Skip to main content
Log in

Tropical Application of Floating Treatment Wetlands

  • Article
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The treatment efficiencies of floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) containing two types of macrophytes, Typha angustifolia and Canna iridiflora, were investigated in a pilot scale study in the tropical climate of Sri Lanka. In batch experiments, over 80 % of biological oxygen demand (BOD5) and ammonium (NH +4 -N) removal was observed, while nitrate (NO 3 -N) removal was over 40 %. Typha angustifolia showed slightly higher BOD5, NH +4 -N and NO 3 -N removal than Canna iridiflora. Because of higher and steady root growth, Typha angustifolia resulted in a better performance and has a greater potential to extract nutrients from wastewater and allow water-plant interactions than Canna iridiflora whose root mat is thick and compact. Similar to the batch system, the continuous flow systems performed better at most times with Typha angustifolia. FTWs with Typha angustifolia may be considered a possible solution for lake restoration where there are space and cost constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen WC, Hook PB, Biederman JA, Stein OR (2002) Temperature and wetland plant species effects on wastewater treatment and root zone oxidation. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:1010–1016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong J, Armstrong W (1988) Phragmites australis – a preliminary study of soil oxidizing sites and internal gas transport pathway. New Phytol 108:373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash R, Troung P (2003) The use of Vetiver grass wetlands for sewerage treatment in Australia. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Vetiver, Guangzhou, China, 132-141

  • Brix H (1994) Functions of macropytes in constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology 29(4):71–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess ND, Hirons GJM (1992) Creation and management of artificial nesting sites for wetland birds. Journal of Environmental Management 34(4):285–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caselles-Osorio A, García J (2007) Impact of different feeding strategies and plant presence on the performance of shallow horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment 378:253–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dendene MA, Rolland T, Tremolieres M, Cariener R (1993) Effect of ammonium ions on the net photosynthesis of three species of Eldoea. Aquatic Botany 46(3–4):301–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton AD, Clesceri SL, Greenberg EA (1995) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonder N, Headley T (2010) Systematic nomenclature and reporting for treatment wetlands. In: Vymazal J (ed) Water and Nutrient Management in Natural and Constructed Wetlands. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 191–220

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garbutt P (2004) An investigation into the application of floating reed bed and barley straw techniques for the remediation of eutrophic waters. Water Environment Journal 19(3):174–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenway M (2003) Suitability of macrophytes for nutrient removal from surface flow constructed wetlands receiving secondary treated effluent in Queensland, Australia. Water Science and Technology 48(2):121–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães JRD, Meili M, Hylander LD, Silva EDC, Roulet M, Mauro JBN, Lemos RA (2000) Mercury net methylationin five tropical flood plain regions of Brazil: high in the root zone of floating macrophyte mats but low in surface sediments and flooded soils. The Science of the Total Environment 261:99–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard RK, Gascho GJ, Newton GL (2004) Use of floating vegetation to remove nutrients from swine lagoon wastewater. Transactions of ASAE 47(6):1963–1972

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jinadasa KBSN, Tanaka N, Sasikala S, Werellagama DRIB, Mowjood MIM, Ng WJ (2008) Impact of harvesting on constructed wetlands performance – a comparison between Scirpus grossus and Typha angustifolia. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A 43(6):664–671

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson L (1997) Use of light expanded clay aggregates (Leca) for removal of phosphorus from wastewater. Water Science and Technology 35(5):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juwarkar A, Oke B, Juwarkar A, Patnaik SM (1995) Domestic wastewater treatment through constructed wetland in India. Water Science and Technology 32(3):291–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kansiime F, van Bruggen JJA (2001) Distribution and retention of faecal coliforms in the Nakivubo wetland in Kampala, Uganda. Water Science and Technology 44(11/12):199–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kato Y, Takemon Y, Hori M (2009) Invertebrate assemblages in relation to habitat type on a floating mat in Mizorogaike Pond, Kyoto, Japan. Limnology 10:167–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konnerup D, Koottatep T, Brix H (2009) Treatment of domestic wastewater in tropical, subsurface flow constructed wetlands planted with Canna and Heliconia. Ecological Engineering 35:248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koottatep T, Polprasert C (1997) Role of plant uptake on nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands located in tropics. Water Science and Technology 36(12):1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kyambadde J, Kansiime F, Gumaelius L, Dalhammar G (2004) A comparative study of Cyperus papyrus and Miscanthidium violaceum-based constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in a tropical climate. Water Research 38(2):475–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Jing S, Wang T, Lee D (2002) Effects of macrophytes and external carbon sources on nitrate removal from ground water in constructed wetlands. Environmental Pollution 119(3):413–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, D’Angelo EM (1997) Biogeochemical indicators to evaluate pollutant efficiency in constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology 35(5):1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sooknah RD, Wilkie AC (2004) Nutrient removal by floating aquatic macrophytes cultured in anaerobically digested flushed dairy manure wastewater. Ecological Engineering 22:27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Systat Software (2004) Inc. SigmaStat 3.1for Windows. San Jose, CA 95110, USA

  • Tanner CC, Clayton JS, Upsdell MP (1995) Effect of loading rate and planting on treatment of dairy farm wastewaters in constructed wetlands – II. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus. Water Research 29(1):27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner CC, Headley TR (2011) Components of floating emergent macrophyte treatment wetlands influencing removal of stormwater pollutants. Ecological Engineering 37:474–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsujino R, Fujita N, Katayama M, Kawase D, Matsui K, Seo A, Shimamura T, Takemon Y, Tsujimura N, Yumoto T, Ushimaru A (2010) Restoration of floating mat bog vegetation after eutrophication damages by improving water quality in a small pond. Limnology 11:289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Moortel AMK, Meers E, Pauw ND, Tack FMG (2010) Effects of vegetation, season and temperature on the removal of pollutants in experimental floating treatment wetlands. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 212:181–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2002) The use of subsurface constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czech Republic: 10 years experience. Ecological Engineering 18:633–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment 380(1–3):48–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang DQ, Tan SK, Gersberg RM, Zhu JF, Sadreddini S, Li YF (2011) Nutrient removal in tropical subsurface flow constructed wetlands under batch and continuous flow conditions. Journal of Environmental Management 96:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude towards Environmental Endeavor-2, a collaboration effort between the LIEN Foundation and Nanyang Technological University, for financially supporting this project. Kind technical assistance from Mr. P Fernando, National Water Supply and Drainage Board is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Qing Zhang.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 301 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weragoda, S.K., Jinadasa, K.B.S.N., Zhang, D.Q. et al. Tropical Application of Floating Treatment Wetlands. Wetlands 32, 955–961 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-012-0333-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-012-0333-5

Keywords

Navigation