Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Remedial investigations of karst aquifers: a case study at former Marietta Air Force Station, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Carbonates and Evaporites Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A phased multi-disciplinary approach was used to investigate potential environmental impact on the overburden aquifer and karst (bedrock) aquifer from the historic use of a suspected fire training pit at the former Marietta Air Force Station in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Investigation techniques have included direct push technology, real-time sample analysis via use of a mobile laboratory, earth resistivity imaging/induced polarization, geophysical borehole logging, packer testing, installation of one multi-port well with five sampling ports set in the karst aquifer, installation of multiple conventional monitoring wells, and completion of multiple rounds of groundwater sampling and data analysis. Both the vertical and lateral extents of groundwater contamination by chlorinated volatile organic compounds were delineated in the overburden and karst aquifer. The pathway-focused human health risk assessment has indicated that groundwater remediation is required to meet the federal and state health standards for volatile organic compounds. Based on the hydrogeological conditions and the nature and extent of the delineated contamination, plumes in both the overburden and karst aquifers, chemical oxidation (in the karst aquifer), and enhanced bioremediation (in the overburden aquifer) have been selected as the preferred alternatives for groundwater remediation, with monitored natural attenuation included as a common component of both alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson PM (1984) Movement of contaminants in groundwater: groundwater transport-advection and dispersion in studies in geophysics, groundwater contamination. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg TM, Christine MD (1981) Atlas of preliminary geologic quadrangle maps of Pennsylvania, Map 61. In: Berg TM, Christine MD (eds) Pennsylvania geological survey, Fourth Series, Harrisburg

  • Cherry JA, Parker BL, Keller C (2007) A new depth-discrete multilevel monitoring approach for fractured rock. Ground Water Monit Rem 27(2):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeb R, Hawley E, Kell L, O’Laskey R (2011) Assessing alternative endpoints for groundwater remediation at contaminated sites. ESTCP Project ER-200832

  • Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (2011) Guidance protocol: environmental restoration project ER-0518, application of nucleic acid-based tools for monitoring monitored natural attenuation (MNA), biostimulation, and bioaugmentation at chlorinated solvent sites

  • ERT Inc. (2015) Remedial investigation and feasibility study report, suspected fire training pit, former Marietta Air Force Station, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania

  • Fetter CW (1999) Contaminant hydrogeology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelhar LW, Welty C, Rehfeldt KR (1992) A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers. Water Resour Res 28(7):1955–1974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inc Foothill Engineering Consultants (2000) Site investigation report. Former Marietta Air Force Station, Marietta

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennel JR (2008) Advances in rock core VOC analyses for high resolution characterization of chlorinated solvent contamination in a dolostone aquifer (Thesis), Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

  • Kueper BH, McWhorter DB (1991) The behavior of dense, nonaqueous phase liquids in fractured clay and rock. Ground Water 29:716–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan Engineering & Environmental Services (2006) Remedial investigation/Final Act 2 Report, suspected former Fire Training Pit, Marietta Air Force Station, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania

  • Li P, Qian H, Wu J (2014) Origin and assessment of groundwater pollution and associated health risk: a case study in an industrial park, northwest China. Environ Geochem Health 36(4):693712. doi:10.1007/s1065301395903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipson DS, White KA (2014) Groundwater remediation in karst terranes: state of the practice. Abstract in NGWA Groundwater Summit, Denver, Colorado

  • Loop CM, White WB (2001) A conceptual model for DNALP transport in karst ground water basins. Ground Water 39(1):119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm Pirnie (2002) Guidance to site managers at army installations: groundwater evaluation and development of remediation strategies where aquifer restoration may be technically impracticable, prepared for United States Army Environmental Center

  • National Research Council (1994) Alternatives for ground water cleanup. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman SP (1990) Universe scaling of hydraulic conductivities and dispersivities in geologic media. Water Resour Res 26(8):1749–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newland PQ (2015) The development, application and acceptance of environmental and health risk assessment methodology for MAR schemes in South Australia. Environ Earth Sci 73:77397745. doi:10.1007/s1266501434063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PADEP (2011) Statewide health standards. Land Recycling Program

  • Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) (2002) Pennsylvania’s land recycling program, technical guidance manual, section IV—general guidance. 253-0300-100

  • Plett JH (2006). Metolachlor and TCE Plume characteristics in a Dolostone aquifer using a transect (Thesis), Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

  • Teutsch G, Sauter M (1991) Groundwater modeling in karst terranes—scale effects, data acquisition, and field verification. In: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Hydrogeology, Ecology, Monitoring, and Management of Ground Water in Karst Terranes, Nashville, Tennessee, December 4–6, 1991: National Ground Water Association, pp. 17–54

  • USACE (2005) Engineering evaluation/cost analysis, suspected fire training pit, Marietta Air Force Station Formerly Used Defense Site, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania

  • USEPA (1998) Technical protocol for evaluating natural attenuation of chlorinated solvents in ground water, EPA/600/R-98/128

  • USEPA (2002) Risk assessment guidance for superfund, volume I: human health evaluation manual (Part D: standardized planning, reporting, and review of superfund risk assessments). OSWER, Washington, D.C. Publication 9285.7-47

  • USEPA (2004) Johnson and Ettinger model for subsurface vapor intrusion into buildings. Groundwater Advanced, Version 3.1

  • USEPA (2015) OSWER technical guide for assessing and mitigating the vapor intrusion pathway from subsurface vapor sources to indoor air. OSWER Publication 9200.2-154

  • Williams PW (1983) The role of the subcutaneous zone in karst hydrology. J Hydrol 61:45–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W (2001) Numerical simulation of two-phase flow in conceptualized fractures. Environ Geol 40(7):797–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Wheater HS, Johnston PM (1997) State of the art of modelling two-phase flow in fractured rock. Environ Geol 31(3/4):157–166

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering Division, USACE Baltimore District, 10 South Howard Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA

    Marc Randrianarivelo

  2. ERT, Inc, 2890 University Square, Suite 2A, Huntsville, AL, 35816, USA

    Wanfang Zhou

  3. ERT, Inc, 14401 Sweitzer Lane, Suite 300, Laurel, MD, 20707, USA

    Michael Barsa

Authors
  1. Marc Randrianarivelo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wanfang Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Barsa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanfang Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Randrianarivelo, M., Zhou, W. & Barsa, M. Remedial investigations of karst aquifers: a case study at former Marietta Air Force Station, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Carbonates Evaporites 34, 233–247 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-017-0369-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-017-0369-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation