Representation of tropical storms in the northwestern pacific by the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for research and applications

  • Myong-In LeeEmail author
  • Siegfried D. Schubert
  • Dongmin Kim


This study examines the tropical storms simulated in the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) global atmospheric reanalysis for the recent 12 years (1998–2009), focusing on the tropical storm activity over the Northwestern Pacific. For validation, the International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS) dataset is used as an observational counterpart. Climatological-mean features of the tropical storm genesis, tracks and their maximum intensity are the primary interests in this study. Regarding the genesis location of tropical storms, MERRA is reasonable in resolving major development regions over the South China Sea and the Northwestern Pacific close to the Philippines. The seasonal variation of the number of storms is also reproduced in a realistic way in MERRA, with peak values occurring from July to September. In addition, MERRA tends to reproduce the observed interannual variation of the number of tropical storms during the 12-years, though with a limited accuracy. The simulated paths toward higher latitudes are also reasonable in MERRA, where the reanalysis corresponds well with the observations in resolving frequent paths of westward moving storms and recurving storms toward the northeast. Regarding the intensity, MERRA captures the linear relationship between the minimum center pressure and the maximum wind speed near the surface at the maximum development. Some discrepancies from the observed features are found in the reanalysis, such as less frequent development of storms over the South China Sea and less frequent paths over this region. The reanalysis also does not attain the observed maximum intensity for the resolved tropical storms, particularly underestimating the center pressure. These deficiencies are likely related to limitations in the horizontal resolution and the parameterized physics of the data assimilation system.

Key words

Tropical storms Northwestern Pacific atmospheric reanalysis data assimilation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bosilovich, M. G., J. Chen, F. R. Robertson, and R. F. Adler, 2008: Evaluation of Global Precipitation in Reanalyses. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 2279–2299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloom, S., L. Takacs, A. DaSilva, and D. Ledvina, 1996: Data assimilation using incremental analysis updates. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 1256–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosilovich, M. G., F. R. Robertson, and J. Chen, 2011: Energy and water budgets in MERRA. J. Climate, Submitted.Google Scholar
  4. Camargo, S. J., and S. E. Zebiak, 2002: Improving the detection and tracking of tropical cyclones in atmospheric general circulation models. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 1152–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chou, M. -D., and M. J. Suarez, 1999: A Solar Radiation Parameterization for Atmospheric Studies. NASA Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation 104606, 15, 40 pp.Google Scholar
  6. ___ M. J. Suarez, X. Z. Liang, and M. M.-H. Yan, 2001: A Thermal Infrared Radiation Parameterization for Atmospheric Studies. NASA Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation 104606, 19, 56 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Garcia, R. R. and B. A. Boville, 1994: Downward control of the mean meridional circulation and temperature distribution of the polar winter stratosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2238–2245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kanamitsu, M., W. Ebisuzaki, J. Woolen, S.-K. Yang, J. J. Hnilo, M. Fiorino, and G. L. Potter, 2002: NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 1631–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim, H.-S., J.-H. Kim, C.-H. Ho, and P.-S. Chu, 2011: Pattern classification of typhoon tracks using the fuzzy c-means clustering method, J. Climate, 24, 488–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knapp, K. R. and M. C. Kruk, 2010: Quantifying interagency differences in tropical cyclone best-track wind speed estimates, Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1459–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. —, D. H. Levinson, H. J. Diamond, and C. J. Neumann, 2010: The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS): Unifying tropical cyclone best track data. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koster, R. D., M. J. Suárez, A. Ducharne, M. Stieglitz, and P. Kumar, 2000: A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a GCM, Part 1, Model Structure. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 24809–24822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin, S.-J., 2004: A vertically Lagrangian finite-volume dynamical core for global models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2293–2307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lock, A. P., A. R. Brown, M. R. Bush, G. M. Martin, and R. N. B. Smith, 2000: A new boundary layer mixing scheme. Part I: Scheme description and single-column model tests. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 3187–3199.Google Scholar
  16. Louis, J., M. Tiedtke, and J. Geleyn, 1982: A short history of the PBL parameterization at ECMWF. Proc. ECMWF Workshop on Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 59–80.Google Scholar
  17. McFarlane, N. A., 1987: The effect of orographically excited gravity wave drag on the general circulation of the lower stratosphere and troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 1775–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moorthi, S., and M. J. Suarez, 1992: Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert, A Parameterization of Moist Convection for General-Circulation Models. Mon. Wea. Rev. 120, 978–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Onogi, K., and Coauthors, 2007: The JRA-25 Reanalysis. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85, 369–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rienecker, M. M., and Coauthors, 2008: The GEOS-5 Data Assimilation System — Documentation of Versions 5.0.1, 5.1.0, and 5.2.0. NASA Tech. Rep. Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation Vol. 27, 101 pp.Google Scholar
  21. —, and Coauthors, 2011: MERRA — NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, J. Climate, Submitted.Google Scholar
  22. Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2010: The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 1015–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Uppala, S., and Coauthors, 2005: The ERA-40 Re-Analysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2961–3012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu, W.-S., R. J. Purser, and D. F. Parrish, 2002: Three-dimensional variational analysis with spatially inhomogeneous covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2905–2916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Meteorological Society and Springer Netherlands 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Myong-In Lee
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Siegfried D. Schubert
    • 2
  • Dongmin Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Ulsan National Institute of Science and TechnologyUlsanKorea
  2. 2.NASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA
  3. 3.School of Urban and Environmental EngineeringUlsan National Institute of Science and TechnologyUlsanKorea

Personalised recommendations