Examining the role of a community coalition in facilitating policy and environmental changes to promote physical activity: the case of Get Fit Kaua‘i
Community coalitions help to generate policy and environmental changes that address community health problems. This qualitative study examined how one community coalition, Get Fit Kaua‘i, catalyzed built environment (BE) policy and infrastructure changes in a rural county in Hawai‘i. The purpose was to develop a theory that explained the process by which the community coalition facilitated BE changes to support physical activity. Using a grounded theory approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 25 stakeholders engaged in the coalition’s BE activities. The model to emerge from the coalition interviews consisted of five phases: (1) coalition formation, (2) capacity building, (3) policy development, (4) policy passage, and (5) policy implementation. Community context influenced all of these phases. Although community context limits generalizability, other community coalitions pursuing BE changes can learn from the process of the coalition under study.
KeywordsCollaboration Multisector Built environment Physical activity Policy
This study was funded by the Healthy Hawai‘i Initiative, Hawai‘i State Department of Health, using Tobacco Settlement Special Funds and through a contract with the University of Hawai‘i, Office of Public Health Studies (Jay Maddock served as Principal Investigator). Get Fit Kaua‘i also received funding from the Healthy Hawai‘i Initiative, Hawai‘i State Department of Health. The authors would like to thank Jodi Drisko, Marie Williams, and Lee Steinmetz for their guidance with carrying out this study. We are also grateful to all of the interview participants who shared their valuable insights.
Compliance with ethical standards
The authors have complied with ethical standards.
This study was funded by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health, Healthy Hawai‘i Initiative, using Tobacco Settlement Special Funds.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This study was approved by the University of Hawai‘i Human Studies Program.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Community Preventive Services Task Force. The community guide: increasing physical activity. Available at http://www.thecommunityguide.org/pa/index.html. Accessed February 16, 2015.
- 7.Butterfoss FD, Kegler MC. A coalition model for community action. In: Minkler M, ed. Community organizing and community building for health and welfare. 3rd ed. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 2012: 309-328.Google Scholar
- 9.Butterfoss FD, Kegler MC. The community coalition action theory. In: DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC, eds. Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009: 237-276.Google Scholar
- 12.Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2006.Google Scholar
- 13.Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2002.Google Scholar
- 14.Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 1994: 273-285.Google Scholar
- 15.Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2013.Google Scholar
- 16.NVivo (for Windows) [computer program]. Version 10.0. Available from www.qsrinternational.com
- 17.Carvalho Jr. BP. Holo Holo 2020: growing Kauai responsibly [PDF document]. Available at http://health.hawaii.gov/physical-activity-nutrition/files/2014/01/Day1-HealthyIslandVisions.pdf. Accessed November 16, 2014.