Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Aquatic Invertebrate Food Base for Waterbirds at Wetland Reserve Program Easements in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Migratory waterbirds depend on invertebrates as a key source of dietary protein, but few studies have quantified aquatic invertebrates or their response to management on privately owned wetlands. Our objectives were to quantify the effects of wetland management provided through the Migratory Bird Habitat Initiative (MBHI) on invertebrate biomass, family richness, and secondary production at Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) easements in Arkansas and Missouri. We collected core and sweep-net samples bi-weekly in autumn 2011 and sweep samples in winter 2012 at WRP easements enrolled in MBHI (n = 13), WRP easements not enrolled in MBHI (n = 12), and intensively managed public wetlands (n = 7) in Arkansas and Missouri. Overall mean (±SE) invertebrate biomass and production during autumn were 11.96 (±1.29) kg/ha and 1.57 (±1.09) kg/ha*season, and during winter were 3.96 (±0.55) kg/ha and 1.38 (±0.11), respectively. Macroinvertebrate biomass and family richness did not differ among wetland types or management practices, including inundation and mowing. Secondary macroinvertebrate production during autumn was 200 % greater on MBHI contracts compared to WRP easements. During winter, production was 40 % greater on MBHI and WRP easements compared to public wetlands. Our results suggest that with management, wetlands enrolled in conservation easement programs can be an important source of invertebrate production for migratory waterbirds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altermatt F, Ebert D (2008) The influence of pool volume and summer desiccation on the production of the resting and dispersal stage in a Daphnia metapopulation. Oecologia 157:441–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Altermatt F, Ebert D (2010) Populations in small, ephemeral habitat patches may drive dynamics in a Daphnia magna metapopulation. Ecology 91:2975–2982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Altermatt F, Pajunen VI, Ebert D (2010) Dessication of rock pool habitats and its influence on population persistence in a Daphnia metacommunity. PLoS ONE 4:e4703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JT, Smith LM (1998) Protein and energy production in playas: implications for migratory bird management. Society of Wetland Scientists 18:437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JT, Smith LM (2000) Invertebrate response to moist-soil management of playa wetlands. Ecological Applications 10:550–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JT, Smith LM (2002) The effect of flooding regimes on decomposition of Polygonum pensylvanicum in playa wetlands (Southern Great Plains, USA). Aquatic Botany 74:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JT, Smith LM (2004) Persistence and colonization strategies of playa wetland invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 513:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JT, Smith LM, Haukos DA (2000) Food selection and feather molt by nonbreeding American green-winged teal in Texas playas. The Journal of Wildlife Management 64:222–230

  • Ballard BM, Thompson JE, Petrie MJ, Checkett JM, Hewitt DG (2004) Diet and nutrition of northern pintails wintering along the southern coast of Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management 68:371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batzer DP (2013) The seemingly intractable ecological responses of invertebrates in North American wetlands: a review. Wetlands 33:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batzer DP, Resh VH (1992) Macroinvertebrates of a California seasonal wetland and responses to experimental habitat manipulation. Wetlands 12:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty WS, Kesler DC, Webb EB, Raedeke AH, Naylor LW, Humburg DD (2014) The role of protected area wetlands in waterfowl habitat conservation: implications for protected area network design. Biological Conservation 176:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benke AC, Huryn AD (2006) Secondary productivity of macroinvertebrates.  Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (eds) Methods in stream ecology. Elsevier, New York, New York, pp 691–710

  • Benke AC, Huryn AD (2010) Benthic invertebrate production-facilitating answer to ecological riddles in freshwater ecosystems. Journal of North American Benthological Society 29:264–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benke AC, Huryn AD, Smock LA, Wallace JB (1999) Length-mass relationships for freshwater macroinvertebrates in North America with particular reference to the southeastern United States. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18:308–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolduc F, Afton AD (2003) Effects of structural marsh management and salinity on invertebrate prey of waterbirds in marsh ponds during winter on the Gulf Coast Chenier Plain. Wetlands 23:897–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buler JJ, Sieges ML, Smolinsky JA (2013) Assessment of bird response to the NRCS Migratory bird habitat initiative using weather surveillance radar: final report. Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology. University of Delaware, Newark

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheal F, Davis J, Growns J, Bradley J, Whittles F (1993) The influence of sampling method on the classification of wetland macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 257:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collazo JA, O’Harra DA, Kelly CA (2002) Accessible habitat for shorebirds: factors influencing its availability and conservation implications. Waterbirds 25:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis CA, Bidwell JR (2008) Response of aquatic invertebrates to vegetation management and agriculture. Wetlands 28:793–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis CA, Smith LM (1998) Ecology and management of migrant shorebirds in the Playa Lakes Region of Texas. Wildlife Monographs 140:1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • De Szalay FA, Resh VH (1997) Responses of wetland invertebrates and plants important in waterfowl diets to burning and mowing of emergent vegetation. Wetlands 17:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Szalay FA, Resh VH (2000) Factors influencing macroinvertebrate colonization of seasonal wetlands: responses to emergent plant cover. Freshwater Biology 45:295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Szalay FA, Batzer DP, Resh VH (1996) Mesocosm and macrocosm experiments to examine effects of mowing emergent vegetation on wetland invertebrates. Environmental Entomology 25:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delettre YR, Morvan N (2000) Dispersal of adult aquatic Chironomidae (Diptera) in agricultural landscapes. Freshwater Biology 44:399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuBowy PJ (1988) Waterfowl communities and seasonal environments: temporal variability in interspecific competition. Ecology 69:1439–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy WG, LaBar DJ (1994) Aquatic invertebrate production in southeastern USA wetlands during winter and spring. Wetlands 14:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Peters GR, Dugger BD, Petrie MJ (2012) Plant community composition and waterfowl food production on Wetland Reserve Program easements compared to those on managed public lands in western Oregon and Washington. Wetlands 32:391–399

  • Evans-White MA, Dodds WK, Whiles MR (2003) Ecosystem significance of crayfishes and stonerollers in a prairie stream: functional differences between co-occurring omnivores. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22:423–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming KS, Kaminski RM, Tietjen TE, Schummer ML, Ervin GN, Nelms KD (2012) Vegetative forage quality and moist-soil management on Wetlands Reserve Program Lands in Mississippi. Wetlands 32:919–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson LH (1991) Strategies for water level manipulations in moist-soil systems. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish and Wildlife Leaflet 13.4.6., Washington, D.C., USA

  • Fredrickson LH, Reid FA (1988) Invertebrate response to wetland management. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish and Wildlife Leaflet 13.3.1., Washington, D.C., USA

  • Fredrickson LH, Taylor TS (1982) Management of seasonally flooded impoundments for wildlife. U. S. Department of Interior, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Publication 148, Washington, D.C., USA

  • Gray RL, Teels BM (2006) Wildlife and fish conservation through the Farm Bill. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34:906–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray MJ, Kaminski RM, Weerakkody G, Leopold BD, Jensen KC (1999) Aquatic invertebrate and plant responses following mechanical manipulations of moist-soil habitat. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:770–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagy HM, Kaminski RM (2012) Winter waterbird and food dynamics in autumn‐managed moist‐soil wetlands in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Wildlife Society Bulletin 36:512–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall DL, Willig MR, Moorhead DL, Sites RW, Fish EB, Mollhagen TR (2004) Aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity of playa wetlands: the role of landscape and island biogeographic characteristics. Wetlands 24:77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer GL, Heske EJ, Brawn JD, Brown PW (2006) Migrant shorebird predation on benthic invertebrates along the Illinois River, Illinois. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 188:152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haukos DA, Smith LM (1993) Moist-soil management of playa lakes for migrating and wintering ducks. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21:288–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmers DL (1992) Shorebird management manual. Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network, Manomet

    Google Scholar 

  • Isola C, Colwell M, Taft O, Safran R (2000) Interspecific differences in habitat use of shorebirds and waterfowl foraging in managed wetlands of California’s San Joaquin Valley. Waterbirds 23:196–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec JA (1962) Effects of a drawdown on a waterfowl impoundment. Ecology 43:267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King SL, Twedt DJ, Wilson RR (2006) The role of the Wetland Reserve Program in conservation efforts in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. The Wildlife Society Bulletin 34:914–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostecke RM, Smith LM, Hands HM (2005) Macroinvertebrate response to cattail management at Cheyenne Bottoms, Kansas, USA. Wetlands 25:758–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapu GL, Reinecke KJ (1992) Foraging ecology and nutrition. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG et al (eds) Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Leao M (2005) Fish utilization and diversity associated with created wetlands within the Lower White River Watershed, Arkansas. Thesis, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, USA

  • Merritt RW, Cummins KW (eds) (1996) An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, 3rd edn. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer CK, Peterson SD, Whiles MR (2011) Quantitative assessment of yield, precision, and cost-effectiveness of three wetland invertebrate sampling techniques. Wetlands 31:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihue JR, Trost CH, Mihue TB (1997) Shorebird predation on benthic macroinvertebrates in an irrigation reservoir. Great Basin Naturalist 57:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorhead DL, Hall DL, Willig MR (1998) Succession of macroinvertebrates in playas of the southern high plains, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 17:430–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murkin HR, Kaminski RM, Titman RD (1982) Responses by dabbling ducks and aquatic invertebrates to an experimentally manipulated cattail marsh. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60:2324–2332

  • Murkin HR, Wrubleski DA, Reid F (1994) Sampling invertebrates in aquatic and terrestrial habitats. In: Bookhout TA (ed) Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 349–369

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2012) “Climate prediction center - monitoring & data: drought monitoring.” http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/monitoring_and_data/drought.shtml. Accessed 2013 July 08

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (2013) Wetlands reserve program. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/programs/easements/wetlands/ Accessed 2013 June 27

  • Neckles HA, Murkin HR, Cooper JA (1990) Influence of seasonal flooding on macroinvertebrate abundance in wetland habitats. Freshwater Biology 23:311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead VG, Webb EB, Johnson RW (2013) Moist-soil seed biomass and species richness on Wetland Reserve Program Easements in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Wetlands 33:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pehrsson O (1984) Relationships of food to spatial and temporal breeding strategies of mallards in Sweden. Journal of Wildlife Management 48:322–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratti JT, Garton EO (1994) Research and experimental design. In: Bookhout TA (ed) Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats, 5th edn. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid FA, Kelly JR Jr, Taylor TS, Fredrickson LH (1989) Upper Mississippi Valley wetlands—refuges and moist-soil impoundments. In: Smith LM, Pederson RL, Kaminski RM (eds) Habitat management for migrating and wintering waterfowl in North America. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, pp 181–202

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc (2012) SAS 9.2 enhanced logging facilities. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA

  • Sherfy MH, Kirkpatrick RL, Richkus KD (2000) Benthos core sampling and chironomid vertical distribution: implications for assessing shorebird food availability. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:124–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Skagen SK, Oman HD (1996) Dietary flexibility of shorebirds in the Western Hemisphere. Canadian Field Naturalist 110:419–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford JD, Kaminski RM, Reinecke KJ, Manley SW (2006) Waste rice for waterfowl in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Journal of Wildlife Management 70:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stagliano DM, Whiles MR (2011) Macroinvertebrate production and trophic structure in a tallgrass prairie headwater stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21:97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson GA, Meyer MI (1977) Impact of fluctuating water levels on feeding ecology of breeding blue-winged teal. Journal of Wildlife Management 41(3):426–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapp JL (2013) Waterbird use and food availability on Wetland Reserve Program easements enrolled in the Migratory Bird Habitat Initiative. Thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA

  • Tidwell PR, Webb EB, Vrtiska MP, Bishop AA (2013) Diets and Food Selection of Female Mallards and Blue-Winged Teal during Spring Migration. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 4:63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner AM, Trexler JC (1997) Sampling aquatic invertebrates from marshes: evaluating the options. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16:694–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twedt DJ (2013) Foraging habitat for shorebirds in Southeastern Missouri and its predicted future availability. Wetlands 33:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigts DK (1976) Aquatic invertebrate abundance in relation to changing marsh vegetation. American Midland Naturalist 95:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb EB, Smith LM, Vrtiska MP, LaGrange TG (2010) Effects of local and landscape variables on wetland bird habitat use during migration through the Rainwater Basin. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehrle BW, Kaminski RM, Leopold BD, Smith WP (1995) Aquatic invertebrate resources in Mississippi forested wetlands during winter. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23:774–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting DP, Whiles MR, Stone ML (2011) Patterns of macroinvertebrate production, trophic structure, and energy flow along a tallgrass prairie stream continuum. Limnologcial Oceanographer 56:887–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) and Mississippi State University (MSU). We thank the many landowners in Arkansas and Missouri, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Missouri Department of Conservation for providing study wetlands for this project. C. Harris, A. Dinges, B. Cobban, J. Bleich, S. James, J. Cowan, J. Fox, K. Cole, Z. Haverly, D. Brown, and K. Moreau assisted with sample collection and processing. Dr. J. Millspaugh provided statistical guidance. The Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit is jointly sponsored by the Missouri Department of Conservation, the University of Missouri, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Wildlife Management Institute. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government or other sponsoring or participating agencies.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jessica L. Tapp

    Present address: Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 S. Baltimore, Kirksville, MO, 63501, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

    Jessica L. Tapp

  2. U.S. Geological Survey, Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

    Elisabeth B. Webb

Authors
  1. Jessica L. Tapp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elisabeth B. Webb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica L. Tapp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tapp, J.L., Webb, E.B. Aquatic Invertebrate Food Base for Waterbirds at Wetland Reserve Program Easements in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Wetlands 35, 183–192 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-014-0613-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-014-0613-3

Keywords