Physiological and anatomical basis of differential tolerance to soil flooding of Lotus corniculatus L. and Lotus glaber mill. Plant and Soil 276:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Striker GG, Insausti P, Grimoldi AA (2008) Flooding effects on plants recovering from defoliation in Paspalum dilatatum and Lotus tenuis. Annals of Botany 102:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Striker GG, Manzur ME, Grimoldi AA (2011) Increasing defoliation frequency constrains regrowth of the forage legume Lotus tenuis under flooding. The role of crown reserves. Plant and Soil 343:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tanentzap AJ, Lee WG (2017) Evolutionary conservatism explains increasing relatedness of plant communities along a flooding gradient. The New Phytologist 213:634–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tanentzap AJ, Lee WG, Monks A, Ladley K, Johnson PN, Rogers GM, Comrie JM, Clarke DA, Hayman E (2014) Identifying pathways for managing multiple disturbances to limit plant invasions. Journal of Applied Ecology 51:1015–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thorne MA, Frank DA (2009) The effects of clipping and soil moisture on leaf and root morphology and root respiration in two temperate and two tropical grasses. Plant Ecology 200:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. van der Plas F, Zeinstra P, Veldhuis M, Fokkema R, Tielens E, Howison R, Olff H (2013) Responses of savanna lawn and bunch grasses to water limitation. Plant Ecology 214:1157–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. van der Valk AG (1981) Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62:688–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. van Soest PJ (1994) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  79. Vervuren PJA, Blom C, de Kroon H (2003) Extreme flooding events on the Rhine and the survival and distribution of riparian plant species. Journal of Ecology 91:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Violle C, Bonis A, Plantegenest M, Cudennec C, Damgaard C, Marion B, Le Cœur D, Bouzillé J-B (2011) Plant functional traits capture species richness variations along a flooding gradient. Oikos 120:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Visser EJW, Bögemann GM (2003) Measurement of porosity in very small samples of plant tissue. Plant and Soil 253:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Voesenek LACJ, Bailey-Serres J (2015) Flood adaptive traits and processes: an overview. The New Phytologist 206:57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Weiher EDP, Keddy PA (1995) The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos 73:323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Westoby M, Wright IJ (2006) Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:125–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexus J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas M-L, Niinemets U, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklass EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yang HJ, Li Y, Wu MY, Zhang Z, Li LH, Wan SQ (2011) Plant community responses to nitrogen addition and increased precipitation: the importance of water availability and species traits. Global Change Biology 17:2936–2944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhang XC, Shabala S, Koutoulis A, Shabala L, Johnson P, Hayes D, Nichols DS, Zhou MX (2015) Waterlogging tolerance in barley is associated with faster aerenchyma formation in adventitious roots. Plant and Soil 394:355–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam S. T. Purcell
    • 1
  • William G. Lee
    • 2
    • 3
  • Andrew J. Tanentzap
    • 4
  • Daniel C. Laughlin
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.School of ScienceUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Landcare ResearchDunedinNew Zealand
  3. 3.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  4. 4.Ecosystems and Global Change GroupUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  5. 5.Department of BotanyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations