Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhancing capacity among faith-based organizations to implement evidence-based cancer control programs: a community-engaged approach

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to promote cancer control among Latinos have proliferated in recent years, though adoption and implementation of these interventions by faith-based organizations (FBOs) is limited. Capacity building may be one strategy to promote implementation. In this qualitative study, 18 community key informants were interviewed to (a) understand existing capacity for health programming among Catholic parishes, (b) characterize parishes’ resource gaps and capacity-building needs implementing cancer control EBIs, and (c) elucidate strategies for delivering capacity-building assistance to parishes to facilitate implementation of EBIs. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted. Key informants concurred about the capacity of Catholic parishes to deliver health programs, and described attributes of parishes that make them strong partners in health promotion initiatives, including a mission to address physical and mental health, outreach to marginalized groups, altruism among members, and existing engagement in health programming. However, resource gaps and capacity building needs were also identified. Specific recommendations participants made about how existing resources might be leveraged to address challenges include to: establish parish wellness committees; provide “hands-on” learning opportunities for parishioners to gain program planning skills; offer continuous, tailored, on-site technical assistance; facilitate relationships between parishes and community resources; and provide financial support for parishes. Leveraging parishes’ existing resources and addressing their implementation needs may improve adoption of cancer control EBIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Census Bureau (2016). Facts for Features: Hispanic Heritage Month 2015. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/newsroom/facts-for-features/2015/cb15-ff18_hispanic_heritage_month.pdf. https://rtips.cancer.gov/rtips/index.do.

  2. Siegel, R. L., et al. (2015). Cancer statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin, 65(6), 457–480.

  3. Siegel, R.L., et al. (2015). Cancer facts & figures for Hispanics/Latinos, 2015-17. Retrieved from American Cancer Society Website: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/cancer-facts-and-figures-for-hispanics-and-latinos/cancer-facts-and-figures-for-hispanics-and-latinos-2015-2017.pdf.

  4. Ransohoff, D.F. (2009). How much does colonoscopy reduce colon cancer mortality?. Ann Intern Med, 150(1), 50–52.

  5. Sabatino, S. A., et al. (2015). Cancer screening test use—United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 64(17), 464–468.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabatino, S. A., et al. (2012). Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med, 43(1), 97–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baron, R. C., et al. (2008). Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review. Am J Prev Med, 35(1 Suppl), S34–S55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Naylor, K., Ward, J., & Polite, B. N. (2012). Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med, 27(8), 1033–1046.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Brouwers, M. C., et al. (2011). Effective interventions to facilitate the uptake of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: an implementation guideline. Implement Sci, 6, 112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. National Cancer Institute. Research-tested Intervention Programs (RTIPs). Available at https://rtips.cancer.gov/rtips/index.do. Accessed 7 July 2017.

  11. Community Preventive Services Task Force. The Guide to Community Preventative Services: Task Force findings for cancer prevention and control. Available at https://www.thecommunityguide.org/content/task-force-findings-cancer-prevention-and-control. Accessed 7 July 2017.

  12. Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K., eds. (2012). Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  13. Neta, G., et al. (2015). Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: a decade of grant funding by the National Cancer Institute and future directions. Implement Sci, 10(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell, M. K., et al. (2007). Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned. Annu Rev Public Health, 28, 213–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Markens, S., et al. (2002). Role of black churches in health promotion programs: lessons from the Los Angeles mammography promotion in churches program. Am J Public Health, 92(5), 805–810.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Peterson, J., Atwood, J. R., & Yates, B. (2002). Key elements for church-based health promotion programs: outcome-based literature review. Public Health Nurs, 19(6), 401–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Allen, J. D., et al. (2014). A pilot test of a church-based intervention to promote multiple cancer-screening behaviors among Latinas. J Cancer Educ, 29(1), 136–143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Allicock, M., et al. (2010). Evaluating the implementation of peer counseling in a church-based dietary intervention for African Americans. Patient Educ Couns, 81(1), 37–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Holt, C. L., et al. (2013). Spiritually based intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans: screening and theory-based outcomes from a randomized trial. Health Educ Behav, 40(4), 458–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bopp, M., et al. (2007). Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a physical activity intervention in churches. Prev Chronic Dis, 4(4), A87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Leone, L. A., Allicock, M., Pignone, M.P., et al. (2016). Cluster randomized trial of a church-based peer counselor and tailored newsletter intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening and physical activity among older African Americans. Health Educ Behav, 43(5), 568–576.

  22. Webb, B. L., Bopp, M. J. (2017). Results of walking in faith: a faith-based physical activity program for clergy. J Relig Health, 56(2), 561–574.

  23. Nguyen, A. B., & Belgrave, F. Z. (2014). Suc Khoe la Quan Trong hon sac dep! Health is better than beauty! A community-based participatory research intervention to improve cancer screening among Vietnamese women. J Health Care Poor Underserved, 25(2), 605–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Holt, C. L., et al. (2009). A comparison of a spiritually based and non-spiritually based educational intervention for informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church-attending African-American men. Urol Nurs, 29(4), 249–258.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Holt, C. L., et al. (2015). Informed decision-making and satisfaction with a church-based men’s health workshop series for African-American men: men-only vs. mixed-gender format. J Cancer Educ, 30(3), 530–534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Holt, C. L., & Klem, P. R. (2005). As you go, spread the word: spiritually based breast cancer education for African American women. Gynecol Oncol, 99(3 Suppl 1), S141–S142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Holt, C. L., et al. (2009). Development of a spiritually based educational intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church-attending African American men. J Health Commun, 14(6), 590–604.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Holt, C. L., et al. (2011). Your body is the temple: impact of a spiritually based colorectal cancer educational intervention delivered through community health advisors. Health Promot Pract, 12(4), 577–588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Saunders, D. R., et al. (2013). Development of the men’s prostate awareness church training: church-based workshops for African American men. Fam Community Health, 36(3), 224–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jandorf, L., et al. (2012). Esperanza y Vida: a culturally and linguistically customized breast and cervical education program for diverse Latinas at three different United States sites. J Health Commun, 17(2), 160–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Castro, F. G., et al. (1995). Mobilizing churches for health promotion in Latino communities: Companeros en la Salud. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 18, 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fox, S. A., et al. (1998). A trial to increase mammography utilization among Los Angeles Hispanic women. J Health Care Poor Underserved, 9(3), 309–321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Welsh, A. L., et al. (2005). The effect of two church-based interventions on breast cancer screening rates among Medicaid-insured Latinas. Prev Chronic Dis, 2(4), A07.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lopez, V. A., & Castro, F. G. (2006). Participation and program outcomes in a church-based cancer prevention program for Hispanic women. J Community Health, 31(4), 343–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sauaia, A., et al. (2007). Church-based breast cancer screening education: impact of two approaches on Latinas enrolled in public and private health insurance plans. Prev Chronic Dis, 4(4), A99.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Duan, N. H., et al. (2000). Maintaining mammography adherence through telephone counseling in a church-based trial. Am J Public Health, 90(9), 1468–1471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Davis, D. T., et al. (1994). The urban church and cancer control: a source of social influence in minority communities. Public Health Rep, 109(4), 500–506.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Daniels, N. A., et al. (2007). Effectiveness of adult vaccination programs in faith-based organizations. Ethn Dis, 17(1), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lujan, J., Ostwald, S. K., & Ortiz, M. (2007). Promotora diabetes intervention for Mexican Americans. Diabetes Educ, 33(4), 660–670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hall, C. P., et al. (2007). Effects of a culturally sensitive education program on the breast cancer knowledge and beliefs of Hispanic women. Oncol Nurs Forum, 34(6), 1195–1202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Holschneider, C. H., et al. (1999). A single-visit cervical carcinoma prevention program offered at an inner city church: a pilot project. Cancer, 86(12), 2659–2667.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dornelas, E. A., et al. (2007). Urban ethnic minority women’s attendance at health clinic vs. church based exercise programs. J Cross Cult Gerontol, 22(1), 129–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Allen, J. D., Linnan, L. A., Emmons, K. M. (2012). Fidelity and its relationship to implementation effectiveness, adaptation, and dissemination. In R.C. Brownson, D. A. Colditz, Proctor E. K (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice (pp. 281–304). New York: Oxford University Press.

  44. Spoth, R., et al. (2004). PROSPER community–university partnership model for public education systems: capacity-building for evidence-based, competence-building prevention. Prev Sci, 5(1), 31–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Chinman, M., et al. (2005). Developing a community science research agenda for building community capacity for effective preventive interventions. Am J Community Psychol, 35(3–4), 143–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wandersman, A., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol, 41(3–4), 171–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Allen, J. D., et al. (2015). Enhancing organizational capacity to provide cancer control programs among Latino churches: design and baseline findings of the CRUZA study. BMC Health Serv Res, 15, 147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Pew Research Center. (2014). The shifting religious identity of Latinos in the United States. Available at http://www.pewforum.org/2014/05/07/the-shifting-religious-identity-of-latinos-in-the-united-states/. Accessed 7 July 2017.

  49. Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: a guidebook and resource. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

  50. Palinkas, L. A., et al. (2011). Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res, 38(1), 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Allen, J. D., et al. (2014). Dimensions of religiousness and cancer screening behaviors among church-going Latinas. J Relig Health, 53(1), 190–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Leyva, B., et al. (2014). Religion, fatalism, and cancer control: a qualitative study among Hispanic Catholics. Am J Health Behav, 38(6), 839–849.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Allen, J. D., et al. (2014). Religious beliefs and cancer screening behaviors among Catholic Latinos: implications for faith-based interventions. J Health Care Poor Underserved, 25(2), 503–526.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Allen, J. D., et al. (2015). Recruiting and surveying Catholic parishes for cancer control initiatives: lessons learned from the CRUZA implementation study. Health Promot Pract, 16(5), 667–676.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Fereday, J., Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods, 5(1), 88–92.

  56. Provalis Research. (2011). QDA Miner 4.0 user’s guide (p. 240). Montreal: Provalis Research.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ospino, H. (2015). Hispanic ministry in Catholic parishes: a summary report of findings from the National Study of Catholic Parishes with Hispanic ministry. Huntington: Our Sunday Visitor.

  58. Allen, J. D., et al. (2016). Dissemination of evidence-based cancer control interventions among Catholic faith-based organizations: results from the CRUZA randomized trial. Implement Sci, 11(1), 74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Holt, C. L., et al. (2014). Translating evidence-based interventions for implementation: experiences from project HEAL in African American churches. Implement Sci, 9, 66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Erwin, D. O., et al. (1996). Increasing mammography and breast self-examination in African American women using the witness project model. J Cancer Educ, 11(4), 210–215.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Allicock, M., et al. (2012). Evaluating the dissemination of Body & Soul, an evidence-based fruit and vegetable intake intervention: challenges for dissemination and implementation research. J Nutr Educ Behav, 44(6), 530–538.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Leeman, J., et al. (2015). What strategies are used to build practitioners’ capacity to implement community-based interventions and are they effective?: A systematic review. Implement Sci, 10(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. McCracken, J.L., Friedman, D.B., Brandt, H.M., et al. (2013). Findings from the community health intervention program in South Carolina: implications for reducing cancer-related health disparities. J Cancer Educ, 28(3), 412–9.

  64. Honeycutt, S., Carvalho, M., Glanz, K., Daniel, S. D., & Kegler, M. C. (2012). Research to reality: a process evaluation of a mini-grants program to disseminate evidence-based nutrition programs to rural churches and worksites. J Public Health Manag Pract, 18(5), 431-9.

  65. Resnicow, K., et al. (2004). Body and soul. A dietary intervention conducted through African-American churches. Am J Prev Med, 27(2), 97–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Campbell, M. K., et al. (2007). Process evaluation of an effective church-based diet intervention: Body & Soul. Health Educ Behav, 34(6), 864–880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Fink, B., & Branch, A. Y. (2005). Promising practices for improving the capacity of faith- and community-based organizations. Retrieved from Branch Associates Website: http://branchassoc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/PromisingPracticesExecutiveSummary.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2017.

  68. Powell, B. J., et al. (2015). A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci, 10(1), 21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S.R., Alexander, J.A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci, 4(1), 50.

  70. Helfrich, C. D., et al. (2007). Determinants of implementation effectiveness: adapting a framework for complex innovations. Med Care Res Rev, 64(3), 279–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Negron, R., et al. (2014). Leadership networks in Catholic parishes: implications for implementation research in health. Soc Sci Med, 122, 53–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the time and insights provided by study participants. We also acknowledge the many contributions made by the project’s Community Advisory Board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.D.A. and M.I.T. were responsible for obtaining funding. J.D.A., M.I.T., H.O., L.T., and B.L. contributed to the design of the study, and implementation and coordination of the project. B.L. led the qualitative data analysis and writing. All authors helped draft the manuscript, and read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan Leyva.

Ethics declarations

The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. The manuscript has not been published previously. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

IRB approval

The Harvard School of Public Health Institutional Review Board approved all research procedures.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute (U54CA156732, UMASS Boston/Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center Comprehensive Cancer Partnership Program), the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R21MD005976), and through a cooperative agreement by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with the National Cancer Institute (U48DP001946, Massachusetts Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Implications

Practice: FBOs hold capacity to advance health programming, yet need additional implementation support, including resources and technical assistance, to carry out cancer control-specific interventions.

Policy: Efforts to enhance capacity among FBOs to implement community-based cancer control programs may improve the reach of existing evidence-based interventions to underserved groups.

Research: Future studies should test and compare strategies to improve capacity among FBOs to implement evidence-based interventions.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leyva, B., Allen, J.D., Ospino, H. et al. Enhancing capacity among faith-based organizations to implement evidence-based cancer control programs: a community-engaged approach. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 7, 517–528 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0513-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0513-1

Keywords

Navigation