Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships Between Soil Composition and Spartina Alterniflora Dieback in an Atlantic Salt Marsh

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large scale dieback of Spartina alterniflora poses a threat to salt marsh ecosystem function. Several hypothesized drivers of recent dieback events have been proposed, however, some aspects of salt marsh soil composition and dieback recurrence remain unexplored. We surveyed soil conditions in dieback affected zones and unaffected zones in two marshes on Sapelo Island, Georgia during a drought year to test whether dieback is associated with spatial variations in soil properties such as pH, salinity, water retention and texture. We also surveyed previously documented dieback locations to test whether dieback zones exhibit spatial recurrence. Tidal salt marshes showed significant spatial variability in three physical soil characteristics and exhibited strong associations with zones of S. alterniflora dieback. Sediments in dieback zones had lower silt content, higher bulk density and lower field capacity (a measure of water retention) relative to healthy S. alterniflora stands. Dieback zones also showed patterns of spatial recurrence and similarities with vegetation free areas. These data suggest that the legacy of dieback may be reflected in soils making certain areas susceptible to further dieback during drought periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alber M, Swenson EM, Adamowicz SC, Mendelssohn IA (2008) Salt marsh dieback: an overview of recent events in the US. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 80(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelini C, Silliman BR (2012) Patch size-dependent community recovery after massive disturbance. Ecology 93(1):101–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch EW, Stier AC, Silliman BR (2011) The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81(2):169–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley PM, Morris JT (1990) Physical characteristics of salt marsh sediments: ecological implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 61:245–252

  • Chmura GL, Anisfeld SC, Cahoon DR, Lynch JC (2003) Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 17(4)

  • Cloverdale TC, Altieri AH, Bertness MD (2012) Belowground herbivory increases vulnerability of New England salt marshes to die-off. Ecology 93:2085–2094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft CB, Seneca ED, Broome SW (1991) Loss on ignition and Kjeldahl digestion for estimating organic carbon and total nitrogen in estuarine marsh soils: calibration with dry combustion. Estuaries 14(2):175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Development Core Team R (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmer WH, Marra RE (2011) New species of Fusarium associated with dieback of Spartina alterniflora in Atlantic salt marshes. Mycologia 103:806–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer JM, Reed-Andersen T, Klug JL, Chalmers AG (2000) Spatial pattern of localized disturbance along a southeastern salt marsh tidal creek. Estuaries 23(4):565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaeta JW, Kornis MS (2011) Stem borer frequency and composition in healthy Spartina alterniflora (smooth cordgrass) and dieback zones in a southern Atlantic Coast salt marsh. Estuar Coasts 34(5):1078–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman JM (1988) Recolonization of small disturbance patches in a New England salt marsh. Am J Bot 83:1521–1527

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1999) Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • King GM, Klug MJ, Wiegert RG, Chalmers AG (1982) Relation of soil water movement and sulfide concentration to Spartina alterniflora production in a Georgia salt marsh. Science 218:61–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan ML, Murray AB, Boyd WS (2008) Temporary vegetation disturbance as an explanation for permanent loss of tidal wetlands. Geophys Res Lett 35. doi:10.1029/2007GL032681

  • Lindstedt DM, Swenson EM (2006) The case of the dying marsh grass. Report submitted to the Lousiana Department of Natural Resources. Baton Rouge, LA

    Google Scholar 

  • Luther GW III, Ferdelman TG, Kostka JE, Tsamakis EJ, Church TM (1991) Temporal and spatial variability of reduced sulfur species (FeS2, S2O3 2−) and porewater parameters in salt marsh sediments. Biogeochemistry 14:57–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan TR (1986) The effect of seed source on primary succession in a forest ecosystem. Vegetatio 65:175–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee KL, Mendelssohn IA, Materness MD (2004) Acute salt marsh dieback in the Mississippi River deltaic plain: a drought-induced phenomenon? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13(1):65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcleod E, Chmura GL, Bouillon S, Salm R, Björk M, Duarte CM, Lovelock CE, Schlesinger WH, Silliman BR (2011) A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front Ecol Environ 9(10):552–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meesters EH, Pauchli W, Bak RPM (1997) Predicting regeneration of physical damage on a reef-building coral by regeneration capacity and lesion shape. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 146:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelssohn IA, Seneca ED (1980) The influence of soil drainage on the growth of salt marsh cordgrass Spartina alterniflora in North Carolina. Estuar Coast Mar Sci 11(1):27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffett KB, Gorelick SB, McLaren RG, Sudicky EA (2012) Salt marsh ecohydrological zonation due to heterogeneous vegetation – groundwater – surface water interactions. Water Resour Res 48

  • Mudd SM, D’Alpaos A, Morris JT (2010) How does vegetation affect sedimentation on tidal marshes? Investigating particle capture and hydrodynamic controls on biologically mediated sedimentation. J Geophys Res 115:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumeier U, Ciavola P (2004) Flow resistance and associated sedimentary processes in a Spartina maritima salt marsh. J Coast Res 20(2):435–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyman JA, Walters RJ, Delaune RD, Patrick WH Jr (2006) Marsh vertical accretion via vegetative growth. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 69:370–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogburn MB, Alber M (2006) An investigation of salt marsh dieback in Georgia using field transplants. Estuar Coasts 29:54–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls WJ, Pachepsky YA, Ritchie JC, Sobecki TM, Bloodworth H (2003) Effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention. Geoderma 116(1–2):61–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Royston P (1995) Remark AS R94: a remark on Algorithm AS 181: the W test for normality. Appl Stat 44:547–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman BR, Bertness MD (2002) A trophic cascade regulates salt marsh primary production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(16):10500–10505

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman BR, van de Koppel J, Bertness MD, Stanton LE, Mendelssohn IA (2005) Drought, snails, and large-scale die-off of southern U.S. salt marshes. Science 310(5755):1803–1806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson JC, Ward LG, Kearney MS (1988) Sediment transport and trapping in marsh systems: implications of tidal flux studies. Mar Geol 80:37–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf P (1983) The process of sedimentation of a salt marsh on the surface of a salt marsh. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 17:495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teal JM (1962) Energy flow in the salt marsh ecosystem of Georgia. Ecology 43:614–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temmerman S, Moonen P, Schoelynck J, Govers G, Bouma TJ (2012) Impact of vegetation die-off on spatial flow patterns over a tidal marsh. Geophys Res Lett 39, doi:10.1029/2011GL050502

  • Turner MG, Baker WM, Peterson CJ, Peet RK (1998) Factors influencing succession: lessons from large, infrequent natural disturbances. Ecosystems 1:511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KR, Kelley JT, Tanner BR, Belknap DF (2009) Probing the origins and stratgraphic signature of salt pools from north-temperate marshes in Maine, U.S.A. J Coast Res 26:1007–1026

Download references

Acknowledgments

E. Thomas conducted particle size analyses, A. Johnson and B. Korte assisted with sample processing in Madison. We wish to thank S. Powers and E. Stanley for helpful discussion; and J. Gaeta and M. Kornis for discussion and feedback on an early version of the manuscript. We also thank The University of Georgia Marine Institute for providing housing and laboratory space. This work was funded by the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute under grants from the National Sea Grant College Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, and from the State of Wisconsin Federal grant number NA100AR4170070.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John T. Crawford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crawford, J.T., Stone, A.G. Relationships Between Soil Composition and Spartina Alterniflora Dieback in an Atlantic Salt Marsh. Wetlands 35, 13–20 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-014-0588-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-014-0588-0

Keywords

Navigation