Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in a Large Eutrophic Floodplain Forest of the Southeastern Atlantic Coastal Plain, USA
Anthropogenic land use has significantly altered sediment and nutrient dynamics at watershed-scales, resulting in significant redeposition within large floodplain ecosystems. Some upland land uses have had documented negative effects on soil carbon (C) stocks, although the specific impacts of these disturbances on soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics in depositional environments are poorly understood. Assessment of SOC stocks in floodplain environments will allow for more precise estimates of C distribution at watershed and regional scales. In this study, we measured SOC pools to depths of 100 and 200 cm in four distinct floodplain landscapes (natural levee, flats, mineral wetlands, organic wetlands) in a large bottomland forest within Congaree National Park, South Carolina, USA. Mean SOC stocks to a depth of 100 cm were 108–109 Mg C ha−1 in flats and levees, 193 Mg C ha−1 in mineral wetlands, and 533 Mg C ha−1 in organic wetlands. In addition, hydric soils contained significantly more SOC in deep horizons (100–200 cm depths). At a regional scale, similar alluvial soils within large floodplains were estimated to store approximately 0.l Pg of SOC. These results highlight the importance of inclusion of deep SOC storage in alluvial settings when estimating watershed C budgets.
KeywordsFloodplain Soil carbon Fluvial processes Riparian forest
The authors are grateful for field and laboratory assistance provided by Robin Governo, Andrew Parsons, Russell Miller, Robert Price, Lauren Behnke, Theresa Thom, Ed Schenk, Cliff Hupp, David Shelley, and Frank Henning. We are also grateful to Drs. William Conner, Joey Shaw, and Yucheng Feng who helped improve draft versions of this manuscript. Funding and support for this research was provided by the United States Geological Survey and the United States National Park Service.
- Blake GR, Hartge K (1986) Bulk density. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. Agronomy monograph 9. ASA and SSSA, Wisconsin, pp 363–375Google Scholar
- Fry J, Xian G, Jin S, Dewitz J, Homer C, Yang L, Barnes C, Herold N, Wickham J (2011) Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 77:858–864Google Scholar
- Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. Agronomy monograph 9. ASA and SSSA, Wisconsin, pp 383–411Google Scholar
- Grossman RB, Harms DH, Kuzila MS, Glaum SA, Hartung SL, Fortner JR (1998) Organic carbon in deep alluvium in southeast Nebraska and northeast Kansas. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Stewart BA (eds) Soil processes and the carbon cycle. Advances in Soil Science. CRC Press, Massachusetts, pp 45–56Google Scholar
- Jackson ML (2005) Soil chemical analysis: advanced course. Revision of the 2nd edn. 11th printing. Parallel Press, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
- Mausbach MJ, Richardson JL (1994) Biogeochemical processes in hydric soil formation. Current Topics in Wetland Biogeochemistry 1:68–127Google Scholar
- Schlesinger WH (1997) Biogeochemistry: an analysis of global change, 2nd edn. Academic Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Schoeneberger PJ, Wysocki DA, Benham EC, Broderson WD (2002) Field book for describing and sampling soils, Version 2.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, LincolnGoogle Scholar
- Soil Survey Staff (2013) Web soil survey: Soil data mart. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov. Accessed 14 Jul 2013
- Soil Survey Laboratory Staff (2004) Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil survey investigation report no. 42 version 4.0. United States Department of Agriculture, Government Printing Office, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
- Trimble SW (2008) Man-induced soil erosion on the southern Piedmont, 2nd edn. Soil and Water Conservation Society, IowaGoogle Scholar