Behavioral and Social Sciences at the National Institutes of Health: adoption of research findings in health research and practice as a scientific priority
- 309 Downloads
The National Institutes of Health’s Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR) recently released its Strategic Plan for 2017 to 2021. This plan highlights three scientific priorities: (1) improve the synergy of basic and applied behavioral and social sciences research, (2) enhance and promote the research infrastructure, methods, and measures needed to support a more cumulative and integrated approach to behavioral and social sciences research, and (3) facilitate the adoption of behavioral and social sciences research findings in health research and in practice. This commentary focuses on the challenges and opportunities to facilitate the adoption of research findings in health research and in practice. In addition to the ongoing NIH support for dissemination and implementation (D&I) research, we must address transformative challenges and opportunities such as better disseminating and implementing D&I research, merging research and practice, adopting more rigorous and diverse methods and measures for both D&I and clinical trials research, evaluating technological-based delivery of interventions, and transitioning from minimally adaptable intervention packages to planned adaptations rooted in behavior change principles. Beyond translation into practice and policy, the OBSSR Strategic Plan also highlights the need for translation of behavioral and social science findings into the broader biomedical research enterprise.
KeywordsDissemination and implementation research Implementation science Practice adoption Planned adaptation Clinical research methodology Clinical translation Behavioral and social sciences research
- 1.The Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Strategic Plan 2017-2021. Retrieved November 23, 2016, from https://obssr.od.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/OBSSR-SP-2017-2021.pdf.
- 2.Riley, W. T. (2017). Basic and applied behavioural and social sciences at the NIH. Nature Human Behav, 1, 0023. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0023.
- 3.Riley, W. T. (2017) Behavioral and social sciences at the National Institutes of Health: methods, measures, and data infrastructures as a scientific priority. Health Psych, 36(1), 5–7.Google Scholar
- 5.Wolff, S. H. (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA, 299(2), 274–286.Google Scholar
- 8.Neta, G., Sanchez, M. A., Chambers, D. A., Phillips, S. M., Leyva, B., Cynkin, L., et al. (2015). Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: a decade of grant funding by the National Cancer Institute and future directions. Implement Sci, 10, 4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0020-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Curran, G. M., Bauer, M., Mittman, B., Pyne, J. M., & Stetler, C. (2012). Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care, 50(3), 217–226. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Nutbeam, D., & Bauman, A. E. (2006). Evaluation in a nutshell: a practical guide to the evaluation of health promotion programs. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- 31.Atkins, M. S., Rusch, D., Mehta, T. G., & Lakind, D. (2016). Future directions for dissemination and implementation science: Aligning ecological theory and public health to close the research to practice gap. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol, 45(2), 215–226. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1050724.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar