Raumforschung und Raumordnung

, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 153–164 | Cite as

Economic resilience. The Case Study of Pomorskie Region

Bericht aus Forschung und Praxis

Abstract

This article aims to identify the resilience of the Pomorskie Region in Poland. The analysed region belongs to a group of European regions where the negative impact of the economic crisis has not been distinctively visible. In a unitary state like Poland the resilience of the region to the crisis results to a high degree from the external macroeconomic factors of the country. However some regional features play an important role in strengthening resilience. We analysed socio-economic structures in the context of their significance for the region’s resilience. Walker’s and Salt’s (Resilience Thinking. Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world, 2006) resilience attributes were used as a template for the findings. Although it is difficult to determine the level of a region’s resilience in a situation of ongoing and growing recession, some conclusions may be derived from the analysis. One of the most important factors of the Pomorskie Region’s resilience is the diversity of economic and social structures. The community and its social capital is undoubtedly one of the strongest attributes of the regional resilience. The Pomorskie Region’s richness in ecosystem services also strengthens its resilience significantly. Overlaps in governance are mainly connected with the development of institutional embeddedness. However the current lack of governance on the level of the most dynamically developing metropolitan areas is an impediment to more dynamic development. The post-totalitarian tradition of centralised governance continues to negatively influence the tight feedbacks attribute of resilience.

Keywords

Economic resilience Macroeconomic policy Structural and functional determinants Pomorskie Region 

Ökonomische Resilienz. Fallstudie Pommern

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Artikel widmet sich der Ermittlung der Resilienz der Region Pommern in Polen. Die betrachtete Region gehört einer Gruppe europäischer Regionen an, bei denen die negativen Auswirkungen der Wirtschaftskrise nicht klar sichtbar geworden sind. In einem Einheitsstaat wie Polen hängt die Resilienz der Region im hohen Maße von den makroökonomischen Faktoren des Landes ab. Dennoch spielen einige regionale Eigenschaften eine wichtige Rolle bei der Stärkung der Resilienz. Wir analysieren die sozioökonomischen Strukturen im Hinblick auf ihre Bedeutung für die Resilienz der Region. Die von Walker und Salt (2006) entwickelten Resilienz-Attribute dienten als Vorlage für die Ergebnisse. Bei einer anhaltenden und wachsenden Rezession ist es schwierig, den Stand der Resilienz einer Region festzustellen, dennoch lassen sich einige Schlussfolgerungen aus der Analyse herleiten. Einer der wichtigsten Faktoren der Resilienz der Region Pommern ist die Diversität der ökonomischen und sozialen Strukturen. Die Gemeinschaft und ihr Sozialkapital ist zweifellos eine der bedeutendsten Attribute der regionalen Resilienz. Die Vielfalt der Ökosystemdienstleistungen in Pommern verstärkt signifikant die Resilienz der Region. Überschneidungen von Zuständigkeiten ergeben sich hauptsächlich im Zusammenhang mit der Entwicklung institutioneller Einbettung. Dennoch stellt der aktuelle Mangel an Governance auf der Ebene der sich dynamisch entwickelnden Metropolregionen ein Hemmnis für eine weitere dynamische Entwicklung dar. Die post-totalitäre Tradition der zentralen Governance übt weiterhin einen negativen Einfluss auf das Resilienz-Attribut der engen Rückkopplung aus.

Schlüsselwörter

Ökonomische Resilienz Makroökonomische Faktoren Strukturelle und funktionale Determinanten Pommern 

References

  1. Adger, W.N. (2003): Building resilience to promote sustainability. In: IHDP Update 2, 1–3.Google Scholar
  2. Briguglio, L.; Cordina, G.; Farrugia, N.; Vella, S. (2009): Economic Vulnerability and Resilience: Concepts and Measurements. In: Oxford Development Studies 37 (3), 229–247.Google Scholar
  3. Central Intelligence Agency (2013): The World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pl.html (15.10. 2013).
  4. Central Statistical Office (2012): Bank Danych Lokalnych. http://www.stat.gov.pl/bdl/app/strona.html?p_name=indeks (15.10.2013).
  5. Christopherson, S.; Michie, J.; Tyler, P. (2010): Regional resilience: theoretical and empirical perspectives. In: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3 (1), 3–10.Google Scholar
  6. Davoudi, S. (2013): Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End? In: Planning Theory and Practice 13 (2), 299–307.Google Scholar
  7. Davoudi, S.; Strange, I. (2009): Space and place in the twentieth-century planning: An analytical framework and an historical review. In: Davoudi, S.; Strange, I. (eds.): Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning. London, 7–42.Google Scholar
  8. Doran, J.; Fingleton, B. (2013): Economic shocks and growth: Spatio-temporal perspectives on Europe’s economies in a time of crisis. In: Papers in Regional Science. doi:10.1111/pirs.12048.Google Scholar
  9. Działek, J. (2011): Kapitał społeczny jako czynnik rozwoju gospodarczego w skali regionalnej i lokalnej w Polsce. Kraków.Google Scholar
  10. Fingleton, B.; Garretsen, H.; Martin, R. (2012): Recessionary shocks and regional employment: evidence on the resilience of UK regions. In: Journal of Regional Science 52 (1), 109–133.Google Scholar
  11. Folke, C.; Carpenter, S.; Elmqvist, T.; Gunderson, L.; Holling, C.S.; Walker, B.; Bengtsson, J.; Berkes, F.; Colding, J.; Danell, K.; Falkenmark, M.; Gordon, L.; Kasperson, R.; Kautsky, N.; Kinzig, A.; Levin, S.; Mäler, K.-G.; Moberg, F.; Ohlsson, L.; Olsson, P.; Ostrom, E.; Reid, W.; Rockström, J.; Savenije, H.; Svedin, U. (2002): Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Scientific Background Paper on Resilience for the Process of the World Summit on Sustainable Development on Behalf of the Environmental Advisory Council to the Swedish Government. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  12. Folke, C.; Carpenter, S.; Walker, B.; Scheffer, M.; Chapin, T.; Rockström, J. (2010): Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. In: Ecology and Society 15 (4), 20–28.Google Scholar
  13. Holling, C.S. (1986): The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In: Clark, W.C.; Munn, R.E. (eds.): Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge, 292–320.Google Scholar
  14. Holling, C.S.; Gunderson, L.H. (2002): Resilience and adaptive cycles. In: Gunderson, L.H.; Holling, C.S. (eds): Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, D.C., 25–62.Google Scholar
  15. Kalinowski T. (ed.) (2006): Development success of Polish regions. Gdańsk.Google Scholar
  16. Kębłowski, P.; Welfe, A. (2010): Estimation of the equilibrium exchange rate: The CHEER approach. In: Journal of International Money and Finance 29 (7), 1385–1397.Google Scholar
  17. Marshal’s Office of the Pomorskie Voivodeship (2008): Handel zagraniczny województwa pomorskiego w latach 2000–2006 (Foreign trade of Pomorskie Voivodeship in the years 2000–2006). Gdańsk.Google Scholar
  18. Marshal’s Office of the Pomorskie Voivodeship (2012): Strategia Rozwoju Województwa Pomorskiego 2020 (Development Strategy of Pomorskie Voivodeship 2020). Gdańsk.Google Scholar
  19. Mukherji, N.; Silberman, J. (2013): Absorptive capacity, knowledge flows, and innovation in U.S. metropolitan areas. In: Journal of Regional Science 53 (3), 392–417.Google Scholar
  20. The National Electoral Commission (2011): Wybory 2011 do Sejmu i Senatu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. http://wybory2011.pkw.gov.pl/wyn/pl/000000.html#tabs-1 (15.10.2013).
  21. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008): OECD Territorial Reviews: Poland. Paris.Google Scholar
  22. rganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012): OECD. StatExtracts. http://stats.oecd.org (15.10.2013).
  23. Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (2011): Raport o stanie sektora małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw w Polsce (Report on the condition of small and medium enterprises in Poland). Warszawa.Google Scholar
  24. Putnam, R.D. (2000): Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York.Google Scholar
  25. Scheffer, M. (2009): Critical Transitions in Nature and Society. Princeton.Google Scholar
  26. Statistical Office in Gdańsk (2013): Raport o sytuacji społeczno-gospodarczej województwa pomorskiego w 2012 roku (Report on the socio-economic situation of Pomorskie voivodeship in 2012). Gdańsk.Google Scholar
  27. Stoker, G. (1995): Regime Theory and Urban Politics. In: Judge, D.; Stoker, G.; Wolman, H. (eds.): Theories of Urban Politics. London, 54–71.Google Scholar
  28. Szmytkowska, M.; Masik, G.; Czepczyński, M. (2010): Trendy rozwoju oraz ocena jakości kapitału ludzkiego w regionie pomorskim (Trends and quality assessment of human capital in the Pomorskie Region). Research project for the Department of Regional and Spatial Development of Pomorskie Region (Human Capital Operational Programme in 2007–2013). Gdańsk.Google Scholar
  29. Teigao dos Santos, F.; Rosário Partidário, M. (2011): SPARK: Strategic Planning Approach for Resilience Keeping. In: European Planning Studies 19 (8), 1517–1536.Google Scholar
  30. The Gdańsk Institute for Market Economics (2008): Identyfikacja potencjalnych klastrów na bazie analizy struktury gospodarki województwa pomorskiego (Identification of potential clusters based on analysis of the structure of Pomorskie voivodeship economy). Gdańsk.Google Scholar
  31. Walker, B.; Salt, D. (2006): Resilience Thinking. Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economic GeographyUniversity of GdańskGdańskPoland

Personalised recommendations