Advertisement

Wetlands

, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 1013–1019 | Cite as

Fate of 150 Year Old Beaver Ponds in the Laurentian Great Lakes Region

  • Carol A. JohnstonEmail author
Short Communication

Abstract

The North American beaver, Castor canadensis, has recovered from historic overtrapping, recolonizing much of its former range as its population expanded. Previous studies using historical aerial photos document recent increases in number of beaver ponds, but the long-term sustainability of beaver populations and their ponds over centuries of landscape alteration is unknown. This paper analyzes the fate of beaver ponds mapped in 1868 near Ishpeming, Michigan, USA. Of the 64 beaver dam and pond sites mapped in the 1860s, 72 % were still discernible in 2014. Land use changes that altered the terrain (mining, residential development) or stream paths (channelization) were the main sources of beaver pond loss. This remarkable consistency in beaver pond placement over the last 150 years is evidence of the beaver’s resilience.

Keywords

Castor canadensis Dam Stream Landscape Land use Ecological engineer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Suggestions from four anonymous reviewers improved the quality of this manuscript. This work was supported by National Science Foundation grant DEB-1349240 and USDA Hatch Project H505-14.

References

  1. Brown D, Hubert W, Anderson S (1996) Beaver ponds create wetland habitat for birds in mountains of southeastern Wyoming. Wetlands 16:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butler DR, Malanson GP (2005) The geomorphic influences of beaver dams and failures of beaver dams. Geomorphology 71:48–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cunningham JM, Calhoun AJK, Glanz WE (2006) Patterns of beaver colonization and wetland change in Acadia National Park. Northeastern Naturalist 13:583–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Curran JC, Cannatelli KM (2014) The impact of beaver dams on the morphology of a river in the eastern United States with implications for river restoration. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 39:1236–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fryxell JM (2001) Habitat suitability and source–sink dynamics of beavers. Journal of Animal Ecology 70:310–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gewertz D, Errington F (2015) Doing good and doing well: prairie wetlands, private property, and the public trust. American Anthropologist 117:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grover AM, Baldassarre GA (1995) Bird species richness within beaver ponds in south-central New York. Wetlands 15:108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hood GA, Larson DG (2014) Beaver-created habitat heterogeneity influences aquatic invertebrate assemblages in boreal Canada. Wetlands 34:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hood GA, Larson DG (2015) Ecological engineering and aquatic connectivity: a new perspective from beaver-modified wetlands. Freshwater Biology 60:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hyvönen T, Nummi P (2008) Habitat dynamics of beaver Castor canadensis at two spatial scales. Wildlife Biology 14:302–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ingle-Sidorowicz HM (1982) Beaver increase in Ontario: result of changing environment. Mammalia 46:167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jerome DS (2006) Landforms of the Upper Peninsula, Michigan. Natural Resource Conservation Service, MarquetteGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson IA (1919) The Michigan fur trade. Michigan Historical Commission, LansingGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnston CA (2012) Beaver wetlands. In: Batzer DP, Baldwin A (eds) Wetland habitats of North America: Ecology and Conservation Concerns. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 161–171Google Scholar
  15. Johnston CA, Naiman RJ (1990) Aquatic patch creation in relation to beaver population trends. Ecology 71:1617–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnston CA, Windels SK (2015) Using beaver works to estimate colony activity in boreal landscapes. Journal of Wildlife Management. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.927 Google Scholar
  17. Jones CG, Gutiérrez JL, Byers JE, Crooks JA, Lambrinos JG, Talley TS (2010) A framework for understanding physical ecosystem engineering by organisms. Oikos 119:1862–1869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Little AM, Guntenspergen GR, Allen TFH (2012) Wetland vegetation dynamics in response to beaver (Castor canadensis) activity at multiple scales. Ecoscience 19:246–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Michigan Geographic Data Library (2015) Michigan Public Land Survey Sections (online database). http://www.mcgi.state.mi.us/mgdl/?rel=ext&action=sext. Accessed 13 Nov 2014
  20. Morgan LH (1868) The American beaver and his works. J. B. Lippencott & Co., Philadelphia. https://archive.org/details/americanbeaverhi68morg. Accessed 12 Nov 2014
  21. Morrison A, Westbrook CJ, Bedard-Haughn A (2015) Distribution of Canadian Rocky Mountain wetlands impacted by beaver. Wetlands 35:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Naiman RJ, Johnston CA, Kelley JC (1988) Alteration of North American streams by beaver. Bioscience 38:753–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nolet BA, Rosell F (1998) Comeback of the beaver Castor fiber: an overview of old and new conservation problems. Biological Conservation 83:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pollock MM, Beechie TJ, Jordan CE (2007) Geomorphic changes upstream of beaver dams in Bridge Creek, an incised stream channel in the interior Columbia River basin, eastern Oregon. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32:1174–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ray AM, Rebertus AJ, Ray HL (2001) Macrophyte succession in Minnesota beaver ponds. Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne De Botanique 79:487–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ray HL, Ray AM, Rebertus AJ (2004) Rapid establishment of fish in isolated peatland beaver ponds. Wetlands 24:399–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Remillard MM, Gruendling GK, Bogucki DJ (1987) Disturbance by beaver (Castor canadensis Kuhl) and increased landscape heterogeneity. In: Turner MG (ed) Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. Springer, New York, pp 103–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schulte LA, Mladenoff DJ (2001) The original US public land survey records: their use and limitations in reconstructing presettlement vegetation. Journal of Forestry 99(10):5–10Google Scholar
  29. Simmons, GC (1974) Bedrock geologic map of the Ishpeming quadrangle, Marquette County, Michigan (1:24,000 Map). Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map GQ-1130. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  30. Snodgrass JW (1997) Temporal and spatial dynamics of beaver-created patches as influenced by management practices in a south-eastern North American landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:1043–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stevens CE, Paszkowski CA, Scrimgeour GJ (2006) Older is better: beaver ponds on boreal streams as breeding habitat for the wood frog. Journal of Wildlife Management 70:1360–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Syphard AD, Garcia MW (2001) Human- and beaver-induced wetland changes in the Chickahominy River watershed from 1953 to 1994. Wetlands 21:342–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. USDA (2015) Geospatial Data Gateway (online spatial dataset). https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Accessed 12 Jun 2015
  34. USGS (2015a) National Land Cover Database 2011 (online spatial dataset). U.S. Geological Survey. http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_data.php. Accessed 16 Jun 2015
  35. USGS (2015b) Orthoimagery (online spatial dataset). U.S. Geological Survey. http://nationalmap.gov/ortho.html. Accessed 16 Jun 2015
  36. USGS (2015c) Historical Topographic Map Collection (online spatial dataset). U.S. Geological Survey. http://nationalmap.gov/historical/ Accessed 16 June 2015Google Scholar
  37. USGS (2015d) National Elevation Dataset (online spatial dataset) http://ned.usgs.gov/. Accessed 16 Jun 2015
  38. USGS (2015e) National Hydrography Dataset (online spatial dataset). U.S. Geological Survey. http://nhd.usgs.gov/. Accessed 16 Jun 2015
  39. Westbrook CJ, Cooper DJ, Baker BW (2011) Beaver assisted river valley formation. River Research and Applications 27:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wiitala, SW, Newport, TG, and Skinner, EL (1967) Water resources of the Marquette Iron Range area, Michigan. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1842. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural Resource ManagementSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsUSA

Personalised recommendations