Advertisement

Translational Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 638–647 | Cite as

Examining the role of a community coalition in facilitating policy and environmental changes to promote physical activity: the case of Get Fit Kaua‘i

  • Lehua B. ChoyEmail author
  • Jay E. Maddock
  • Beverley Brody
  • Katherine L. Richards
  • Kathryn L. Braun
Case Study

Abstract

Community coalitions help to generate policy and environmental changes that address community health problems. This qualitative study examined how one community coalition, Get Fit Kaua‘i, catalyzed built environment (BE) policy and infrastructure changes in a rural county in Hawai‘i. The purpose was to develop a theory that explained the process by which the community coalition facilitated BE changes to support physical activity. Using a grounded theory approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 25 stakeholders engaged in the coalition’s BE activities. The model to emerge from the coalition interviews consisted of five phases: (1) coalition formation, (2) capacity building, (3) policy development, (4) policy passage, and (5) policy implementation. Community context influenced all of these phases. Although community context limits generalizability, other community coalitions pursuing BE changes can learn from the process of the coalition under study.

Keywords

Collaboration Multisector Built environment Physical activity Policy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Healthy Hawai‘i Initiative, Hawai‘i State Department of Health, using Tobacco Settlement Special Funds and through a contract with the University of Hawai‘i, Office of Public Health Studies (Jay Maddock served as Principal Investigator). Get Fit Kaua‘i also received funding from the Healthy Hawai‘i Initiative, Hawai‘i State Department of Health. The authors would like to thank Jodi Drisko, Marie Williams, and Lee Steinmetz for their guidance with carrying out this study. We are also grateful to all of the interview participants who shared their valuable insights.

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors have complied with ethical standards.

Funding

This study was funded by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health, Healthy Hawai‘i Initiative, using Tobacco Settlement Special Funds.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the University of Hawai‘i Human Studies Program.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

13142_2015_379_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (47 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 47 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Community Preventive Services Task Force. The community guide: increasing physical activity. Available at http://www.thecommunityguide.org/pa/index.html. Accessed February 16, 2015.
  2. 2.
    Glasgow RE, King DK. Implications of active living by design for broad adoption, successful implementation, and long-term sustainability. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 37(6S2): S450-S452.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chehimi S, Cohen L, Valdovinos E. In the first place: community prevention’s promise to advance health and equity. Environ Urban. 2011; 23(1): 71-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 27: 297-322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wolff T. Community coalition building—contemporary practice and research: introduction. Am J Community Psychol. 2001; 29(2): 165-172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roussos ST, Fawcett SB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000; 21: 369-402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Butterfoss FD, Kegler MC. A coalition model for community action. In: Minkler M, ed. Community organizing and community building for health and welfare. 3rd ed. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 2012: 309-328.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baker EA, Wilkerson R, Brennan LK. Identifying the role of community partnerships in creating change to support active living. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43(5 Suppl 4): S290-S299.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Butterfoss FD, Kegler MC. The community coalition action theory. In: DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC, eds. Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009: 237-276.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kegler MC, Rigler J, Honeycutt S. How does community context influence coalitions in the formation stage? A multiple case study based on the Community Coalition Action Theory. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10: 90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kegler MC, Swan DW. An initial attempt at operationalizing and testing the Community Coalition Action Theory. Health Educ Behav. 2011; 38(3): 261-70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2006.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2002.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 1994: 273-285.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2013.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    NVivo (for Windows) [computer program]. Version 10.0. Available from www.qsrinternational.com
  17. 17.
    Carvalho Jr. BP. Holo Holo 2020: growing Kauai responsibly [PDF document]. Available at http://health.hawaii.gov/physical-activity-nutrition/files/2014/01/Day1-HealthyIslandVisions.pdf. Accessed November 16, 2014.
  18. 18.
    Litt J, Reed H, Zieff SG, et al. Advancing environmental and policy change through active living collaboratives: compositional and stakeholder engagement correlates of group effectiveness. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013; 19(3 Suppl 1): S49-57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gustat J, Healy I, Litt J, et al. Lessons in promoting active living: the collaborative perspective. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013; 19(3 Suppl 1): S58-64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lehua B. Choy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jay E. Maddock
    • 2
  • Beverley Brody
    • 1
  • Katherine L. Richards
    • 3
  • Kathryn L. Braun
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of Hawai‘i at MānoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.School of Public HealthTexas A & M Health Science CenterCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Healthy Hawai‘i InitiativeHawai‘i State Department of HealthHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations