Correction to: Carbonates and Evaporites (2019) 34:175–187 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-018-0474-6

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Figure 3, Tables 4 and 6 were incorrect. The corrected Fig. 3, Tables 4 and 6 are given in the following page.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Results of the analysis of the carbonate bodies of the study area, according to the EPIK and KDI methods, showing the actual karst situation between the Guapiara Plateau and Paranapiacaba Range. a Epikarst (E); b protective cover (P); c infiltration (I); d karst network (K); e protection factor (F)

Table 4 Karst vulnerability
Table 6 Results for each vulnerability assessment method