Wetlands

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 319–327 | Cite as

Classifying the Hydrologic Function of Prairie Potholes with Remote Sensing and GIS

  • Jennifer Rover
  • Chris K. Wright
  • Ned H. EulissJr.
  • David M. Mushet
  • Bruce K. Wylie
Article

Abstract

A sequence of Landsat TM/ETM+ scenes capturing the substantial surface water variations exhibited by prairie pothole wetlands over a drought to deluge period were analyzed in an attempt to determine the general hydrologic function of individual wetlands (recharge, flow-through, and discharge). Multipixel objects (water bodies) were clustered according to their temporal changes in water extents. We found that wetlands receiving groundwater discharge responded differently over the time period than wetlands that did not. Also, wetlands located within topographically closed discharge basins could be distinguished from discharge basins with overland outlets. Field verification data showed that discharge wetlands with closed basins were most distinct and identifiable with reasonable accuracies (user’s accuracy = 97%, producer’s accuracy = 71%). The classification of other hydrologic function types had lower accuracies reducing the overall accuracy for the four hydrologic function classes to 51%. A simplified classification approach identifying only two hydrologic function classes was 82%. Although this technique has limited success for detecting small wetlands, Landsat-derived multipixel-object clustering can reliably differentiate wetlands receiving groundwater discharge and provides a new approach to quantify wetland dynamics in landscape scale investigations and models.

Keywords

Landsat Cluster analysis Wetland classification Object-oriented image analysis 

References

  1. Baker C, Lawrence RL, Montagne C, Patten D (2007) Change detection of wetland ecosystems using Landsat imagery and change vector analysis. Wetlands 27:610–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beeri O, Phillips RL (2007) Tracking palustrine water seasonal and annual variability in agricultural wetland landscapes using Landsat from 1997 to 2005. Global Change Biology 13:897–912Google Scholar
  3. Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 37:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cowardin LM, Golet FC (1995) US Fish and Wildlife Service 1979 Wetland classification: a review. Plant Ecology 118:139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ESRI (2006) ArcGIS 9.2. ESRI, Inc., CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  6. Euliss NH Jr, LaBaugh JW, Fredrickson LH, Mushet DM, Laubhan MK, Swanson GA, Winter TC, Rosenberry DO, Nelson RD (2004) The wetland continuum: a conceptual framework for interpreting biological studies. Wetlands 24:448–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Federal Geographic Data Committee (1992) Application of satellite data for mapping and monitoring wetlands: Fact finding report. Wetlands Subcommittee, RestonGoogle Scholar
  8. High Plains Regional Climate Center (2005) Historical climate data summaries, Woodworth 3 E, North Dakota (329575), 6/ 1/1951 to 4/30/2005. Available via http://www.hprcc.unl.edu/data/historical/. Accessed 26 August 2010
  9. Henderson FM, Lewis AJ (2008) Radar detection of wetland ecosystems: a review. International Journal of Remote Sensing 29:5809–5835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jenson SK (1991) Applications of hydrologic information automatically extracted from digital elevation models. Hydrological Processes 5:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jenson SK, Domingue O (1988) Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54:1593–1600Google Scholar
  12. Johnson WC, Boettcher SE, Poiani KA, Guntenspergen GR (2004) Influence of weather extremes on the water levels of glaciated prairie wetlands. Wetlands 24:385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones BM, Arp CD, Hinkel KM, Beck RA, Schmutz JA, Winston B (2009) Arctic lake physical processes and regimes with implications for winter water availability and management in the National Petroleum Reserve Alaska. Environmental Management 43:1071–1084PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kantrud HA, Krapu GL, Swanson GA (1989) Prairie basin wetlands of the Dakotas: A community profile. Biological Report 85(7.28). US Fish and Wildlife Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (2005) Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  16. Koshel P, McAllister K (2008) Transitioning to sustainability through research and development on ecosystem services and biofuels: Workshop summary. National Research Council, The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. LaBaugh JW (1989) Chemical characteristics of water in northern prairie wetlands. In: van der Valk AG (ed) Northern prairie wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 56–90Google Scholar
  18. LaBaugh JW, Winter TC, Rosenberry DO (1998) Hydrologic function of prairie wetlands. Great Plains Research 8:17–37Google Scholar
  19. LaBaugh JW, Winter TC, Swanson GA, Rosenberry DO, Nelson RD, Euliss NH Jr (1996) Changes in atmospheric circulation patterns affect midcontinent wetlands sensitive to climate. Limnology and Oceanography 41:864–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leahy MG, Jollineau MY, Howarth PJ, Gillespie AR (2005) The use of Landsat data for investigating the long-term trends in wetland change at Long Point, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 31:240–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lunetta RS, Balogh ME (1999) Application of multi-temporal Landsat 5 TM imagery for wetland identification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 65:1303–1310Google Scholar
  22. Melack JM (2004) Tropical freshwater wetlands. In: Ustin SL (ed) Remote sensing for natural resource management and environmental monitoring. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 319–343Google Scholar
  23. Mertes LAK, Dekker AG, Brakenridge GR, Birkett CM, Létourneau G (2004) Rivers and lakes. In: Ustin SL (ed) Remote sensing for natural resource management and environmental monitoring. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 345–400Google Scholar
  24. Ozesmi SL, Bauer ME (2002) Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management 10:381–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenberry DO (2003) Climate of the cottonwood lake area. In: Winter TC (ed) Hydrological, chemical, and biological characteristics of a prairie pothole wetland complex under highly variable climate conditions—The Cottonwood Lake Area, East-central North Dakota, U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1675, pp 25–34Google Scholar
  26. Rover JA, Wylie BK, Ji L (2010) A self-trained classification technique for producing 30-m percent-water maps from Landsat data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 31:2197–2203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sethre PR, Rundquist BC, Todhunter PE (2005) Remote detection of Prairie Pothole ponds in the Devils Lake basin, North Dakota. GIScience Remote Sensing 42:277–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stewart RE, Kantrud HA (1972) Vegetation of Prairie Potholes, North Dakota, in relation to quality of water and other environmental factors. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 585-D. United States Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  29. Swanson GA, Winter TC, Adomaitis VA, LaBaugh JW (1988) Chemical characteristics of prairie lakes in south-central North Dakota—their potential for influencing use by fish and wildlife. Technical Report 18. US Fish & Wildlife Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  30. Swanson GA, Euliss NH Jr, Hanson BA, Mushet DM (2003) Dynamics of a prairie wetland complex: implications for wetland management. In: Winter TC (ed) Hydrological, chemical, and biological characteristics of a prairie pothole wetland complex under highly variable climate conditions—The Cottonwood Lake Area, East-central North Dakota, U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1675, pp 55–94Google Scholar
  31. US Fish and Wildlife Service (2008) National Wetlands Inventory. Available via http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/DataDownload.html. Accessed 26 May 2010
  32. US Geological Survey (2001) Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC), National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD). Available via http://www.mrlc.gov. Accessed 26 May 2010
  33. US Geological Survey (2006) National Elevation Data, Digital Elevation Models (DEM). Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. Available via http://ned.usgs.gov. Accessed 26 May 2010
  34. van der Valk AG, Pederson RL (2003) The SWANCC decision and its implications for Prairie Potholes. Wetlands 23:590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van der Valk AG (2005) Water-level fluctuations in North American prairie wetlands. Hydrobiologia 539:171–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Winter TC, Rosenberry DO (1998) Hydrology of Prairie Pothole wetlands during drought to deluge: a 17-year study of the Cottonwood Lake wetland complex in North Dakota in the perspective of longer term measured and proxy hydrological records. Climatic Change 40:189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Work EA Jr, Gilmer DS (1976) Utilization of satellite data for inventorying prairie ponds and lakes. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 42:685–694Google Scholar
  38. Zhang B, Schwartz FW, Tong D (2009a) Landsat sub-pixel analysis in mapping impact of climatic variability on Prairie Pothole changes. Transactions in GIS 13:179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang B, Schwartz FW, Liu G (2009b) Systematics in the size structure of prairie pothole lakes through drought and deluge. Water Resources Research 45:W0442Google Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Rover
    • 1
  • Chris K. Wright
    • 2
  • Ned H. EulissJr.
    • 3
  • David M. Mushet
    • 3
  • Bruce K. Wylie
    • 1
  1. 1.United States Geological SurveyEarth Resources Observation and Science CenterSioux FallsUSA
  2. 2.Geographic Information Science Center of ExcellenceSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsUSA
  3. 3.United States Geologic SurveyNorthern Prairie Wildlife Research CenterJamestownUSA

Personalised recommendations