, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 773–786 | Cite as

How Wetlands Affect Floods

  • M. AcremanEmail author
  • J. Holden


It is widely recognised that wetlands play an important role in the hydrological cycle, influencing groundwater recharge, low flows, evaporation and floods. This has led to policies being formulated world-wide to conserve and manage wetlands to deliver these key services, especially flood risk reduction. Generic statements have often been published about wetland hydrological services but the term “wetlands” covers many land types, including wet woodlands, reedbeds, peat bogs, fens, and salt marshes. Each of these wetland types can have a hydrological function that is subtly different, making it difficult to generalise the flood reduction services of wetlands. In this paper we focus on two example wetland types (upland rain-fed wetlands and floodplain wetlands) to demonstrate why there are differences in flood functions both within and between wetland types. Upland wetlands generally tend to be flood generating areas while floodplain wetlands have a greater potential to reduce floods. However, landscape location and configuration, soil characteristics, topography, soil moisture status and management all influence whether these wetlands provide flood reduction services.


Wetlands Floods Water storage Runoff generation Water table Peat Hydrology 


  1. Acreman MC (1985) The effects of afforestation on the flood hydrology of the Upper ettrick valley. Scottish Forestry 39:89–99Google Scholar
  2. Acreman MC, Miller F (2007) Hydrological impact assessment of wetlands. In: Ragone S, Hernández-Mora N, de la Hera A, Bergkamp G, McKay J (eds) The global importance of groundwater in the 21st century: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Groundwater Sustainability. National Groundwater Association Press, OhioGoogle Scholar
  3. Acreman MC, Booker DJ, Riddington R (2003) Hydrological impacts of floodplain restoration: a case study of the river Cherwell, UK. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 7:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Acreman MC, Fisher J, Stratford CJ, Mould DJ, Mountford JO (2007) Hydrological science and wetland restoration: case studies from Europe. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11:158–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Acreman MC, Harding RJ, Lloyd C, McNamara NP, Mountford JO, Mould DJ, Purse BV, Heard MS, Stratford CJ, Dury S (2011) Trade-off in ecosystem services of the Somerset Levels and Moors wetlands. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56(8):1543–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Agarwal A, Chak A (1991) Floods, floodplains and environmental myths. State of India’s environment 3. Centre for Science and Environment, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  7. Archer DR (1989) Flood wave attenuation due to channel and floodplain storage and effects on flood frequency. In: Beven KJ, Carling P (eds) Floods: hydrological, sedimentological and geomorphological implications. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 37–46Google Scholar
  8. Armstrong A, Holden J, Kay P, Francis B, Foulger M, Gledhill S, McDonald AT, Walker A (2010) The impact of peatland drain-blocking on dissolved organic carbon loss and discolouration of water; results from a national survey. Journal of Hydrology 381:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ballard CE, McIntyre N, Wheater HS, Holden J, Wallage ZE (2011) Hydrological modelling of drained blanket peat. Journal of Hydrology 407:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baptist MJ, Penning WE, Duel H, Smits AJM, Geerling GW, van der Lee GEM, van Alphen JSL (2004) Assessment of the effects of cyclic floodplain rejuvenation on flood levels and biodiversity along the Rhine River. Rivers Research and Applications 20:285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bates PD, Anderson MG, Baird L, Walling DE, Simm D (1992) Modelling floodplain flows using a two-dimentional finite element model. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 17:575–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bates PD, Stewart MD, Desitter A, Anderson MG, Renaud J-P (2000) Numerical simulation of floodplain hydrology. Water Resources Research 36:2517–2529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bay RR (1969) Runoff from small peatland watersheds. Journal of Hydrology 9:90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bedinger MS (1981) Hydrology of bottomland hardwood forests of the Mississippi Embayment. In: Clark JR, Benforado J (eds) Wetlands of bottomland hardwood forests. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benke AC (2001) Importance of flood regime to invertebrate habitat in an unregulated river–floodplain ecosystem. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20:225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Betson RP (1964) What is watershed runoff? Journal of Geophysical Research 69:1541–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Beven K, Germann P (1982) Macropores and water-flow in soils. Water Resources Research 18:1311–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin 24:43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Blackwell MSA, Maltby E (2006) Ecoflood guidelines. How to use floodplains for flood risk reduction. EUR 22001 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  20. Bragg OM, Tallis JH (2001) The sensitivity of peat-covered upland landscapes. Catena 42:345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brinson MM (1993) A hydro-geomorphic classification for wetlands. Technical Report WRP-DF-4. US Army Engineers Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Bromley J, Robinson M, Barker JA (2004) Scale-dependency of hydraulic conductivity: an example from Thorne Moor, a raised mire in South Yorkshire, UK. Hydrological Processes 18:973–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brookes A (1985) River channelisation, traditional engineering methods, physical consequences and alternative practices. Progress in Physical Geography 9:44–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bucher EH, Bonetto A, Boyle T, Canevari P, Castro G, Huszar P, Stone T (1993) Hidrovia- an initial environmental examination of the Paraguay - Parana waterway. Wetlands for the Americas Publication No. 10, Manomet, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Bullock A, Acreman MC (2003) The role of wetlands in the hydrological cycle. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 7:358–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Burke W (1968) Drainage of blanket peat at Glenamoy. Proceedings of the 2nd International Peat Congress. HMSO, Edinburgh, pp 809-817Google Scholar
  27. Burke W (1975) Aspects of the hydrology of blanket peat in Ireland. Hydrology of marsh-ridden areas, Proceedings of the Minsk Symposium (June, 1972), International Association of Hydrological Sciences, UNESCO/IAHS, Paris, pp 171-182Google Scholar
  28. Burt TP (1995) The role of wetlands in runoff generation from headwater catchments. In: Hughes J, Heathwaite AL (eds) Hydrology and hydrochemistry of British wetlands. Wiley, Chichester, pp 21–38Google Scholar
  29. Burt TP (1996) The hydrology of headwater catchments. In: Petts GE, Calow P (eds) River flows and channel forms. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 6–31Google Scholar
  30. Burt TP (2001) Integrated management of sensitive catchment systems. Catena 42:275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Burt TP, Butcher DP (1985) Topographic controls of soil moisture distributions. European Journal of Soil Science 36:469–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. CEC (1995) Wise use and conservation of wetlands. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Commission of the European Communities COM(95) 189 (final)Google Scholar
  33. CEH (1999) Flood estimation handbook. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Chow VT (1959) Open channel hydraulics. McGraw Hill, USAGoogle Scholar
  35. CIFOR (2005) Forests and floods drowning in fiction or thriving on facts? Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor Barat 16680, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  36. Costanza R et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Cowan WL (1956) Estimating hydraulic roughness coefficients. Agricultural Engineering 37:473–475Google Scholar
  38. Cowardine LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deep water habitats in the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Darmer KI (1970) A proposed streamflow data program for New York: U.S. Geological Survey open-file report, Albany, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Davies J, Claridge CF (1993) Wetland benefits: the potential for wetlands to support and maintain development. Asian Wetland Bureau Publication No. 87: IWRB Special Publication 27: Wetlands for the America Publication No. 11. Asian Wetland Bureau, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  41. Davis TJ (1993) Towards the wise use of wetlands. Ramsar Convention Bureau, GlandGoogle Scholar
  42. Delaney T (1995) Benefits to downstream flood attenuation and water quality as a result of constructed wetlands in agricultural landscapes. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50:620–626Google Scholar
  43. Devito KJ, Hill AR, Roulet N (1996) Groundwater-surface water interactions in headwater forested wetlands of the Canadian Shield. Journal of Hydrology 181:127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Doyle AF (1987) The Charles River Watershed: a dual approach to floodplain management. Proceedings of the National Wetland Symposium on Wetland Hydrology. Association of State Wetland Managers Inc., Chicago, pp 110–112Google Scholar
  45. Dugan PJ (1990) Wetland conservation - a review of current issues and required action. IUCN - The World Conservation Union, GlandGoogle Scholar
  46. Eggelsmann R, Heathwaite AL, Grosse-Braukmann G, Küster E, Naucke W, Schuch M, Schweickle V (1993) Physical processes and properties of mires. In: Heathwaite AL, Gottlich K (eds) Mires, process, exploration and conservation. John Wiley, Chichester, pp 171–262Google Scholar
  47. Emerton L, Bos E (2004) Value. Counting ecosystems as an economic part of water. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  48. Falconer RH, Cobby D, Smyth P, Astle G, Dent J, Golding B (2009) Pluvial flooding: new approaches in flood warning, mapping and risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management 2:198–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01034.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fischer B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68:643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Forest WE, Walker PN (1970) A proposed streamflow data program for Maryland and Delaware, Towson, Maryland, U.S. Geolological Survey Open File ReportGoogle Scholar
  51. Forster DR, Glaser PH (1986) The raised bogs of south-eastern Labrador, Canada: classification, distribution, vegetation and recent dynamics. Journal of Ecology 74:47–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gilman K (1994) Hydrology and wetland conservation. John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  53. Gilman K (2002) A review of evapotranspiration rates from wetland and wetland catchment plant communities, with particular reference to Cors y Llyn NNR, Powys, Wales. CCW Science Report; 504, Countryside Council for Wales, BangorGoogle Scholar
  54. Glenn MS, Woo M-K (1997) Spring and summer hydrology of a valley-bottom wetland, Ellesmere Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. Wetlands 17:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Grayson R, Holden J, Rose R (2010) Long-term change in storm hydrographs in response to peatland vegetation change. Journal of Hydrology 389:336–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Haarhoff J, Cassa A (2009) Introduction to flood hydrology. Juta Legal and Academic Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  57. Harvey JW, Schaffranek RW, Noe GB, Larsen LG, Nowacki DJ, O’Connor BL (2009) Hydroecological factors governing surface water flow on a low-gradient floodplain. Water Resources Research 45, W03421. doi: 10.1029/2008WR007129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Heathwaite AL (1995) Overview of the hydrology of British wetlands. In: Hughes JMR, Heathwaite AL (eds) Hydrology and hydrochemistry of British Wetlands. John Wiley, Chichester, pp 11–20Google Scholar
  59. Hewlett JD, Hibbert AR (1967) Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid regions. In: Sopper WE, Lull HW (eds) Forest hydrology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 275–290Google Scholar
  60. Hillman GR (1998) Floodwave attenuation by a wetland following a beaver dam failure on a second order boreal stream. Wetlands 18:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Holden J (2005a) Peatland hydrology and carbon cycling: why small-scale process matters. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 363:2891–2913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Holden J (2005b) Controls of soil pipe density in blanket peat uplands. Journal of Geophysical Research 110:F010002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Holden J, Burt TP (2002a) Infiltration, runoff and sediment production in blanket peat catchments: implications of field rainfall simulation experiments. Hydrological Processes 16:2537–2557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Holden J, Burt TP (2002b) Piping and pipeflow in a deep peat catchment. Catena 48:163–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Holden J, Burt TP (2003a) Hydrological studies of blanket peat: the significance of the acrotelm-catotelm model. Journal of Ecology 91:86–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Holden J, Burt TP (2003b) Runoff production in blanket peat covered catchments. Water Resources Research 39:article number 1191Google Scholar
  67. Holden J, Burt TP (2003c) Hydraulic conductivity in upland blanket peat: measurement and variability. Hydrological Processes 17:1227–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Holden J, Burt TP, Vilas M (2002) Application of ground penetrating radar to the identification of subsurface piping in blanket peat. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27:235–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Holden J, Chapman PJ, Labadz JC (2004) Artificial drainage of peatlands: hydrological and hydrochemical process and wetland restoration. Progress in Physical Geography 28:95–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Holden J, Burt TP, Evans MG, Horton M (2006) Impact of land drainage on peatland hydrology. Journal of Environmental Quality 35:1764–1778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Holden J, Gascoign M, Bosanko NR (2007) Erosion and natural revegetation associated with surface land drains in upland peatlands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32:1547–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Holden J, Kirkby MJ, Lane SN, Milledge DJ, Brookes CJ, Holden V, McDonald AT (2008) Factors affecting overland flow velocity in peatlands. Water Resources Research 44:W06415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Holden J, Wallage ZE, Lane SN, McDonald AT (2011) Water table dynamics in drained and restored blanket peat. Journal of Hydrology 402:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Holden J, Wearing C, Palmer S, Jackson B, Johnston K, Brown LE (2013) Fire decreases near-surface hydraulic conductivity and macropore flow in blanket peat. Hydrological Processes. doi: 10.1002/hyp.9875 Google Scholar
  75. Hooijer A (1996) Floodplain hydrology: an ecologically oriented study of the Shannon Callows, Ireland. Amsterdam University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  76. Howe CP, Claridge GF, Hughes R, Zuwendra (1992) Manual of guidelines for scoping EIA in tropical wetlands, 2nd edn. Asian Wetland Bureau-Indonesia, Bogor, 261pGoogle Scholar
  77. Howie SA, Whitfield PH, Hebda RJ, Munson TG, Dakin RA, Jeglum JK (2009) Water table and vegetation response to ditch blocking: restoration of a raised bog in southwestern British Columbia. Canadian Water Resources Journal 34:381–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. John DM, Leveque C, Newton LE (1993) Chapter on West Africa. In: Whigham DF, Dykyjova D, Hejny S (eds) Wetlands of the world I: inventory, ecology and management. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  79. Jones JAA (1997) Pipeflow contributing areas and runoff response. Hydrological Processes 11:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Jones JAA (2010) Soil piping and catchment response. Hydrological Processes 24:1548–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106:110–127Google Scholar
  82. Kjeldsen TR (2009) Modelling the impact of urbanisation on flood runoff volumes. Proceedings of ICE, Water Management 162(5):329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Kjeldsen TR, Jones DA (2009) An exploratory analysis of error components in hydrological regression modelling. Water Resources Research 45:W02407, 13 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Kloet L (1971) Effects of drainage and runoff and flooding within the Pembina River Basins: North Dakota - Manitoba. Bureau of Sport, Fisheries and Wildlife, BismarckGoogle Scholar
  85. Lane SN, Milledge DG (2013) Impacts of upland open drains upon runoff generation: a numerical assessment of catchment-scale impacts. Hydrological Processes 27:1701–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lin H (2010) Linking principles of soil formation and flow regimes. Journal of Hydrology 393:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Lloyd J, Tellam J, Rukin N, Lerner D (1993) Wetland vulnerability in East Anglia: a possible conceptual framework and generalized approach. Journal of Environmental Management 9(37):87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ludden AP, Frink DL, Johnson DH (1983) Water storage capacity of natural wetland depressions in the Devils Lake basin of North Dakota. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 38:45–48Google Scholar
  89. Maltby E (1991) Wetland management goals: wise use and conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 20:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Maltby E, Acreman MC (2011) Ecosystem Services of Wetlands: pathfinder for a new paradigm. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56(8):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Maltby E, Hogan DV, McInnes RJ (1996) Functional analysis of European wetland ecosystems. Report to the European Commission. EC DGXII STEP-CT90-0084Google Scholar
  92. Maltby E, Acreman MC, Blackwell M, Everard M, Morris J (2013) The challenges and implications of linking wetland science to policy – experience from the UK National Ecosystem Assessment. Ecological Engineering 2414Google Scholar
  93. Martín-Vide JP, Amarilla M, Zárate FJ (2013) Collapse of the Pilcomayo River. Geomorphology. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.007 Google Scholar
  94. Mazvimavi D (1994) A review of the hydrology of dambos in Zimbabwe. In: Matiza T, Crafter S (eds) Wetland ecology and priorities for conservation ion Zimbabwe. IUCN Wetlands Programme, IUCN, Gland, pp 47–53Google Scholar
  95. McCartney MP (2000) The water budget of a headwater catchment containing a dambo. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth B 25:611–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. McDonald AT (1973) Some views on the effects of peat drainage. Scottish Forestry 27:315–327Google Scholar
  97. McDonnell JJ (2003) Where does water go when it rains? Moving beyond the variable source area concept of rainfall-runoff response. Hydrological Processes 17:1869–1875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Millennium ecosystem assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  99. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  100. Moklyak VI, Kubyshkin GP, Karkutsiev GN (1975) The effect of drainage works on streamflow. Hydrology of marsh-ridden areas, Minsk, USSR, 1972. IAHS Studies and Reports in Hydrology, 19: Unesco Press pp 439–446Google Scholar
  101. Moore RJ (1985) The probability distributed principle and runoff production at point and basin scales. Hydrological Sciences Journal 30:273–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Morris J, Hess TM, Gowing DJ, Leeds-Harrison PB, Bannister N, Wade M, Vivash RM (2005) Integrated washland management for flood defence and biodiversity. English Nature Research Reports Number 598, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  103. Mosepele K, Moyle PB, Merron GS, Purkey DR, Mosepele B (2009) Fish, Floods, and Ecosystem Engineers: Aquatic Conservation in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. BioScience 59:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Natural Environment Research Council (1975) Flood studies report. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Five volumesGoogle Scholar
  105. Nepf HM (1999) Drag, turbulence and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resources Research 35(2):479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Nielsen SA, Refsgaard JC, Mathur VK (1991) Conceptual modelling of water loss on floodplains and its application to River Yamuna upstream of Delhi. Nordic Hydrology 22:265–274Google Scholar
  107. Novitski RP (1978) Hydrologic characteristics of Wisconsin’s wetlands and their influence on floods, streamflow and sediment. In: Wetland functions and values: the state of our understanding. American Water Resources Association, Minneapolis, MN, USA, pp 377–388Google Scholar
  108. OECD (1996) Guidelines for aid agencies for improved conservation and sustainable use of tropical and sub-tropical wetland. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Development Assistance Committee: Guidelines on Aid and Environment No. 9Google Scholar
  109. Ogawa H, Male JW (1986) Simulating the flood mitigation role of wetlands. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 112:114–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Price JS (1992) Blanket bog in Newfoundland: Part 2. Hydrological processes. Journal of Hydrology 135:103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Quinton WL, Roulet NT (1998) Spring and summer hydrology of a subarctic patterned wetland. Arctic and Alpine Research 30:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Rameshwaran P (1999) Conveyance prediction for meandering two-stage channel flows. Proceedings of the Institutions of Civil Engineers, Water, Maritime & Energy 136:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Ramsbottom D (1994) The use of models in river basin flood control. In: Kirby C, White WR (eds) Integrated river basin development. Wiley, Chichester, pp 425–435Google Scholar
  114. Republic of Uganda (1995) National policy for the conservation and management of wetland resources. Ministry of Natural Resources, KampalaGoogle Scholar
  115. Righetti M, Armanini A (2002) Flow resistance in open channel flows with sparsely distributed bushes. Journal of Hydrology 269:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Rodwell JS (1991) British plant communities, vol 2, Mires and heaths. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  117. Smart RP, Holden J, Dinsmore K, Baird AJ, Billett MF, Chapman PJ, Grayson R (2013) The dynamics of natural pipe hydrological behaviour in blanket peat. Hydrological Processes. doi: 10.1002/hyp.9242 Google Scholar
  118. Sparks RE (1995) The need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains. Bioscience 45:168–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Sun X, Shiono K, Rameshwaran P, Chandler JH (2010) Modelling vegetation effects in irregular meandering rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Research 48:775–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Sutcliffe JV, Parks YP (1989) Comparative water balances of selected African wetlands. Hydological Sciences Journal 34:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Swiatek D, Szporak S, Chormański J, Okruszko T (2008) Hydrodynamic model of the lower Biebrza river flow - a tool for assessing the hydrologic vulnerability of a floodplain to management practices. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 8:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Thomas H, Nisbet TR (2007) An assessment of the impact of floodplain woodland on flood flows. Water and Environment Journal 21(2):114–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Thomas H, Nisbet T (2012) Modelling the hydraulic impact of reintroducing large woody debris into watercourses. Journal of Flood Risk Management. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2012.01137.x Google Scholar
  124. Tiner RW (1984) Wetlands of the United States: current status and recent trends. US Fish and Wildlife Sevice, National Wetlands Inventory, Washington D.C, 59 ppGoogle Scholar
  125. Tockner K, Malard F, Ward JV (2000) An extension of the flood pulse concept. Hydrological Processes 14:2861–2883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Turner N (1757) An essay on draining and improving peat bogs; in which their nature and properties are fully considered. Baldwin and Pew, LondonGoogle Scholar
  127. US Corps of Engineers (1972) An overview of major wetland functions and values. US Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-84/18Google Scholar
  128. Verry ES, Boelter DH (1975) The influence of bogs on the distribution of streamflow from small bog upland catchments. Hydrology of marsh-ridden areas, Proc. of the Minsk Symp. (June, 1972), International Association of Hydrological Sciences UNECSO/IAHS, Paris 469–478Google Scholar
  129. Waddington JM, Lucchese MC, Duval TP (2011) Sphagnum moss moisture retention following the revegetation of degraded peatlands. Ecohydrology 4:359–366. doi: 10.1002/eco.130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Wakelin MJ, Walker TG, Wilson D (1987) Lincoln flood alleviation scheme. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 82:755–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Wallage ZE, Holden J, McDonald AT (2006) Drain blocking is an effective treatment for reducing dissolved organic carbon loss and water colour in peatlands. The Science of the Total Environment 367:811–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Ward R (1978) Floods. A geographical perspective. MacMillan Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  133. Wilson L, Wilson JM, Johnstone I, Holden J, Armstrong A, Morris M (2011a) The impact of drain blocking on an upland blanket bog during storm and drought events, and the importance of sampling-scale. Journal of Hydrology 404:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Wilson L, Wilson JM, Holden J, Johnstone I, Armstrong A, Morris M (2011b) Ditch blocking, water chemistry and organic carbon flux: evidence that blanket bog restoration reduces erosion and fluvial carbon loss. Science of the Total Environment 409:2010–2018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Woo M-K, Young K (1998) Characteristics of patchy wetlands in a polar desert environment, Arctic Canada. Proceedings, 7th International Conference on Permafrost, 23–27 June, Yellowknife, pp 1141–1146Google Scholar
  136. World Conservation Monitoring Centre (1992) Global biodiversity: status of the earth’s living resources. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  137. Zedler JB, Kercher S (2005) Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:39–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Zwarts L, Cisse N, Diallo N (2005) Hydrology of the Upper Niger. In: Zwarts L et al (eds) The Niger, a lifeline. Effective water management in the Upper Niger Basin. Institiute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment, Lelystad, pp 15–41Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Ecology & HydrologyCrowmarsh GiffordUK
  2. 2.School of GeographyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations