, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 1125–1134 | Cite as

Environmental Factors at Dissimilar Spatial Scales Influence Plant and Microbial Communities in Restored Wetlands

  • Ariane L. Peralta
  • Jeffrey W. Matthews
  • Diana N. Flanagan
  • Angela D. KentEmail author


Identifying environmental factors that contribute to plant and microbial community variation at different spatial scales can provide critical information for restoration of these communities and the ecosystem services they provide. The objectives of this study were to (i) quantify the relationships among landscape/local environmental factors and plant, bacterial and denitrifier communities, and (ii) assess the spatial relationships between environmental and biological community matrices in 27 restored Illinois wetlands. We hypothesized that plant and microbial community composition are sensitive to different environmental factors operating at local compared to landscape scales. We surveyed plant assemblages, overall bacterial communities, and denitrifying bacteria. Landscape (surrounding land cover, regional climate variables) and local soil factors (soil organic matter, moisture, inorganic nitrogen, pH, redox status) were also assessed. Land use, temperature, and nitrogen availability influenced plant community composition. In contrast, microbial community composition was correlated with local soil factors, especially pH. Our results demonstrated that plant communities in restored wetlands are influenced by both landscape and local factors, whereas microbial communities are more strongly influenced by local soil factors. Choosing restoration sites based on environmental conditions known to support particular plant or microbial communities may enhance recovery of ecosystem services mediated by plants and soil microorganisms.


Community assembly Local vs. landscape Permutational (nonparametric) multivariate analysis of variance 



This material was supported by a National Great Rivers Research and Education Center grant to Anton Endress and J. W. Matthews and the University of Illinois Campus Research Board under Award Number 06351, and the Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under project number ILLU 875–374 to A. D. Kent. This research was also supported by an Illinois Water Resources Center Research Assistantship to A. L. Peralta. Wetland sites were constructed by the Illinois Department of Transportation. Anton Endress, Patrick Baldwin and Arun Soni assisted with fieldwork. Diane Szafoni provided GIS assistance and R. Ryan Lash provided GIS assistance and produced the sampling map. We thank Richard Lankau and Anthony Yannarell for statistical assistance. James Dalling, Yong Cao, Michelle Wander, Emily Wheeler, Richard Lankau, Chris Balakrishnan, Sara Paver and two anonymous reviewers contributed helpful comments to this manuscript.

Supplementary material

13157_2012_343_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (84 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 84 kb)


  1. Bedford BL, Walbridge MR, Aldous A (1999) Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands. Ecology 80:2151–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bissels S, Holzel N, Donath TW, Otte A (2004) Evaluation of restoration success in alluvial grasslands under contrasting flooding regimes. Biological Conservation 118:641–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bissett A, Richardson AE, Baker G, Wakelin S, Thrall PH (2010) Life history determines biogeographical patterns of soil bacterial communities over multiple spatial scales. Molecular Ecology 19:4315–4327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bontti EE, Burke IC, Lauenroth WK (2011) Nitrogen partitioning between microbes and plants in the shortgrass steppe. Plant and Soil 342:445–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27:325–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bru D, Ramette A, Saby NPA, Dequiedt S, Ranjard L, Jolivet C, Arrouays D, Philippot L (2011) Determinants of the distribution of nitrogen-cycling microbial communities at the landscape scale. ISME Journal 5:532–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castenson KL, Rabenhorst MC (2006) Indicator of reduction in soil (IRIS): Evaluation of a new approach for assessing reduced conditions in soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70:1222–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeAngelis KM, Silver WL, Thompson AW, Firestone MK (2010) Microbial communities acclimate to recurring changes in soil redox potential status. Environmental Microbiology 12:3137–3149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dechesne A, Pallud C, Grundmann GL (2007) Spatial distribution of bacteria at the microscale in soil. In: Franklin RB, Mills AL (eds) The spatial distribution of microbes in the environment springer. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 87–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drenovsky RE, Steenwerth KL, Jackson LE, Scow KM (2010) Land use and climatic factors structure regional patterns in soil microbial communities. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19:27–39Google Scholar
  11. Enwall K, Throback IN, Stenberg M, Soderstrom M, Hallin S (2010) Soil resources Influence spatial patterns of denitrifying communities at scales compatible with land management. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76:2243–2250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fenchel T, Finlay BJ (2004) The ubiquity of small species: patterns of local and global diversity. Bioscience 54:777–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fierer N, Jackson RB (2006) The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:626–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster D, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw B, Tilman D, Knapp A (2003) The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. Bioscience 53:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galatowitsch SM, vanderValk AG (1996) The vegetation of restored and natural prairie wetlands. Ecological Applications 6:102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gemborys SR, Hodgkins EJ (1971) Forests of small stream bottoms in coastal plain of southwestern Alabama. Ecology 52:70–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Green J, Bohannan BJM (2006) Spatial scaling of microbial biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:501–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffiths RI, Thomson BC, James P, Bell T, Bailey M, Whiteley AS (2011) The bacterial biogeography of British soils. Environmental Microbiology 13:1642–1654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harpole WS, Suding KN (2011) A test of the niche dimension hypothesis in an arid annual grassland. Oecologia 166:197–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hartman WH, Richardson CJ, Vilgalys R, Bruland GL (2008) Environmental and anthropogenic controls over bacterial communities in wetland soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:17842–17847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hobbs RJ, Norton DA (2004) Ecological filters, thresholds, and gradients in resistance to ecosystem reassembly. In: Temperton VM, Hobbs RJ, Nuttle T, Halle S (eds) Assembly rules and restoration ecology: bridging the gap between theory and practice. Island Press, Washington D.C, pp 72–95Google Scholar
  22. Illinois State Geological Survey (2003) Illinois county boundaries, 2nd edn. Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois. Accessed 25 April 2011
  23. Jenkinson BJ, Franzmeier DP (2006) Development and evaluation of iron-coated tubes that indicate reduction in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones CM, Hallin S (2010) Ecological and evolutionary factors underlying global and local assembly of denitrifier communities. ISME Journal 4:633–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keddy PA (1992) Assembly and response rules - Two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keddy PA (2000) Wetland ecology: principles and conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Kent AD, Yannarell AC, Rusak JA, Triplett EW, McMahon KD (2007) Synchrony in aquatic microbial community dynamics. ISME Journal 1:38–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. King R, Richardson CJ, Urban DL, Romanowicz EA (2004) Spatial dependency of vegetation-environment linkages in an anthropogenically influenced wetland system. Ecosystems 7:75–97Google Scholar
  29. Lankau RA (2011) Resistance and recovery of soil microbial communities in the face of Alliaria petiolata invasions. New Phytologist 189:536–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ (1997) Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63:4516–4522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Luman D, Tweddale T, Bahnsen B, Willis P (2004) Illinois Map 12, scale 1:500,000- Illinois land cover. Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  33. Madigan MT, Martinko JM (2006) Brock biology of microorganisms, 11th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  34. Matthews JW (2008) Restoration progress and plant community development in compensatory mitigation wetlands. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  35. Matthews JW, Peralta AL, Flanagan DN, Baldwin PM, Soni A, Kent AD, Endress AG (2009) Relative influence of landscape vs. local factors on plant community assembly in restored wetlands. Ecological Applications 19:2108–2123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McArdle BH, Anderson MJ (2001) Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mentzer JL, Goodman RM, Balser TC (2006) Microbial response over time to hydrologic and fertilization treatments in a simulated wet prairie. Plant and Soil 284:85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands Fourth edition. John Wiley and Sons, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  39. National Atlas of the United States (2005) State boundaries of the United States. National Atlas of the United States, Reston, VA. Accessed 25 April 2011
  40. National Atlas of the United States (2006) Streams and waterbodies of the United States. National Atlas of the United States, Reston, VA. Accessed 25 April 2011
  41. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2010) Community Ecology Package 'vegan'Google Scholar
  42. Ozinga WA, Schaminee JHJ, Bekker RM, Bonn S, Poschlod P, Tackenberg O, Bakker J, van Groenendael JM (2005) Predictability of plant species composition from environmental conditions is constrained by dispersal limitation. Oikos 108:555–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pavoine S, Vela E, Gachet S, de Belair G, Bonsall MB (2011) Linking patterns in phylogeny, traits, abiotic variables and space: a novel approach to linking environmental filtering and plant community assembly. Journal of Ecology 99:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peralta AL, Matthews JW, Kent AD (2010) Microbial community structure and denitrification in a wetland mitigation bank. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76:4207–4215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pett-Ridge J, Firestone MK (2005) Redox fluctuation structures microbial communities in a wet tropical soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71:6998–7007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Picek T, Simek M, Santruckova H (2000) Microbial responses to fluctuation of soil aeration status and redox conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils 31:315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Poll C, Ingwersen J, Stemmer M, Gerzabek MH, Kandeler E (2006) Mechanisms of solute transport affect small-scale abundance and function of soil microorganisms in the detritusphere. European Journal of Soil Science 57:583–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from Accessed 1 Mar 2011
  49. Rees GN, Baldwin DS, Watson GO, Perryman S, Nielsen DL (2004) Ordination and significance testing of microbial community composition derived from terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms: application of multivariate statistics. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek International Journal of General and Molecular Microbiology 86:339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rhine ED, Sims GK, Mulvaney RL, Pratt EJ (1998) Improving the Berthelot reaction for determining ammonium in soil extracts and water. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62:473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rich JJ, Heichen RS, Bottomley PJ, Cromack K, Myrold DD (2003) Community composition and functioning of denitrifying bacteria from adjacent meadow and forest soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69:5974–5982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richardson DM, Holmes PM, Esler KJ, Galatowitsch SM, Stromberg JC, Kirkman SP, Pysek P, Hobbs RJ (2007) Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Diversity and Distributions 13:126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sambrook J, Russell D (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NYGoogle Scholar
  54. Savage D, Barbetti MJ, MacLeod WJ, Salam MU, Renton M (2010) Timing of propagule release significantly alters the deposition area of resulting aerial dispersal. Diversity and Distributions 16:288–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schimel J, Balser TC, Wallenstein M (2007) Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 88:1386–1394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sims GK, Ellsworth TR, Mulvaney RL (1995) Microscale determination of inorganic nitrogen in water and soil extracts. Communications in Soil Science and Plant 26:303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Truu M, Juhanson J, Truu J (2009) Microbial biomass, activity and community composition in constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment 407:3958–3971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weiher E, Keddy PA (1995) The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos 73:323–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yannarell AC, Triplett EW (2005) Geographic and environmental sources of variation in lake bacterial community composition. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71:227–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zobel M (1992) Plant species coexistence—the role of historical, evolutionary and ecological filter. Oikos 65:314–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zumft WG (1997) Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 61:533–616PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ariane L. Peralta
    • 1
    • 4
  • Jeffrey W. Matthews
    • 2
    • 3
  • Diana N. Flanagan
    • 2
  • Angela D. Kent
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation BiologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  3. 3.Illinois Natural History SurveyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  4. 4.W.K. Kellogg Biological StationMichigan State UniversityHickory CornersUSA

Personalised recommendations