Advertisement

Wetlands

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 775–785 | Cite as

Modelling Habitat Distribution of Mediterranean Coastal Wetlands: The Ebro Delta as Case Study

  • Xavier Benito
  • Rosa Trobajo
  • Carles Ibáñez
Original Research

Abstract

Present-day altered distribution of the natural habitats in the Ebro Delta is consequence of intensive human settlement in the last two centuries. We developed spatial predictive models of potential natural wetland habitats of the Ebro Delta based on ecogeographical predictors and presence/pseudo-absence data for each habitat. The independent variables (i.e. elevation, distance from the coast, distance from the river and distance from the inner border) were analysed using Generalized Additive Models (GAMs). Elevation and the distance from the coast appeared as key predictors in most of the coastal habitats (coastal lagoons, sandy environments, Salicornia-type marshes and reed beds), whereas distances from the river and from the inner border were relevant in the most terrestrial or inland habitats (salt meadows, Cladium-type marshes and riparian vegetation). Our findings suggest that the most inland habitats (i.e. Cladium-type marshes, salt meadows and riparian vegetation) would have undergone a severe reduction (higher than 90 %), whereas in the most coastal habitats (coastal lagoons, sandy environments, Salicornia-type marshes) the reduction in relation to their potential distribution would be around 70 %. This modelling approach can be applied to other deltaic areas, since all them share a similar topography.

Keywords

Predictive modelling Mediterranean wetlands Deltas Generalized additive models Geographic information system 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by IRTA-URV-Santander fellowship to Xavier Benito Granell through “BRDI Trainee Research Personnel Programme funded by University of Rovira and Virgili R + D + I projects”. The work described in this publication was supported by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme through the grant to the budget of the Collaborative Project RISES-AM-, Contract FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage-603396. The Digital Elevation Model is propriety of Cartographic Institute of Catalonia (www.icc.cat). The authors would like to thank to the IRTA technicians Lluís Jornet and David Mateu for field support. We thank also two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

13157_2014_541_Fig6_ESM.gif (257 kb)
Supplementary Fig. S1 Location of the study area, the Ebro Delta, and its present-day main habitats. (GIF 257 kb)
13157_2014_541_MOESM1_ESM.tif (295 kb)
(TIFF 295 kb)
13157_2014_541_Fig7_ESM.gif (234 kb)
Supplementary Fig. S2 Map showing the potential distribution (presence/absence) of natural habitats in the Ebro Delta predicted by the models. The overlap of the habitats have been made on the basis of the explained deviance by the GAM models. (GIF 234 kb)
13157_2014_541_MOESM2_ESM.tif (249 kb)
(TIFF 249 kb)

References

  1. Álvarez-Rogel J, Carrasco L, Marín C, Martínez-Sánchez J (2007) Soils of a dune coastal salt marsh system in relation to groundwater level, micro-topography and vegetation under a semiarid Mediterranean climate in SE Spain. Catena 69:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin M (2002) Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol Model 157:101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekkby T, Moy FE (2011) Developing spatial models of sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) potential distribution under natural conditions and areas of its disappearance in Skagerrak. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 95:477–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bio A, Alkemade R, Barendregt A (1998) Determining alternative models for vegetation response analysis: a non-parametric approach. J Veg Sci 9:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bossard M, Feranec J, Otahel J (2000) CORINE land cover technical guide: Addendum 2000. European Environment Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardoch L, Day JW, Ibáñez C (2002) Net primary productivity as an indicator of sustainability in the Ebro and Mississippi deltas. Ecol Appl 12:1044–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casanova D, Boixadera J, Llop J (2002) Development and Applications of a Soil Geographic Database: A case study in a deltaic environment under rice cultivation. J Spat Hydrol 2Google Scholar
  8. Chefaoui RM, Lobo JM (2008) Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance. Ecol Model 210:478–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman JM, Huh OK, Braud D Jr (2008) Wetland loss in world deltas. J Coast Res 24:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curcó A, Canicio C, Ibáñez C (1995) Mapa d'hàbitats potencials del Delta de l'Ebre. Butll. Parc Natural Delta Ebre 9:4–12Google Scholar
  11. Curcó A, Ibáñez C, Day JW, Prat N (2002) Net primary production and decomposition of salt marshes of the Ebre Delta (Catalonia, Spain). Estuar Coasts 25:309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Day JW, Pont D, Hensel P, Ibáñez C (1995) Impacts of sea level rise on deltas in the Gulf of Mexico and the Mediterranean: the importance of pulsing events to sustainability. Estuar Coasts 18:636–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Felicísimo A, Sánchez-Gago L (2002) Thematic and spatial accuracy: a comparison of the Corine Land Cover with the Forestry Map of Spain. 5th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Palma, Balearic Islands Spain, pp 109–118Google Scholar
  14. Ferrier S, Watson G, Pearce J, Drielsma M (2002) Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. I. Species-level modelling. Biodivers Conserv 11:2275–2307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Franklin J (1995) Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Prog Phys Geogr 19:474–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hastie T (2012) GAM: Generalized Additive Models. R package version 1.06.2. Available via. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gam
  19. Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Heinanen S, Erola J, von Numers M (2012) High resolution species distribution models of two nesting water bird species: a study of transferability and predictive performance. Landsc Ecol 27:545–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hijmans R, Phillips J, Leathwick J, Elith J (2011) DISMO. Species distribution modeling. R package version 0.8. Available via. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dismo
  22. Ibàñez C, Canicio A, Day JW, Curcó A (1997) Morphologic development, relative sea level rise and sustainable management of water and sediment in the Ebre Delta, Spain. Journal of Coastal Conservation 3:191--202Google Scholar
  23. Ibáñez C, Curcó A, Day JW, Prat N (2000) Structure and Productivity of Microtidal Mediterranean Coastal Marshes. In M. Weinstein and D. Kreeger (eds.), Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Springer Netherlands, pp 107–136Google Scholar
  24. Ibáñez C, Sharpe PJ, Day JW, Day JN, Prat N (2010) Vertical accretion and relative sea level rise in the Ebro Delta Wetlands (Catalonia, Spain). Wetlands 30:979–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ibáñez C, Alcaraz C, Caiola N, Rovira A, Trobajo R, Alonso M, Duran C, Jiménez P, Munné A, Prat N (2011) Regime shift from phytoplankton to macrophyte dominance in a large river: Top-down versus bottom-up effects. Sci Total Environ 416:314–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ibáñez C, Day JW, Reyes E (2013) The response of deltas to sea-level rise: natural mechanisms and management options to adapt to high-end scenarios. Ecological Engineering. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.08.002.
  27. Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM, Hortal J (2008) Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Divers Distrib 14:885–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM (2007) Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either-or presence-absence. Acta Oecol 31:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joye DA, Oertli B, Lehmann A, Juge R, Lachavanne JB (2006) The prediction of macrophyte species occurrence in Swiss ponds. In J. M. Caffrey, A. Dutartre, J. Haury, K. M. Murphy and P. M. Wade (eds.), Macrophytes in Aquatic Ecosystems: From Biology to Management. Hydrobiologia, pp 175–182Google Scholar
  30. Liu C, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG (2005) Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manel S, Williams HC, Ormerod SJ (2001) Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J Appl Ecol 38:921–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mañosa S, Mateo R, Guitart R (2001) A review of the effects of agricultural and industrial contamination on the Ebro Delta biota and wildlife. Environ Monit Assess 71:187–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martínez-Alonso M, Mir J, Caumette P, Gaju N, Guerrero R, Esteve I (2004) Distribution of phototrophic populations and primary production in a microbial mat from the Ebro Delta, Spain. Int Microbiol 7:19–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Martínez B, Viejo RM, Carreño F, Aranda SC (2012) Habitat distribution models for intertidal seaweeds: responses to climatic and non-climatic drivers. J Biogeogr 39:1877–1890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nebra A, Caiola N, Ibáñez C (2011) Community structure of benthic macro in vertebrates inhabiting a highly stratified Mediterranean estuary. Sci Mar 75:577–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peters J, Verhoest NEC, Samson R, Boeckx P, De Baets B (2008) Wetland vegetation distribution modelling for the identification of constraining environmental variables. Landsc Ecol 23:1049–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips S, Dudík M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, Leathwick J, Ferrier S (2009) Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol Appl 19:181–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Planque B, Bellier E, Lazure P (2007) Modelling potential spawning habitat of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) and anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in the Bay of Biscay. Fish Oceanogr 16:16–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pont D, Day JW, Hensel P, Franquet E, Torre F, Rioual P, Ibáñez C, Coulet E (2002) Response scenarios for the deltaic plain of the Rhône in the face of an acceleration in the rate of sea-level rise with special attention to Salicornia-type environments. Estuar Coasts 25:337–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prado P, Caiola N, Ibáñez C (2012) Spatio-temporal patterns of submerged macrophytes in three hydrologically altered Mediterranean coastal lagoons. Estuar Coasts 36:414–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodrigues-Capítulo A, España A, Ibáñez C, Prat N (1994) Limnology of natural wells in the Ebro Delta (NE Spain). In A. Sladeckova (ed.). International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology, Proceedings, pp 1430–1433Google Scholar
  42. Rovira L, Trobajo R, Leira M, Ibáñez C (2012a) The effects of hydrological dynamics on benthic diatom community structure in a highly stratified estuary: The case of the Ebro Estuary (Catalonia, Spain). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 101:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rovira L, Trobajo R, Ibáñez C (2012b) The use of diatom assemblages as ecological indicators in highly stratified estuaries and evaluation of existing diatom indices. Mar Pollut Bull 64:500–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanmartí N, Menéndez M (2007) Litter decomposition of Scirpus maritimus L. in a Mediterranean coastal marsh: Importance of the meiofauna during the initial phases of detached leaves decomposition. Int Rev Hydrobiol 92:211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seoane J, Viñuela J, Díaz-Delgado R, Bustamante J (2003) The effects of land use and climate on red kite distribution in the Iberian Peninsula. Biol Conserv 111:401–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shoutis L, Patten DT, McGlynn B (2010) Terrain-based predictive modeling of riparian vegetation in a Northern Rocky Mountain watershed. Wetlands 30:621–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Silvestri S, Defina A, Marani M (2005) Tidal regime, salinity and salt marsh plant zonation. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 62:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vigo J, Carreras J (2003) Los hábitats del proyecto CORINE en el ámbito territorial catalán: delimitación y cartografía. Acta Botánica Barcinonensia 49:401–420Google Scholar
  49. Wood SN, Augustin NH (2002) GAMs with integrated model selection using penalized regression splines and applications to environmental modelling. Ecol Model 157:157–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zedler JB, Callaway JC, Desmond JS, Vivian-Smith G, Williams GD, Sullivan G, Brewster AE, Bradshaw BK (1999) Californian salt-marsh vegetation: An improved model of spatial pattern. Ecosystems 2:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zucchetta M, Franco A, Torricelli P, Franzoi P (2010) Habitat distribution model for European flounder juveniles in the Venice lagoon. J Sea Res 64:133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zuur AF (2012) A beginner's guide to Generalized Additive Models with R. Limited, Highland StatisticsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IRTA, Aquatic Ecosystems ProgramCataloniaSpain
  2. 2.Centre for Climate Change, Geography DepUniversity Rovira i VirgiliTortosaSpain

Personalised recommendations