Carbonates and Evaporites

, Volume 28, Issue 1–2, pp 141–147 | Cite as

Using InSAR to detect subsidence at brine wells, sinkhole sites, and mines

  • Michael L. Rucker
  • Bibhuti B. Panda
  • Robert A. Meyers
  • John C. Lommler
Original Article


The July 16, 2008, collapse of a brine well southeast of Artesia, New Mexico, has led to concern about the stability of a brine well facility located within the city limits of Carlsbad, New Mexico. Monitoring and mitigation studies were initiated in 2009, and emergency response procedures are in place should it collapse into a large sinkhole. For historic subsidence data, satellite-based Interferometry by Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) provides a method to quantify land subsidence as differential ground movement over time using archived data extending back to 1992. To evaluate InSAR for monitoring and provide a sampling of historic subsidence, data acquired in July 2005, February 2006, and March 2006 were obtained and processed into a July 2005 to March 2006 interferogram. The resulting scene included three study areas: the Carlsbad brine well, underground potash mining in the Carlsbad Mining District, and the collapsed brine well sinkhole southeast of Artesia and north of Carlsbad (Jim’s Water Service). Changes in surface elevation were estimated from the unwrapped InSAR results. Random elevation fluctuations in apparently stable areas were considered to be ‘noise’. After simple smoothing by averaging three adjacent data points, resulting standard deviations were less than 2 mm. No differential subsidence above ‘noise’ was interpreted across either of the brine wells from July 2005 to March 2006. Precursor subsidence was not indicated 2 years before the 2008 brine well collapse. Numerous subsidence features with 8-month subsidence of 20–40 mm were interpreted in the Carlsbad Mining District study area. Some of these subsidence features underlie infrastructure, including a highway, railroad, and pipeline.


InSAR Interferometry Subsidence Sinkhole 


  1. Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) (2010) Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR). Accessed 22 May 2010
  2. Chirumamilla JB (2008) Prediction of sinkholes using interferometric analysis—a case study of Wink Sink #2 in Texas. MA Thesis, University of Arizona, Tempe, p 73Google Scholar
  3. Goodman WM, Schneider JM, Gnage DJ, Henard DA, Van Sambeek LL (2009) Two-dimensional seismic evaluation of the I&W Brine Cavern, Carlsbad, New Mexico: Rapid City, S. Dak., RESPEC. Topical report RSI-2083, prepared for New Mexico Oil Conservation Division, p 47. Accessed 27 Apr 2010
  4. Henard DA, Van Sambeek LL, Wallace MG, Goodman WM, Hocking CM, Barber CA, Krantz EL (2009) Geohydrological and structural analysis and monitoring I&W Cavern, Carlsbad, New Mexico—status report no. 1: Topical Report RSI-2060, Revision 1, prepared for New Mexico Oil Conservation Division, p 43. Accessed 27 Apr 2010
  5. Karimi-Jafari M, Berest P, Brouard B (2008) Subsidence, sinkholes and craters above salt caverns: Solution Mining Research Institute Spring Meeting, Porto, Portugal, April 27–30, p 269Google Scholar
  6. Paine JG, Buckley S, Collins EW, Wilson CR, Kress W (2009) Assessing sinkhole potential at Wink and Daisetta using gravity and radar interferometry. In: Proceedings of the 22nd SAGEEP symposium on the application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems, vol 22, SAGEEP, Ft. Worth, Texas, March 29–April 2. doi: 10.4133/1.3176733
  7. Rucker ML, Crumb G, Meyers R, Lommler JC (2005) Geophysical identification of evaporite dissolution structures beneath a highway alignment. In: Beck BF (ed) Proceedings of the 10th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and engineering and environmental impacts of karst, San Antonio, Texas, September 24–28, Reston, VA, American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE geotechnical special publication 144, pp 659–666Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Rucker
    • 1
  • Bibhuti B. Panda
    • 1
  • Robert A. Meyers
    • 2
  • John C. Lommler
    • 3
  1. 1.AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.PhoenixUSA
  2. 2.Geotechnical Section, New Mexico Department of TransportationSanta FeUSA
  3. 3.AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.AlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations