, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 1143–1149 | Cite as

Time-Dependent Impacts of Cattail Invasion in a Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Complex

  • Mark E. Mitchell
  • Shane C. Lishawa
  • Pamela Geddes
  • Daniel J. Larkin
  • David Treering
  • Nancy C. Tuchman


The aggressive cattail species Typha X glauca and Typha angustifolia have established in wetlands across the Great Lakes region, decreasing native plant diversity and altering environmental conditions. We relied on a parallel study in which 80 years of historical aerial photographs from a large Lake Michigan wetland complex were used to map the spread and determine the age of invasive cattail stands. Floristic, edaphic, and environmental data were collected from plots across an invasion-age gradient. Compared with reference uninvaded sites, litter mass more than doubled within 10 years of invasion (P < 0.001), plant diversity declined by more than 50% within 25 years of invasion (P = 0.003), and soil organic depth was more than 29-cm deeper in areas invaded for more than 35 years compared with areas invaded for 10 years or less (P = 0.006). These time-dependent changes in plant communities, soil, and environmental conditions fundamentally alter the structure of invaded wetlands, likely influencing a range of ecosystem services.


Invasion dynamics Invasive species Organic matter Typha X glauca 


  1. Albert DA, Wilcox DA, Ingram JW, Thompson TA (2005) Hydrogeomorphic classification for Great Lakes coastal wetlands. Journal of Great Lakes Research 31:129–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angeloni NL, Jankowski KJ, Tuchman NC, Kelly JJ (2006) Effects of an invasive cattail species (Typha x glauca) on sediment nitrogen and microbial community composition in a freshwater wetland. FEMS Microbiology Letters 263:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  4. Boers AM, Veltman RLD, Zedler JB (2007) Typha x glauca dominance and extended hydroperiod constrain restoration of wetland diversity. Ecological Engineering 29:232–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinson M, Lugo A, Brown S (1981) Primary productivity, decomposition and consumer activity in freshwater wetlands. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12:123–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buffam I, Carpenter SR, Yeck W, Hanson PC, Turner MG (2010) Filling holes in regional carbon budgets: predicting peat depth in a north temperate lake district. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 115. doi:10.1029/2009JG001034
  7. Byers J, Reichard S, Randall J, Parker I, Smith C, Lonsdale W, Atkinson I, Seastedt T, Williamson M, Chornesky E (2002) Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species. Conservation Biology 16:630–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clewell A, Rieger J (1997) What practitioners need from restoration ecologists. Restoration Ecology 5:350–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis C, van der Valk A (1978) The decomposition of standing and fallen litter of Typha glauca and Scirpus fluviatilis. Canadian Journal of Botany 56:662–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Desgranges JL, Ingram J, Drolet B, Morin J, Savage C, Borcard D (2006) Modelling wetland bird response to water level changes in the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River hydrosystem. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 113:329–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dwire K, Kauffman J, Brookshire E, Baham J (2004) Plant biomass and species composition along an environmental gradient in montane riparian meadows. Oecologia 139:309–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Epstein E, Spencer E, Feldkirchner D, Anderson C (2002) A data compilation and assessment of coastal Wetlands of Wisconsin’s Great Lakes: final report. Natural Heritage Inventory Program, Bureau of Endangered Resources, Wisconsin Dept. of Natural ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrer E, Goldberg D (2009) Litter drives ecosystem and plant community changes in cattail invasion. Ecological Applications 19:398–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher J, Acreman MC (2004) Wetland nutrient removal: a review of the evidence. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 8:673–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freyman M (2008) The effect of litter accumulation of the invasive cattail Typha x glauca on a Great Lakes coastal marsh. Master’s Thesis, Loyola University ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Frieswyk CB, Zedler JB (2007) Vegetation change in Great Lakes coastal wetlands: deviation from the historical cycle. Journal of Great Lakes Research 33:366–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gates FC (1912) The vegetation of the beach area in Northeastern Illinois and Southeastern Wisconsin. Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History 9, Article 5Google Scholar
  19. Hall SJ, Zedler JB (2010) Constraints on sedge meadow self-restoration in urban wetlands. Restortion Ecology 18:671–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirschner AKT, Riegl B, Velimirov B (2001) Degradation of emergent and submerged macrophytes in an oxbow lake of an embanked backwater system: implications for the terrestrialization process. International Review of Hydrobiologie 86:555–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larkin DJ, Freyman MJ, Lishawa SC, Geddes P, Tuchman NC (2011) Mechanisms of dominance by the invasive hybrid cattail Typha X glauca. Biological Invasions. doi:10.1007/s10530-011-0059-y
  22. Leeds JA, Garrett PB, Newman JM (2009) Assessing impacts of hydropattern restoration of an overdrained wetland on soil nutrients, vegetation and fire. Restoration Ecology 17:460–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lishawa SC, Albert DA, Tuchman NC (2010) Water level decline promotes Typha X glauca establishment and vegetation change in Great Lakes coastal wetlands. Wetlands 30:1085–1096Google Scholar
  24. Marchante E, Kjøller A, Struwe S, Freitas H (2008) Short-and long-term impacts of Acacia longifolia invasion on the belowground processes of a Mediterranean coastal dune ecosystem. Applied Soil Ecology 40:210–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moore T, Bubier J, Bledzki L (2007) Litter decomposition in temperate peatland ecosystems: the effect of substrate and site. Ecosystems 10:949–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rooth JE, Stevenson JC, Cornwall JC (2003) Increased sediment accretion rates following invasion by Phragmites australis: the role of litter. Estuaries 26:475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith S (1987) Typha: its taxonomy and the ecological significance of hybrids. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 27:129–138Google Scholar
  28. Snow AA, Travis SE, Wildova R, Fer T, Sweeney PM, Marburger JE, Windels S, Kubatova B, Goldberg DE, Mutegi E (2010) Species-specific SSR alleles for studies of hyrbrid cattails (Typha latifolia X T. angustifolia; Typhaceae) in North America. American Journal or Botany 97:2061–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (1985) A land use management plan for the Chiwaukee Prairie-Carol Beach area of the town of Pleasant Prairie. Community Assistance Planning Report 88Google Scholar
  30. Strayer D, Eviner V, Jeschke J, Pace M (2006) Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:645–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Su R, Lohner RN, Kuehn KA, Sinsabaugh R, Neely RK (2007) Microbial dynamics associated with decomposing Typha angustifolia litter in two contrasting Lake Erie coastal wetlands. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 46:295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Travis SE, Marburger JE, Windels S, Kubatova B (2010) Hybridization dynamics of invasive cattail (Typhaceae) stands in the Western Great Lakes Region of North America: a molecular analysis. Journal of Ecology 98:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Travis SE, Marburger JE, Windels S, Kubatova B (2011) Clonal structure of invasive cattail (Typhaceae) stands in the Upper Midwest Region of the US. Wetlands 31:221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tuchman N, Larkin D, Geddes P, Wildova R, Jankowski K, Goldberg D (2009) Patterns of environmental change associated with Typha x glauca invasion in a Great Lakes coastal wetland. Wetlands 29:964–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vaccaro LE, Bedford BL, Johnston CA (2009) Litter accumulation promotes dominance of invasive species of cattails (Typha spp.) in Lake Ontario wetlands. Wetlands 29:1036–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vitousek P, D’antonio C, Loope L, Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist 84:468–478Google Scholar
  37. Welsch M, Yavitt J (2003) Early stages of decay of Lythrum salicaria L. and Typha latifolia L. in a standing-dead position. Aquatic Botany 75:45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wetzel RG, Likens GE (1991) Limnological analyses, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. White JR, Gardner LM, Sees M, Corstanje R (2008) The short-term effects of prescribed burning on biomass removal and the release of nitrogen and phosphorus in a treatment wetland. Journal of Environmental Quality 37:2386–2391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Windham L, Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Net impact of a plant invasion on nitrogen-cycling processes within a brackish tidal marsh. Ecological Applications 13:883–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zedler JB, Kercher S (2004) Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23:431–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark E. Mitchell
    • 1
  • Shane C. Lishawa
    • 1
  • Pamela Geddes
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel J. Larkin
    • 1
    • 3
  • David Treering
    • 1
  • Nancy C. Tuchman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Center for Urban Environmental Research and PolicyLoyola University ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyNortheastern Illinois UniversityChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Plant Science and Conservation, Chicago Botanic GardenGlencoeUSA

Personalised recommendations