Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial and Temporal Changes in Emergent Marsh and Associated Marsh Birds of the Lower Mobile-Tensaw River Delta in Alabama, USA

  • Wetlands and Climate Change
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sea-level rise, suppression of natural disturbances, and human development of coastal lands have influenced the capacity of tidal marshes to maintain quality habitat for wildlife, including coastal marsh birds. This study targeted the oligohaline marshes of the lower Mobile-Tensaw River Delta, Alabama, USA with the objective of assessing landcover and marsh bird distributional changes relative to two sampling periods, 2004 and 2015. We employed analysis of aerial imagery and standardized marsh bird surveys to derive information on the densities of common gallinule (Gallinula galeata), king rail (Rallus elegans), and least bittern (Ixobrychus exilis) during each sampling period. A gradient of land change was apparent where the northernmost and the southeastern portions of the study area lost land from 2006 to 2013 while the extent of emergent marsh wetland increased in the south and decreased in the north. Average densities of all three birds declined between survey periods (common gallinule 15%, king rail 50%, least bittern 38%). Changes in the distributions of these marsh birds reflected change in landform and emergent marsh habitat. This study reveals that tidal wetlands and associated communities do not change through linear processes. Rather, coastal wetlands may show distinct patterns surrounding areas of accretion, and loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aust QM, McKee SE, Seiler JR, Strahm BD, Schilling EB (2012) Long-term sediment accretion in bottomland hardwoods following timber harvest disturbances in the Mobile-Tensaw River Delta, Alabama, USA. Wetlands 32:871–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST (2006) Point-transect surveys for songbirds: robust methodologies. Auk 123:345–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2004) Advanced distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2010) Model selection and multimodel inference. In: A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes MR, Berlinghoff JL, Griffee SG (2012) Final report. Sediment dynamics in Mobile Bay, Alabama: development of an operational sediment budget. Applied Coastal Research and Engineering Inc., Mashpee, MA. Prepared for Mobile Bay National Estuary Program. Accessed on-line http://www.mobilebaynep.com/images/uploads/library/mobile_bay_sediment_budget_final_report_plus_appendices_032013.pdf, Mar 3, 2016

  • Chandler RB, Royle JA, King DI (2011) Inference about density and temporary emigration in unmarked populations. Ecology 92:1429–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy MJ, Cooper RJ, Rush SA, Stodola KW, Nuse BL, Woodrey MS (2010) Effective use of data from marshbird monitoring programs for conservation decision-making. Waterbirds 33:397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway CJ (2009) Standardized north American marsh bird monitoring protocols. United States Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

  • Cook M, Tew BH (2007) Analysis of sediment loading rates and impacts of land sue change on D’Olive and Tiawasee Creek watersheds in Baldwin County. Open file report 0710, geological survey of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL. Accessed on-line at: http://www.mobilebaynep.com/images/uploads/library/DOlive-and-Tiawasee-Creeks-Sedimentation-Final-Report.pdf, March 4, 2016

  • Correll MD, Wiest WA, Olsen BJ, Shriver WG, Elphick CS, Hodgman TP (2016) Habitat specialization explains avian persistence in tidal marshes. Ecosphere 7:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll MD, Wiest WA, Hodgman TP, Shriver WG, Elphick CS, McGill BJ, O’Brien KM, Olsen BJ (2017) Predictors of specialist avifaunal decline in coastal marshes. Conservation Biology 31:172–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day JW, Christian RR, Boesch DM, Yáñez-Arancibia A, Morris J (2008) Consequences of climate change on the ecogeomorphology of coastal wetlands. Estuaries and Coasts 31:477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearn M, Haywick D, Sanders J (2004) Changes in water conditions and sedimentation rates associated with construction of the Mobile Bay Causeway. Alabama Center for Estuarine Studies, Mobile, AL. Accessed on-line at: https://www.southalabama.edu/geography/fearn/Causeway.htm, March 4, 2016

  • Fiske I, Chandler R (2011) Unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software 43:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes MG, Dunton KH (2006) Response of a subtropical estuarine marsh to local climate change in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico. Estuaries and Coasts 29:1242–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan JA, Wong MA (1979) A K-means clustering algorithm. Applied Statistics 28:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig C (2014) Fpc: flexible procedures for clustering. R package version 2.1–9. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fpc

  • Hunter EA, Nibbelink NP, Alexander CR, Barrett K, Mengak LF, Guy RK, Moore CT, Cooper RJ (2015) Coastal vertebrate exposure to predicted habitat changes due to sea level rise. Environmental Management 56:1528–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isphording WC, Imsand FD, Jackson RB (1996) Fluvial sediment characteristics of the Mobile River Delta. Transactions. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies 39:387–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH, Gibbs JP, Herzog M, Lor S, Niemuth ND, Ribic CA, Seamans M, Shaffer TL, Shriver WG, Stehman SV, Thomspon WL (2009) A sampling design framework for monitoring secretive marshbirds. Waterbirds 32:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1990) Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan ML, Megonigal JP (2013) Tidal wetland stability in the face of human impacts and sea-level rise. Nature 504:53–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DL, Royle JA (2005) Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:1105–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelssohn IA, Andersen GL, Baltz DM, Caffey RH, Carman KR, Fleeger JW, Joye SB, Lin Q, Maltby E, Overton EB, Rozas LP (2012) Oil impacts on coastal wetlands: implications for the Mississippi River Delta ecosystem after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. BioScience 62:562–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson LA, Viola DV, Brown RN (2010) Hybridization of invasive Phragmites australis with a native subspecies in North America. Biological Invasions 12:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murgulet D, Tick GR (2009) Assessing the extent and sources of nitrate contamination in the aquifer system of southern Baldwin County, Alabama. Environmental Geology 58:1051–1065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pickens BA, King SL (2014) Multiscale habitat selection of wetland birds in the northern Gulf Coast. Estuaries and Coasts 37:1301–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Robichaud CD, Rooney RC (2017) Long-term effects of a Phragmites australis invasion on birds in Lake Erie coastal marsh. Journal of Great Lakes Research 43:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rush SA, Soehren EC, Woodrey MS, Graydon CL, Cooper RJ (2009) Occupancy of select marsh birds within northern Gulf of Mexico tidal marsh: current estimates and projected change. Wetlands 29:798–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan JJ, Goodell HG (1972) Marine geology and estuarine history of Mobile Bay, Alabama part 1. Contemporary sediments. Geological Society of America Memoirs 133:517–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seffen M, Estes M, Mohammad AH (2010) Using remote sensing data to evaluate habitat loss in the mobile, Galveston, and Tampa Bay watersheds. Coastal Education and Research Foundation. Accessed on-line at http://weather.msfc.nasa.gov/applied_science/Wetland_Paper_Final.pdf, March 3, 2016

  • Smith CG, Osterman LE (2014) An evaluation of temporal changes in sediment accumulation and impacts on carbon burial in Mobile Bay, Alabama, USA. Estuaries and Coasts 37:1092–1106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CG, Osterman LE, Poore RZ (2013) An examination of historical inorganic sedimentation and organic matter accumulation in several marsh types within the Mobile Bay and Mobile-Tensaw River Delta region. Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue 63:68–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Soehren EC, Tucker JW, Crow DG (2009) Effectiveness of call-broadcast surveys for breeding marsh birds along coastal Alabama. Southeastern Naturalist 8:277–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser JM, Sasser CE, Linscombe RG, Chabreck RH (2000) Marsh vegetation of the Chenier plain, Louisiana, USA. Estuaries 23:318–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodrey MS, Rush SA, Cherry JA, Nuse BL, Cooper RJ, Lehmicke AJ (2012) Understanding the potential impacts of global climate change on marsh birds in the Gulf of Mexico region. Wetlands 32:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior through the Coastal Impact Assistance Program (CIAP). The CIAP is funded by qualified outer continental shelf oil and gas revenues. We are most grateful to Jeremiah Kolb of the State Lands Division Coastal Section for CIAP administrative assistance for managing this project. Monika Lapinski was instrumental in performing marsh bird surveys in 2015, while Aung Chan assisted in digitizing some of the study sites. Zac Loman provided analytical expertise towards working with the marsh bird data. The authors also thank Dr. Qingmin Meng (MSU-Geosciences Dept.) for advice on how to obtain imagery and for help outlying the methodology. Thanks to Howard Horne for volunteering with field reconnaissance and for assistance with identifying in situ vegetation types.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott A. Rush.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rush, S.A., Rodgers, J., Soehren, E.C. et al. Spatial and Temporal Changes in Emergent Marsh and Associated Marsh Birds of the Lower Mobile-Tensaw River Delta in Alabama, USA. Wetlands 39, 1189–1201 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1082-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1082-x

Keywords

Navigation