Support for indoor tanning policies among young adult women who indoor tan
- 241 Downloads
The purpose of this study to examine support for indoor tanning policies and correlates of policy support among young adult women who indoor tan. Non-Hispanic white women ages 18–30 who indoor tanned in the past year (n = 356, M 23.3 age, SD 3.1) recruited in the Washington, DC area from 2013 to 2016 completed measures of indoor tanning behaviors, attitudes, perceptions, beliefs, and policy support. Most women in the sample supported policies to prevent children under the age of 18 from indoor tanning (74.0 %) and stronger warnings about the risks of indoor tanning on tanning devices (77.6 %); only 10.1 % supported a total ban. In multivariable analyses, support for individual indoor tanning policies varied by demographics (e.g., age), frequent indoor tanning behavior, indoor tanning beliefs, and risk perceptions. Non-Hispanic white young adult women who indoor tan, the primary consumers of indoor tanning, and a high-risk population, largely support indoor tanning prevention policies implemented by many state governments and those currently under review for national enactment. Given low levels of support for a total indoor tanning ban, support for other potential policies (e.g., increasing the minimum age to 21) should be investigated to inform future steps to reduce indoor tanning and the associated health risks.
KeywordsSkin cancer Indoor tanning Policy Prevention
Compliance with ethical standards
This research was supported through a grant from the Harry J. Lloyd Charitable Trust (PI: D. Mays). This work was also supported in part by the Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Support grant number P30CA051008 from the National Institutes of Health. The study sponsors had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Statement of human rights
All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human subjects and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.
All participants provided written informed consent.
The study was reviewed and approved by the Georgetown University Institutional Review Board.
Statement on the welfare of animals
- 1.US Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent skin cancer. Reports of the Surgeon General. 2014. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/calls/prevent-skin-cancer/.
- 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2012). Use of indoor tanning devices by adults—United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 61(18), 323–326 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6118a2.htm. Accessed 17 Feb 2016.Google Scholar
- 10.Food and Drug Administration, & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2014). General and plastic surgery devices: reclassification of ultraviolet lamps for tanning, henceforth to be known as sunlamp products and ultraviolet lamps intended for use in sunlamp products. Final order. Fed Regist, 79(105), 31205–31214.Google Scholar
- 11.Food and Drug Administration, & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2015). General and plastic surgery devices: Restriced sale, distribution, and use of sunlamp products. Fed Regist, 80(245), 79493–79504.Google Scholar
- 12.Richmond, J., & Kotelchuck, M. (1991). Coordination and development of strategies and policy for public health promotion in the United States. In W. Holland, R. Detels, & G. Knox (Eds.), Oxford textbook of public health (2nd ed., pp. 441–454). New York: Oxdford University Press.Google Scholar
- 13.Seelye KQ. Firestorm erupts in anti-smoking Massachusetts town. New York Times Web site. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/18/us/disgusted-by-smoking-outraged-by-a-plan-to-ban-tobacco.html?_r=1. 2014. Accessed 6 July 2016.
- 16.Fishbein, M. (1980). A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications. Neb Symp Motiv, 27, 65–116.Google Scholar
- 18.Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Advancing regulatory science at FDA: a strategic plan. 2011. http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/RegulatoryScience/ucm267719.htm. Accessed Feb 17, 2016.
- 21.Banerjee, S. C., Greene, K., Bagdasarov, Z., & Campo, S. (2009). ’My friends love to tan’: examining sensation seeking and the mediating role of association with friends who use tanning beds on tanning bed use intentions. Health Educ Res, 24(6), 989–998. doi: 10.1093/her/cyp035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Stapleton, J., Turrisi, R., Hillhouse, J., Robinson, J. K., & Abar, B. (2010). A comparison of the efficacy of an appearance-focused skin cancer intervention within indoor tanner subgroups identified by latent profile analysis. J Behav Med, 33(3), 181–190. doi: 10.1007/s10865-009-9246-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Mayer, J. A., Hoerster, K. D., Pichon, L. C., Rubio, D. A., Woodruff, S. I., & Forster, J. L. (2008). Enforcement of state indoor tanning laws in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis, 5(4), A125 .http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2008/oct/07_0194.htm. Accessed February 25, 2016PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 28.Boyd C. Impactful public health messaging and controlling exposure levels in indoor tanning facilities—innovations from the New York City Department of Health. Webinar for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Skin Cancer Workgroup. 2014.Google Scholar
- 30.Bonnie, R. J., Stratton, K., & Kwan, L. Y. (2015). http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2015/TobaccoMinimumAgeReport.aspx. Accessed 9 March 2016 Public health implications of raising the minimum age of legal access to tobacco products. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar