Primary Productivity in 20-year Old Created Wetlands in Southwestern Virginia

Abstract

Thousands of depressional wetlands accidentally formed as a result of pre-1977 contour coal mining in the Appalachian Mountains. Eleven 20-yr old sites were found in a watershed that did not receive acid mine drainage. The purpose of this study was to quantify and model above- and below-ground plant biomass in these created wetlands and to evaluate functional development. Sampling was stratified by weighted average of two plant communities, which corresponded to shallower and deeper water levels, facultative wetland and obligate wetland communities, respectively. In 1994, peak above-ground biomass averaged 473.7 g m−2 in the facultative wetland community and 409.5 g m−2 in the obligate wetland community. Scirpus cyperinus exhibited the highest peak above-ground biomass (51.8% of total biomass) and Typha latifolia ranked second. Canonical correspondence analysis detected positive effects of longer soil exposure to the atmosphere and greater sediment depth on above-ground biomass at the site (wetland ecosystem) level. Within communities, forward stepwise regression identified positive association of above-ground biomass with water soluble reactive P, water soluble NH3, decomposition rate over 507 d, live S. cyperinus tissue P content, and sediment depth. When these results are combined with prior studies conducted at the same 20-yr old sites, it appears that both structural and functional development has been arrested at a somewhat immature state resulting primarily from soil and hydrologic factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Anderson CJ, Cowell BC (2004) Mulching effects on the seasonally flooded zone of West-Central Florida, USA Wetlands. Wetlands 24:811–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson CJ, Mitsch WJ (2005) Effect of pulsing on macrophyte productivity and nutrient uptake: a wetland mesocosm experiment. American Midland Naturalist 154:305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson CJ, Mitsch WJ (2006) Sediment, carbon, and nutrient accumulation at two 10-year-old created riverine marshes. Wetlands 26:779–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. AOAC (1990) Official methods of analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  5. APHA (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  6. Atkinson RB, Cairns J Jr (2001) Plant decomposition and litter accumulation in depressional wetlands: functional performance of two wetland age classes that were created via excavation. Wetlands 21:354–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Atkinson RB, Perry JE, Smith EP, Cairns J Jr (1993) Use of created wetland delineation and weighted averages as a component of assessment. Wetlands 13:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Atkinson RB, Perry JE, Cairns J Jr (2005) Vegetative communities of 20-year old created depressional wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13:469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Auclair AND, Bouchard A, Pajaczkowski J (1976) Plant standing crop and productivity relations in a Scirpus-Equisetum wetland. Ecology 57:941–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bailey DE, Perry JE, Daniels WE (2007) Vegetation dynamics in response to an organic matter loading experiment in a created freshwater wetland in southeastern Virginia. Wetlands 27:936–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barnes LE (1983) The colonization of ball-clay ponds by macroinvertebrates and macrophytes. Freshwater Biology 13:561–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bedford BL, Walbridge MR, Aldous A (1999) Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands. Ecology 80:2151–2169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Belcher JW, Keddy PA, Twolan-Strutt L (1995) Root and shoot competition intensity along a soil depth gradient. Journal of Ecology 83:673–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bishel-Machung L, Brooks RP, Yates SS, Hoover KL (1996) Soil properties of reference wetlands and wetland creation projects in Pennsylvania. Wetlands 16:532–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyd CE, Hess LW (1970) Factors influencing shoot production and mineral nutrient levels in Typha latifolia. Ecology 51:296–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen-total. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Agronomy 9: methods of soil analysis, Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, pp 595–624

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brinson MM, Lugo AE, Brown S (1981) Primary productivity, decomposition and consumer activity in freshwater wetlands. Annual Review of Ecology Systems 12:123–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ChangTing W, GuangMin C, QiLan W, ZengChun J, LuMing D, RuiJun L (2008) Changes in plant biomass and species composition of alpine Kobresia meadows along altitudinal gradient on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Science in China Series C: Life Sciences 51:86–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cole CA (1992) Wetland vegetation ecology on a reclaimed coal surface mine in southern Illinois. Wetlands Ecology and Management 2:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, Laroe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington, DC, FWS/OBS-79/31

  21. Daniels WL, Amos DF (1982) Chemical characteristics of some Southwest Virginia minesoils. In: Graves GH (ed) Symposium on surface mining, hydrology, sedimentology, and reclamation. Office of Engineering Services, Lexington, pp 377–380

    Google Scholar 

  22. de la Cruz A (1978) Primary production processes: summary and recommendations. In: Good RE, Whigham DF, Simpson RL (eds) Freshwater wetlands: ecological processes and management potential. Academic, New York, pp 79–86

    Google Scholar 

  23. DeBerry DA, Perry JE (2004) Primary succession in a created freshwater wetland. Castanea 69:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dickerman JA, Stewart AJ, Wetzel RG (1986) Estimates of net annual aboveground production: sensitivity to sampling frequency. Ecology 67:650–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Doumlele DG (1981) Primary production and seasonal aspects of emergent plants in a tidal freshwater marsh. Estuaries 4:139–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Emery SL, Perry JA (1995) Aboveground biomass and phosphorus concentrations of Lythrum salicaria (Purple Loosestrife) and Typha spp. (Cattail) in 12 Minnesota wetlands. American Midland Naturalist 134:394–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Garver EG, Dubbe DR, Pratt DC (1988) Seasonal patterns in accumulation and partitioning of biomass and macronutrients in Typha spp. Aquatic Botany 32:115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Güsewell S, Koerselman W, Verhoeven JTA (2003) Biomass N:P ratios as indicators of nutrient limitations for plant populations in wetlands. Ecological Applications 13:372–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hill BH (1987) Typha productivity in a Texas pond. Aquatic Botany 27:385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hogan DM, Jordan TE, Walbridge MR (2004) Phosphorus retention and soil organic carbon in restored and natural freshwater wetlands. Wetlands 24:573–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Holl KD, Cairns J Jr (1994) Vegetational community development on reclaimed coal surface mines in Virginia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 121:327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setäla H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kao JT, Titus JE, Zhu W (2003) Differential nitrogen and phosphorus retention by five wetland plant species. Wetlands 23:979–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kirkman LK, Goebel PC, West L, Drew MB, Palik BJ (2000) Depressional wetland vegetation types: a question of plant community development. Wetlands 20:373–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Klopatek JM, Stearns FW (1978) Primary productivity of emergent macrophytes in a Wisconsin freshwater marsh ecosystem. American Midland Naturalist 100:320–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koerselman W, Mueleman AFM (1996) The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology 33:1441–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Langis R, Zalejko M, Zedler JB (1991) Nitrogen assessments in a constructed and a natural salt marsh of San Diego Bay. Ecological Applications 1:40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Li RS, Daniels WL (1994) Nitrogen accumulation and form over time in young mine spoils. Journal of Environmental Quality 23:166–172

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nair VD, Graetz DA, Reddy KR, Olila OG (2001) Soil development in phosphate-mined created wetlands of Florida, USA. Wetlands 21:232–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Neill C (1990) Effects of nutrients and water levels on emergent macrophyte biomass in a prairie marsh. Canadian Journal of Botany 68:1007–1014

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Nygaard B, Ejrnaes R (2009) The impact of hydrology and nutrients on species composition and richness. Wetlands 29:187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Odum EP (1989) Wetland values in retrospect. In: Sharitz RR, Gibbons JW (eds) Freshwater wetlands and wildlife. Symposium Series Number 61. U.S.DOE, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge, TN, pp 1–8

  45. Olde Venterink H, Wassen MJ, Verkroost AWM, De Ruiter PC (2003) Species richness-productivity patterns differ between N-, P-, and K-limited wetlands. Ecology 84:2191–2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agronomy Monograph Number 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 403–430

    Google Scholar 

  47. Reed PB Jr (1988) National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Southeast (Region 2). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, Biological Report 88 (24)

  48. Sather HJ, Smith RD (1984) An overview of major wetland functions and values. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-84/18

  49. Schalles JF, Shure DJ (1989) Hydrology, community structure and productivity patterns of a dystrophic Carolina Bay wetland. Ecological Monographs 59:365–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Seabloom EW, van der Valk AG (2003) The development of vegetative zonation patterns in restored prairie pothole wetlands. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shaffer PW, Ernst TL (1999) Distribution of soil organic matter in freshwater emergent/open water wetlands in the Portland, Oregon Metropolitan area. Wetlands 19:505–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Stewart RE, Kantrud HA (1971) Classification of natural ponds and lakes in the glaciated prairie region. U.S. Fish Wildlife Service, Research Publication 92

  53. USDA, NASS (2009) Virginia statistics. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Virginia/Publications/County_Estimates/wise.pdf. Accessed on 29 May 2009

  54. USDA, NRCS (2009) The PLANTS Database. http://plants.usda.gov/. Accessed 23 May 2009

  55. USDC, NCDC (2009) National Climatic Data Center, http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html. Accessed 15 May 2009

  56. Weltzin JF, Keller JK, Bridgham SD, Pastor J, Allen PB, Chen J (2005) Litter controls plant community composition in a northern fen. Oikos 110:537–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wentworth TR, Johnson GP, Kologiski RL (1988) Designation of wetlands by weighted averages of vegetation data: a preliminary evaluation. Water Resources Bulletin 24:389–396

    Google Scholar 

  58. Westlake DF (1963) Comparisons of plant productivity. Biological Review 38:385–425

    Google Scholar 

  59. Whigham D, Pittek M, Hofmockel KH, Jordan T, Pepin AL (2002) Biomass and nutrient dynamics in restored wetlands on the outer coastal plain of Maryland, USA. Wetlands 22:562–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Woo I, Zedler JB (2002) Can nutrients alone shift a sedge meadow towards dominance by the invasive Typha × glauca? Wetlands 22:509–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Katie Haering, Velva Groover, W.T. Price, Colin Rosenquist, David Jones, and Barbara Niederlehner provided field and laboratory assistance, Darla Donald provided editorial assistance, and Barbara Falls and Teresa Moody also provided help. We gratefully acknowledge the support of Vann Weaver and the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement. The efforts of four anonymous reviewers were appreciated.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert B. Atkinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atkinson, R.B., Perry, J.E., Noe, G.B. et al. Primary Productivity in 20-year Old Created Wetlands in Southwestern Virginia. Wetlands 30, 200–210 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-010-0033-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Functional performance
  • Nutrient limitation
  • Peak standing crop
  • Tissue nutrient content