Abstract
The accuracy of the western North Pacific tropical cyclone intensity forecast guidance products available at the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) is evaluated relative to a new skill metric called Weighted Analog Intensity Pacific (WAIP) that includes knowledge of the JTWC official track forecast and the current intensity, which is information that is available at the time the intensity forecast is generated. An intensity consensus technique called S5XX that includes statistical-dynamic intensity forecasts plus other dynamic and thermodynamic prediction techniques has statistically significant smaller errors than WAIP at 24 h and 48 h and has similar accuracy through 120 h. While the track consensus CONW is a critical input to the JTWC official track forecast, it has no skill relative to WAIP as an intensity forecast. Three regional numerical models also have no skill relative to WAIP, and especially at forecast intervals beyond 72 h because their mean absolute errors are statistically significantly larger than for WAIP. Furthermore, these regional models have statistically significant positive or negative intensity biases relative to the verifying intensities. However, an experimental consensus technique called CMES that includes these three regional models has small accuracy relative to WAIP in the 24 h to 72 h forecast intervals. Geographical-based comparisons of the intensity guidance products with the WAIP indicate almost all of the products are more accurate than WAIP over the South China Sea region. The statistical-dynamic consensus technique S5XX does have skill through 72 h for landfalling situations along the coasts of China and Southeast Asia. At 120 h, the WAIP has superior performance over the guidance products over most areas of the western North Pacific, but again the S5XX is more accurate than WAIP for landfalling tropical cyclones on the Philippine Islands, Southeast Asia, South China, and northeastern Japan. This information will be useful to the forecaster in deciding when and where (or how much) to rely on each guidance product in preparing the five-day intensity forecast once the official track forecast has been established.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DeMaria, M., C. R. Sampson, J. A. Knaff, and K. D. Musgrave, 2014: Is tropical cyclone intensity guidance improving? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 387–398.
Elsberry, R. L., 2007: Advances in tropical cyclone motion prediction and recommendations for the future. Bull. World Meteor. Organiz, 56, 131–135.
Elsberry, R. L., and H.-C. Tsai, 2014: Situation-dependent intensity skill metric and intensity spread guidance for western North Pacific tropical cyclones. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 95, 297–306.
Emanuel, K., C. DesAutels, C. Holloway, and R. Korty, 2004: Environmental control of tropical cyclone intensity. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 843–858.
Goerss, J., and C. K. Sampson, 2014: Prediction of consensus tropical cyclone intensity forecast error. Wea. Forecasting, 29, 750–762.
Knaff, J. A., C. R. Sampson, and M. DeMaria, 2005: An operational statistical typhoon intensity prediction scheme for the western North Pacific. Wea. Forecasting, 20, 688–699.
Knaff, J. A., M. DeMaria, C. R. Sampson, and J. M. Gross, 2003: Statistical, five-day tropical cyclone intensity forecasts derived from climatology and persistence. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 80–92.
Tsai, H.-C., and R. L. Elsberry, 2014: Applications of situation-dependent intensity and intensity spread predictions based on a weighted analog technique. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 507–518.
Tsai, H.-C., and R. L. Elsberry, 2015a: Weighted analog technique for intensity and intensity spread predictions of Atlantic tropical cyclones. Wea. Forecasting, 30, 1321–1333.
Tsai, H.-C., and R. L. Elsberry, 2015b: Seven-day intensity and intensity spread predictions for western North Pacific tropical cyclones. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 331–342.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsai, HC., Elsberry, R.L. Skill of western North Pacific tropical cyclone intensity forecast guidance relative to Weighted-Analog technique. Asia-Pacific J Atmos Sci 52, 281–290 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-016-0001-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-016-0001-4