Wetlands

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 275–284 | Cite as

The Effects of Soil Moisture and Emergent Herbaceous Vegetation on Carbon Emissions from Constructed Wetlands

Original Research

Abstract

Wetlands serve as sinks for carbon and nutrients but they are also a large source of greenhouse gases. Our objective was to quantify emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) from three free water surface-flow constructed wetlands in the presence and absence of emergent herbaceous vegetation (Typha angustifolia L. and Typha latifolia L.) across a gradient of soil moisture. Measurements were collected on eight sampling dates during June and July, 2014. Similar to previous research, CO2 emissions were higher in vegetated plots, increasing from a median ± std. error of 242 ± 29 to 1612 ± 95 mg m−2 h−1. Emissions of CH4 were also significantly higher in vegetated plots, but the relative magnitude of the effect of plants varied among wetlands. Emissions of CH4 were highest from vegetated plots in the wetland with the highest soil moisture (4.4 ± 1.0 mg m−2 h−1). However, the largest effect of plants on methane emissions occurred in the wetland with intermediate soil moisture, with a 15-fold increase in CH4 emissions from 0.15 ± 0.90 to 2.4 ± 1.2 mg m−2 h−1. Design and management that consider the interactive effects of soil moisture and plants on CH4 emissions may help reduce the greenhouse gas footprint of constructed wetlands.

Keywords

Carbon dioxide Methane Greenhouse gas efflux Constructed wetlands 

References

  1. Aerts R, Ludwig F (1997) Water-table changes and nutritional status affect trace gas emissions from laboratory columns of peatland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1691–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altor AE, Mitsch WJ (2008) Methane and carbon dioxide dynamics in wetland mesocosms: effects of hydrology and soils. Ecol Appl 18:1307–1320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbera AC, Borin M, Cirelli GL, Toscano A, Mauciera C (2015) Comparison of carbon balance in Mediterranean pilot constructed wetlands vegetated with different C4 plant species. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:2372–2383Google Scholar
  4. Bellisario LM, Moore TR (1998) Net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a boreal peatland, northern Manitoba. Ecoscience 5:534–541Google Scholar
  5. Bloom AA, Palmer PI, Fraser A, Reay DS, Frankenberg C (2010) Large-scale controls of methanogenesis inferred from methane and gravity spaceborne data. Science 327:322–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonneville M, Strachan I, Humphreys ER, Roulet NT (2008) Net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a temperate cattail marsh in relation to biophysical properties. Agric For Meteorol 148:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boon PI, Mitchell A, Lee K (1997) Effects of wetting and drying on methane emissions from ephemeral floodplain wetlands in south-eastern Australia. Hydrobiologia 357:73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhullar GS, Edwards PJ, Venterink HO (2013) Variation in the plant-mediated methane transport and its importance for methane emission from intact wetland peat mesocosms. J Plant Ecol 6:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bridgham SD, Richardson CJ (1992) Mechanisms controlling soil respiration (CO2 and CH4) in southern peatlands. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1089–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brix H, Sorrell BK, Orr PT (1992) Internal pressurization and convective gas flow in some emergent freshwater macrophytes. Am Soc of Limnol and Oceanogr 37:1420–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carmichael MJ, Bernhardt BS, Bräuer SL, Smith WK (2014) The role of vegetation in methane flux to the atmosphere: should vegetation be included as a distinct category in the global methane budget? Biogeochemistry 19:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calhoun A, King GM (1997) Regulation of root-associated methanotrophy by oxygen availability in the rhizosphere of two aquatic macrophytes. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3051–3058PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Chimner RA, Cooper DJ (2003) Influence of water table levels on CO2 emissions in a Colorado subalpine fen: an in situ microcosm study. Soil Biol Biochem 35:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Klein JJ, van der Werf AK (2014) Balancing carbon sequestration and GHG emissions in a constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 66:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green SM, Baird AJ (2012) A mesocosm study of the role of the sedge Eriophorum angustifolium in the efflux of methane - including that due to episodic ebullition - from peatlands. Plant Soil 351:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Günther A, Jurasinski G, Huth V, Glatzel S (2014) Opaque closed chambers underestimate methane fluxes of Phragmites australis (Cav.) trin. Ex steud. Environ Monit Assess 186:2151–2158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Helton AM, Bernhardt ES, Fedders A (2014) Biogeochemical regime shifts in coastal landscapes: the contrasting effects of saltwater incursion and agricultural pollution on greenhouse gas emissions from a freshwater wetland. Biogeochemistry 120:133–147. doi:10.1007/s10533-014-9986-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henneberg A, Brix H, Sorrell BK (2015) The interactive effect of juncus effuses and water table position on mesocosm methanogenesis and methane emissions. Plant Soil. doi:10.1007/s111104-015-2707-y Google Scholar
  19. Hier MB (2007) The role of vegetation in pollutant treatment by a Connecticut stormwater wetland. University of Connecticut, ThesisGoogle Scholar
  20. Hijosa-Valsero M, Sidrach-Cardona R, Bécares E (2012) Comparison of interannual removal variation of various constructed wetland types. Sci Total Environ 430:174–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirota M, Tang Y, Hu O, Hirata S, Kato T, Mo W, Cao G, Mariko S (2004) Methane emissions from different vegetation zones in a Qinghai-Tibetan plateau wetland. Soil Biol Biochem 36:737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inamori R, Gui P, Dass P, Matsumura M, Xu K, Kondo T, Ebie Y, Inamori Y (2007) Investigating CH4 and N2O emissions from eco-engineering wastewater treatment processes using constructed wetland microcosms. Process Biochem 42:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joabsson A, Christensen TR, Wallén B (1999) Vascular plant controls on methane emissions from northern peatforming wetlands. Trends Ecol Evol 14:385–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  25. Kankaala P, Mäkelä S, Bergström I, Huitu E, Käki T, Ojala A, Rantakari M, Kortelainen P, Arvola L (2003) Midsummer spatial variation in methane efflux from stands of littoral vegetation in a boreal meso-eutrophic lake. Freshw Biol 48:1617–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kao-Kniffin J, Freyre DS, Balser TC (2010) Methane dynamics across wetland plant species. Aquat Bot 93:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kayranli B, Scholz M, Mustafa A, Hedmark Å (2010) Carbon storage and fluxes within freshwater wetlands: a critical review. Wetlands 30:111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelley CA, Martens CS, Ussler W (1995) Methane dynamics across a tidally flooded riverbank margin. Limnol Oceanogr 40:1112–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. King JY, Reeburgh WS, Regli SK (1998) Methane emission and transport by Arctic sedges in Alaska: results of a vegetation removal experiment. J Geophys Res 103:29083–29092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laanbroek H (2010) Methane emission from natural wetlands: interplay between emergent macrophytes and soil microbial processes: a mini-review. Ann Bot 105:141–153CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Li C, Qiu J, Frolkin S, Xiao X, Salas W, Moore B III, Boles S, Huang Y, Sass R (2002) Reduced methane emissions from large-scale changes in water management of China’s rice paddies during 1980–2000. Geophy Res Lett 29(20):33–1–33–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Livingston GP, Hutchinson GL (1995) Enclosure-based measurement of trace gas exchange: Applications and sources of error. In: PA M, RC H (eds) Methods in Ecology. Biogenic trace gases: Measuring emissions from soil and water. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 14–51Google Scholar
  33. Lund M, LaFleur PM, Roulet NT, Lindroth A, Christensen TR, Aurela M, Chojnicki BH, Flanagan LB, Humphreys ER, Laurila T, Oechel WC, Olejnik J, Rinne J, Schubert P, Nilsson MB (2010) Variability in exchange of CO2 across 12 northern peatland and tundra sites. Glob Chang Biol 16:2436–2448Google Scholar
  34. Mander U, Dotro G, Ebie Y, Towprayoon S, Chiemchaisri C, Nogueira SF, Jamsranjav B, Kasak K, Truu J, Tournebize J, Mitsch WJ (2014) Greenhouse gas emissions in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: a review. Ecol Eng 66:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maltais-Landry G, Marranger R, Brisson J (2009) Greenhouse gas production and efficiency of planted and artificially aerated construction wetlands. Environ Pollut 157(3):748–754CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Maucieri C, Borin M, Barbera AC (2014) Role of C3 plant species on carbon dioxide and methane emissions in Mediterranean constructed wetland. Ital J Agron 9:120–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitsch WJ, Bernal B, Nahlik AM, et al. (2013) Wetlands, carbon, and climate change. Landsc Ecol 28(4):583–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moore TR, Dalva M (1993) The influence of temperature and water table position on carbon dioxide and methane emissions from laboratory columns of peatland soils. J Soil Sci 44:651–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morse JL, Ardón M, Bernhardt ES (2012) Greenhouse gas fluxes in southeastern U.S. coastal plain wetlands under contrasting land uses. Ecol Appl 22:264–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Myhre G, Shindell DT, Breon F-M, Collins W, Fuglestvedt J, Huang J, Koch D, Lamarque J-F, Lee D, Mendoza B, Nakajima T, Robock A, Stephens G, Takemura T, Zhang H (2013) Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, et al. (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis, report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Newman JM, Clausen JC (1997) Seasonal effectiveness of a constructed wetland for processing milkhouse wastewater. Wetlands 17:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Osterberg KL (2006) Constructed wetland to reduce metals, nutrients, and bacteria in roof runoff. University of Connecticut, ThesisGoogle Scholar
  43. Oquist MG, Svensson BH (2002) Vascular plants as regulators of methane emissions from a subarctic mire ecosystem. J Geophys Res - Atmos 107(D21) ACL 10-1–ACL 10-10, doi:10.1029/2001JD001030
  44. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna <http://www.R-project.org>.
  45. Raghoebarsing AA, Smolders AJP, Schmid MC, Rijpstra WIC, Wolters-Arts M, Derksen J, Jetten MSM, Schouten S, Damsté JSS, Lamers LPM, Roelofs JGM, Op den Camp HJM, Strous M (2005) Methanotrophic symbionts provide carbon for photosynthesis in peat bogs. Nature 436:1153–1156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Reed SC, Brown DS (1992) Constructed wetland design: the first generation. Water Environ Res 64(6):776–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shannon RD, White JR, Lawson JE, Gilmour BS (1996) Methane efflux from emergent vegetation in peatlands. J Ecol 84:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stadmark J, Leonardson L (2005) Emissions of greenhouse gases from ponds constructed for nitrogen removal. Ecol Eng 25(5):542–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strom L, Ekberg A, Mastepanov M, Christensen TR (2005) Species-specific effects of vascular plants on carbon turnover and methane emissions from wetlands. Biogeochemistry 75:65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strom L, Ekberg A, Mastepanov M, Christensen TR (2003) The effect of vascular plants on carbon turnover and methane emissions from a tundra wetland. Glob Chang Biol 9:1185–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sugimoto A, Fujita N (1997) Characteristics of methane emission from different vegetations on a wetland. Tellus 49:382–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turetsky MR, Kotowska A, Bubier J, Dise NB, Crill P, Hornibrook ERC, Minkkinen K, Moore TR, Myers-Smith IH, Nykänen H, Olefeldt D, Rinne J, Saarnio S, Shurpalil N, E-S T, JM W, JR W, KP W, Wilmking M (2014) A synthesis of methane emissions from 71 northern, temperate and subtropical wetlands. Glob Chang Biol 20:2183–2197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Van der Nat F, Middelburg JJ (1998) Seasonal variation in methane oxidation by the rhizosphere of Phragmites australis and Scirpus lacustris. Aquat Bot 61:95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Waddington JM, Roulet NT, Swanson RV (1996) Water table control of CH4 emission enhancement by vascular plants in boreal peatlands. J Geophys Res 101:22775–22786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang Y, Inamori R, Kong H, Xu K, Inamori Y, Kondo T, Zhang J (2008) Influence of plant species and wastewater strength on constructed wetland methane emissions and associated microbial populations. Ecol Eng 32:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Whalen SC (2005) Biogeochemistry of methane exchange between natural wetlands and the atmosphere. Environ Eng Sci 22(1):73–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wild U, Kamp T, Lenz A, Heinz S, Pfadenhauer J (2001) Cultivation of Typha spp. In constructed wetlands for peatland restoration. Ecol Eng 17(1):49–54Google Scholar
  58. Yang J, Liu J, Hu X, Li X, Wang Y, Li H (2013) Effect of water table level on CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions in a freshwater marsh of northeast China. Soil Biol Biochem 61:52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yates TT, Si BC, Farrell RE, Pennock DJ (2006) Probability distribution and spatial dependence of nitrous oxide emission: temporal change in hummocky terrain. Soil Sci Soc of Am 70:753–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yavitt JB, Knapp AK (1995) Methane emissions to atmosphere through emergent cattail (Typha latifolia L.) plants. Tellus 47:521–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zak D, Reuter H, Augustin J, Shatwell T, Barth M, Gelbrecht J, McInnes JR (2015) Changes of the CO2 and CH4 production potential of rewetted fens in the perspective of temporal vegetation shifts. Biogeosciences 12:2455–2468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhai X, Piwpuan N, Arias CA, Headley T, Brix H (2013) Can root exudates from emergent wetland plants fuel denitrification in subsurface flow constructed wetland systems? Ecol Eng 61:555–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and the Environment and the Center for Environmental Sciences and EngineeringUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations