Skip to main content

Patient factors associated with initiation of behavioral weight loss treatment: a prospective observational study in an integrated care setting

Abstract

Low enrollment in behavioral weight loss treatments limits their impact. We aimed to identify factors associated with treatment initiation. The participants were outpatients (n = 198) at Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare facilities who were referred to a free VA-based behavioral weight loss treatment. Participants were assessed on psychosocial factors potentially relevant to treatment initiation. Subsequent treatment initiation was determined via medical record review. Study participants were 77 % male, 60 % African American, and 54 % initiated treatment. In multivariable analyses, treatment initiation was associated with being single, higher anxiety, and patients’ perceptions that referring provider supported their weight autonomy. Endorsement of treatment barriers was not associated with treatment initiation. Treatments offering in-person sessions and mood management components were rated as more preferred. Initiation of behavioral weight loss treatments may increase if patients believe that providers respect their weight control autonomy and if healthcare organizations offer treatments that match patients’ preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Kritchevsky, S., Beavers, K., Miller, M., Shea, M. K., Houston, D. K., Kitzman, D. W., & Nicklas, B. J. (2015). Intentional weight loss and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. PLoS One, 10(3), e0121993.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (2009). 10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the diabetes prevention program outcomes study. Lancet, 374(9702), 1677–1686.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jensen, M. D., Ryan, D. H., Apovian, C. M., Ard, J. D., Comuzzie, A. G., Donato, K. A., Hu, F. B., Hubbard, V. S., Jakicic, J. M., & Kushner, R. F. (2013). AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol, 63(25 pt B), 2985–3023.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    LeBlanc, E. S., O’Connor, E., Whitlock, E. P., Patnode, C. D., & Kapka, T. (2011). Effectiveness of primary care-relevant treatments for obesity in adults: a systematic evidence review for the US preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med, 155(7), 434–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Humana. http://press.humana.com/press-release/current-releases/humana-and-weight-watchers-join-forces-help-employers-tackle-obesity. Retrived 06/01/2015.

  6. 6.

    Kinsinger LS, Jones KR, Kahwati L, Harvey R, Burdick M, Zele V & Yevich S J. (2009) Design and dissemination of the MOVE! Weight-management program for veterans. Prev Chronic Dis, 6(3).

  7. 7.

    Moroshko, I., Brennan, L., & O’Brien, P. (2011). Predictors of dropout in weight loss interventions: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev, 12(11), 912–934.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nicklas, J. M., Huskey, K. W., Davis, R. B., & Wee, C. C. (2012). Successful weight loss among obese US adults. Am J Prev Med, 42(5), 481–485.

  9. 9.

    Kahwati LC, Lance TX, Jones KR, Kinsinger LS. (2011) RE-AIM evaluation of the veterans health Administration’s MOVE! Weight management program. Transl Behav Med, 1–10.

  10. 10.

    Tsai, A., Wadden, T., Pillitteri, J., Sembower, M. A., Gerlach, K. K., Kyle, T. K., & Burroughs, V. J. (2009). Disparities by ethnicity and socioeconomic status in the use of weight loss treatments. J Natl Med Assoc, 101(1), 62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jeffery, R. W., McGuire, M. T., Brelje, K. L., Pronk, N. P., Boyle, R. G., Hase, K. A., & Boucher, J. L. (2004). Recruitment to mail and telephone interventions for obesity in a managed care environment: the weigh-to-Be project. Am J Manag Care, 10(6), 378–382.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    McVay, M. A., Yancy Jr, W. S., Vijan, S., Van Scoyoc, L., Neelon, B., Voils, C. I., & Maciejewski, M. L. (2014). Obesity-related health status changes and weight-loss treatment utilization. Am J Prev Med, 46(5), 465–472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tinker, J. E., & Tucker, J. A. (1997). Motivations for weight loss and behavior change strategies associated with natural recovery from obesity. Psychol Addict Behav, 11(2), 98–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ciao, A., Latner, J., & Durso, L. (2012). Treatment seeking and barriers to weight loss treatments of different intensity levels among obese and overweight individuals. Eat Weight Disord, 17(1), e9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rosenstock, I. M. (1966). Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q, 44(3), 94–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pollak, K. I., Alexander, S. C., Coffman, C. J., Tulsky, J. A., Lyna, P., Dolor, R. J., James, I. E., Namenek Brouwer, R. J., Manusov, J. R. E., & Østbye, T. (2010). Physician communication techniques and weight loss in adults: project CHAT. Am J Prev Med, 39(4), 321–328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. 1980.

  19. 19.

    Voils, C. I., Gierisch, J. M., Olsen, M. K., Maciejewski, M. L., Grubber, J., McVay, M. A., Strauss, J. L., Bolton, J., Gaillard, L., Strawbridge, E., & Yancy, W. (2014). Study design and protocol for a theory-based behavioral intervention focusing on maintenance of weight loss: the maintenance after initiation of nutrition TrAINing (MAINTAIN) study. Contemp Clin Trials, 39(1), 95–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ames GE, Heckman MG, Grothe K, Clark MM. (2012) Eating self-efficacy: development of a short-form WEL. Eat Behav, 13(4), 375–8.

  21. 21.

    Norman, S. B., Hami Cissell, S., Means-Christensen, A. J., & Stein, M. B. (2006). Development and validation of an overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS). Depress Anxiety, 23(4), 245–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Campbell-Sills, L., Norman, S. B., Craske, M. G., Sullivan, G., Lang, A. J., Chavira, D. A., Bystritsky, A., Sherbourne, C., Roy-Byrne, P., & Stein, M. B. (2009). Validation of a brief measure of anxiety-related severity and impairment: the overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS). J Affect Disord, 112(1–3), 92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mansfield, A. K., Addis, M. E., & Courtenay, W. (2005). Measurement of men’s help seeking: development and evaluation of the barriers to help seeking scale. Psychol Men Masc, 6(2), 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Williams, G. C., Freedman, Z. R., & Deci, E. L. (1998). Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care, 21(10), 1644–1651.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Addis, M. E., & Carpenter, K. M. (1999). Why, why, why?: reason-giving and rumination as predictors of response in activation-and insight-oriented treatment rationales. J Clin Psychol, 55(7), 881–894.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Frosch, D. L., Légaré, F., Fishbein, M., & Elwyn, G. (2009). Adjuncts or adversaries to shared decision-making? Applying the integrative model of behavior to the role and design of decision support interventions in healthcare interactions. Implement Sci, 4, 73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Burke, L. E., Steenkiste, A., Music, E., & Styn, M. A. (2008). A descriptive study of past experiences with weight-loss treatment. J Am Diet Assoc, 108(4), 640–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Rees, C. S., Richards, J. C., & Smith, L. M. (1998). Medical utilisation and costs in panic disorder: a comparison with social phobia. J Anxiety Disord, 12(5), 421–435.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hadlandsmyth, K., Rosenbaum, D. L., Craft, J. M., Gervino, E. V., & White, K. S. (2013). Health care utilisation in patients with non-cardiac chest pain: a longitudinal analysis of chest pain, anxiety and interoceptive fear. Psychol Health, 28(8), 849–861.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan A. McVay PhD.

Ethics declarations

The findings reported have not been previously published and the manuscript is not being simultaneously submitted elsewhere.Portions of this data have previously been presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Behavioral Medicine in 2015. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review data if requested.

Ethics statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. This study was approved by the Durham VA Institutional Review Board.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This research was made possible by funding from the Veterans Affairs Office of Academic Affiliation Health Services Research and Development postdoctoral fellowship (TPP 21-024) and a Career Development Award from the National Institutes of Health (K23 HL127334) to Dr. Megan McVay. This research was also funded by a Career Research Scientist Award to Dr. Corrine Voils (RCS 14–443)

Additional information

Implications

Practice: Healthcare providers should respect patient autonomy when discussing weight management and treatment options.

Policy: Healthcare systems should provide training to providers in communication styles that convey respect for patient autonomy and should consider offering evidence-based behavioral weight loss treatments with varying features to appeal to varying patient treatment preferences.

Research: Researchers should test the effects of offering treatments with differing characteristics on treatment initiation.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McVay, M.A., Yancy, W.S., Scott, C.N. et al. Patient factors associated with initiation of behavioral weight loss treatment: a prospective observational study in an integrated care setting. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 7, 75–83 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0430-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Behavioral weight loss treatment
  • Treatment engagement
  • Provider communication