Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sinkhole investigation methods: the next step after special publication no. 57

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Carbonates and Evaporites Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Presently, there is no standard method required by the Florida statutes in a sinkhole investigation. However, most investigators follow the recommendations found in the Florida Geological Survey, Special Publication No. 57 (SP 57). This paper expands on the information in SP 57 by providing specific geophysical, geotechnical and structural recommendations that should be considered in sinkhole investigations. In particular, attention is directed at developing an understanding of the interaction of a building with the subsurface, how an investigation should be conducted to obtain this crucial information, and how the investigative process is interactive: as new information is developed, previous assumptions need to be reexamined in light of the new data. In addition, recommendations are made for the various steps to be taken in a subsurface investigation. Using the recommendations found in this manuscript, sinkhole investigations can become more standardized and comprehensive thereby gaining more agreement among investigators in the outcome of the investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Day RW (1999) Forensic geotechnical and foundation engineering. McGraw-Hill, Boston, p 460

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobecki TL, Upchurch SB (2006) Applications to detect sinkholes and ground subsidence. Lead Edge 25(3):336–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Code Council (2008) 2007 Florida Building Code—Existing Building: Country Club Hills, Ill., International Code Council, p 120

  • Schmidt W, compiler (2005) Geological and geotechnical investigation procedures for evaluation of the causes of subsidence damage. Florida Geological Survey Special Publication 57 (SP 57), Florida, p 22

  • Wightman MJ, Zisman ED (2008) The selection and application of geophysical test methods in karst terrains. In: Yuhr LB, Alexander EC, Beck BF (eds) Sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst—proceedings of the eleventh multidisciplinary conference, September 22–26, 2008, vol 183. American Society of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Special Publications, Tallahassee, pp 81–90

  • Zisman ED (2001a) A standard method for sinkhole detection in the Tampa, Florida, area. Environ Eng Geosci 7(1):51–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Zisman, ED (2001b) Application of a standard method of sinkhole detection in the Tampa, Florida, area. In: Beck BF, Herring JG (eds) Geotechnical and environmental applications of karst geology and hydrology—Proceedings of the eigth multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and karst, Louisville, Ky., April 1–4, 2001, Balkema, pp 187–192

  • Zisman ED (2003a) Guilty until proven innocent—sinkhole definition & identifying features. In: Beck BF (ed) Sinkholes and engineering and environmental impact of karst, proceedings of the ninth multidisciplinary conference, September 6–10, 2003, vol 122. American Society of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Special Publications, Huntsville, pp 124–130

  • Zisman ED (2003b) Sinkhole size. In: Beck BF (ed) Sinkholes and engineering and environmental impact of karst, proceedings of the ninth multidisciplinary conference, September 6–10, 2003, vol 122. American Society of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Special Publications, Huntsville, pp 131–137

  • Zisman ED (2005) Sinkhole case studies—is it or isn’t it a sinkhole? In: Beck BF (ed) Sinkholes and engineering and environmental impact of karst, proceedings of the tenth multidisciplinary conference, September 24–28, 2005, vol 144. American Society of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Special Publications, San Antonio, pp 303–310

  • Zisman ED (2009) Forensic considerations in sinkhole investigations. In: Chen S-E, de Leon AD, Dolhon AM, Drerup MJ, Parfitt MK (eds) Forensic engineering 2009—pathology of the built environment, proceedings of the fifth congress on forensic engineering, November 11–14, 2009, Washington D.C., pp 224–233

  • Zisman ED (2010) The use of forensic engineering in sinkhole investigations. In: Fratta DO, Puppala AJ, Muhunthan B (eds) GeoFlorida 2010—advances in analysis, modeling, and design, February 20–24, 2010, vol 199. American Society of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Special Publications, West Palm Beach, pp 1201–1207

  • Zisman ED, Wightman MJ, Taylor C (2005) The effectiveness of GPR in sinkhole investigations. In: Beck BF (ed) Sinkholes and engineering and environmental impact of karst, proceedings of the tenth multidisciplinary conference, September 24–28, 2005, vol 144. American Society of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Special Publications, San Antonio, pp 608–615

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ATC Associates, Tampa, FL, USA

    E. D. Zisman

  2. GeoView, St. Petersburg, FL, USA

    Mike Wightman

  3. Haag Engineering, Tampa, FL, USA

    Justin Kestner

Authors
  1. E. D. Zisman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mike Wightman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Justin Kestner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. D. Zisman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zisman, E.D., Wightman, M. & Kestner, J. Sinkhole investigation methods: the next step after special publication no. 57. Carbonates Evaporites 28, 103–109 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-013-0145-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-013-0145-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation