Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacité d’une technique de réaction de polymérisation en chaîne (seminested et multiplex) pour l’identification des trois principales espèces bactériennes responsables de méningites au Burkina Faso

Effectiveness of a polymerase chain reaction using seminested and multiplex strategy for the identification of the three main bacteria responsible for meningitis in Burkina Faso

  • Bactériologie / Bacteriology
  • Published:
Bulletin de la Société de pathologie exotique

Résumé

Une étude prospective de neuf mois (1er août 2006 au 30 avril 2007) a été réalisée au Multi Disease Surveillance Centre (MDSC) de Ouagadougou sur 214 échantillons de liquide céphalorachidien (LCR) provenant de cas suspects de méningites bactériennes. L’objectif de l’étude était d’évaluer la performance d’une technique de détection simultanée de Neisseria meningitidis, de Streptoccocus sp. et de Haemophilus influenzae par une polymerase chain reaction (PCR) en multiplex, utilisant une stratégie de seminested. Sur les 214 échantillons analysés par PCR et par culture, les taux globaux de confirmation des cas suspects de méningites étaient de 64 % par la PCR et 40,1 % par la culture bactérienne (p = 2 × 10−6). En prenant la culture comme référence, la technique PCRa, de façon globale, une sensibilité (Se) de 98,8 % et une spécificité (Sp) de 59,4 %. La Se de la PCR était respectivement de 100, 97,3 et 100 % pour N. meningitidis, pour Streptoccocus sp. et pour H. influenzae, avec des Sp respectives de 70, 93,2 et 97,2 %. En conclusion, la technique de seminested PCR est une technique sensible et peut être implémentée dans les laboratoires de référence dans le but d’une surveillance microbiologique plus exhaustive des méningites bactériennes.

Abstract

A prospective study (from August 2006 to April 2007) was carried out with 214 cerebrospinal fluid samples with suspicion of bacterial meningitis. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus sp. and Haemophilus influenzae using seminested polymerase chain reaction strategy. Among the 214 samples tested by both PCR and culture, the overall confirmation rate was 64% for PCR and 40.1% for culture (P = 2 × 10−6). Taking culture method as the standard reference, the overall sensitivity of PCR was 98.8% and specificity, 59.4%. The sensitivity of PCR was 100, 97.3 and 100% respectively for N. meningitidis, Streptococcus sp. and H. influenzae with respective specificities of 70, 93.2 and 97.2%. In conclusion, the seminested PCR strategy is a sensitive method and it can be implemented in the reference public health laboratories for an exhaustive microbiological surveillance of bacterial meningitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Backman A, Lantz PG, Radström P, Olcen P (1999) Evaluation of an extended diagnostic PCR assay for detection and verification of the common causes of bacterial meningitis in CSF and other biological samples. Mol Cell Probes 13:49–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chanteau S, Sidikou F, Djibo S, et al (2006) Scaling-up of PCR-based surveillance of bacterial meningitis in the African meningitis belt: indisputable benefits of multiplex PCR assay in Niger. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 100:677–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coovadia YM, Solwa Z (1987) Three latex agglutination tests compared with Gram staining for the detection of bacteria in cerebrospinal fluid. S Afr Med J 71:442–444

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coovadia YM, Van den ende J, Solwa Z (1989) Comparison of Gram stain and latex agglutination for diagnosis of meningococcal meningitis. Lancet 16:677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corless CE, Guiver M, Borrow R, et al (2001) Simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae in suspected cases of meningitis and septicemia using real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 39:1553–1558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Das BK, Gurubacharya RL, Mohapatra TM, Mishra OP (2003) Bacterial antigen detection test in meningitis. Indian J Pediatr 70:799–801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. European Union. Invasive Bacterial Infections Surveillance (EUIBIS) — Culture-confirmed meningococcal cases by country & year, 1999–2002 (http://www.euibis.org/php/meningo_db_index.htm)

  8. European Union. Invasive Bacterial Infections Surveillance (EUIBIS) — Number of culture-confirmed and/or PCR-confirmed meningococcal disease cases by country & year, 1999–2002. (http://www.euibis.org/php/meningo_db_index.htm)

  9. Failace L, Wagner M, Chesky M, et al (2005) Simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus sp. by polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 63:920–924

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gray LD, Fedorko DP (1992) Laboratory diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev 5:130–145

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall LMC, Duke B, Urwin G (1995) An approach to the identification of the pathogens of bacterial meningitis by the polymerase chain reaction. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 14:1090–1094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Martet G, Merlin M, Debonne J (1994) Les épidémies de méningites à méningocoques: aspects Africains. Med Trop 54: 355–360

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Parent Du Châtelet I, Traoré Y, Gessner B, et al (2005) Bacterial meningitis in Burkina Faso: surveillance using field-based polymerase chain reaction testing. Clin Infect Dis 40:17–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Radström P, Backman A, Qian NY, et al (1994) Detection of bacterial DNA in cerebrospinal fluid by an assay for simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococci using a seminested PCR strategy. J Clin Microbiol 32:2738–2744

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reinert P (2003) Méningites purulentes chez l’enfant: particularités dans les pays en développement. Med Trop 63:481–485

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanou I (2004) Étude des méningites bactériennes en phases épidémiques et interépidémique au Burkina Faso de 2000 à 2003. Thèse de doctorat unique, université de Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso), p. 16

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saruta K, Matsunaga T, Kono M, et al (1997) Simultaneous detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae by nested PCR amplification from cerebrospinal fluid samples. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 19:151–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sidikou F, Djibo S, Taha MK (2003) Enhancement of the surveillance of bacterial meningitis in remote areas in Niger: relevance of PCR assay. Emerg Infect Dis 9:486–488

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sidikou F, Djibo S, Taha MK, et al (2003) Polymerase chain reaction assay and bacterial meningitis surveillance in remote areas, Niger. Emerg Infect Dis 9:1486–1488

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Taha MK (2000) Simultaneous approach for nonculture PCR-based identification and serogroup prediction of Neisseria meningitidis. J Clin Microbiol 38:855–857

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamamoto Y (2002) PCR in diagnosis of infection: detection of bacteria in cerebrospinal fluids. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9:508–514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Nikièma.

About this article

Cite this article

Nikièma, A., Toé, L., Adjami, G. et al. Efficacité d’une technique de réaction de polymérisation en chaîne (seminested et multiplex) pour l’identification des trois principales espèces bactériennes responsables de méningites au Burkina Faso. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. 103, 8–13 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13149-009-0003-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13149-009-0003-x

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation