Wetlands

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 252–262 | Cite as

Does Long-term Grazing by Pack Stock in Subalpine Wet Meadows Result in Lasting Effects on Arthropod Assemblages?

  • Jeffrey G. Holmquist
  • Jutta Schmidt-Gengenbach
  • Sylvia A. Haultain
Original Paper

Abstract

Pack stock are often used in mountain environments and are grazed in uplands and wetlands, particularly subalpine wet meadows. Effects of pack stock on wetland invertebrates are unknown. Sequoia National Park, (Sierra Nevada, USA), was an ideal location for the study of lasting stock impacts on fauna, because a) there was an 18-year database of stock usage, b) there were meadows with little grazing that could be contrasted with grazed meadows, c) there is a long winter with no stock use, and d) the start of grazing for each meadow is controlled, so we could sample after greenup but just before stock arrived. We could thus address persistent conditions produced by many years of stock use in isolation from any potential short term impacts. We sampled terrestrial arthropods in paired “grazed” and “ungrazed” meadows across the Park and collected associated vegetation data. We found some negative effects of grazing on vegetation structure, but few lasting negative or positive effects of long-term stock grazing on arthropods in these wetlands. Although it appears that pack stock do not cause lasting damage to this arthropod assemblage, the extent of impact at the height of the grazing season remains unknown.

Keywords

Araneae Baiting Disturbance Insecta Sierra Nevada (USA) Sweep netting 

References

  1. Alonso LE (2000) Ants as indicators of diversity. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, pp 80–88Google Scholar
  2. Andersen AN, Majer JD (2004) Ants show the way down under: invertebrates as bioindicators in land management. Front Ecol Environ 2:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andresen H, Bakker JP, Brongers M, Heydemann B, Irmler U (1990) Long-term changes of salt marsh communities by cattle grazing. Vegetatio 89:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baines M, Hambler C, Johnson PJ, Macdonald DW, Smith H (1998) The effects of arable field margin management on the abundance and species richness of Araneae. Ecography 21:74–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batzer DP, Sharitz RR (eds) (2006) Ecology of freshwater and estuarine wetlands. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  6. Bausell RB, Li YF (2002) Power analysis for experimental research. Cambridge University, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bayfield N (1979) Some effects of trampling on Molophilus ater (Meigen) (Diptera, Tipulidae). Biol Conserv 16:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benedict NB (1983) Plant associations of subalpine meadows, Sequoia National Park, California. Arct Alp Res 15:383–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bestelmeyer BT, Agosti D, Alonso LE, Brandão CRF, Brown WL Jr, Delabie JHC, Silvestre R (2000) Field techniques for the study of ground-dwelling ants: an overview, description, and evaluation. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, pp 122–144Google Scholar
  10. Bestelmeyer BT, Wiens JA (1996) The effects of land use on the structure of ground-foraging ant communities in the Argentine Chaco. Ecol Appl 6:1225–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bestelmeyer BT, Wiens JA (2001) Ant biodiversity in semiarid landscape mosaics: the consequences of grazing vs. natural heterogeneity. Ecol Appl 11:1123–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bock CE, Jones ZF, Bock JH (2006) Grasshopper abundance in an Arizona rangeland undergoing exurban development. Rangeland Ecol Manage 59:640–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bromham L, Cardillo M, Bennett AF, Elgar MA (1999) Effects of stock grazing on the ground invertebrate fauna of woodland remnants. Aust J Ecol 24:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clifford HT, Stephenson W (1975) An introduction to numerical classification. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Cochran WG (1941) The distribution of the largest of a set of estimated variances as a fraction of their total. Ann Eugen 11:47–52Google Scholar
  16. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  17. Cole DN, van Wagtendonk JW, McClaran MP, Moore PE, McDougald NK (2004) Response of mountain meadows to grazing by recreational pack stock. J Range Manage 57:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crist TO, Guertin DS, Wiens JA, Milne BT (1992) Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes: an experiment with Eleodes beetles in shortgrass prairie. Funct Ecol 6:536–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dayton PK (1998) Ecology: reversal of the burden of proof in fisheries management. Science 279:821–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delabie JHC, Fisher BL, Majer JD, Wright IW (2000) Sampling effort and choice of methods. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, pp 145–154Google Scholar
  21. Duffey E (1975) The effects of human trampling on the fauna of grassland litter. Biol Conserv 7:255–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duffey E, Morris MG, Sheail J, Ward LK, Wells DA, Wells TCE (1974) Grassland ecology and wildlife management. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Dull RA (1999) Palynological evidence for 19th century grazing-induced vegetation change in the southern Sierra Nevada, California, U.S.A. J Biogeogr 26:899–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eckrich CE, Holmquist JG (2000) Trampling in a seagrass assemblage: direct effects, response of associated fauna, and the role of substrate characteristics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 201:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A (1996) GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput 28:1–11Google Scholar
  26. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Meth 39:175–191Google Scholar
  27. Feber RE, Smith H, Macdonald DW (1996) The effects of management of uncropped edges of arable fields on butterfly abundance. J Appl Ecol 33:1191–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Field SA, Tyre AJ, Jonzén N, Rhodes JR, Possingham HP (2004) Minimizing the cost of environmental management decisions by optimizing statistical thresholds. Ecol Lett 7:669–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gadagkar R, Chandrashekara K, Nair P (1990) Insect species diversity in the tropics, sampling methods and a case study. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 87:337–353Google Scholar
  30. Gibson CWD, Brown VK, Losito L, McGavin GC (1992) The response of invertebrate assemblies to grazing. Ecography 15:166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. González-Megías A, Gómez JM, Sánchez-Piñero F (2004) Effects of ungulates on epigeal arthropods in Sierra Nevada National Park (southeast Spain). Biodivers Conserv 13:733–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hartley SE, Gardner SM, Mitchell RJ (2003) Indirect effects of grazing and nutrient addition on the Hemipteran community of heather moorlands. J Appl Ecol 40:793–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hatfield RG, LeBuhn G (2007) Patch and landscape factors shape community assemblage of bumble bees, Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), in montane meadows. Biol Conserv 139:150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haysom KA, Coulson JC (1998) The Lepidoptera fauna associated with Calluna vulgaris: effects of plant architecture on abundance and diversity. Ecol Entomol 23:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heske EJ, Campbell M (1991) Effects of an 11-year livestock exclosure on rodent and ant numbers in the Chihuahuan desert, southeastern Arizona. The Southwest Nat 36:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoenig JM, Heisey DM (2001) The abuse of power: the persuasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. Am Stat 55:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Holmquist JG (1998) Permeability of patch boundaries to benthic invertebrates: influences of boundary contrast, light level, and faunal density and mobility. Oikos 81:558–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hurlbert SH (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kendall KC, Metzgar LH, Patterson DA, Steele BM (1992) Power of sign surveys to monitor population trends. Ecol Appl 2:422–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. King KL, Hutchinson KJ (1983) The effects of sheep grazing on invertebrate numbers and biomass in unfertilized natural pastures of the New England Tablelands (NSW). Aust J Ecol 8:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kirk RE (1982) Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Brooks/Cole, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  43. Klikoff LG (1965) Microenvironmental influence on vegetational pattern near timberline in the Central Sierra Nevada. Ecol Monogr 35:187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Körner C (2003) Alpine plant life, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  45. Kruess A, Tscharntke T (2002) Contrasting responses of plant and insect diversity to variation in grazing intensity. Biol Conserv 106:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lilliefors HW (1967) On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Stat Assoc 64:399–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lipsey MW, Wilson DB (1993) Educational and behavioral treatment: confirmation from meta-analysis. Am Psychol 48:1181–1209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Loft ER, Menke JW, Kie JG (1991) Habitat shifts by mule deer: the influence of cattle grazing. J Wildl Manage 55:16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Loomis JB, Loft ER, Updike DR, Kie JG (1991) Cattle-deer interactions in the Sierra Nevada: a bioeconomic approach. J Range Manage 44:395–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Majer JD, Beeston G (1996) The biodiversity integrity index: an illustration using ants in Western Australia. Conserv Biol 10:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  52. Mapstone BD (1995) Scalable decision rules for environmental impact studies: effect size, Type I, and Type II errors. Ecol Appl 5:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mayr S, Buchner A, Erdfelder E, Faul F (2007) A short tutorial of GPower. Tutor Quant Meth Psychol 3:51–59Google Scholar
  54. McAbendroth L, Ramsay PM, Foggo A, Rundle SD, Bilton DT (2005) Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass, and body size distributions? Oikos 111:279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McClaran MP (1989) Recreational pack stock management in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks. Rangelands 11:3–8Google Scholar
  56. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Moore PE, Cole DN, van Wagtendonk JW, McClaran MP, McDougald NK (2000) Meadow response to pack stock grazing in the Yosemite wilderness: integrating research and management. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-15 5:160–164Google Scholar
  58. Morris MG (1979) Responses of grassland invertebrates to management by cutting. II. Heteroptera. J Appl Ecol 16:417–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Morris MG (1990) The effects of management on the invertebrate community of calcareous grassland. In: Hillier SH, Walton DWH, Wells DA (eds) Calcareous grasslands-ecology and management. Bluntisham Books, Huntingdon, pp 128–133Google Scholar
  60. Morris MG, Lakhani KH (1979) Responses of grassland invertebrates to management by cutting. J Appl Ecol 16:77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Morris MG, Rispin WE (1987) Abundance and diversity of the coleopterous fauna of a calcareous grassland under different cutting regimes. J Appl Ecol 24:451–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mysterud A, Hansen LO, Peters C, Austrheim G (2005) The short-term effect of sheep grazing on selected invertebrates (Diptera and Hemiptera) relative to other environmental factors in an alpine ecosystem. J Zool Lond 266:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nakagawa S, Foster TM (2004) The case against retrospective statistical power analyses with an introduction to power analysis. Acta Ethol 7:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. New TR (1998) Invertebrate surveys for conservation. Oxford University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Olff H, Ritchie M (1998) Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:261–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Olson-Rutz KM, Marlow CB, Hansen K, Gagnon LC, Rossi RJ (1996a) Packhorse grazing behavior and immediate impact on a timberline meadow. J Range Manag 49:546–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Olson-Rutz KM, Marlow CB, Hansen K, Gagnon LC, Rossi RJ (1996b) Recovery of a high elevation plant community after packhorse grazing. J Range Manag 49:541–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rambo JL, Faeth SH (1999) Effect of vertebrate grazing on plant and insect community structure. Conserv Biol 13:1047–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ratliff RD (1985) Meadows in the Sierra Nevada of California: state of knowledge. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA, General Technical Report PSW-84Google Scholar
  70. Simberloff D (1972) Properties of the rarefaction diversity measurement. Am Nat 106:414–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. Southwood TRE, Henderson PA (2000) Ecological methods. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  73. Spildie DR, Cole DN, Walker SC (2000) Effectiveness of a confinement strategy in reducing pack stock impacts at campsites in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness, Idaho. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-15 5:199–208Google Scholar
  74. Stiling PD (2001) Ecology, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  75. Stohlgren TJ, DeBenedetti SH, Parsons DJ (1989) Effects of herbage removal on productivity of selected high-Sierra meadow community types. Environ Manag 13:485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF (2005) Borror and DeLong’s introduction to the study of insects, 7th edn. Thomson Brooks/Cole, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  77. Uhrin AV, Holmquist JG (2003) Effects of propeller scarring on macrofaunal use of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 250:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology. Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  79. Underwood EC, Fisher BL (2006) The role of ants in conservation monitoring: if, when, and how. Biol Conserv 132:166–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. van der Valk AG (2006) The biology of freshwater wetlands. Oxford University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Vickery JA, Tallowin JR, Feber RE, Asteraki EJ, Atkinson PW, Fuller RJ, Brown VK (2001) The management of lowland neutral grasslands in Britain: effects of agricultural practices on birds and their food. J Appl Ecol 38:647–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Weaver T, Dale D (1978) Trampling effects of hikers, motorcycles, and horses in meadows and forests. J Appl Ecol 15:451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wiens JA, Schooley RL, Weeks RD Jr (1997) Patchy landscapes and animal movements: do beetles percolate? Oikos 78:257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. With KA (1994) Ontogenetic shifts in how grasshoppers interact with landscape structure: an analysis of movement patterns. Funct Ecol 8:477–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Williams DD (2006) The biology of temporary waters. Oxford University, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey G. Holmquist
    • 1
  • Jutta Schmidt-Gengenbach
    • 1
  • Sylvia A. Haultain
    • 2
  1. 1.University of California White Mountain Research StationBishopUSA
  2. 2.Sequoia and Kings Canyon National ParksThree RiversUSA

Personalised recommendations