Choosing between responsive-design websites versus mobile apps for your mobile behavioral intervention: presenting four case studies
Both mobile apps and responsive-design websites (web apps) can be used to deliver mobile health (mHealth) interventions, but it can be difficult to discern which to use in research. The goal of this paper is to present four case studies from behavioral interventions that developed either a mobile app or a web app for research and present an information table to help researchers determine which mobile option would work best for them. Four behavioral intervention case studies (two developed a mobile app, and two developed a web app) presented include time, cost, and expertise. Considerations for adopting a mobile app or a web app—such as time, cost, access to programmers, data collection, security needs, and intervention components— are presented. Future studies will likely integrate both mobile app and web app modalities. The considerations presented here can help guide researchers on which platforms to choose prior to starting an mHealth intervention.
KeywordsmHealth Interventions Mobile apps Websites Study design Health behavior
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
All the studies presented in this paper were approved by the appropriate institutional review board.
This study was funded by the following entitites: the South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research Institute with an academic home at the Medical University of South Carolina CTSA NIH/NCATS grant number UL1TR000062 (PI: Turner-McGrievy); a University of South Carolina Advanced Support for Innovative Research Excellence—II grant (PI: Turner-McGrievy); NIH grant numbers 1R01GM081793 and P20 RR-016461 (PI: Valafar); the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases under award number R44DK103377 (PIs: Wirth, Shivappa and Hébert); a Support to Promote Advancement of Research and Creativity (SPARC) grant from the University of South Carolina’s Office of the Vice President for Research (PI: Schoffman); and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes under award number 1R01HL112787 (PI: Beets). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. James R. Hébert is the owner and Drs. Michael Wirth and Nitin Shivappa are employees of Connecting Health Innovations (CHI), LLC, a company planning to license the right to the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) from the University of South Carolina to develop computer and smartphone applications for patient counseling and dietary intervention in clinical settings.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The findings reported have not been previously published and that the manuscript is not being simultaneously submitted elsewhere.
Any previously reported data from the projects described in these case studies have been cited.
The authors have had full control of all primary data and that they agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Warman M. Macworld 2009: Macworld through the years. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/apple/4126366/Macworld-2009-Macworld-through-the-years.html. Accessed on November 9, 2015. The Telegraph. 2009.
- 5.Bender, J. L., Yue, R. Y. K., To, M. J., Deacken, L., & Jadad, A. R. (2013). A lot of action, but not in the right direction: systematic review and content analysis of smartphone applications for the prevention, detection, and management of cancer. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(12), e287.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 8.Laing, B. Y., Mangione, C. M., Tseng, C.-H., et al. (2014). Effectiveness of a smartphone application for weight loss compared with usual Care in Overweight Primary Care PatientsA randomized, controlled TrialSmartphone application for weight loss in overweight primary care patients. Ann Intern Med, 161(10_Supplement), S5–S12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.CIO and Mobile Leader State of Enterprise Mobility Survey. 2014. http://resources.kinvey.com/docs/State+of+Enterprise+Mobility+Survey+2014+-+Kinvey.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2015.
- 15.Mohorovicic S. Implementing responsive web design for enhanced web presence. Paper presented at: Information & Communication Technology Electronics & Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2013 36th International Convention on; 20–24 May 2013, 2013.Google Scholar
- 16.Parr R. How Much Does a Website Cost in 2015? http://www.executionists.com/blog/much-website-cost-2015/. Accessed November 24, 2015.
- 17.How long does it take to build a website? A timeline from our digital agency. Available at http://www.rakacreative.com/blog/web-development/how-long-does-it-take-to-build-a-website/. Accesibility verfied on November 30, 2015.
- 18.Koopmans T. How long does it take to design and build a website? Available at http://liftinteractive.com/log/how-long-does-it-take-to-design-and-build-a-websi/. Accesibility verfied November 30, 2015.
- 21.Federal Trade Commission. Mobile Health Apps Interactive Tool. https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/mobile-health-apps-interactive-tool. Accessed May 19, 2016.
- 22.HealthIT.gov. Everyone has a role in protecting and securing health information. https://www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/everyone-has-role-protecting-and-securing-health-information. Accessed May 4, 2016.
- 23.Hales S, Turner-McGrievy GM, Wilcox S, et al. Social networks for improving healthy weight loss behaviors for overweight and obese adults: a randomized clinical trial of the Social Pounds Off Digitally (Social POD) Mobile App. Int J Med Inf. 2016.Google Scholar
- 24.Hales SB, Turner-McGrievy GM, Fahim A, et al. The Social POD app: a mixed-methods approach to the development, refinement, and pilot testing of a mobile application for improving healthy behaviors. Journal of Medical Internet Research - Human Factors. 2016.Google Scholar
- 27.Pazzani, M., & Billsus, D. (2007). Content-based recommendation systems. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, & W. Nejdl (Eds.), Adapt (Vol. 4321, pp. 325–341). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- 28.Shani G, Gunawardana A. Evaluating recommendation systems. In: Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, Kantor PB, eds. Recommender Systems Handbook. U.S.: Springer: 257–297.Google Scholar
- 29.Wiecha JL, Gannett L, Hall G, Roth BA. National Afterschool Association Standards for healthy eating and physical activity in out-of-school time programs. 2011; http://www.niost.org/images/host/Healthy_Eating_and_Physical_Activity_Standards.pdf. Accessed November 2nd, 2015.
- 30.Beets, M. W., Weaver, R. G., Turner-McGrievy, G., et al. (2014). Making healthy eating and physical activity policy practice: the design and overview of a group randomized controlled trial in afterschool programs. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 38(2), 291–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 32.Shivappa, N., Steck, S. E., Hurley, T. G., et al. (2013). A population-based dietary inflammatory index predicts levels of C-reactive protein in the seasonal variation of blood cholesterol study (SEASONS). Public Health Nutr, 10, 1–9.Google Scholar
- 33.Shivappa, N., Steck, S. E., Hurley, T. G., Hussey, J. R., & Hebert, J. R. (2013). Designing and developing a literature-derived, population-based dietary inflammatory index. Public Health Nutr, 14, 1–8.Google Scholar
- 34.DII Screener. Available at the Google Play Store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ftinc.dii&hl=en. Accessed December 6, 2015.
- 35.DII Screener. Available at the iTunes store https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/dii-screener/id950444434?mt=8. Accessed on December 6, 2015.