Wetlands

, Volume 34, Supplement 1, pp 213–224 | Cite as

Evaluating Effects of Everglades Restoration on American Crocodile Populations in South Florida Using a Spatially-Explicit, Stage-Based Population Model

  • Timothy W. Green
  • Daniel H. Slone
  • Eric D. Swain
  • Michael S. Cherkiss
  • Melinda Lohmann
  • Frank J. Mazzotti
  • Kenneth G. Rice
Hydrologic Restoration

Abstract

The distribution and abundance of the American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) in the Florida Everglades is dependent on the timing, amount, and location of freshwater flow. One of the goals of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) is to restore historic freshwater flows to American crocodile habitat throughout the Everglades. To predict the impacts on the crocodile population from planned restoration activities, we created a stage-based spatially explicit crocodile population model that incorporated regional hydrology models and American crocodile research and monitoring data. Growth and survival were influenced by salinity, water depth, and density-dependent interactions. A stage-structured spatial model was used with discrete spatial convolution to direct crocodiles toward attractive sources where conditions were favorable. The model predicted that CERP would have both positive and negative impacts on American crocodile growth, survival, and distribution. Overall, crocodile populations across south Florida were predicted to decrease approximately 3 % with the implementation of CERP compared to future conditions without restoration, but local increases up to 30 % occurred in the Joe Bay area near Taylor Slough, and local decreases up to 30 % occurred in the vicinity of Buttonwood Canal due to changes in salinity and freshwater flows.

Keywords

Spatial model Population modeling Stage-based model Crocodylus acutus Mangroves Wetlands 

References

  1. Brandt LA, Mazzotti FJ, Wilcox JR, Barker P, Hasty G, Wasilewski J (1995) Status of the American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) at a power plant site in Florida, USA. Herpetol Nat Hist 3:29–36Google Scholar
  2. Campos Z, Magnusson W (1995) Relationships between rainfall, nesting habitat and fecundity of Caiman crocodilus yacare in the Pantanal, Brazil. J Trop Ecol 11:351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Sinauer Associates, IncGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherkiss MS (1999) Status and distribution of the American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) in Southeastern Florida. Master’s Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  5. Cherkiss MS, Brandt LA, Chartier KL, Lorenz J, Miller M, Parry MW, Pearlstine LG, Rice KG, Shang Z, Mazzotti FJ (2006) The Role of the American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) as an Indicator of Ecological Change in Everglades Ecosystems. http://crocdoc.ifas.ufl.edu/publications/posters/crocodileasindicator/. Accessed 12 Jul 2012
  6. Dunson WA (1982) Salinity relations of crocodiles in Florida Bay. Copeia 1982:374–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunson WA, Mazzotti FJ (1989) Salinity as a limiting factor in the distribution of reptiles in Florida Bay: a theory for the estuarine origin of marine snakes and turtles. Bull Mar Sci 44:229–244Google Scholar
  8. Graham AD (1968) The Lake Rudolf Crocodile (Crocodylus Niloticus Laurenti) population. Report to the Kenya Game Department, Wildlife Services LimitedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hallac D, Kline J, Sadle J, Bass S, Ziegler T, Snow S (2010) Preliminary effects of the January 2010 cold weather on flora and fauna in Everglades National Park. Homestead, FL: Biological Resources Branch, South Florida Natural Resources Center, Everglades and Dry Tortugas National Parks, p 8Google Scholar
  10. Hutton J (1989) Movements, home range, dispersal and the separation of size classes in Nile crocodiles. Am Zool 29:1033–1049Google Scholar
  11. Kushlan JA, Mazzotti FJ (1989) Historic and present distribution of the American crocodile in Florida. J Herpetol 23:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lefkovitch L (1965) The study of population growth in organisms grouped by stages. Biometrics 21:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mazzotti FJ (1985) The ecology of Crocodylus acutus in Florida: a thesis in ecology. Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  14. Mazzotti FJ (1999) The American crocodile in Florida Bay. Estuar Coasts 22:552–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mazzotti FJ, Dunson WA (1984) Adaptations of Crocodylus acutus and Alligator for life in saline water. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 79:641–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mazzotti FJ, Dunson WA (1989) Osmoregulation in crocodilians. Am Zool 29:903–920Google Scholar
  17. Mazzotti FJ, Bohnsack B, McMahon MP, Wilcox JR (1986) Field and laboratory observations on the effects of high temperature and salinity on hatchling Crocodylus acutus. Herpetol 42:191–196Google Scholar
  18. Mazzotti FJ, Brandt LA, Moler PE, Cherkiss MS (2007) American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) in Florida: recommendations for endangered species recovery and ecosystem restoration. J Herpetol 41:122–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mazzotti FJ, Romañach SS, Cherkiss MS, Chartier KL, Chartier V, Brandt LA (2009) Habitat Suitability Index Model for American Crocodiles (Crocodylus acutus) in South Florida. Joint Ecosystem Modeling Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  20. Moler PE (1991a) American Crocodile Nest Survey and Monitoring. Final Report. Study Number 7533. Bureau of Wildlife Research, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FLGoogle Scholar
  21. Moler PE (1991b) American Crocodile Population Dynamics, Final Report, Study Number: 7532. Bureau of Wildlife Research, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FLGoogle Scholar
  22. National Research Council (2002) Florida Bay Research Programs and Their Relation to the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Nichols JD, Viehman L, Chabreck R, Fenderson B (1976) Simulation of a commercially harvested alligator population in Louisiana. Bulletin no. 69. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Center for Agricultural Sciences and Rural Development, Agricultural Experiment StationGoogle Scholar
  24. Ogden JC (1978) Status and nesting biology of the American Crocodile, Crocodylus acutus, (Reptilia, Crocodilidae) in Florida. J Herpetol 12:183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pearlstine L, Smith S, Brandt L, Allen C, Kitchens W, Stenberg J (2002) Assessing state-wide biodiversity in the Florida Gap analysis project. J Environ Manag 66:127–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polis GA, Myers CA (1985) A survey of intraspecific predation among reptiles and amphibians. J Herpetol 19:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. RECOVER (2005) Interim Goal 4.4 American Crocodile. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida, and South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  28. Richards PM, Wasilewski J (2003) Crocodylus acutus (American crocodile) cannibalism. Herpetol Rev 34:371Google Scholar
  29. Schubert A, James W, Mendez H, Santana G (1996) Headstarting and translocation of juvenile Crocodylus acutus in Lago Enriquillo, Dominican Republic. In: IUCN—The World Conservation Union Gland, Switzerland, pp 166–175Google Scholar
  30. SFWMD (1997) Documentation for the South Florida Water Management Model. Hydrologic Systems Modeling Division, Planning Department, SFWMD, West Palm BeachGoogle Scholar
  31. Shenton W, Bond NR, Yen JDL, Nally RM (2012) Putting the “ecology” into environmental flows: ecological dynamics and demographic modelling. Environ Manag 50:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Slone DH (2011) Increasing accuracy of dispersal kernels in grid-based population models. Ecol Model 222:573–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Slone DH, Rice KG, Allen JC (2003) Model evaluates influence of Everglades restoration on alligator populations (Florida). Ecol Restor 21:141–142Google Scholar
  34. Swain ED, Lohmann M, Decker J, Liebscher H, Clarke R, Rodda J, Schultz G, Schumann A, Ubertini L, Young G (2009) Hydrological simulations of water-management scenarios in support of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. In: The role of hydrology in water resources management. IAHS, Island of Capri, Italy, pp 296–305Google Scholar
  35. US Fish and Wildlife Service (1999) South Florida multi-species recovery plan. Atlanta, GA. 2172ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang J, Swain ED, Wolfert MA, Langevin CD, James DE, Telis PA (2007) Application of FTLOADDS to Simulate Flow, Salinity, and Surface-Water Sage in the Southern Everglades, Florida. Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5010, U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy W. Green
    • 1
  • Daniel H. Slone
    • 1
  • Eric D. Swain
    • 2
  • Michael S. Cherkiss
    • 3
  • Melinda Lohmann
    • 2
  • Frank J. Mazzotti
    • 4
  • Kenneth G. Rice
    • 1
  1. 1.US Geological SurveySoutheast Ecological Science CenterGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.US Geological SurveyFlorida Water Science CenterFort LauderdaleUSA
  3. 3.US Geological SurveySoutheast Ecological Science CenterDavieUSA
  4. 4.Department of Wildlife Ecology and ConservationUniversity of FloridaDavieUSA

Personalised recommendations