Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Daily Water Table Depth Computing Model for Poorly Drained Soils

  • Applied Wetland Science
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to present a relatively simplified model to predict daily water table (WT) by solving ordinary differential equation dWT (t)/dt = F (α1, α2, α3, WT0(t), RF (t), PET (t)), with α1, α2, α3, WT0 as parameters, and RF (rainfall) and PET (potential evapotranspiration), respectively, as inputs. The model was calibrated and validated with WT on four poorly to moderately drained soils (Lenoir, Rains, Lynchburg, and Goldsboro) on a forested wetland. Calibration results were in good agreement with the measured WT for all soils, except the Goldsboro with deeper WT. r2 (coefficient of determination) and NSE (Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency) statistics both ranged from 0.81 for the Lenoir to 0.89 and 0.87, respectively, for the Lynchburg. Average absolute daily deviation (AADD) varied from 10.8 cm for Lenoir to 16.7 cm for Rains. The performance was somewhat poorer, during relatively dry periods with deeper WT, yielding r2 and NSE as low as 0.55 and 0.29, respectively, for Lenoir, and large AADD for Lynchburg. Discrepancies were associated with WT overprediction for deeper depths. The new model is capable of describing the WT for poorly drained high water table soils, with a potential for assessing effects of land management, wetland hydrology, and climate changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amatya DM and Harrison CA (2016) Comparison of potential evapotranspiration (PET) using five methods for a grass reference and a natural Forest in coastal plain of South Carolina. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2016, 21(5): 05016007: 1-13

  • Amatya DM, Jha MK (2011) Evaluating SWAT model for a low gradient forested watershed in coastal South Carolina. Transactions of the ASABE 54(6):2151–2163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amatya, Skaggs (2001) Hydrologic modeling of pine plantations on poorly drained soils. Forest Science 47(1):103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Amatya DM, Skaggs RW (2011) Long-term hydrology and water quality of a drained pine plantation in North Carolina, U.S.A. Transactions of the ASABE 54(6):2087–2098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amatya DM and Trettin CC (2007) Development of watershed hydrologic studies at Santee Experimental Forest, South Carolina. In: Furniss, M.; Clifton, C.; Ronnenberg, K. Eds. Proceedings of the Forest Service National Earth Sciences Conference. PNW-GTR-689, Vol. I, Portland, OR: USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, p:180-190

  • Amatya DM, Skaggs RW, Gregory JD (1996) Effects of controlled drainage on the hydrology of a drained pine plantation in the North Carolina Coastal Plains. Journal of Hydrology 181(1996):211–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amatya DM, Miwa M, Harrison CA, Trettin CC, and Sun G (2006) Hydrology and water quality of two first order watersheds in coastal South Carolina. Paper # 062182, American Society of Agricultural Engineers. St. Joseph, MI

  • Amatya DM, Callahan TJ, Trettin CC, and Radecki-Pawlik A (2009) Hydrologic and water quality monitoring on Turkey Creek watershed, Francis Marion National Forest, SC. Paper # 09-5999, American Society of Agricultural Engineers St. Joseph, MI

  • Amatya DM, Trettin CC, Panda S, Ssegane H (2013) Application of LiDAR data for hydrologic assessments of low-gradient coastal watershed drainage characteristics. Journal of Geographic Information System 2013(5):171–195. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2013.52017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amatya DM, Callahan TJ, Hansen WF, Trettin CC, Radecki-Pawlik A, Meire P (2015) Turkey Creek – a case study of Ecohydrology and integrated watershed management in the low-gradient Atlantic coastal plain, U.S.A. Journal of Water Resource and Protection 2015(7):792–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard CE, McIntyre HS, Wheater HS, Holden J, Wallage ZE (2011) Hydrological modelling of drained blanket peatland. Journal of Hydrology 407:81–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt TP, Pinay G, Matheson FE, Haycock NE, Butturini A, Clement JC, Danielescu S, Dowrick DJ, Hefting MM, Hillbricht-Ilkowska A, Maitre V (2002) Water table fluctuations in the riparian zone: comparative results from a pan-European experiment. Journal of Hydrology 265:129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan TJ, Vulava VM, Passarello MC, Garrett CG (2012) Estimating groundwater recharge in lowland watershed. Hydrological Processes. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8356

  • Callahan TJ, Amatya DM, Stone P (2017) Coastal forests and groundwater: using case studies to understand the effects of drivers and stressors for resource management. Sustainability 2017(9):447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chescheir GM, Amatya DM, Skaggs RW (1994) Modeling the hydrology of natural forested wetlands. Paper no. 942597, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan

  • Cooper DJ, Sanderson JS, Stannard DI, Groeneveld DP (2006) Effects of long-term water table drawdown on evapotranspiration and vegetation in an arid region phreatophyte community. Journal of Hydrology 325:21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Li C, Trettin CC, Sun G, Amatya DM, Li H (2010a) Bi-criteria evaluation of the MIKE SHE model for a forested watershed on the South Carolina coastal plain. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 14:1033–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Amatya DM, Sun G, Trettin CC, Li C, and Li H (2010b) A comparison of MIKESHE and DRAINMOD for modeling Forested Wetland hydrology in coastal South Carolina, U.S.a., proceedings, 9th international drainage symposium at the XVIIth world congress of the CIGR, Quebec, Canada, June 12-14, 2010

  • Dai Z, Amatya DM, Sun G, Trettin CC, Li C, Li H (2011) Climate variability and its impact on forest hydrology on South Carolina coastal plain of USA. Atmosphere 2011(2):330–357. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos2030330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Trettin CC and Amatya DM (2013) Effects of climate variability on Forest hydrology and carbon sequestration on the Santee experimental Forest in Coastal South Carolina. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-172, 32p

  • DHI, (2005) MIKE SHE Technical Reference. Version 2005. DHI water and environment. Danish Hydraulic Institute, Denmark (2005)

  • Diggs JA (2004) Simulation of nitrogen and hydrology loading of forested fields in Eastern North Carolina using DRAINMOD-N 11. M.S. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 155 p

  • Hammer DE, Cadlec RH (1986) A model for wetland surface dynamics. Water Resources Research 22(13):1951–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He X, Verpraskas MJ, Skaggs RW, Lindbo DL (2002) Adapting a drainage model to simulate water table levels in coastal plain soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:1722–1731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Healy RW, Cook PG (2002) Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeology Journal 10:91–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hook DD, Buford MA, and Williams TM (1991) Impact of hurricane Hugo on the South Carolina coastal plain Forest. Journal of Coastal Research (special issue no. 8) pp. 291-300

  • Kim HW, Amatya DM, Broome S, Hesterberg D, and Choi M (2012) Sensitivity analysis of the DRAINWAT model applied to an agricultural watershed in the lower coastal plain, North Carolina, USA. 2012. Water and Environment Journal, 26(1):130-145. March 2012

  • La Torre Torres I (2008) Seasonal relationships between precipitation and streamflow patterns related to watershed characteristics of two third-order coastal plain watersheds in South Carolina. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, 206 p

  • La Torre TI, Amatya DM, Callahan TJ, Sun G (2011) Seasonal rainfall-runoff relationships in a lowland forested watershed in the Southeastern U.S.A. Hydrological Processes 25:2032–2045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Kumar M (2016) Role of meteorological controls on interannual variations in wet-period characteristics of wetlands. Water Resour Res 52(7):5056–5074

  • Liu S, Graham WD, Jacobs JM (2005) Daily potential evapotranspiration and diurnal climate forcings: influence on the numerical modelling of soil water dynamics and evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology 309:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu JG, Sun S, McNulty G, and Comerford NB (2009) Sensitivity of Pine Flatwoods Hydrology to Climate Change and Forest Management in Florida, U.S.A. Wetlands, Vol. 29, No. 3, September 2009, pp. 826–836

  • Maltby E, Acreman MC (2011) Ecosystem service of wetlands: pathfinder for a new paradigm. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56(8):1341–1359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.631014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansell RS, Bloom SA, Sun G (2000) A model for wetland hydrology: description and validation. Soil Science 165:384–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marion DA, Sun G, Caldwell PV, Ford CR, Ouyang Y, Amatya DM, Clinton BD, Conrads PA, S. Gull-Laird, Dai Z, Clingenpeel JA, Liu Y, Roehl EA Jr, Moore Meyers JA, and Trettin C (2013) Chapter 9: Managing Forest Water Quantity and Quality Under Climate Change. In Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Management Options: A Guide for Natural Resource Managers in Southern Forest Ecosystems, Eds. Vose, J. and K. Kleipzig, November 7, 2013 by CRC Press, 496 Pages

  • Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and environment. Symposium of Society for Experimental Biologists 19:205–234

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison AE (2016) Storm event analysis at varying watershed scales: Turkey Creek, Santee experimental Forest, South Carolina. M.S. thesis, environmental studies program, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC. 315 p, June 2016

  • Pappenberger F, Beven KJ, Ratto M, Matgen P (2008) Multi-method global sensitivity analysis of flood inundation models. Advance sin Water Resources 31(2008):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu Y, Duffy CJ (2007) A semidiscrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation. Water Resources Research 43:W08419. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riekerk H (1986) Hydrologic effects of Flatwoods silviculture. In Phillips, D.R. Proceedings of the fourth biennial Southern Silvicultural research conference. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Research Station, general technical report SE-42. Pp.321-326

  • SCS (1980) Soil survey of Berkeley County, South Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 94 p

  • Sieber A, Uhlenbrook S (2005) Sensitivity analyses of a distributed catchment model to verify the model structure. Journal of Hydrology 310:216–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs RW (1978) A water management model for shallow water table soils. Water resources research Institute of the University of North Carolina report no. 134, NC State University, Raleigh, NC

  • Skaggs R, Gilliam J, and Evans R (1991) A computer simulation study of Pocosin hydrology, Wetlands, 11(special issue), 399–416, 1991

  • Skaggs RW, Amatya DM, Evans RO, Parsons JE (1994) Characterization and evaluation of proposed hydrologic criteria for wetlands. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49(5):354–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs RW, Chescheir GM, Fernandez GP, Amatya DM, Diggs J (2011a) Effects of land use on soil properties and hydrology of drained coastal plain watersheds. Transactions of the ASABE 54(4):1357–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs RW, Phillips B, Chescheir GM, Trettin CC (2011b) Effect of minor drainage on hydrology of forested wetlands. Transactions of the ASABE 54(6):2139–2149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs RW, Youssef MA, Chescheir GM (2012) DRAINMOD: Model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE 55(4):1509–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Riekerk H, Comerford NB (1998) Modeling the forest hydrology of wetland-upland ecosystems in Florida. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(4):827–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, McNulty SG, Amatya DM, Skaggs RW, Swift LW, Shepard JP, Riekerk H (2002) A comparison of the hydrology of the coastal forested wetlands/pine Flatwoods and the mountainous uplands in the southern US. Journal of Hydrology 263:92–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taormina R, Chau KW, Sethi R (2012) Artificial neural network simulation of hourly groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer system of the Venice lagoon. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 25(8):1670–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian S, Youssef MA, Skaggs RW, Amatya DM, Chescheir GM (2012) DRAINMOD-FOREST: integrated modeling of hydrology, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, and plant growth for drained forests. J Environ Qual 41(3):764

  • Trousdell KB, Hoover MD (1955) A change in ground water level after clearcutting on loblolly pine in the coastal plain. Journal of Forestry 53:493–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams TM (1978) Response of shallow water tables to rainfall. P 363–370 In Balmer, W.E. Proceedings: Soil Moisture-Site productivity symposium USDA Forest Service Southeastern Area State and Private Forestry

  • Williams TM and Amatya DM (2016) Coastal plain soils and geomorphology: a key to understanding Forest hydrology. In: Headwaters to estuaries: advances in watershed science and management (pp 14-21), Proc. of the 5th interagency conference on research in the watersheds. Editors: Stringer, Christina E.; Krauss, Ken W.; Latimer, James S, e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-211. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station

  • Williams TM, Krauss KW, Okruszko T (2016) Hydrology of flooded and wetland forests. In: Amatya DM, Williams TM, Bren L, de Jong C (eds) Chapter 7, Forest hydrology- processes, management and assessment. CABI Publishers, UK, pp 103–123

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yapo PO, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S (1996) Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data. Journal of Hydrology 181:23–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young CE Jr and Klaiwitter RA (1968) Hydrology of wetland forest watersheds. Proceedings of CUCOH hydrology conference. Clemson University, March 28-29, 1968: 29-38

  • Zampella RA, Dow CL, Bunnell JF (2001) Using reference sites and simple linear regression to estimate long-term water level in coastal plain forests. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37(5):1189–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YK, Schilling KE (2006) Effects of land cover on water table, soil moisture, and evapotranspiration on groundwater recharge: a field observation and analysis. Journal of Hydrology 319:328–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Sun G, Li W, Zhang Y, Miao G, Noormets A, McNulty SG, King JS, Kumar M, Wang X (2017) Modeling the potential impacts of climate change on the water table level of selected forested wetlands in the southeastern United States. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 21:6289–6305. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6289-2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is a result of a cooperation, with scientists from Agricultural University of Krakow (AUK) and Polish Academy of Sciences in Warsaw, both in Poland, initiated while the first author was in AUK on a sabbatical supported by US-Poland Fulbright Fellowship in 2010-11. We greatly appreciate the support of Dennis Law, retired former Soil Scientist and Bill Hansen, retired former Hydrologist at USDA Forest Service Francis Marion & Sumter National Forests, SC, Tripp Gaskins, Silviculturist at Francis Marion National Forest District Ranger Office, Andy Harrison, Hydrologic Technician at USDA Forest Service, Center for Forested Wetlands Research, Bray Beltran, former College of Charleston, SC graduate student, and Artheera Bales, Research Assistant at College of Charleston, SC for various levels of support during this study. We also would like to sincerely thank reviewers Dr. Timothy Callahan, College of Charleston, SC and Dr. Ge Sun, USDA Forest Service, Raleigh, NC for their feedbacks in the manuscript as well as anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions and comments on the manuscript that only helped to improve its quality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Devendra M. Amatya.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 47 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amatya, D.M., Fialkowski, M. & Bitner, A. A Daily Water Table Depth Computing Model for Poorly Drained Soils. Wetlands 39, 39–54 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1069-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1069-7

Keywords

Navigation