Advertisement

Wetlands

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 1183–1188 | Cite as

Standing Dead Trees: a Conduit for the Atmospheric Flux of Greenhouse Gases from Wetlands?

  • Mary Jane CarmichaelEmail author
  • William K. Smith
Short Communication

Abstract

Wetlands represent the largest natural source of methane flux to the atmosphere, which can occur across the sediment/water/plant-atmosphere interface. Of these three potential methane sources, the role of vegetation in this flux is the least well understood. Both living and dead herbaceous vegetation have been demonstrated to act as methane sources, while knowledge regarding the contribution of woody vegetation to this flux is restricted to live plants. For dead woody vegetation to act as a methane source, two conditions must occur: (1) gas evolution/accumulation within the trunk airspace of a dead tree (e.g. snag) and (2) flux of this gas across the plant-atmosphere interface. The research presented here investigates condition (1) and provides evidence for a significant accumulation of both CH4 and CO2 in trunk airspace at water level (104.4 ± 19.0 and 1785.5 ± 470.7 μL L−1 for CH4 and CO2 respectively) and CO2 at breast height (1257.6 ± 294.4 μL L−1) as compared to ambient air immediately outside the trunk (ca. 3 and 370 μL L−1 for CH4 and CO2 respectively) in dead snags located within two ghost forest landscapes at the Timberlake Observatory for Wetland Restoration (Tyrrell County, North Carolina). A more finely resolved understanding of this potential pathway for methane flux to the atmosphere is important given the predicted increase in dead carbon stocks within coastal wetland ecosystems, as global climate change can lead to the conversion of these ecosystems into ghost forest landscapes.

Keywords

Dead vegetation Wetlands Carbon cycle Methane Decomposition Gas transport 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Marcelo Ardón, Emily Bernhardt, Suzanna Bräuer, Ashley Helton, and Joseph White for advice and helpful discussion, Sean Taylor for field assistance, and Brooke Hassett (Duke River Center) for assistance with gas chromatography. Support was provided for M.J. Carmichael by the Charles H. Babcock Foundation and by a Vecellio Award for Graduate Research from Wake Forest University.

References

  1. Ardón M, Montanair S, Morse JL, Doyle MD, Bernhardt ES (2010a) Phosphorous export from a restored wetland ecosystem in response to natural and experimental hydrologic fluctuations. Journal of Geophysical Research 115, G04031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardón M, Morse JL, Doyle ME, Bernhardt ES (2010b) The water quality consequences of restoring wetland hydrology to a large agricultural watershed in the southeastern coastal plain. Ecosystems 13:1060–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong J, Armstrong W, Beckett PM (1992) Phragmites australis: Venturi- and humidity-induced pressure flows enhance rhizome aeration and rhizosphere oxidation. New Phytologist 120:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brix H (1990) Gas exchange through the soil-atmosphere interphase and through dead culms of Phragmites australis in a constructed reed bed receiving domestic sewage. Water Research 2:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carmichael MJ, Bernhardt ES, Bräuer SL, Smith WK (2014) The role of vegetation in the annual flux of methane to the atmosphere: should vegetation be included as a distinct category in the global methane budget? Biogeochemistry 119:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chambers JQ, Schimel JP, Nobre AD (2001) Respiration from coarse wood litter in central Amazon forests. Biogeochemistry 52:115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ciais P, Sabine C, Bala G, Bopp L, Brovkin V, Canadell JG, Chhabra A, DeFries R, Galloway J, Heimann M, Jones C, Le Quéré C, Myneni RB, Piao S, and Thornton P (2013) Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattne GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, and Midgley PM (eds.), Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribtion of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmnetal Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge UP, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Covey KR, Wood SA, Warren RJ II, Lee X, Bradford MA (2012) Elevated methane concentrations in trees of an upland forest. Geophysical Research Letters 39, L15705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dlugokencky EJ, Nisbet EG, Fisher R, Lowry D (2011) Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369:2058–2072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilbert S, Lackstrom K, Tufford D (2012) The impact of drought on coastal ecosystems in the Carolinas. Research Report: CISA-2012-01. Columbia, SC: Carolinas Integrated Sciences and AssessmentsGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanson RS, Hanson TE (1996) Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiological Reviews 60:439–471PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Haroon MF, Hu S, Shi Y, Imelfort M, Keller J, Hugenholtz P, Yuan Z, Tyson GW (2013) Anaerobic oxidation of metahne coupled to nitrate reduction in a novel archaeal lineage. Nature 500:567–572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Heilman MA, Carlton RG (2001) Methane oxidation associated with submersed vascular macrophytes and its impact on plant diffusive methane flux. Biogeochemistry 52:207–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Helton AM, Bernhardt ES, Fedders A (2014) Biogeochemical regime shifts in coastal landscapes: the contrasting effects of saltwater intrusion and agricultural pollution on greenhouse gas emissions from a freshwater wetland. Biogeochemistry 120:133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hook DD (1984) Adaptations to flooding with freshwater. In: Kozlowski TT (ed) Flooding and Plant Growth. Academic Press, New YorK, p 356Google Scholar
  16. Joabsson A, Christensen RT, Wallén B (1999) Vascular plant controls on methane emissions from northern peatforming wetlands. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14:385–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirschke S, Bousquet P, Ciais P, Saunois M, Canadell JG, Dlugokencky EJ, Bergamaschi P, Bergmann D, Blake DR, Buruhwiler L, Cameron-Smith P, Castaldi S, Chevallier F, Feng L, Fraser A, Heimann M, Hodson EL, Houweling S, Josse B, Fraser PJ, Krummel PB, Lamarque JF, Langenfelds RL, Le Quére C, Naik V, O’Doherty S, Palmer PI, Pison I, Plummer D, Poulter B, Prinn RG, Stelle LP, Strode SA, Sudo K, Szopa S, van der Werf GR, Voulgarakis A, van Weele M, Weiss RF, Williams JE, Zeng G (2013) Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nature Geoscience 6:813–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kozlowski TT (1997) Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiology Monograph 1:1–29Google Scholar
  19. Melillo JM, Richmond T, Yohe GW, eds (2014) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, 841 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Montzka SA, Dlugokencky EJ, Butler JH (2011) Non-CO2 greenhouse gases and climate change. Nature 476:43–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Morse JL, Ardón M, Bernhardt ES (2012) Greenhouse gas fluxes in southeastern U.S. coastal plain wetlands under contrasting land uses. Ecological Applications 22:264–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Myhre G, Shindell DT, Breon FM, Collins W, Fuglestvelt J, Huang J, Koch D, Lamarque JF, Lee D, Mendoza B, Nakajima, T, Robock A, Stephens G, Takemura T, Zhang H (2013) Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In: Stoker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds.) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Needham R (2006) Implementation plan for agricultural restoration at Timberlake Farms. Needham Environmental Incorporated, WilmingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. Neubauer SC, Megonigal JP (2015) Moving beyond global warming potentials to quantify the climatic role of ecosystems. Ecosystems 18:1000–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Öquist MG, Svensson BH (2002) Vascular plants as regulators of methane emissions from a subarctic mire ecosystem. Journal of Geophysical Research 107:4580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pangala SR, Moore S, Horinbrook ERC, Gauci V (2012) Trees are major conduits for methane egress from tropical forested wetlands. New Phytologist 197:524–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pangala SR, Gowing DJ, Hornibrook ERC, Gauci V (2013) Controls on methane emissions from Alnus glutinosa saplings. New Phytologist 201:887–896CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pangala SR, Hornibrook ERC, Gowing DJ, Gauci V (2015) The contribution of trees to ecosystem methane emissions in a temperate forested wetland. Global Change Biology 21:2642–2654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saleska SR, Miller SD, Matross DM, Goulden ML, Wofsy SC, da Rocha HR, de Camargo PB, Crill P, Daube BC, de Freitas HC, Hutyra L, Keller M, Kirchhoff V, Menton M, Munger JW, Pyle EH, Rice AG, Silva H (2003) Carbon in Amazon forests: unexpected seasonal fluxes and disturbance-induced losses. Science 302:1554–1557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schlesinger WH, Bernhardt ES (2013) Biogoechemistry: an analysis of global change, 3rd edn. Elsevier, WalthamGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwietzke S, Sherwood OA, Bruhwiler LMP, Miller JB, Etiope G, Dlugokencky EJ, Michel SE, Arling VA, Vaughn BH, White JWC, Tans PP (2016) Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope data. Nature 538:88–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sebacher DI, Harriss RC, Bartlett KB (1985) Methane emissions to the atmosphere through aquatic plants. Journal of Environmental Quality 14:40–46Google Scholar
  33. Shindell DT, Faluvegi G, Koch DM, Schmidt GA, Unger N, Bauer SE (2009) Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions. Science 326:716–718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith LK, Lewis WM Jr (1992) Seasonality of methane emissions from five lakes and associated wetlands of the Colorado Rockies. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 6:323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Titus JG, Richman C (2001) Maps of lands vulnerable to sea level rise: modeled elevations along the US Atlantic and Gulf coasts. Climate Research 18:205–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Valentine DL, Reeburgh WS (2000) New perspectives on anaerobic methane oxidation. Environmental Microbiology 2:477–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. van der Nat F, Middelburg JJ (1998) Effects of two common macrophytes on methane dynamics in freshwater sediments. Biogeochemistry 43:79–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vann CD, Megonigal JP (2003) Elevated CO2 and water-depth regulation of methane emissions: comparison of woody and non-woody wetland plant species. Biogeochemistry 63:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Whiting GJ, Chanton JP (1992) Plant-dependent CH4 emission in a subarctic Canadian fen. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 6:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wuebbles DJ, Hayhoe K (2002) Atmospheric methane and global change. Earth-Science Reviews 57:177–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations